Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T02:05:10.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Signals of discipline and puritanical challenges to liberty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2023

Jared B. Celniker Open the ORCID record for Jared B. Celniker [Opens in a new window] ,
Peter H. Ditto ,
Paul K. Piff  and
Azim F. Shariff
Jared B. Celniker
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA jcelnike@uci.edu phditto@uci.edu; https://sites.uci.edu/peterdittolab/ ppiff@uci.edu; https://paulpiff.wixsite.com/meshlab
Peter H. Ditto
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA jcelnike@uci.edu phditto@uci.edu; https://sites.uci.edu/peterdittolab/ ppiff@uci.edu; https://paulpiff.wixsite.com/meshlab
Paul K. Piff
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA jcelnike@uci.edu phditto@uci.edu; https://sites.uci.edu/peterdittolab/ ppiff@uci.edu; https://paulpiff.wixsite.com/meshlab
Azim F. Shariff
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada shariff@psych.ubc.ca; https://sharifflab.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We extend the target authors' moral disciplining theory (MDT) by discussing signaling, proscriptive and prescriptive morality, and the dynamics by which signaling may operate in tandem with proscriptive and prescriptive forms of moral disciplining. We also suggest that MDT can help explain challenges to economic and social progress by revealing fundamental tensions between puritanical intuitions and liberal ideals.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e299
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barclay, P. (2013). Strategies for cooperation in biological markets, especially for humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celniker, J. B., Gregory, A., Koo, H. J., Piff, P. K., Ditto, P. H., & Shariff, A. F. (2023). The moralization of effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001259CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history? The National Interest, 16, 3–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24027184Google Scholar
Geoffroy, F., Baumard, N., & André, J. B. (2019). Why cooperation is not running away. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 32(10), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2017). Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: The silent revolution in reverse. Perspectives on Politics, 15(2), 443–454. doi: 10.1017/S1537592717000111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janoff-Bulman, R., Sheikh, S., & Hepp, S. (2009). Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of moral regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013779CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markovits, D. (2019). The meritocracy trap: How America's foundational myth feeds inequality, dismantles the middle class, and devours the elite. Penguin.Google Scholar