Boos, M., & Cornelius, C. (2001). Bedeutung und Erfassung konversationaler Kohärenz in direkter und computervermittelter Kommunikation [Meaning and Measurement of Conversational Coherence in Direct and Computer-mediated Communication]. In Hesse, F.W. & Friedrich, H.F. (Eds.). Partizipation und Interaktion im virtuellen Seminar (pp. 55–80). Muenster, Germany: Waxmann.Google Scholar

Cornelius, C., & Boos, M. (2003). Enhancing mutual understanding in synchronous computer-mediated communication by training: Trade-offs in judgmental tasks. Communication Research, 30, 147–177. doi.org/10.1177/0093650202250874CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boos, M., Riethmüller, M., & Cornelius, C. (2013). Sozialer Einfluss in Chat‐Gruppen: Geschlechtsspezifische Auswirkungen auf konversationale Partizipation und Kohärenz [Social influence in chat groups: Gender-specific effects on conversational participation and coherence]. Gruppendynamik & Organisationsberatung, 44, 445‐460. doi.org/10.1007/s11612-013-0226-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cappella, J. N. (1994). The management of conversational interaction in adults and infants. In Knapp, M. L. & Miller, G. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (pp. 380–418). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Cornelius, C. (1996). Themenentwicklung in Gruppendiskussionen [Topic development in group discussions]. University of Konstanz: Unpublished Diploma Thesis.Google Scholar

Cornelius, C. (2001). Gegenseitiges Verständnis in Computerkonferenzen. Voraussetzungen und Folgen konversationaler Kohärenz in Entscheidungsfindungsgruppen im Medienvergleich [Mutual understanding in computer conferences: Conditions and effects of conversational coherence in decision-making groups]. Muenster, Germany: Waxmann.Google Scholar

Cornelius, C., & Boos, M. (1999). Es lohnt sich, kohärent zu sein! [It is worthwile to be coherent!] In Reips, U.-D. (Ed.), Aktuelle Online Forschung – Trends, Techniken, Ergebnisse [Current internet science – trends, techniques, results]. Zürich, Switzerland: Online Press. Retrieved February 12, 2018, from http://iscience.deusto.es/archive/reips/books/tband99/pdfs/a_h/cornelius.pdfGoogle Scholar

Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (Eds.), Conversational coherence: Form, structure, and strategy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Crow, B. K. (1983). Topic shifts in couples’ conversations. In Craig, R. T. & Tracy, K. (Eds.), Conversational coherence: Form, structure, and strategy (pp. 136–156). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Grosz, B. J. (1977). The representation and use of focus in a system for understanding dialogs. Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 67–76). Cambridge, Massachusetts. Retrieved February 12, 2018, from www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/77-1/Papers/009.pdfGoogle Scholar

Hewes, D. E. (1996). Small group communication may not influence decision making. An amplification of socio-egocentric theory. In Hirokawa, R. & Poole, M. S. (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 179–211). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1972). Einfache Sozialsysteme [Simple social systems]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 1, 51–65. doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1972-0105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newcomb, T. M. (1959). Individual systems of orientation. In Koch, S. (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science, Vol. 3 (pp. 384–422). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Ng, S. H., & Bradac, J. J. (1993). Power in language: Verbal communication and social influence. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Pavitt, C., & Johnson, K. K. (1999). An examination of the coherence of group discussions. Communication Research, 26, 303–321. doi.org/10.1177/009365099026003002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piontkowski, U., Oehlschlegel-Haubrock, S., & Hoelker, P. (1997). Annaeherung oder Abgrenzung? [Approximation or avoidance?] Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 26, 128–138. doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1997-0204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reichman, R. (1978). Conversational coherency. Cognitive Science, 2, 283–327. doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0204_1Google Scholar

Tracy, K. (1985). Conversational coherence: A cognitively grounded rules approach. In Street, R. L. & Cappella, J. N. (Eds.), Sequence and pattern in communicative behaviour (pp. 30–49). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Tschan, F. (1995). Communication enhances small group performance if it conforms to task requirements: The concept of ideal communication cycles. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 371–393. doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1703_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and context. Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. New York, NY: Longmann.Google Scholar

Willke, H. (1978). Elemente einer Systemtheorie der Gruppe: Umweltbezug und Prozesssteuerung [Elements of a systems theory of groups: Environment relationship and process steering]. Soziale Welt, 29, 343–357. Retrieved February 12, 2018, from www.jstor.org/stable/40877230Google Scholar

Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M. J., & Manser, T. (2013). Co-ACT: A framework for observing coordination behaviour in acute care teams. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22, 596–605. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cicchetti, D. V., & Feinstein, A. R. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 551–558. doi:org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-MCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 543–549. doi:org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-LCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fletcher, G., Flin, R., McGeorge, P., Glavin, R., Maran, N., & Patey, R. (2004). Rating non-technical skills: Developing a behavioral marker system for use in anaesthesia. Cognition, Technology and Work, 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gawande, A. A., Zinner, M. J., Studdert, D. M., & Brennan, T. A. (2003). Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery, 133, 614–621. doi:10:1067/msy.2003.169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grote, G., Kolbe, M., Zala-Mezö, E., Bienefeld-Seall, N., & Künzle, B. (2010). Adaptive coordination and heedfulness make better cockpit crews. Ergonomics, 52, 211–228. doi:10.1080/00140130903248819CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M. J., & Manser, T. (2011). Analyzing communication to understand how healthcare action teams coordinate. Paper presented at the 5th International Workshop on Behavioral Science Applied to Acute Care Teams, Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar

Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M. J., Wacker, J., Grande, B., Nohynkova, R., Manser, T., … Grote, G. (2012). Speaking-up is related to better team performance in simulated anesthesia inductions: An observational study. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 115, 1099–1108. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318269cd32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Waller, M. J., Wacker, J., Grande, B., Burtscher, M., & Spahn, D. (2014). Monitoring and talking to the room: Autochthonous coordination patterns in team interaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1254–1267. doi:org/10.1037/a0037877CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolbe, M., Künzle, B., Zala-Mezö, E., Wacker, J., & Grote, G. (2009). Measuring coordination behaviour in anaesthesia teams during induction of general anaesthetics. In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery. Analysing behaviour in the operating theatre (pp. 203–221). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observers agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Manser, T., Howard, S. K., & Gaba, D. M. (2008). Adaptive coordination in cardiac anaesthesia: A study of situational changes in coordination patterns using a new observation system. Ergonomics, 51, 1153–1178. doi:10.1080/00140130801961919CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mazzocco, K., Petitti, D. B., Fong, K. T., Bonacum, D., Brookey, J., Graham, S., … Thomas, E. J. (2009). Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg, 197(5), 678–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.574506CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, S. H., Yule, S., Flin, R., & McKinley, A. (2011). Towards a model of surgeons’ leadership in the operating room. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20, 570–579. doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.040295CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sundstrom, E., de Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams. Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120–133. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, E. J., Sexton, J. B., & Helmreich, R. L. (2004). Translating teamwork behaviours from aviation to healthcare: Development of behavioural markers for neonatal resuscitation. Qual Saf Health Care, 13(suppl 1), i57–i64. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.009811CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Vetterli, M., Gurtner, A., Hunziker, S., & Marsch, S. U. (2011). Developing observational categories for group process research based on task and coordination-requirement analysis: Examples from research on medical emergency-driven teams. In Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P., & Ellwart, T. (Eds.), Coordination in human and primate groups (pp. 93–118). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Undre, S., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. (2009). Observing and assessing surgical teams: The Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS). In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Edsr.), Safer surgery. Analysing behaviour in the operating theatre (pp. 83–101). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Weiss, M., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Dambach, M., Marty, A., Spahn, D. R., & Grande, B. (2014). Agency and communion predict speaking up in acute care teams. Small Group Research, 45, 290–313. doi:10.1177/1046496414531495CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiss, M., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Spahn, D. R., & Grande, B. (2017a). We can do it! Inclusive leader language promotes voice behavior in multi-professional teams. The Leadership Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiss, M., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Spahn, D. R., & Grande, B. (2017b). Why didn’t you say something? Using after-event reviews to affect voice behavior and hierarchy beliefs in multi-professional action teams. European Journal of Work and Organization Psychology, 26(1), 66–80. doi:org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1208652CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, A. L., Lasky, R. E., Dannemiller, J. L., Andrei, A. M., & Thomas, E. J. (2010). Teamwork behaviours and errors during neonatal resuscitation. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19(1), 60–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yule, S., Flin, R., Paterson-Brown, S., & Maran, N. (2006). Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: A review of the literature. Surgery, 139, 140–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Seelandt, J. C., Tschan, F., Keller, S., Beldi, G., Jenni, N., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Semmer, N. K. (2014). Assessing distractors and teamwork during surgery: Developing an event-based method for direct observation. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 918–929. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002860CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis; a method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar

Barsade, S. G., & Knight, A. P. (2015). Group affect. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 21–46. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bedwell, W. L., Ramsay, P. S., & Salas, E. (2012). Helping fluid teams work: A research agenda for effective team adaptation in healthcare. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2(4), 504–509. doi:10.1007/s13142-012-0177-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feuerbacher, R. L., Funk, K., Spight, D. H., Diggs, B. S., & Hunter, J. G. (2012). Realistic distractions and interruptions that impair simulated surgical performance by novice surgeons. Archives of Surgery, 147(11), 1026–1030. doi:doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.1480CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Flin, R. (2013). Non-technical skills for anaesthetists, surgeons and scrub practitioners (ANTS, NOTSS, and SPLINTS). Retrieved February 16, 2018, from http://patientsafety.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/non_technical_skills_for_anaesthetists_surgeons_and_scrub_practitioners.pdfGoogle Scholar

Futoran, G. C., Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1989). TEMPO: A time-based system for analysis of group interaction process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(3), 211–232. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1003_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Healey, A. N., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. (2006). Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics, 49, 589–604. doi:10.1080/00140130600568899CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hodge, B., & Thompson, J. F. (1990). Noise pollution in the operating theatre. Lancet, 335(8694), 891–894. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)90486-OCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Katz, J. D. (2015). Noise in the operating room. Survey of Anesthesiology, 59(1), 60. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000319CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, S., Tschan, F., Beldi, G., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Semmer, N. K. (2016). Noise peaks influence communication in the operating room. An observational study. Ergonomics, 59(12), 1541–1552. doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1159736CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kolbe, M., Künzle, B., Zala-Mezo, E., Wacker, J., & Grote, G. (2009). Measuring coordination behavior in anaesthesia teams during induction of general anaesthetics. In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery: Analysing behavior in the operating theatre (pp. 203–222). London, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Kurmann, A., Peter, M., Tschan, F., Muhlemann, K., Candinas, D., & Beldi, G. (2011). Adverse effect of noise in the operating theatre on surgical-site infection. British Journal of Surgery, 98(7), 1021–1025. doi:10.1002/bjs.7496CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mazzocco, K., Petitti, D. B., Fong, K. T., Bonacum, D., Brookey, J., Graham, S., Lasky, R. E., Sexton, J. B., & Thomas, E. J. (2009). Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. American Journal of Surgery, 197(5), 678–685. doi:S0002-9610(08)00459-5 [pii] 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sevdalis, N., Davis, R., Koutantji, M., Undre, S., Darzi, A., & Vincent, C. A. (2008). Reliability of a revised NOTECHS scale for use in surgical teams. American Journal of Surgery, 196(2), 184–190. doi:0.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.070CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sevdalis, N., Healey, A. N., & Vincent, C. A. (2007). Distracting communications in the operating theatre. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 13(3), 390–394. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00712.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sevdalis, N., Undre, S., McDermott, J., Giddie, J., Diner, L., & Smith, G. (2014). Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments. World Journal of Surgery, 38(4), 751–758. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2315-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tschan, F., Holzer, E., Semmer, N. K., Keller, S., Zimmermann, J., Huber, S. A., Beldi, G., & Stolz, M. (2016). Adjustable Field Notes – A 5$ iPad application to observe team interactions. Paper presented at the 10th International Meeting for Behavioral Science in Surgery & Acute Care Settings, November 11–12, 2016, Aberdeen.Google Scholar

Tschan, F., Seelandt, J., Keller, S., Semmer, N. K., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Beldi, G. (2015). Impact of case-relevant and case-irrelevant communication within the surgical team on surgical site infection. British Journal of Surgery. doi:10.1002/bjs.9927CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Undre, S., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. (2009). Observing and assessing surgical teams: The Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTASS). In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery. Analysing behaviour in the operating theatre (pp. 83–102). London, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Wadhera, R. K., Parker, S. H., Burkhart, H. M., Greason, K. L., Neal, J. R., Levenick, K. M., Wiegmann, D. A., & Sundt, T. M. 3rd. (2010). Is the “sterile cockpit” concept applicable to cardiovascular surgery critical intervals or critical events? The impact of protocol-driven communication during cardiopulmonary bypass. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 139(2), 312–319. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Way, T. J., Long, A., Weihing, J., Ritchie, R., Jones, R., Bush, M., & Shinn, J. B. (2013). Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room. Journal of the American College of Surgery, 216(5), 933–938. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yule, S., Flin, R., Maran, N., Rowley, D., Youngson, G., & Paterson-Brown, S. (2008). Surgeons’ non-technical skills in the operating room: Reliability testing of the NOTSS behavior rating system. World Journal of Surgery, 32(4), 548–556. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9320-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zheng, B., Fung, E., Fu, B., Panton, N. M., & Swanstrom, L. L. (2015). Surgical team composition differs between laparoscopic and open procedures. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 29(8), 2260–2265. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3938-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed