Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE ‘WAR ON TERROR’
- Introduction
- 1 Order, Rights and Threats: Terrorism and Global Justice
- 2 Liberal Security
- 3 The Human Rights Case for the War in Iraq: A Consequentialist View
- 4 Human Rights as an Ethics of Power
- 5 How Not to Promote Democracy and Human Rights
- 6 War in Iraq: Not a Humanitarian Intervention
- 7 The Tension between Combating Terrorism and Protecting Civil Liberties
- 8 Fair Trials for Terrorists?
- 9 Nationalizing the Local: Comparative Notes on the Recent Restructuring of Political Space
- 10 The Impact of Counter Terror on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights: A Global Perspective
- 11 Human Rights: A Descending Spiral
- 12 Eight Fallacies About Liberty and Security
- 13 Our Privacy, Ourselves in the Age of Technological Intrusions
- 14 Are Human Rights Universal in an Age of Terrorism?
- 15 Connecting Human Rights, Human Development, and Human Security
- 16 Human Rights and Civil Society in a New Age of American Exceptionalism
- Index
- References
1 - Order, Rights and Threats: Terrorism and Global Justice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 August 2009
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE ‘WAR ON TERROR’
- Introduction
- 1 Order, Rights and Threats: Terrorism and Global Justice
- 2 Liberal Security
- 3 The Human Rights Case for the War in Iraq: A Consequentialist View
- 4 Human Rights as an Ethics of Power
- 5 How Not to Promote Democracy and Human Rights
- 6 War in Iraq: Not a Humanitarian Intervention
- 7 The Tension between Combating Terrorism and Protecting Civil Liberties
- 8 Fair Trials for Terrorists?
- 9 Nationalizing the Local: Comparative Notes on the Recent Restructuring of Political Space
- 10 The Impact of Counter Terror on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights: A Global Perspective
- 11 Human Rights: A Descending Spiral
- 12 Eight Fallacies About Liberty and Security
- 13 Our Privacy, Ourselves in the Age of Technological Intrusions
- 14 Are Human Rights Universal in an Age of Terrorism?
- 15 Connecting Human Rights, Human Development, and Human Security
- 16 Human Rights and Civil Society in a New Age of American Exceptionalism
- Index
- References
Summary
The Challenge of Terrorism
In 2002, the International Council on Human Rights Policy published a report entitled Human Rights After September 11, based on an international seminar of distinguished human-rights scholars and practitioners (International Council on Human Rights Policy, hereafter ICHRP, 2002). The title implied that human rights after 9/11 were different from human rights before 9/11. How could that be?
Human rights are commonly thought to be ‘timeless’, because they are grounded in ‘the dignity and worth of the human person’. However, they have a history. After the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, the struggle for human rights took place in a world dominated by the Cold War and the consequences of decolonization. The period from the mid-1980s to 2001 witnessed a surge of human-rights optimism, as many countries made the transition from authoritarianism to democracy. There were human-rights disasters in this period, such as the Rwandan genocide and the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia, but, overall, the idea of human rights moved from the margins to the centre of international politics. The events of 9/11 seemed to bring an abrupt change. The dominant terms of political discourse became ‘terrorism’, ‘security’ and ‘war’. It is true that ‘terrorism’ was represented as a threat to Western values, including human rights, and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq toppled two regimes that had been massive human-rights violators. Nevertheless, human-rights activists have generally believed that the ‘war on terrorism’ has created new challenges for their cause.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human Rights in the 'War on Terror' , pp. 37 - 56Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
Andrews, K. (2003). ‘Why Bush Should Explain 11 September’. In , and (Eds.), America's War on Terror, pp. 29–40. Aldershot: AshgateGoogle Scholar
An-Na'im, A. A. (2002). ‘Upholding International Legality Against Islamic and American Jihad’. In and (Eds.), Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order, pp. 162–71. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Beitz, C. R. (2001). ‘Does Global Inequality Matter?’ In (Ed.), Global Justice, pp. 106–22. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
(2003). ‘Just War Doctrine and the Military Response to Terrorism’. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 11 (2), pp. 153–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. (2003). ‘Selective Humanitarianism: In Defence of Inconsistency’. In and (Eds.), Ethics and Foreign Intervention, pp. 31–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
(2004). Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law.Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(2002). Why Terrorism Works: Understanding the Threat, Responding to the Challenge.New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
(2004, September 2). ‘Not Iran, Not North Korea, Not Libya, but Pakistan’. London Review of Books, 26 (17)Google Scholar
(2003). Just War Against Terror: The Burden of American Power in a Violent World. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
(2004, August 26). ‘The U.S. and Treatment of Prisoners: Only Part of the Story’. Lincoln Journal StarGoogle Scholar
Freedman, L. (2002a). ‘Introduction’. In (Ed.), Superterrorism: Policy Responses, pp. 1–6. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Freedman, L. (2002b). ‘The Coming War on Terrorism’. In (Ed.), Superterrorism: Policy Responses, pp. 40–56. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Freeman, M. A. (2004). ‘Human Rights and Force: Revisiting the Question of Intervention’. Paper presented to the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Montréal, Québec, Canada, 17–20 March
Fukuyama, F. (2002). ‘History and September 11’. In and (Eds.), Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order, pp. 27–36. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Gearson, J. (2002). ‘The Nature of Modern Terrorism’. In (Ed.), Superterrorism: Policy Responses, pp. 7–24. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
(1996). Islam and the Myth of Confrontation: Religion and Politics in the Middle East. London: I. B. TaurisGoogle Scholar
Halliday, F. (2002). ‘A New Global Configuration’. In and (Eds.), Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order, pp. 235–41. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
(2004). Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus. Cambridge: PolityGoogle Scholar
([1651]1996). Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, revised student edition, edited by R. TuckGoogle Scholar
(2004). The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror. Princeton: Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Council on Human Rights Policy. (2002). Human Rights After September 11. Versoix, Switzerland: International Council on Human Rights Policy
Kapitan, T. (2003). ‘The Terrorism of “Terrorism”’. In (Ed.), Terrorism and International Justice, pp. 47–66. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kassam, Z. (2003). ‘Can a Muslim Be a Terrorist?’ In (Ed.), Terrorism and International Justice, p. 114–31. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
& (2002). ‘Comprehending “Evil”: Challenges for Law and Policy’. Ethics and International Affairs, 16 (1), pp. 27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). John Locke: Resistance, Religion and Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987). Making Sense of Human Rights: Philosophical Reflections on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T. W. (2001). ‘Priorities of Global Justice’. In (Ed.), Global Justice, pp. 6–23. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
(2003). ‘Human Rights in U.S. Policy: A Casualty of the “War on Terrorism”?’ The International Journal of Human Rights, 7 (4), pp. 51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valls, A. (2000). ‘Can Terrorism Be Justified?’ In (Ed.), Ethics in International Affairs: Theories and Cases, pp. 65–79. Lanham, MD: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
(2003). ‘Security and Liberty: The Image of Balance’. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 11 (2), pp. 191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). ‘Terrorism and the Uses of Terror’. The Journal of Ethics, 8 (1), pp. 5–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, W. (2002). ‘American Hegemony: European Dilemmas’. In (Ed.), Superterrorism: Policy Responses, pp. 105–18. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Wenar, L. (2001). ‘Contractualism and Global Economic Justice’. In (Ed.), Global Justice, pp. 76–90. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.