Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T02:24:26.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

66 - Medical Records

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Rade B. Vukmir
Affiliation:
Critical Care Medicine Associates
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Medical Records Service. 42 C.F.R. 482.24 (c)(1), Conditions of Participation.Google Scholar
Davidson, SJ, Zwemer, FL, Nathanson, LA, Sable, KN, Khan, ANGA. Where is the beef? The promise and the reality of clinical documentation. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(11):11271134. DOI:10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mangalmurti, SS, Murtagh, L, Mello, MM. Medical malpractice liability in the age of electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(21):20602067.Google Scholar
Handler, JA, Adams, JG, Feled, CF, Gillam, M, Vozenilek, J, Barthell, EN, Davidson, SJ. Emergency Medicine Information Technology Consensus Conference: executive summary. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(11):11121113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, MA, Kats, AM, Kleinman, K, Bates, DW, Simon, SR. The relationship between electronic health records and malpractice claims. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(15):11871189. DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2371.Google Scholar
Virapongse, A, Bates, DW, Shi, P, Jenter, CA, Volk, LA, Kleinman, K et al. Electronic health records and malpractice claims in office practice. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(21): 23622367. DOI:10.1001/archinte.168.21.2362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maryland State Board of Medicine v. Eist. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. No. 329, Sept Term, 2006.Google Scholar
Maryland Code (1981, 2000 Rep.Vol., 2004 Supp.), Section 14–404 (a)(22).Google Scholar
Lofton v. Grieco, 2012 NY Slip Op 52003 (U).Google Scholar
New York Civil Practice Law and Rules §310. Scope of Disclosure.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×