Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T04:14:47.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Health cognition assessment

from Psychology, health and illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Brian McMillan
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Mark Conner
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Health cognitions are items of knowledge or beliefs about health and illness. These include evaluations of health-relevant behaviours, expectations about the consequences of these behaviours, self-representations, perceptions of social approval or disapproval resulting from engaging in these behaviours, perceptions about the behaviour of others, perceptions regarding one's own abilities and thoughts about ones personal disposition towards engaging in particular behaviours. The assessment of health cognitions is more than merely the rule-based assignment of numerals to objects or events. Assessment must assign values to entities that are theoretically meaningful, and in this respect assessment and theory go hand in hand. Theory provides us with guidance as to what we should measure, but it is good measurement that theory depends upon.

Self-report methods for assessing health cognitions

Health cognitions are commonly assessed by self-reports measured using Guttman, Thurstone, Likert, or semantic differential scales (Kline, 2000), although only the latter two continue to receive significant attention. Likert scales are less cumbersome than Thurstone's technique without compromising on reliability and validity. Semantic differential scales consist of bipolar adjective scales where respondents are asked to rate an attitude object (e.g. ‘Exercising for 30 minutes, 5 times a week would be …’ Good–Bad). Unlike other techniques, semantic differential scales do not require the development and scaling of specific belief items (see Eagly & Chaiken, 1993).

Important considerations for self-report measures

Since good theory depends upon dependable measurement, it is disappointing that much published work examining health cognitions pays scant attention to reliability and validity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, C. & Sheeran, P. (2000). Understanding and changing health behaviour: from health beliefs to self-regulation. In Norman, P., Abraham, C. & Conner, M. (Eds.). Understanding and changing health behaviour: from health beliefs to self-regulation (pp. 3–24). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes personality and behavior. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Special Issue: Theories of cognitive self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Champion, V. L. (1984) Instrument development for health belief model constructs. Advances in Nursing Science. 6(3), 73–85.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R. & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–26.Google Scholar
Conner, M. & Sparks, P. (2005). The theory of planned behavior and health behaviors. In Conner, M. & Norman, P. (Eds.). Predicting Health Behavior (2nd edn.). (pp. 170–222). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Conner, M. & Norman, P. (2005). Predicting Health Behaviour: Research and Practise with Social Cognition Models (2nd edn.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Eagly, A.H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, Texas, US: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Evans, D. & Norman, P. (2003). Predicting adolescent pedestrians' road crossing intentions: an application and extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Health Education Research, 18(3), 267–77.Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H. & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E. & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–80.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. (1987). Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–40.Google Scholar
Jones, E. E. & Sigall, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: a new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 349–64.Google Scholar
Kline, P. (2000). Handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Multisite HIV Prevention Trial Group (2001). Social–cognitive theory mediators of behavior change in the National Institute of Mental Health Multisite HIV Prevention Trial. Health Psychology, 20(5), 369–76.
O'Connor, R. C. & Armitage, C. J. (2003). Theory of planned behaviour and parasuicide: an exploratory study. Current Psychology, 22, 196–205.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In Cacioppo, J. T. & Petty, R.E. (Eds.). Social psychophysiology: a source book (pp. 153–76). New York: Guilford Press.
Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J. & Becker, M. H. (1988). Social Learning Theory and the health belief model, Health Education Quarterly, 15(2), 175–83.Google Scholar
Schwarzer, R., Sniehotta, F. F., Lippke, S. et al. (2003). On the assessment and analysis of variables in the Health Action Process Approach: conducting an investigation. Retrieved July 31, 2004 from http://www.fu-berlin.de/gesund/hapa_web.pdf
Sutton, S. (2005). Stage theories of health behaviour. In Conner, M. & Norman, P. (Eds.). Predicting Health Behavior (2nd edn.). (pp. 223–75). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Swanson, J. E., Rudman, L. A. & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude–behavior consistency for stigmatized behavior. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 207–30.Google Scholar
Velicer, W., Prochaska, J. O., Fava, J. L., Norman, G. J. & Redding, C. A. (1998). Smoking cessation and stress management: applications of the transtheoretical model of behavior change. Homeostasis in Health and Disease. 38(5–6), 216–33.Google Scholar
Wallston, K. A., Wallston, B. S. & DeVellis, R. (1978). Development of multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC) scales. Health Education Monographs, 6, 160–70.Google Scholar
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–73.Google Scholar
Weinstein, W. D. (1988). The precaution adoption process. Health Psychology, 7, 355–86.Google Scholar
White, K. M., Terry, D. J. & Hogg, M. A. (1994). Safer sex behavior: the role of attitudes, norms, and control factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(24), 2164–92.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×