Humbad, M. N., Donnellan, M. B., Klump, K. L., & Burt, S. A. (2011). Development of the Brief Romantic Relationship Interaction Coding Scheme (BRRICS). Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 759–769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025216CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burt, S. A., Wildey, M. N., & Klump, K. L. (2015). The quality of the interparental relationship does not moderate the etiology of child conduct problems. Psychological Medicine, 45, 319–332. doi:10.1017/S003329171400138XCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caughlin, J. P., Huston, T. L., & Houts, R. M. (2000). How does personality matter in marriage? An examination of trait anxiety, interpersonal negativity, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 326–336. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.326CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chow, C. M., & Ruhl, H. (2018). Congruity of observed social support behaviors and couple relationship quality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 62–71. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, A., Eldridge, K., Catta-Preta, A. B., Lim, V. R., Santagata, R. (2006). Cross-cultural consistency of the demand/withdraw interaction pattern in couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1029–1044. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00311.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2006). Relationship satisfaction. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 579–594). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grych, J. H., Seid, M., & Fincham, F. D. (1992). Assessing marital conflict from the child’s perspective: The Children’s Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale. Child Development, 63, 558–572. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01646.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heyman, R. E. (2004). Rapid Marital Interaction Coding System (RMICS). In Kerig, P. K. & Baucom, D. H. (Eds.), Couple observational coding systems (pp. 67–93). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Julien, D., Markman, H. J., & Lindahl, K. M. (1989). A comparison of global and microanalytic coding systems: Implications for future trends in studying interactions. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 81–100. doi:10.1007/BF00962701Google Scholar

Labreton, J. M., Burgess, J. R. D., Kaiser, R. B., Atchley, E. K., & James, L. R. (2003). Variance hypothesis and interrater reliability and agreement: Are ratings from multiple sources really dissimilar? Organizational Research Methods, 6, 80–128. doi:10.1177/1094428102239427CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28. doi:10.2307/350547CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiss, R. L., & Tolman, A. O. (1990). The Marital Interaction Coding System – Global (MICS-G): A global companion to the MICS. Behavioral Assessment, 12, 271–294.Google Scholar

Wildey, M. N., Donnellan, M. B., Klump, K. L., & Burt, S. A. (submitted). Using multiple methods to evaluate associations between externalizing psychopathology, personality, and relationship quality: A replication and extension. Journal of Personality Disorders.Google Scholar

Ericson, P. M., & Rogers, L. E. (1973). New procedures for analyzing relational communication. Family Process, 12, 245–267. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1973.00245.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Escudero, V., & Rogers, L. E. (2004). Analyzing relational communication. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form. (pp. 3–21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Friedlander, M. L., & Heatherington, L. (1989). Analyzing relational control in family therapy interviews. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 139–148. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogers, L. E., & Farace, R. V. (1975). Relational communication analysis: New measurement procedures. Human Communication Research, 1, 222–239. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00270.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayers, J., & Miura, S. Y. (1981). Construct and predictive validity of instruments for coding relational control. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York, NY: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Cecil, D. W., & von Friederichs-Fitzwater, M. (2004). Relational control in physician-patient interaction. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 179–195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Erchul, W. P. (1978). A relational communication analysis of control in school consultation. Professional School Psychology, 2, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairhurst, G. T. (2004). Organizational relational control research: Problems and possibilities. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 197–215). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Friedlander, M. L. (1993). Does complementarity promote or hinder client change in brief therapy? A review of the evidence from two theoretical perspectives. The Counseling Psychologist, 21, 457–486. doi:10.1177/0011000093213010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedlander, M. L., Siegel, S. M., & Brenock, K. (1989). Parallel processes in counseling and supervision: A case study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 149–157. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedlander, M. L., Wildman, J., & Heatherington, L. (1991). Interpersonal control in structural and Milan systemic family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 17, 395–408. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1991.tb00909.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaul, R., Simon, L., Friedlander, M. L., Heatherington, L., & Cutler, C. (1991). Correspondence of family therapists’ perceptions with FRCCCS coding rules for triadic interactions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 17, 379–393. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1991.tb00908.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heatherington, L. (1988). Coding relational control in counseling: Criterion validity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heatherington, L., & Friedlander, M. L. (1987). Family Relational Communication Control Coding System. Unpublished manuscript. Williams College, Williamstown, MA.Google Scholar

Heatherington, L., & Friedlander, M. L. (1990). Complementarity and symmetry in family therapy communication. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 261–268. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.37.3.261CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heatherington, L., & Friedlander, M. L. (2004). From dyads to triads, and beyond: Relational control in individual and family therapy. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 103–129). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Muñiz de la Peña, C., Friedlander, M. L., Escudero, V., & Heatherington, L. (2012). How do therapists ally with adolescents in family therapy? An examination of relational control communication in early sessions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 339–351. doi:10.1037/a0028063CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogers, L. E. (1979). Relational communication control coding manual. (Available from L. E. Rogers, Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112).Google Scholar

Rogers, L. E., & Escudero, V. (Eds.) (2004a). Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Rogers, L. E., & Escudero, V. (2004b). Relational communication patterns in marital interaction. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 83–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Rogers, L. E., & Millar, F. (1979). Domineeringness and dominance: A transactional view. Human Communication Research, 5, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siegel, S. M., Friedlander, M. L., & Heatherington, L. (1992). Nonverbal relational control in family communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16, 117–139. doi:10.1007/BF00990326CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strong, S. R., Hills, H. I., Kilmartin, C. T., DeVries, H., Lanier, K., Nelson, B. N., … Meyer, C. W. III, (1988). The dynamic relations among interpersonal behaviors: A test of complementarity and anticomplementarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 789–810. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.798CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal basis of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

Tracey, T. J., Heck, E. J., & Lichtenberg, J. W. (1981). Role expectations and symmetrical/complementary therapeutic relationships. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 18, 338–344. doi:10.1037/h0088384CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiles, W. B. (1992). Describing talk: A taxonomy of verbal response modes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Anderson, T., Knobloch-Fedders, L., Stiles, W. B., Ordonez, T., & Heckman, B. D. (2012). The power of subtle interpersonal hostility in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A speech acts analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 348–362. doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.658097CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bales, R. F. Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970.Google Scholar

Cansler, D. C., & Stiles, W. B. (1981). Relative status and interpersonal presumptuousness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 459–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cape, J. D., & Stiles, W. B. (1998). Verbal exchange structure of general practice consultations with patients presenting psychological problems. Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 5–21. doi:10.1177/135910539800300101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Caro, I. (1993). Actos de habla de pacientes y terapeutas: Un análisis de la terapia lingüística de evaluación a través de los Modos de Respuesta Verbal [Patients’ and therapists’ speech acts: The linguistic therapy of evaluation analyzed through the Verbal Response Modes]. In Caro, I. (Ed.), Psicoterapia e investigación de procesos [Psychotherapy and process research]. Valencia, Spain: Promolibro (Colección de Psicología Teorética).Google Scholar

Caro, I., & Stiles, W. B. (1997). Vamos a traducir los MRV (let’s translate the VRM): Linguistic and cultural inferences drawn from translating a verbal coding system from English into Spanish. Psychiatry, 60, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, R., Hill, C. E., Stiles, W. B., Friedlander, M. L., Mahrer, A. R., & Margison, F. R. (1987). Primary therapist response modes: Comparison of six rating systems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 218–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goodman, G., & Dooley, D. (1976). A framework for help-intended interpersonal communication. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 13, 106–117. doi:10.1037/h0088322CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henricks, W. H., & Stiles, W. B. (1989). Verbal processes on psychological radio call-in programs: Comparison with other help-intended interactions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20, 315–321. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.20.5.315CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinkle, S., Stiles, W. B., & Taylor, L. A. (1988). Verbal processes in a labour/management negotiation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 123–136. doi:10.1177/0261927X8800700203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meeuwesen, L. (Ed. and Trans.) (1984). Handleiding voor een taxonomie van verbale antwoordwijzen: Een beschrijving en bewerking van Stiles “Verbal Response Modes (V.R.M.)”. Vakgroep Klinische Psychologie, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

Meeuwesen, L., Schaap, C., & van der Staak, C. (1991). Verbal analysis of physician-patient communication. Social Science & Medicine, 32, 1143–1150. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90091-PCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, N. L., & Stiles, W. B. (1986). Verbal familiarity in American presidential nomination acceptance speeches and inaugural addresses (1920–1981). Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 72–81. doi:10.2307/2786858CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orlinsky, D. E., Grawe, K., & Parks, B. K. (1994). Process and outcome in psychotherapy – Noch einmal. In Bergin, A. E. & Garfield, S. L. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th edn., pp. 270–376). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Shaikh, A., Knobloch, L. M., & Stiles, W. B. (2001). The use of a verbal response mode coding system in determining patient and physician roles in medical interviews. Health Communication, 13, 49–60. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1301_05CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stiles, W. B. (1978a). Manual for a taxonomy of verbal response modes. Chapel Hill: Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Stiles, W. B. (1978b). Verbal response modes and dimensions of interpersonal roles: A method of discourse analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 693–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiles, W. B. (1981). Classification of intersubjective illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 10, 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiles, W. B. (1986). Development of taxonomy of verbal response modes. In Greenberg, L. S. & Pinsof, W. M. (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 161–199). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Stiles, W. B., Lyall, L. M., Knight, D. P., Ickes, W., Waung, M., Hall, C. L., & Primeau, B. E. (1997). Gender differences in verbal presumptuousness and attentiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 759–772. doi:10.1177/0146167297237009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiles, W. B., & Shapiro, D. A. (1995). Verbal exchange structure of brief psychodynamic-interpersonal and cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 15–27. doi:10.1037//0022-006X.63.1.15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stiles, W. B., Shapiro, D. A., & Firth-Cozens, J. A. (1988). Verbal response mode use in contrasting psychotherapies: A within-subjects comparison. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 727–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stiles, W. B., Shuster, P. L., & Harrigan, J. A. (1992). Disclosure and anxiety: A test of the fever model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 980–988. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.980CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stiles, W. B., Walz, N. C., Schroeder, M. A. B., Williams, L. L., & Ickes, W. (1996). Attractiveness and disclosure in initial encounters of mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Social and Personal Relations, 13, 305–314. doi:10.1177/0265407596132009CrossRefGoogle Scholar