Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T10:47:31.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Lasing without inversion and other effects of atomic coherence and interference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Marlan O. Scully
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
M. Suhail Zubairy
Affiliation:
Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad
Get access

Summary

Quantum coherence and correlations in atomic and radiation physics have led to many interesting and unexpected consequences. For example, an atomic ensemble prepared in a coherent superposition of states yields the Hanle effect, quantum beats, photon echo, self-induced transparency, and coherent Raman beats. In fact, in Section 1.4, we saw that the quantum beat effect provides one of the most compelling reasons for quantizing the radiation field.

A further interesting consequence of preparing an atomic system in a coherent superposition of states is that, under certain conditions, it is possible for atomic coherence to cancel absorption. Such atomic states are called trapping states†. The observation of nonabsorbing resonances via atomic coherence and interference impacts on the concepts of lasing without inversion (LWI),‡ enhancement of the index of refraction accompanied by vanishing absorption, and electromagnetically induced transparency.

In lasing without inversion, the essential idea is the absorption cancellation by atomic coherence and interference. This phenomenon is also the essence of electromagnetically induced transparency. Usually this is accomplished in three-level atomic systems in which there are two coherent routes for absorption that can destructively interfere, thus leading to the cancellation of absorption. A small population in the excited state can thus lead to net gain. A related phenomenon is that of resonantly enhanced refractive index without absorption in an ensemble of phase-coherent atoms (phaseonium). In a phaseonium gas with no population in the excited level, the absorption cancellation always coincides with vanishing refractivity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Quantum Optics , pp. 220 - 247
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×