We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Objectives/Goals: Highlight the importance of community engagement: Showcase how the involvement of Promotoras de Salud is critical for fostering trust and encouraging participation in clinical trials. Cultural relevance and adaptation: Underline the importance of cultural and contextual relevance in developing and refining clinical research tools. Methods/Study Population: The theater test, an interactive evaluation approach akin to a dress rehearsal in theater, was conducted with approximately 60 Promotoras de Salud at a community center near the US-Mexico border. The Promotoras were divided into four groups, each focusing on one domain of the toolkit and facilitated discussions provided critical feedback on the materials and methods. A community engagement liaison with the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center played a key role in introducing the EXPLORE team to these community leaders, leveraging long-standing relationships that predate this project. Results/Anticipated Results: Post-testing evaluations showed that 97% of the Promotoras were likely to encourage clinical trials in their communities, and 86% saw significant benefits for their community members. The Promotoras provided key insights and recommendations to enhance the toolkit’s cultural and contextual relevance. The community engagement liaison created a bilingual infographic to share these insights, which was presented at a Promotoras meeting, fostering meaningful discussion about clinical trials. Discussion/Significance of Impact: This project underscores the importance of community voices in research, transforming feedback into actionable insights for public health. Engaging Promotoras through theater testing validated the EXPLORE Toolkit and strengthened ties between clinical research and communities impacted by the opioid crisis.
Objectives/Goals: Here, we utilize deep learning to automate the analysis of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans in the UK Biobank (UKB) imaging dataset to enable a large-scale assessment of lumbar spine disc degeneration, low back pain, and socioeconomic status. Methods/Study Population: Study Population: The UKB is a biomedical database that includes lateral spine DEXA imaging for 50,000 participants. Deep Learning Model Development: A computer vision model was developed that receives a DEXA scan as input and outputs a quadrilateral that corresponds to the corners of 5 lumbar vertebral bodies. The model is a deep, fully convolutional, encoder–decoder network using DeepLabV3. Statistical Analysis: To determine our preliminary model accuracy, we used the intersection over union (IoU) metric.We analyzed data using an ordinal regression model to determine the relationship between income/ neighborhood level multiple deprivation index (MDI) and low back pain (LBP), as well as a mixed effects model to estimate the relationship between income/MDI and disc height index (DHI). Results/Anticipated Results: Our model predicted vertebral body quadrilaterals in training and unseen test data (train IoU = 0.96, test IoU = .91) and was used to infer data for 10,440 participants. Confirming previous studies, there were significant relationships (p0.05) between income or MDI and DHI (Figure 2). Discussion/Significance of Impact: Low back pain is the world’s leading cause of disability, and socioeconomic factors play an important role. We found no relationship between disc height index and socioeconomic status. Thus, disc degeneration may not be a factor in this low back pain phenotype.
Objectives/Goals: Children with chronic respiratory technology needs (CRTN) are becoming a dominant patient group in pediatric intensive care units (ICUs). However, little is known about patient-level, long-term outcomes in this population. The lack of such knowledge may lead to inadequate ICU therapies, interventions, or follow-up care. Methods/Study Population: This project will deploy a set of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) modules measuring real-time functioning as well as standardized instruments to measure child and family outcomes including health care utilization, physical functioning, and health-related quality of life following pediatric critical illness in children with CRTN. EMA has particular strength in assessing conditions where individual-level characteristics vary over time, as after critical illness. EMA’s recurrent measurements allow for evaluation of the variables’ temporal course and limit the potential for bias associated with recall surveys. Pulmonary function in children with CRTN in this study will be monitored over time using standardized pulmonary metrics and information from home respiratory machines. Results/Anticipated Results: This work tests the central hypothesis that long-term functional outcomes in children with CRTN are predicted by multimodal data obtained during and shortly after critical illness. To date, 17 families (of a planned 70) have been enrolled. Adherence to EMA modules is high, with 80% completion. Following serial data collection at 3, 6, and 9 months after hospital discharge, phenotypes of recovery (including improvement, stability, or deterioration) will be described. This will include 1) describing the patient demographic and clinical features associated with each long-term outcome trajectory and 2) identifying subgroups with similar outcome trajectories using patient demographics, features of the clinical illness, and EMA data using both traditional biostatistical and causal analysis techniques. Discussion/Significance of Impact: This project will provide important insights into the long-term outcomes following critical illness of children with CRTN while utilizing an innovative methodology. This proposal will provide the necessary information to drive future clinical trials assessing potential interventions at a number of different points to improve outcomes.
To examine power and governance arrangements in food and nutrition policy formulation and agenda-setting in South Africa
Design:
Analysis of the policy implementation environment and in-depth interviews were conducted focussing on: existing policy content and priorities across food system sectors; institutional structures for cross-sectoral and external stakeholder engagement; exercise of power in relation to food system policies; and opportunities to strengthen action on nutrition.
Setting:
South Africa
Participants:
Interviews were conducted with 48 key stakeholders involved in the food and nutrition policy sphere: government sectors relevant to food systems (n=21), the private sector (n=4), academia (n=10), NGOs (n=11) and farmers (n=2).
Results:
This study found that there are power dynamics involved in shaping the planning agenda that is inadvertently generating a food system that undermines the right to food. The concept of nutrition governance remains poorly defined and applied in different ways and usually based on a relatively narrow interpretation – therefore limiting policy coherence and coordination. South Africa has strong legal institutions and practices, and social policies that support public provisioning of food, but a non-interventionist approach to the food system.
Conclusions:
The right to food and nutrition, as outlined in the South African Constitution, has not yet been effectively utilized to establish a robust normative and legal basis for tackling the dual challenges of food insecurity and malnutrition. Currently, the governance of the food system is grappling with substantial obstacles, balancing the influence of powerful stakeholders who uphold the status quo against its responsibilities for food justice.
Remaps the state of Scottish writing in the contemporary moment, embracing its uncertainty and the need to reconsider the field's founding assumptions and exclusions.
Edited by
Scott L. Greer, University of Michigan,Michelle Falkenbach, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies,Josep Figueras, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies,Matthias Wismar, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies
The logic of co-benefits produces many theoretically interesting ideas, but to become convincing, it must be paired with competent policy analysis and evaluation. This chapter focuses on the many examples of co-benefits in practice and research literature in order to demonstrate that many policies have effects, intended or unintended, beyond their main targets.
In the absence of treatments to halt or reverse symptoms of Alzheimer's disease, early detection may extend the window for meaningful treatment, advanced planning, and coping. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans for amyloid and tau are validated biomarkers of AD, yet results are rarely disclosed to participants due to concerns about negative impacts. While prior studies suggest limited anxiety, depression, or suicidality following biomarker disclosure, no study to date has examined broader psychological impacts of PET amyloid/tau disclosure to symptomatic individuals. Therefore, we explored post-disclosure changes in future time perspective (perceptions of limited time or possibilities left in the future), self-efficacy for managing symptoms, and perceived stigma as a function of result received.
Participants and Methods:
Forty-three older adults (age = 72.0±6.2 years; education = 16.5±2.6; 88.4% White Non-Hispanic; 48.8% female) participated in the study, of whom 62.8% were diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and the remainder with Dementia of the Alzheimer's type. All participants underwent pre-disclosure biomarker education and decisional capacity assessment, followed by baseline measures. Participants demonstration decisional capacity completed an interactive disclosure session during which they received dichotomous results of their research positron emission tomography (PET) scans for amyloid and tau (elevated versus not elevated for each biomarker). Findings were discussed in relation to presence/absence of Alzheimer's disease, the etiology of their cognitive difficulties, and risk for conversion or further decline. At baseline, immediately following disclosure, and at 1-week follow-up, participants completed several questionnaires: the Future Time Perspective (FTP) scale, a measure of how much the participant sees time as limited, the Self Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease scale (SECD), and the Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness (SSCI-8), all of which were modified to apply to Alzheimer's disease and associated experiences.
Results:
The main effects of time (F=1.10, p=.334, A?p2=.026), biomarker status (F(1)=3.10, p=.086, Ajp2=.070), and the time by biomarker status interaction (F=0.39, p=.661, Ajp2=.009) on FTP score was not significant. Though neither time (F=0.07, p=.933, A?p2=.002) nor the time by biomarker status interaction (F=2.16, p=.122, Ajp2=.050) effect on SECD was significant, being biomarker positive (A+T-/A+T+) was associated with lower self-efficacy (F(1)=5.641, p=.022, Ajp2=.121). Neither main effect for time (F=0.15, p=.853, Ajp2=.004) or biomarker status (F(1)=0.35, p=.558, A?p2=.009) on SSCI-8 was significant. The time by biomarker status interaction was significant (f=4.27, p=.018, =.096), such that biomarker negative participants experience a transient increase in perceived stigma directly after disclosure that resolves one week later, and biomarker negative participants experience the opposite pattern.
Conclusions:
Findings suggest that individuals who receive biomarker positive results may feel less competent to manage their symptoms compared to those who are biomarker negative, emphasizing the need for post-disclosure interventions targeting self-efficacy. The effect of disclosure on perceptions of time being limited and on perceived stigma were minimal, even when those results indicate evidence of Alzheimer's disease and risk for clinical progression. These results further support the safety of biomarker disclosure procedures. Future studies should provide longer-term assessment of psychological, behavioral, and clinical outcomes following Alzheimer's disease biomarker disclosure.
There are many potential benefits of early identification of those with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), including more opportunity for early intervention to slow AD progression (e.g., treatment, lifestyle changes, etc.) and to plan for the future. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans for abnormal amyloid and tau are commonly conducted in research settings. Despite strong interest in learning AD biomarker results, participants rarely receive their research data, in part due to concern about the possibility of undue distress based on results. We aimed to explore both positive and negative emotional reactions following PET biomarker disclosure as a function of result received.
Participants and Methods:
Forty-three older adults (age = 72.0±6.21 years, education = 16.5±2.62 years, 49% Female, 88% White Non-Hispanic) completed PET amyloid and tau testing and disclosure. Sixty-three percent were diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) while the remainder of participants were diagnosed with Dementia Alzheimer’s type (DAT). Participants completed pre-disclosure biomarker education and a decisional capacity assessment followed by baseline measures. Participants then completed a disclosure session where they received personal PET amyloid and tau results on an elevated vs. not elevated scale for each ligand. Results were discussed in relation to presence/absence of Alzheimer’s disease, how the result relates to their cognitive difficulties, and risk of developing Dementia-Alzheimer’s Type. At baseline (pre-disclosure), immediately post-disclosure, and 1-week post-disclosure, participants completed the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), The Geriatric Depression Scale - 15 Item (GDS-15), Impact of Neuroimaging in AD (INI-AD) Scale, and the Positive and Negative Affective Scale - Short Form (PANAS-SF). All questionnaires were modified to apply to Alzheimer’s disease and related experiences.
Results:
Of the 43 participants who participated in disclosure, 74% received biomarker positive results (either A+T- or A+T+); all others were biomarker negative. We conducted a series of mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests to determine the effect of disclosure and biomarker status for each of the outcomes of interest. Neither the effect of time nor the time by biomarker status interaction was significant for any of the outcomes (all p>.05). The main effect of biomarker status was significant for BAI (F(1)=5.12, p=.031, n,p2=.146) and INI-AD Distress (F(1)=12.70, p=.001, np2=.241) and Positive (F(1)=34.57, p<.001, np2=.464) subscale scores with A+T-/A+T+ participants reporting higher negative affect than those who were A-/T-; however, even among biomarker positive individuals, scores did not exceed clinical thresholds. GDS-15, PANAS-Negative and Positive Subscale scores did not differ significantly by biomarker status (all p>.05) and no significant adverse events occurred following disclosure. Additionally, no participants cited regret about receiving their results.
Conclusions:
While disclosure of biomarker positivity may result in mild increases in acute anxiety or distress, or fewer positive emotions, it does not result in clinically significant emotional reactions and was not associated with regret. Overall, findings are consistent with literature indicating safety of biomarker disclosure procedures for symptomatic individuals. Future research should follow participants over longer periods to evaluate the impacts of biomarker disclosure.
Partial agenesis of the corpus callosum (PACC) is a rare brain birth defect characterized by incomplete development of the corpus callosum, the primary white matter bundle that connects the right and left hemispheres. PACC can be associated with other congenital abnormalities, including malformation of the brain’s ventricular system, such as colpocephaly or ventriculomegaly, and it is typically considered a pediatric diagnosis. Clinically, this condition may present with a broad continuum of cognitive and socioemotional difficulties ranging from significant day-to-day impairment to relative independence. Newly diagnosed PACC with ventriculomegaly in adults is very rare (0.0200.025%) and little is known about neuropsychological functioning in adults with this condition. The aim of this case study is to add to the literature base for better PACC neuropsychological conceptualization.
Participants and Methods:
This case study involves neuropsychological evaluation of cognitive and behavioral health functioning of a 37-year-old active duty service member (ADSM) with recently identified PACC and ventriculomegaly (via incidental imaging finding). The ADSM reported a history of learning difficulty, though she was able to earn rank of sergeant first class in a low density military occupation specialty (i.e., Mortuary Affairs) over an 18.5 year active duty career.
Results:
Cognitive testing was notable for consistently low to exceptionally low attention and processing speed scores. Mild executive dysfunction was also noted in the areas of planning and inhibition. Emotionally, she endorsed mild somatic and depression symptoms. Interpersonally, she was shy and avoidant with longstanding characterological traits characterized by worry, insecurity, and general tendency to catastrophize.
Conclusions:
This case adds to the broad clinical presentation of PACC with ventriculomegaly, and highlights that even in the context of a significant congenital brain deformity and longstanding cognitive deficits, independent functioning can be achieved.
Considerable progress continues to be made with regards to the value and use of disease associated polygenic scores (PGS). PGS aim to capture a person’s genetic liability to a condition, disease, or a trait, combining information across many risk variants and incorporating their effect sizes. They are already available for clinicians and consumers to order in Australasia. However, debate is ongoing over the readiness of this information for integration into clinical practice and population health. This position statement provides the viewpoint of the Human Genetics Society of Australasia (HGSA) regarding the clinical application of disease-associated PGS in both individual patients and population health. The statement details how PGS are calculated, highlights their breadth of possible application, and examines their current challenges and limitations. We consider fundamental lessons from Mendelian genetics and their continuing relevance to PGS, while also acknowledging the distinct elements of PGS. Use of PGS in practice should be evidence based, and the evidence for the associated benefit, while rapidly emerging, remains limited. Given that clinicians and consumers can already order PGS, their current limitations and key issues warrant consideration. PGS can be developed for most complex conditions and traits and can be used across multiple clinical settings and for population health. The HGSA’s view is that further evaluation, including regulatory, implementation and health system evaluation are required before PGS can be routinely implemented in the Australasian healthcare system.
The spatial distribution of in situ sessile organisms, including those from the fossil record, provides information about life histories, such as possible dispersal and/or settlement mechanisms, and how taxa interact with one another and their local environments. At Nilpena Ediacara National Park (NENP), South Australia, the exquisite preservation and excavation of 33 fossiliferous bedding planes from the Ediacara Member of the Rawnsley Quartzite reveals in situ communities of the Ediacara Biota. Here, the spatial distributions of three relatively common taxa, Tribrachidium, Rugoconites, and Obamus, occurring on excavated surfaces were analyzed using spatial point pattern analysis. Tribrachidium have a variable spatial distribution, implying that settlement or post-settlement conditions/preferences had an effect on populations. Rugoconites display aggregation, possibly related to their reproductive methods in combination with settlement location availability at the time of dispersal and/or settlement. Additionally, post-settlement environmental controls could have affected Rugoconites on other surfaces, resulting in lower populations and densities. Both Tribrachidium and Rugoconites also commonly occur as individuals or in low numbers on a number of beds, thus constraining possible reproductive strategies and environmental/substrate preferences. The distribution of Obamus is consistent with selective settlement, aggregating near conspecifics and on substrates of mature microbial mat. This dispersal process is the first example of substrate-selective dispersal among the Ediacara Biota, thus making Obamus similar to numerous modern sessile invertebrates with similar dispersal and settlement strategies.
Paromomyidae are one of several families of plesiadapiforms that flourished during the Paleocene in North America soon after the extinction of non-avian dinosaurs some 66 million years ago. Although they are often among the best-represented plesiadapiforms in mammalian faunas in both North America and Europe, the early history of paromomyids is poorly understood, and their fossil record at higher latitudes is comparatively depauperate. We report here on the discovery of two new species of paromomyids from Paleocene deposits in southwestern Alberta: Edworthia greggi new species is the second known species of the basal paromomyid Edworthia Fox, Scott, and Rankin, 2010 whereas Ignacius glenbowensis new species is among the most abundantly represented species of Ignacius Matthew and Granger, 1921. These new discoveries document, for the first time, parts of the upper dentition of Edworthia, and the new species of Ignacius represents the first new, pre-Clarkforkian species of the genus to be described in nearly 100 years. A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of nearly all known paromomyid taxa (including the new species described herein) recovered both species of Edworthia near the base of the paromomyid tree in a polytomy with Paromomys depressidens Gidley, 1923 and a paraphyletic Ignacius. The new paromomyids from Alberta not only increase the known taxonomic diversity of Edworthia and Ignacius but also add significantly to knowledge of the dental anatomy of these poorly known genera and further add to a uniquely Canadian complement of Paleocene plesiadapiforms.
This systematic literature review aimed to provide an overview of the characteristics and methods used in studies applying the disability-adjusted life years (DALY) concept for infectious diseases within European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA)/European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries and the United Kingdom. Electronic databases and grey literature were searched for articles reporting the assessment of DALY and its components. We considered studies in which researchers performed DALY calculations using primary epidemiological data input sources. We screened 3053 studies of which 2948 were excluded and 105 studies met our inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 22 were multi-country and 83 were single-country studies, of which 46 were from the Netherlands. Food- and water-borne diseases were the most frequently studied infectious diseases. Between 2015 and 2022, the number of burden of infectious disease studies was 1.6 times higher compared to that published between 2000 and 2014. Almost all studies (97%) estimated DALYs based on the incidence- and pathogen-based approach and without social weighting functions; however, there was less methodological consensus with regards to the disability weights and life tables that were applied. The number of burden of infectious disease studies undertaken across Europe has increased over time. Development and use of guidelines will promote performing burden of infectious disease studies and facilitate comparability of the results.
Structural racism in the USA has roots that extend deep into healthcare and medical research, and it remains a key driver of illness and early death for Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC). Furthermore, the persistence of racism within academic medicine compels an interrogation of education and research within this context. In the spirit of this interrogation, this article highlights a unique model of community-engaged education that integrates cultural humility. As an individual and institutional stance, cultural humility denotes lifelong learning and self-critique, the mitigation of power imbalances, and accountability. The integration of cultural humility emphasizes that when space is created for BIPOC communities to lead the way, education regarding healthcare and research can be effectively reimagined. Demonstrating this effectiveness, six community partners led the development and implementation of a five-module Structural Racism in Healthcare and Research course. Using a cohort model approach, the pilot course enrolled 12 community members and 12 researchers. The curriculum covered topics such as history of racism in healthcare and research, and introduced participants to a cultural resilience framework. Evaluation results demonstrated a significant increase in participants’ knowledge and ability to identify and take action to address inequities related to racism in healthcare and research.
Irremediability is a key requirement for euthanasia and assisted suicide for psychiatric disorders (psychiatric EAS). Countries like the Netherlands and Belgium ask clinicians to assess irremediability in light of the patient's diagnosis and prognosis and ‘according to current medical understanding’. Clarifying the relevance of a default objective standard for irremediability when applied to psychiatric EAS is crucial for solid policymaking. Yet so far, a thorough examination of this standard is lacking.
Methods
Using treatment-resistant depression (TRD) as a test case, through a scoping review in PubMed, we analyzed the state-of-the-art evidence for whether clinicians can accurately predict individual long-term outcome and single out irremediable cases, by examining the following questions: (1) What is the definition of TRD; (2) What are group-level long-term outcomes of TRD; and (3) Can clinicians make accurate individual outcome predictions in TRD?
Results
A uniform definition of TRD is lacking, with over 150 existing definitions, mostly focused on psychopharmacological research. Available yet limited studies about long-term outcomes indicate that a majority of patients with long-term TRD show significant improvement over time. Finally, evidence about individual predictions in TRD using precision medicine is growing, but methodological shortcomings and varying predictive accuracies pose important challenges for its implementation in clinical practice.
Conclusion
Our findings support the claim that, as per available evidence, clinicians cannot accurately predict long-term chances of recovery in a particular patient with TRD. This means that the objective standard for irremediability cannot be met, with implications for policy and practice of psychiatric EAS.
We compared experiences with The Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infection for Adult and Children in Emergency Department and Urgent Care Settings versus Choosing Wisely to evaluate inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing in ambulatory care. Both identified the same clinics, diagnoses, and antibiotics for high-yield antibiotic stewardship interventions.
This book probes an elusive, in-between moment in Scottish literature and cultural politics. Completed between 2018 and 2020, many of these essays are caught between established settlements (critical, cultural, political) and their surpassing. This is not only a Scottish condition, of course. Since the global financial crisis of 2007–8, Gramsci's over-used quip about ‘morbid symptoms’ has enjoyed a grim revival across the globe (Babic 2020). With the tottering of the liberal world order, billions feel a new resonance in his forecast that ‘the old is dying and the new cannot be born’. A brief symptomology of the past decade would include the swift rise and brutal collapse of the Arab Spring, escalating climate and refugee crises, the rise of mass hyper-surveillance, and galloping online conspiracism – both the cause and consequence of normalised ‘post-democracy’ and a splintered public episteme. Indeed, it becomes difficult to articulate any general pattern as fervent online groupings choose and define their own news, knowledge and reality. Since 2015 the rise of populist, nationalist and far-right politics has delivered Brexit, Trump and a fierce backlash against anti-racist, progressive or ‘woke’ identity politics.
So dramatic have been Scotland's internal political developments over the past decade, they are seldom related to these broader currents in a sustained way. This is not the occasion to attempt that synthesis, but if we return to Gramsci's prison note of 1930 we may note that he treats the zone of morbidity both as ‘crisis’ and ‘interregnum’: a moment of decision and calamity, but also the gap between distinct regimes. As this book attempts a provisional re-mapping of Scotland's post-devolution literary culture, the tension between these temporalities – suggesting change, stasis and exhaustion all at once – speak clearly to us in local accents. As critics we reach forward, stretching for the sharp edges of the new, while conscious that the unfinished business of the present is not finished with us yet.
The worn edges of an earlier ‘new’ – the ‘new Scotland’ promised by devolution – have grown familiar to our touch, shaping our coordinates in ways these essays seek to examine as well as refresh.