Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-n8gtw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T07:03:30.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The many faces of moralized self-control: Puritanical morality is not reducible to cooperation concerns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2023

Netanel Y. Weinstein Open the ORCID record for Netanel Y. Weinstein [Opens in a new window]  and
Dare A. Baldwin
Netanel Y. Weinstein
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA netanelw@uoregon.edu, baldwin@uoregon.edu
Dare A. Baldwin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA netanelw@uoregon.edu, baldwin@uoregon.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fitouchi et al.'s moral disciplining approach highlights the significant role social evaluations of self-control appear to play in human moral judgment. At the same time, attributing the wide range of puritanical concerns to a singular focus on self-control seems unwarranted. A more pluralistic approach would enrich understanding of moral judgment in all its cultural and historical diversity.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e320
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agamben, G. (2004). The open: Man and animal. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Astuti, R., & Bloch, M. (2015). The causal cognition of wrong doing: Incest, intentionality, and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 101–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, J. (2017). Morality, convention and conventional morality. Philosophical Explorations, 20(3), 276–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Joffe, H., & Staerklé, C. (2007). The centrality of the self-control ethos in western aspersions regarding outgroups: A social representational approach to stereotype content. Culture & Psychology, 13(4), 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, F. C. (1992). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, D., & Setman, S. (2020). The psychology of normative cognition. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2020 Ed., pp. 1–28). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Markman, E. M. (1989). Categorization and naming in children: Problems of induction. MIT Press.Google Scholar
McHugh, C., McGann, M., Igou, E. R., & Kinsella, E. L. (2022). Moral judgment as categorization (MJAC). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 131–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J. G. (2015). Taking culture and context into account in understanding moral development. In L. A. Jensen (Ed.), Moral development in a global world: Research from a cultural-developmental perspective (pp. 195–203). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Much, N. C., & Harré, R. (1994). How psychologies “secrete” moralities. New Ideas in Psychology, 12(3), 291–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B. (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A. (2003). Why do men barbecue?: Recipes for cultural psychology. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stich, S. (1993). Moral philosophy and mental representation. In M. Hechter, L. Nadel, & R. E. Michod (Eds.), The origin of values (pp. 215–228). Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stich, S. (2018). The quest for the boundaries of morality. In The Routledge handbook of moral epistemology (pp. 15–37). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar