Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:00:23.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Effects of animal camouflage on the evolution of live backgrounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Kevin R. Abbott
Affiliation:
Carleton University, Ontario, Canada
Reuven Dukas
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
Martin Stevens
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Sami Merilaita
Affiliation:
Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Get access

Summary

Research on camouflage focusses on the ways animals make themselves inconspicuous against their background (Thayer 1909; Cott 1940; Ruxton et al. 2004). A common means of achieving inconspicuousness involves crypsis via background matching. In the visual domain we focus on here, this means possessing a phenotype that matches the colours, patterns and brightness of its surrounding background (Stevens & Merilaita 2009). The traditional focus on animals being the active players that match themselves against a passive background is well justified when the background is not a live entity. In many cases, however, animals’ immediate surroundings are either plants or larger animals. Examples include ambush predators on either flowers or foliage, herbivores on plants and small parasites on large hosts. In such cases, the background organisms may actually be active players that coevolve with the animals that use them as a backdrop. This important feature of animal camouflage requires detailed evaluation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Animal Camouflage
Mechanisms and Function
, pp. 275 - 297
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, K. R. 2006. Bumblebees avoid flowers containing evidence of past predation events. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 84, 1240–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, K. R. 2010. Background evolution in camouflage systems: a predator–prey/pollinator–flower game. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 262, 662–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bond, A. B. & Kamil, A. C. 2002. Visual predators select for crypticity and polymorphism in virtual prey. Nature, 415, 609–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cott, H. B. 1940. Adaptive Coloration in Animals. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Dicke, M. 2009. Behavioural and community ecology of plants that cry for help. Plant, Cell and Environment, 32, 654–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimitrova, M. & Merilaita, S. 2010. Prey concealment: visual background complexity and prey contrast distribution. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukas, R. 2001a. Effects of perceived danger on flower choice by bees. Ecology Letters, 4, 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukas, R. 2001b. Effects of predation risk on pollinators and plants. In Cognitive Ecology of Pollination, eds. Chittka, L. & Thomson, J.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 214–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukas, R. & Morse, D. H. 2003. Crab spiders affect patch visitation by bees. Oikos, 101, 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. M. 1966. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: JohnWiley.Google Scholar
Heil, M. & McKey, D. 2003. Protective ant–plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 425–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D. H. 1966. Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution, 20, 249–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnstone, R. A. 2002. The evolution of inaccurate mimics. Nature, 418, 524–526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, T. M., Chase, J. M., Hillebrand, H. & Holt, R. D. 2006. Predation on mutualists can reduce the strength of trophic cascades. Ecology Letters, 9, 1173–1178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lev-Yadun, S., Dafni, A., Flaishman, M.et al. 2004. Plant coloration undermines herbivorous insect camouflage. BioEssays, 26, 1126–1130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louda, S. M. 1982. Inflorescence spiders: a cost/benefit analysis for the host plant, Haplopappus venetus (Asteraceae). Oecologia, 55, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, R. J. & Whelan, C. J. 1994. Insectivorous birds increase growth of white oak through consumption of leaf-chewing insects. Ecology, 75, 2007–2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merilaita, S. 2003. Visual background complexity facilitates the evolution of camouflage. Evolution, 57, 1248–1254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyerowitz, E. M. & Somerville, C. R. 1994. Arabidopsis. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Morse, D. H. 1981. Prey capture by the crab spider Misumena vatia (Clerck) (Thomisidae) on three common native flowers. American Midland Naturalist, 105, 358–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, D. H. 2007. Predator upon a Flower : Life History and Fitness in a Crab Spider. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raine, N. E., Willmer, P. & Stone, G. N. 2002. Spatial structuring and floral avoidance behavior prevent ant–pollinator conflict in a Mexican ant-acacia. Ecology, 83, 3086–3096.Google Scholar
Romero, G. Q. & Vasconcellos-Neto, J. 2004. Beneficial effects of flower-dwelling predators on their host plant. Ecology, 85, 446–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruxton, G. D., Sherratt, T. N. & Speed, M. P. 2004. Avoiding Attack : The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals, and Mimicry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherratt, T. N. & Beatty, C. D. 2003. The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense. American Naturalist, 162, 377–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, M. & Merilaita, S. 2009. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 364, 423–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thayer, G. H. 1909. Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom: An Exposition of the Laws of Disguise Through Color and Pattern, Being a Summary of Abbott H. Thayer's Discoveries. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Théry, M. & Casas, J. 2009. The multiple disguises of spiders: web colour and decorations, body colour and movement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 364, 471–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turlings, T. C. J., Tumlinson, J. H. & Lewis, W. J. 1990. Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking wasps. Science, 250, 1251–1253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Bael, S. A., Brawn, J. D. & Robinson, S. K. 2003. Birds defend trees from herbivores in a Neotropical forest canopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 100, 8304–8307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickens, T. D. 2002. Elementary Signal Detection Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Willmer, P. G. & Stone, G. N. 1997. How aggressive ant-guards assist seed-set in Acacia flowers. Nature, 388, 165–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmer, P. G., Nuttman, C. V., Raine, N. E.et al. 2009. Floral volatiles controlling ant behaviour. Functional Ecology, 23, 888–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×