Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T06:53:44.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social support interventions

from Psychology, health and illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Benjamin Gottlieb
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

If we knew that our social relationships had the power to shield us from adversity and to prevent us from succumbing to stress-induced anguish and disability, then we would do everything possible to ensure that people are equipped with these protective social resources. However, since some of these people will not have the skills, motivation, or coping propensities to engage in support-relevant interactions with others, we will need to invest effort in determining how to select the best candidates for such interventions and how to design them in a way that has broad appeal. For those practitioners who wish to capitalize on social support's protective potential, all of these activities constitute a challenging agenda for planning and implementing such interventions in the health field.

This chapter begins by setting out the rationale for the development of support interventions, and then distinguishes between interventions in the natural network and interventions that introduce one or more new social ties. In the health field, the latter strategies predominate. Hence, the chapter consists of two main sections, the first concentrating on the design and effectiveness of support groups and the second focusing on ways of marshalling individual supportive allies. Several critical issues and uncertainties about the optimal design of these initiatives are considered, including the importance of properly matching them to certain characteristics of the intended beneficiaries. Questions that need to be addressed in the next generation of support studies are sprinkled throughout the chapter.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, B. L. (1992). Psychological interventions for cancer patients to enhance the quality of life. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 552–68.Google Scholar
Andersen, B., Farrar, W., Golden-Kreutz, D.et al. (2004). Psychological, behavioral, and immune changes after a psychological intervention: a clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(17), 3570–80.Google Scholar
Antoni, M. H., Lehman, J. M., Kilbourn, K. M.et al. (2001). Cognitive–behavioral stress management interventiondecreases the prevalence of depression and enhances benefit-finding among women under treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Health Psychology, 20, 20–32.Google Scholar
Berkman, L. F. & Syme, L. (1979). Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 186–204.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, M. S., Schulz, R. & Burgio, L. (1996). Interventions for caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's Disease: a review and analysis of content, process, and outcomes. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 43(1), 35–92.Google Scholar
Classen, C., Butler, L. D., Koopman, C.et al. (2001). Supportive-expressive group therapy and distress in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized clinical intervention trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 494–501.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. & Wills, T. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–57.Google Scholar
Coyne, J. & Smith, D. (1994). Couples coping with myocardial infarction: contextual perspective on patient's self-efficacy. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 43–54.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. J., Edmonds, C. V. I. & Jenkins, G. (1998). A randomized controlled trial of the effects of group psychological therapy on survival in woman with metastatic breast cancer. Psychooncology, 7, 508–17.Google Scholar
Cutrona, C. & Cole, V. (2000). Optimizing support in the natural network. In Cohen, S., Underwood, L. & Gottlieb, B. H. (Eds.). Social support measurement and intervention (pp. 278–308). New York: Oxford University Press.
Dakoff, & Taylor, S. E. (1990). Victims' perceptions of social support: what is helpful from whom?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 80–9.Google Scholar
Demers, A. & Lavoie, J. P. (1996). Effect of support groups on family caregivers to the frail elderly. Canadian Journal on Aging, 15(1), 129–44.Google Scholar
Dennis, C.-L., Hodnett, E., Gallop, R. & Chalmers, B. (2002). The effect of peer support on breast-feeding duration among primaparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 166(1), 21–8.Google Scholar
Edgar, L., Collet, J.-P. & Rosberger, Z. (2001). Lessons learned: outcomes and methodology of a coping skills intervention trial comparing individual and group formats for patients with cancer. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 31(3), 305–20.Google Scholar
Edmonds, C. V. I., Lockwood, G. A. & Cunningham, A. J. (1999). Psychological response to long term group therapy: a randomized trial with metastatic breast cancer patients. Psychooncology, 8, 74–91.Google Scholar
Frasure-Smith, N., Lesperance, F., Prince, R.et al. (1997). Randomised trial of home-based psychosocial nursing intervention for patients recovering from myocardial infarction. The Lancet, 350, 473–9.Google Scholar
Gallagher-Thompson, D. & DeVries, H. (1994). ‘Coping with Frustration’ classes: development and preliminary outcomes with women who care for relatives with dementia. The Gerontologist, 34, 548–52.Google Scholar
Goodwin, P. J., Leszez, M., Ennis, M.et al. (2001). The effect of group psychosocial support on survival in metastatic breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 345(24), 1719–26.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, B. H. (1988). Support interventions: a typology and agenda for research. In Duck, S. W. (Ed.). Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 519–41). New York: Wiley.
Gottlieb, B. H. & Wachala, E. D. (in press). Cancer support group: a critical review of empirical studies. Psychoncology.
Haley, W., Brown, S. L. & Levine, E. G. (1987). Experimental evaluation of the effectiveness of group intervention for dementia caregivers. The Gerontologist, 27(3), 376–82.Google Scholar
Hamann, H. A., Croyle, R. T., Smith, K. R.et al. (2000). Interest in a support group among individuals tested for a BRCA1 gene mutation. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 18(4), 15–37.Google Scholar
Helgeson, V., Cohen, S., Schulz, R. & Yasko, J. (1999). Education and peer discussion group interventions and adjustment to breast cancer. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 340–7.Google Scholar
Helgeson, V., Cohen, S., Schulz, R. & Yasko, J. (2000). Group support interventions for women with breast cancer: who benefits from what?Health Psychology, 19(2), 107–14.Google Scholar
Helgeson, V. & Gottlieb, B. H. (2000). Support groups. In Cohen, S., Underwood, L. & Gottlieb, B. H. (Eds.). Social support measurement and intervention (pp. 221–45). New York: Oxford University Press.
Heller, K., Thompson, M., Trueba, P., Hogg, J. & Vlachos-Weber, I. (1991). Peer support telephone dyads for elderly women: was this the wrong intervention?American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 53–74.Google Scholar
House, J., Robbins, C. & Metzner, H. (1982). The association of social relationships and activities with mortality: prospective evidence from the Tecumseh Community Health Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 116, 123–40.Google Scholar
Lehman, D. & Hemphill, K. (1990). Recipients' perceptions of support attempts and attributions for support attempts that fail. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 563–74.Google Scholar
Lepore, S., Helgeson, V., Eton, D. & Schulz, R. (2003). Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial of group education interventions. Health Psychology, 22(5), 443–52.Google Scholar
Lovett, S. & Gallagher, D. (1988). Psychoeducational interventions for family caregivers: preliminary efficacy data. Behavior Therapy, 19, 321–30.Google Scholar
McGovern, R. J., Heyman, E. N. & Resnick, M. I. (2002). An examination of coping style and quality of life of cancer patients who attend a prostate support group. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 20(3), 57–68.Google Scholar
Miller, S. M. (1995). Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease. Cancer, 76, 167–77.Google Scholar
Mishel, M., Belyea, M., Germino, B.et al. (2002). Helping patients with localized prostate carcinoma manage uncertainty and treatment side effects. Cancer, 94(6), 1854–66.Google Scholar
Nekhlyudov, L. & Yaker, A. (2002). Group psychosocial support in metastatic breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(16), 1247–8.Google Scholar
Olds, D., Eckenrode, J., Henderson, C.et al. (1998). Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect: 15-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 637–43.Google Scholar
Olds, D., Henderson, C., Chamberlin, R. & Tatelbaum, R. (1986). Preventing child abuse and neglect: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation. Pediatrics, 78, 65–78.Google Scholar
Potthoff, J. G., Holahan, C. J. & Joiner, T. E. Jr. (1995). Reassurance seeking, stress generation, and depressive symptoms: an integrative model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 664–70.Google Scholar
Rook, K. (1991). Facilitating friendship formation in late life: puzzles and challenges. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 103–10.Google Scholar
Schulz, R., O'Brian, A., Czaja, S.et al. (2002). Dementia caregiver intervention research: in search of clinical significance. The Gerontologist, 42(5), 589–602.Google Scholar
Spiegel, D. (2001). Mind matters – group therapy and survival in breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 345(24), 1767–8.Google Scholar
Spiegel, D., Bloom, J. R., Kraemer, H. C. & Gottheil, E. (1989). Effect of psychosocial treatment on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Lancet, 2, 888–91.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E., Falke, R. L., Shoptaw, S. J. & Lichtman, R. R. (1986). Social support, support groups, and the cancer patient. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(5), 608–15.Google Scholar
Thoits, P., Hohmann, A., Harvey, M. & Fletcher, B. (2000). Similar-other support for men undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Health Psychology, 19(3), 264–73.Google Scholar
Vaux, A. (1991). Let's hang up and try again: lessons learned from a social support intervention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 85–90.Google Scholar
Winefield, H. R., Coventry, B. J., Lewis, M. & Harvey, E. J. (2003). Attitudes of patients with breast cancer toward support groups. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 21(2), 39–54.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×