Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-06T23:02:38.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Crypsis through background matching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Sami Merilaita  and
Martin Stevens
Edited by
Martin Stevens  and
Sami Merilaita
Sami Merilaita
Affiliation:
Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Martin Stevens
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Stevens
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Sami Merilaita
Affiliation:
Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Get access

Summary

Considering its widespread occurrence and importance in the animal kingdom, background matching is clearly one of the most under-studied means of concealment. Background matching means that to decrease the risk of being detected by its predators or prey an animal possesses body colours or patterns that resemble those in the surrounding environment (Figure 2.1). The principle has long been acknowledged (e.g. Darwin 1794), and because of the apparent obviousness of its function, it was used as an example to promote the idea of adaptation in many early evolutionary texts. For instance, Wallace (1889) presented numerous examples of what we today call background matching, and described various cases in which animals ‘blended into’ their backgrounds or had colours ‘assimilated’ to or to ‘harmonise’ with it.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Animal Camouflage
Mechanisms and Function
 , pp. 17 - 33
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barbosa, A., Mäthger, L. M., Buresch, K. C.et al. 2008. Cuttlefish camouflage: the effects of substrate contrast and size in evoking uniform, mottle or disruptive body patterns. Vision Research, 48, 1242–1253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behrens, R. R. 1988. The theories of Abbott H. Thayer: father of camouflage. Leonardo, 21, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blough, D. S. 1985. Discrimination of letters and random dot patterns by pigeons and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 261–280.Google ScholarPubMed
Bond, A. B. & Kamil, A. C. 2006. Spatial heterogeneity, predator cognition, and the evolution of color polymorphism in virtual prey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103, 3214–3219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowmaker, J. K. 1995. The visual pigments of fish. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 15, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caro, T., Merilaita, S. & Stevens, M. 2008. The colours of animals: from Wallace to the present day. I. cryptic colouration. In Natural Selection and Beyond: The Intellectual Legacy of Alfred Russel Wallace, eds. Smith, C. H. & Beccaloni, G.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 125–143.Google Scholar
Cott, H. B. 1940. Adaptive Coloration in Animals. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Cuthill, I. C., Stevens, M., Sheppard, J.et al. 2005. Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching. Nature, 434, 72–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, E. 1794. Zoönomia, or the Laws of Organic Life, vol. I. London: Johnson.Google Scholar
Defrize, J., Théry, M. & Casas, J. 2010. Background colour matching by a crab spider in the field: a community sensory ecology perspective. Journal of Experimental Biology, 213, 1425–1435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimitrova, M. & Merilaita, S. 2010. Prey concealment: visual background complexity and prey contrast distribution. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, M., Stobbe, N., Schaefer, H. M. & Merilaita, S. 2009. Concealed by conspicuousness: distractive prey markings and backgrounds. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 276, 1905–1910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endler, J. A. 1978. A predator's view of animal color patterns. Evolutionary Biology, 11, 319–364.Google Scholar
Endler, J. A. 1984. Progressive background matching in moths, and a quantitative measure of crypsis. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 22, 187–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endler, J. A. 1993. The color of light in forests and its implications. Ecological Monographs, 63, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endler, J. A. & Mielke, P. W. 2005. Comparing entire colour patterns as birds see them. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 86, 405–431.CrossRef
Fraser, S., Callahan, A., Klassen, D. & Sherratt, T. N. 2007. Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 274, 1325–1331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godfrey, D., Lythgoe, J. N. & Rumball, D. A. 1987. Zebra stripes and tiger stripes: the spatial frequency distribution of the pattern compared to that of the background is significant in display and crypsis. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 32, 427–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graps, A. 1995. An Introduction to Wavelets. IEEE Computational Science and Engineering, 2, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, E. 1989. A diet-induced developmental polymorphism in a caterpillar. Science, 243, 643–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanlon, R. T., Chiao, C.-C., Mäthger, L. M.et al. 2009. Cephalopod dynamic camouflage: bridging the continuum between background matching and disruptive coloration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 364, 429–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K. & Dinstein, I. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 6, 610–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, N. S. 2001. Visual ecology of avian photoreceptors. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 20, 675–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Håstad, O., Victorsson, J. & Ödeen, A. 2005. Differences in color vision make passerines less conspicuous in the eyes of their predators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 6391–6394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hocking, B. 1964. Fire melanism in some African grasshoppers. Evolution, 18, 333–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, A. I., Stevens, M. & Cuthill, I. C. 2007. Animal camouflage: compromise or specialise in a two patch-type environment? Behavioral Ecology, 18, 769–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. 1977. Functional architecture of the macaque visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 198, 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelber, A, Vorobyev, M. & Osorio, D. 2003. Animal colour vision: behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biological Reviews, 78, 81–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiltie, R. A. & Laine, A. F. 1992. Visual textures, machine vision and animal camouflage. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 163–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiltie, R. A., Fan, J. & Laine, A. F. 1995. A wavelet-based metric for visual discrimination with applications in evolutionary ecology. Mathematical Biosciences, 126, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mather, G. 2009. Foundations of Sensation and Perception, 2nd edn. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Merilaita, S. 1998. Crypsis through disruptive coloration in an isopod. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 265, 1059–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merilaita, S. 2003. Visual background complexity facilitates the evolution of camouflage. Evolution. 57, 1248–1254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merilaita, S. & Lind, J. 2005. Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 272, 665–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merilaita, S., Tuomi, J. & Jormalainen, V. 1999. Optimization of cryptic coloration in heterogeneous habitats. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 67, 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merilaita, S., Lyytinen, A. & Mappes, J. 2001. Selection for cryptic coloration in a visually heterogeneous habitat. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 268, 1925–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, K. S. & Lowe, C. H. 1964. An analysis of background color-matching in amphibians and reptiles. Ecology, 45, 565–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, R. T. 1997. Essential Wavelets for Statistical Applications and Data Analysis. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osorio, D. & Srinivasan, M. V. 1991. Camouflage by edge enhancement in animal coloration patterns and its implications for visual mechanisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 244, 81–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osorio, D. & Vorobyev, M. 2008. A review of the evolution of animal colour vision and visual communication signals. Vision Research, 48, 2042–2051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Párraga, C. A., Troscianko, T. & Tolhurst, D. J. 2002 Spatiochromatic properties of natural images and human vision. Current Biology, 12, 483–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, S. 1999. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pietrewicz, A. T. & Kamil, A. C. 1977. Visual detection of cryptic prey by blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata). Science, 195, 580–582.CrossRef
Popham, E. J. 1941. The variation in the colour of certain species of Arctocorisa (Hemiptera, Corixidae) and its significance. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London A, 111, 135–172.Google Scholar
Rowland, H. M., Cuthill, I. C., Harvey, I. F., Speed, M. & Ruxton, G. D. 2008. Can't tell the caterpillars from the trees: countershading enhances survival in a woodland. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 275, 2539–2546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherratt, T. N., Pollitt, D. & Wilkinson, D. M. 2007. The evolution of crypsis in replicating populations of web-based prey. Oikos, 116, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shohet, A., Baddeley, R., Anderson, J. & Osorio, D. 2007. Cuttlefish camouflage: a quantitative study of patterning. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 92, 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shreeve, T. G. 1990. Microhabit use and hindwing phenotype in Hipparchia semele (Lepidoptera, Satyrinae): thermoregulation and background matching. Ecological Entomology, 15, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddiqi, A., Cronin, T. W., Loew, E. R., Vorobyev, M. & Summers, K. 2004. Interspecific and intraspecific views of color signals in the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio. Journal of Experimental Biology, 207, 2471–2485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skelhorn, J., Rowland, H. M., Speed, M. P. & Ruxton, G. M. 2010. Masquerade: camouflage without crypsis. Science, 327, 51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spottiswoode, C. N. & Stevens, M. 2010. Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 107, 8672–8676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, M. & Cuthill, I. C. 2006. Disruptive coloration, crypsis and edge detection in early visual processing. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 273, 2141–2147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, M. & Merilaita, S. 2009a. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 364, 423–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, M. & Merilaita, S. 2009b. Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 364, 481–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, M., Cuthill, I. C., Windsor, A. M. M. & Walker, H. J. 2006. Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 273, 2433–2438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, M., Párraga, C. A., Cuthill, I. C., Partridge, J. C. & Troscianko, T. S. 2007. Using digital photography to study animal coloration. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 90, 211–237.CrossRef
Stevens, M., Graham, J., Winney, I. S. & Cantor, A. 2008. Testing Thayer's hypothesis: can camouflage work by distraction? Biology Letters, 4, 648–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, M., Stoddard, M. C. & Higham, J. P. 2009a. Studying primate color: towards visual system dependent methods. International Journal of Primatology, 30, 893–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, M., Winney, I. S., Cantor, A. & Graham, J. 2009b. Object outline and surface disruption in animal camouflage. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 276, 781–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoddard, M. C. & Stevens, M. 2010. Pattern mimicry of host eggs by the common cuckoo, as seen through a bird's eye. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 277, 1387–1393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuart-Fox, D. & Moussalli, A. 2008. Selection for social signalling drives the evolution of chameleon colour change. PLoS Biology, 6, 22–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuart-Fox, D. M., Moussalli, A., Johnston, G. R. & Owen, I. P. F. 2004. Evolution of color variation in dragon lizards: quantitative tests of the role of crypsis and local adaptation. Evolution, 58, 1549–1559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumner, F. B. 1934. Does protective coloration protect? Results of some experiments with fishes and birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Washington, 20, 559–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamura, H., Mori, S. & Yamawaki, T. 1978. Textural features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 8, 460–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, A. H. 1896. The laws which underlie protective coloration. TheAuk 13, 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, A. H. 1918. Camouflage. The Scientific Monthly, 7, 481–494.Google Scholar
Thayer, G. H. 1909. Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom: An Exposition of the Laws of Disguise through Color and Pattern: Being a Summary of Abbott H. Thayer's Discoveries. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Theodoridis, S. & Koutroumbas, K. 1999. Pattern Recognition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Théry, M. & Casas, J. 2002. Predator and prey views of spider camouflage. Nature, 415, 133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vorobyev, M. & Osorio, D. 1998. Receptor noise as a determinant of receptor thresholds. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 265, 351–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vorobyev, M., Osorio, D., Bennett, A. T. D., Marshall, N. J. & Cuthill, I. C. 1998. Tetrachromacy, oil droplets and bird plumage colours. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 183, 621–633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, A. R. 1889. Darwinism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. R. 1891. Natural Selection and Tropical Nature:Essays on Descriptive and Theoretical Biology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, F. 1986. Visual texture segmentation in cats. Behavioural Brain Research, 19, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×