Neuropsychological assessment of learning and memory

Nancy D. Chiaravalloti: Affiliation:
Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Corporation
Amanda O'Brien: Affiliation:
Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Corporation
John DeLuca: Affiliation:
Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Corporation
Susan Ayers: Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum: Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus: Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman: Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston: Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman: Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West: Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

With over 100 different theorized types of memory in existence (Tulving, 2002) it is no wonder that the assessment of learning and memory can be quite complex. However, despite our current knowledge, memory is often conceptualized as a unitary concept, especially by non-psychologist health professionals. Memory is actually a multidimensional construct with dissociable sub-systems, or processes. Many of these subsystems are particularly sensitive to impairment following trauma or other acquired brain insult. Therefore, understanding how the brain represents and processes information is essential in the clinical assessment of learning and memory. Despite the major advances in the understanding of cognitive and cerebral aspects of learning and memory in the last century, clinical assessment has lagged behind the research knowledge in this area.

This chapter will present a basic overview of modern clinical assessment of learning and memory in adults. It begins with a brief historical perspective on views of memory followed by a discussion of the different approaches to the conceptual understanding of learning and memory (e.g. ‘process’ versus ‘systems’ approach). The chapter will also touch upon the key brain structures responsible for aspects of memory. We will address the role of learning, current debates in assessment, comprehensive assessment techniques and other cognitive functions that impact memory. Finally, a discussion of future directions and recommendations for improving the quality of memory assessment is presented.

Type: Chapter
Information: Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine , pp. 294 - 300

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543579.064 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological Testing (6th edn.). New York: MacMillan.

Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556–9.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. (2000). Short-term and working memory. In Tulving, E. & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 77–92). New York: Oxford University Press.

Baur, R.M., Tobias, B. & Valenstien, E. (1993). Amnestic disorders. In Heilman, K. M. & Valenstein, E. (Eds.). Clinical neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Binder, L. M. (1993). Assessment of malingering after mild head trauma with the Portland digit recognition test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 170–82.Google Scholar

Brown, S. C. & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Encoding and retrieval of information. In Tulving, E. & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 93–108). New York: Oxford University Press.

Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Kalmar, K.et al. (2000). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1596–615.Google Scholar

Delis, D. C., Kramer, J.H., Kaplan, E.&Ober, B. A. (1987). California verbal learning test. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

DeLuca, J., Schultheis, M. T., Madigan, N. K., Christodoulou, C.&Averill, A. (2000). Acquisition versus retrieval deficits in traumatic brain injury: implications for memory rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(10), 1327–33.Google Scholar

DeLuca, J., Barbieri-Berger, S.&Johnson, S. K. (1994). The nature of memory impairments in multiple sclerosis: acquisition versus retrieval. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 183–9.Google Scholar

DeLuca, J., Gaudino, E. A., Diamond, B. J., Christodoulou, C.&Engel, R. A. (1998). Acquisition and storage deficits in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20, 376–90.Google Scholar

Demaree, H. A., Gaudino, E. A., DeLuca, J.&Ricker, J. H. (2000). Learning impairment is associated with recall ability in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 865–73.Google Scholar

Fink, G. R., Markowitsch, H. J., Reinkemeier, M., Kessler, J.&Heiss, W. D. (1996). A PET study of autobiographical memory recognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 4275–82.Google Scholar

Fletcher, P. C.&Henson, R. N. (2001). Frontal lobes and human memory: insights from functional neuroimaging. Brain, 124, 849–81.Google Scholar

Gaudino, E. A., Chiaravalloti, N. D., DeLuca, J.&Diamond, B. J. (2001). A comparison of memory performance in relapse-remitting, primary progressive and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 14, 32–44.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. K. (1992). MEM: mechanisms of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(3), 268–80.Google Scholar

Jonides J. (1995). Working memory and thinking. In Smith, E. E. & Osheron, D. N. (Eds.). Invitation to Cognitive Science: Thinking (2nd edn.) (pp. 215–65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kalmar, J., Bryant, D., Tulsky, D.&DeLuca, J. (2004). Information processing deficits in multiple sclerosis: does screening instrument make a difference?Rehabilitation Psychology, 49, 213–18.Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C.&Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity. Intelligence, 14, 389–433.Google Scholar

Lezak, M., Howieson, D.&Loring, D. (2004). Neuropsychological Assessment (4th edn.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Markowitsch, H. J. (2000). Neuroanatomy of memory. In Tulving, E., & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 465–84). New York: Oxford University Press.

Prigatano, G. P. (1978). Wechsler memory scale: a selective review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34, 816–32.Google Scholar

Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–28.Google Scholar

Schacter, D. L., Wagner, A.D. & Buckner, R. L. (2000). Memory systems of 1999. In Tulving, E. & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 627–43). New York: Oxford University Press.

Squire, L. R. (1987). Memory and brain. New York: Oxford University Press.

Squire, L. R., Cohen, N. J. & Nadel, L. (1983). The medial temporal region and memory consolidation: a new hypothesis. In Weingartner, H. & Parker, E. (Eds.). Memory consolidation (pp. 185–210). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Tombaugh, T. N. (1997). The test of memory malingering (TOMM): normative data from cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals. Psychological Assessment, 9, 260–8.Google Scholar

Tremont, G., Halpert, S., Javorsky, D. J.&Stern, R. A. (2000). Differential impact of executive dysfunction on verbal list learning and story recall. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14(3), 295–302.Google Scholar

Tulving, E. (2000). Concepts of memory. In Tulving, E. & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 33–44). New York: Oxford University Press.

Tulving, E., Kapur, S., Craik, F. I. M., Moscovitch, M.&Houle, S. (1994). Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: positron emission tomography findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 91, 2016–20.Google Scholar

Vanderploeg, R. D., Crowell, T. A.&Curtiss, G. (2001). Verbal learning and memory deficits in traumatic brain injury: encoding, consolidation and retrieval. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 185–95.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Memory Scale (3rd edn.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Book contents

Neuropsychological assessment of learning and memory

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive