Sommer, C., Boos, M., Conradi, E., Biller-Andorno, N., & Wiesemann, C. (2011). Care and justice arguments in the ethical reasoning of medical students. Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics, 2, 9–32.Google Scholar

Bergmann, J., & Luckmann, T. (Eds.), (1999). Die kommunikative Konstruktion von Moral [The communicative construction of morality]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding (pp. 181–209). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In Farr, R. & Moscovici, S. (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sommer, C. (2004). Fürsorge- und Gerechtigkeitsmoral: Eine interpersonelle Perspektive [Care and Justice Morality: An Interpersonal Perspective]. Hamburg: Kovač.Google Scholar

Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Voss, J. F., Tyler, S. W., & Yengo, L. A. (1983). Individual differences in the solving of social science problems. In Dillon, R. F. & Schmeck, R. R. (Eds.), Individual differences in cognition (pp. 205–232). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989a). Decision development in small groups IV: A typology of decision paths. Human Communication Research, 15, 323–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, M. S. (1983). Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences in decision-making. Communication Monographs, 50, 206–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The coding manual can be found at http://hdl.handle.net/2142/35315 (last retrieved on February 18, 2018).Google Scholar

Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Fisher, B. A. (1970). Decision emergence: Phases in group decision making. Communication Monographs, 37, 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markman, H. J., Renick, M. J., Floyd, F. J., Stanley, S. M., & Clements, M. (1993). Preventing marital distress through communication and conflict management training: A 4- and 5-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, M. S., & Dobosh, M. (2010). Exploring conflict management processes in jury deliberations through interaction analysis. Small Group Research, 41, 408–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989b). Decision development in small groups V: Test of a contingency model. Human Communication Research, 15, 549–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, M. S., Holmes, M., & DeSanctis, , G. (1991). Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting environment. Management Science, 37, 926–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sambamurthy, V., & Poole, M. S. (1992). The effects of variations in capabilities of GDSS designs on management of cognitive conflict in groups. Information Systems Research, 3, 224–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sillars, A. L., Coletti, S. F., Parry, D., & Rogers, M. A. (1982). Coding verbal conflict tactics: Nonverbal and perceptual correlates of the “avoidance-distributive-integrative” distinction. Human Communication Research, 9, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paletz, S. B. F., Schunn, C. D., & Kim, K. H. (2011). Conflict under the microscope: Micro-conflicts in naturalistic team discussions. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 4, 314–351. doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2011.00085.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paletz, S. B. F., Chan, J., & Schunn, C. D. (2017). The dynamics of micro-conflicts and uncertainty in successful and unsuccessful design teams. Design Studies, 50, 39–69. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paletz, S. B. F., Sumer, A., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2017). Psychological factors surrounding disagreement in multicultural design team meetings. CoDesign. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1378685CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amason, A. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123–143. doi:10.2307/256633CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakeman, R., Quera, V., McArthur, D., & Robinson, B. F. (1997). Detecting sequential patterns and determining their reliability with fallible observers. Psychological Methods, 2, 357–370. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.2.4.357CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bales, R. F. (1951). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar

Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2004). Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 216–244. doi:10.1108/eb022913CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bearman, C. R., Paletz, S. B. F., Orasanu, J., & Thomas, M. J. W. (2010). The breakdown of coordinated decision making in distributed systems. Human Factors, 52, 173–188. doi:10.1177/0018720810372104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bendersky, C., Bear, J., Behfar, K. J., Weingart, L. R., Todorova, G., & Jehn, K. A. (2014). Identifying gaps between the conceptualization of conflict and its measurement. In Ashkanasy, N., Ayoko, O., & Jehn, K. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research in conflict management (pp. 79–89). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9781781006948Google Scholar

Chan, J., Paletz, S. B. F., & Schunn, C. D. (2012). Analogy as a strategy for supporting complex problem solving under uncertainty. Memory and Cognition, 40, 1352–1365. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0227-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of Learning Sciences, 6, 271–315. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, B. T., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The role and impact of mental simulation in design. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 327–344. doi:10.1002/acp.1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coan, J. A., & Gottman, J. M. (2007). The Specific Affect (SPAFF) coding system. In Coan, J. A. & Allen, J. J. B. (Eds.) Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 106–123), New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottman, J. M., & Notarius, C. I. (2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 927–947. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00927.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530–557. doi:10.2307/2393737CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187–242. doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25005-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238–251. doi:10.2307/3069453CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kauffeld, S. (2006). Self-directed work groups and team competence. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 1–21. doi:10.1348/096317905X53237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43, 130–158. doi:10.1177/1046496411429599CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, T., & Poole, M. S. (2000). Do conflict management styles affect group decision making? Evidence from a longitudinal field study. Human Communication Research, 26, 558–590. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00769.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Neff, R., Jankovic, S., Wolf, M., Tacey, P., Paletz, S. B. F., & Schunn, C. D. (2012). Affect and conflict in student engineering teams. Poster presented at the International Society for the Psychology of Science and Technology Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar

Paletz, S. B. F., Chan, J., & Schunn, C. D. (2016). Uncovering uncertainty through disagreement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 387–400. doi:10.1002/acp.3213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paletz, S. B. F., Schunn, C. D., & Kim, K. H. (2013). The interplay of conflict and analogy in multidisciplinary teams. Cognition, 126, 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from http://liwc.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/LIWC2015_LanguageManual.pdf. doi:10.15781/T29G6Z.Google Scholar

Smith, C. P. (2000). Content analysis and narrative analysis. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 313–335). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Srikanth, K., Harvey, S., & Peterson, R. (2016). A dynamic perspective on diverse teams: Moving from the dual-process model to a dynamic coordination-based model of diverse team performance. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 453–493. doi:10.1080/19416520.2016.1120973CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Staw, B. M. (1975). Attribution of the ‘‘causes’’ of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 13, 414–432. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90060-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Todorova, G., Bear, J. B., & Weingart, L. R. (2014). Can conflict be energizing? A study of task conflict, positive emotions, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 451–467. doi:10.1037/a0035134CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vuchinich, S. (1987). Starting and stopping spontaneous family conflicts. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 591–601. doi:10.2307/352204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingart, L. R., Behfar, K. J., Bendersky, C., Todorova, G., & Jehn, K. A. (2015). The directness and oppositional intensity of conflict expression. Academy of Management Review, 40, 235–262. doi:10.5465/amr.2013-0124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yao, J., Brett, J., & Zhang, Z. X. n.d. Multi-issue offers: A low-trust path to joint gains in negotiations. Paper presented at the International Association for Conflict Management conference, Berlin, Germany, July 2017.Google Scholar

Yao, J., Zhang, Z. X., & Brett, J. (2017). Understanding trust development in negotiations: An interdependent approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(5), 712–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adair, W. L., & Brett, J. M. (2005). The negotiation dance: Time, culture, and behavioral sequences in negotiation. Organization Science, 16(1), 33–51. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adair, W. L., Okumura, T., & Brett, J. M. (2001). Negotiation behavior when cultures collide: The United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 371–385. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.371CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Curhan, J., & Pentland, A., (2007). Thin slices of negotiation: Predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 802–811. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.802CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

De Dreu, C., Evers, A. Beersma, B., Klewer, E., Nauta, A. (2001). A theory based measure of conflict management in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(6), 645–668. doi:10.1002/job.107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayes, A. F. 2012. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. (White paper). Retrieved February 16, 2018, from www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdfGoogle Scholar

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D., & Cook, W. L. 2006. Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Kong, D. T., Dirks, K., & Ferrin, D. (2014). Interpersonal trust within negotiations: Meta-analytic evidence, critical contingencies, and direction for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1235–1255. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0461CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Liu, M. (2009). The intrapersonal and interpersonal effects of anger on negotiation strategies: A cross-cultural investigation. Human Communication Research, 35(1), 148–169. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.01342.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olekalns, M. Brett, J. M., & Weingart, L. R. 2004. Phases, transitions and interruptions: The processes that shape agreement in multi-party negotiations. International Journal of Conflict Management: Special Issue on Processes in Negotiation, 14(3), 191–211. doi:10.1108/eb022898CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2000). Understanding optimal outcomes: The role of strategy sequences in competitive negotiations. Human Communication Research, 26(4), 527–57. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00768.xGoogle Scholar

Pruitt, D. G. 1981. Negotiation Behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Pruitt, D., & Rubin, J. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar

Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Weingart, L. R., Thompson, L. L., Bazerman, M. H., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1(1), 7–31. doi:10.1108/eb022839CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sillars, A. L. (1980). The sequential and distributional structure of conflict as a function of attributions concerning the locus of causality and stability of conflicts. In Nimmo, D. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 4 (pp. 217–235). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press. [VTCS applied to discussions of college roommates]Google Scholar

Sillars, A. L., Pike, G. R., Jones, T. S., & Redmon, K. (1983). Communication and conflict in marriage. In Bostrom, R. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 7 (pp. 414–429). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. [First application to marital conflict]Google Scholar

Zietlow, P. H., & Sillars, A. L. (1988). Life stage differences in communication during marital conflicts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 223–245. doi:10.1177/026540758800500206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradbury, T. N., Campbell, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (1995). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 328–341. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.328CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1992). Attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 613–628. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.613CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burggraf, C. S., & Sillars, A. L. (1987). A critical examination of sex differences in marital communication. Communication Monographs, 54, 276–294. doi:10.1080/03637758709390233CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canary, D. J., Cunningham, E. M., & Cody, M. J. (1988). Goal types, gender, and locus of control in managing interpersonal conflict. Communication Research, 15, 426–446. doi:10.1177/009365088015004005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cloven, D. H., & Roloff, M. E. (1991). Sense-making activities and interpersonal conflict: Communicative cures for the mulling blues. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 134–158. doi:10.1080/10570319109374376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohan, C. L., & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Negative life events, marital interaction, and the longitudinal course of newlywed marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 114–128. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Comstock, J., & Strzyzewski, K. (1990). Interpersonal interaction on television: Family conflict and jealousy on primetime. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34, 263–282. doi:10.1080/08838159009386742CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, D. S., Christensen, A., & Fincham, F. D. (1999). Predicting marital satisfaction from behavior: Do all roads really lead to Rome? Personal Relationships, 6, 369–387. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00198.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interactions: Experimental investigations. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hahlweg, K. (2004). Kategoriensystem für Partnerschaftliche Interaktion (KPI): Interactional coding system (ICS). In Kerig, P. K. & Baucom, D. H. (Eds.), Couple observational coding systems (pp. 122–142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hellmuth, J. C., & McNulty, J. K. (2008). Neuroticism, marital violence, and the moderating role of stress and behavioral skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 166–180. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.166CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heyman, R. E., Weiss, R. L., & Eddy, J. M. (1995). Marital Interaction Coding System: Revision and empirical evaluation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 737–746. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(95)00003-GCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keck, K. L., & Samp, J. A. (2007). The dynamic nature of goals and message production as revealed in a sequential analysis of conflict interaction. Human Communication Research, 33, 27–47. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00287.xGoogle Scholar

McNulty, J. D., & Russell, V. M. (2010). When “negative” behaviors are positive: A contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 587–604. doi:10.1037/a0017479CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNulty, J. K. (2008). Neuroticism and interpersonal negativity: The independent contributions of perceptions and behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1439–1450. doi:10.1177/0146167208322558CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McNulty, J. K., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Expectancy confirmation in appraisals of marital interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 764–775. doi:10.1177/0146167202289006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNulty, J. K., & Karney, B. R. (2004). Positive expectations in the early years of marriage: Should couples expect the best or brace for the worst? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 729–743. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.729CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2007). Stress crossover in newlywed marriage: A longitudinal and dyadic perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 594–607. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00394.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oetzel, J. G., Ting-Toomey, S., Yokochi, Y., Masumoto, T., Yokochi, Y., Pan, X., Takai, J., & Wilcox, R. (2001). Face and facework in conflict: A cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Communication Monographs, 68, 235–258. doi:10.1080/03637750128061CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Overall, N. C., Hammond, M. D., McNulty, J. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2016). Power in context: Relationship and situational power interact to predict men’s aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195–217. doi:10.1037/pspi0000059CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pike, G. R., & Sillars, A. L. (1985). Reciprocity of marital communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 303–324. doi:10.1177/0265407585023005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, M. S., Holmes, M., & Desanctis, G. (1991). Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting environment. Management Science, 37, 926–953. doi:10.1287/mnsc.37.8.926CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhee, H-S., Pirkul, H., Jacob, V., & Barhki, R. (1995). Effects of computer-mediated communication on group negotiation: An empirical study. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Wailea, HI.Google Scholar

Shearman, S. M., Dumlao, R., & Kagawa, N. (2011). Cultural variations in accounts by American and Japanese young adults: Recalling a major conflict with parents. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 105–125. doi:10.1080/15267431.2011.554499CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sillars, A. L. (1981). Attributions and interpersonal conflict resolution. In Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W. J. & Kidd, R. F. (Eds.), New directions in attribution research, Volume 3 (pp. 279–305). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Sillars, A. L. (1985). Interpersonal perception in relationships. In Ickes, W. J. (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 277–305). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sillars, A. L. (1986). Procedures for coding interpersonal conflict: The Verbal Tactics Coding Scheme (VTCS). Unpublished manuscript, University of Montana.Google Scholar

Sillars, A. L., Coletti, S. F., Parry, D., & Rogers, M. A. (1982). Coding verbal conflict tactics: Nonverbal and perceptual correlates of the “avoidance-distributive-integrative” distinction. Human Communication Research, 9, 83–95. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1982.tb00685.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sillars, A., Holman, A., Richards, A., Jacobs, K., Koerner, A., & Reynolds-Dyk, A. (2014). Conversation and conformity orientations as predictors of observed conflict tactics in parent-adolescent discussions. Journal of Family Communication. 14, 16–31. doi:10.1080/15267431.2013.857327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sillars, A., & Overall, N. C. (2017). Coding observed interaction (pp. 199–216). In VanLear, C. A. & Canary, D. J. (Eds.), Researching communication interaction behavior: A sourcebook of methods and measures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sillars, A. L., Pike, G. R., Jones, T. S., & Murphy, M. A. (1984). Communication and understanding in marriage. Human Communication Research, 3, 317–350. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00022.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sillars, A. L., Weisberg, J., Burggraf, C. S., & Zietlow, P. H. (1990). Communication and understanding revisited: Married couples’ understanding and recall of conversations. Communication Research, 17, 500–502. doi:10.1177/009365090017004006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sillars, A. L., & Wilmot, W. W. (1994). Communication strategies in conflict and mediation. In Wiemann, J. & Daly, J. A. (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 163–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar