Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-mgxrv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-26T13:11:45.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Considering the role of self-interest in moral disciplining

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2023

Jordan W. Moon Open the ORCID record for Jordan W. Moon [Opens in a new window]
Jordan W. Moon*
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, Toulouse, France jordan.moon@iast.fr; www.jordanwmoon.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why do people moralize harmless behaviors? Although people rely on cooperative principles in making their moral judgments, I argue that self-interest likely plays a role even in these judgments. I suggest potential lines of research that might examine the role of self-interest in puritanical morality.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e310
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I., & Bonnefon, J. (2020). Universals and variations in moral decisions made in 42 countries by 70,000 participants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(5), 2332–2337. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911517117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, M., Keefer, L. A., Sacco, D. F., & Brown, F. L. (2022). Demonstrate values: Behavioral displays of moral outrage as a cue to long-term mate potential. Emotion, 22(6), 1239–1254. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000955CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2019). Is it good to cooperate? Testing the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60 societies. Current Anthropology, 60(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/701478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, Y., & Savani, K. (2020). From variability to vulnerability: People exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(6), 1101–1117. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000185CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irons, W. (2001). Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In Nesse, R. M. (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 292–309). Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. C., Gelfand, M. J., De, S., & Fox, A. (2019). The loosening of American culture over 200 years is associated with a creativity–order trade-off. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0516-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karinen, A. K., Wesseldijk, L. W., Jern, P., & Tybur, J. M. (2021). Sex, drugs, and genes: Illuminating the moral condemnation of recreational drugs. Psychological Science, 32(10), 1582–1591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797621997350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurzban, R., Dukes, A., & Weeden, J. (2010). Sex, drugs and moral goals: Reproductive strategies and views about recreational drugs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1699), 3501–3508. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0608CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moon, J. W. (2021). Why are world religions so concerned with sexual behavior? Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moon, J. W., Tratner, A. E., & McDonald, M. M. (2022). Men are less religious in more gender-equal countries. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 289(1968), 20212474. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, M. B. (2013). Moralization as protection against exploitation: Do individuals without allies moralize more? Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinsof, D., & Haselton, M. G. (2016). The political divide over same-sex marriage: Mating strategies in conflict? Psychological Science, 27, 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615621719CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitesa, M., & Thau, S. (2014). A lack of material resources causes harsher moral judgments. Psychological Science, 25(3), 702–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613514092CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(35), 15073–15078. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904312106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weeden, J., Cohen, A. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2008). Religious attendance as reproductive support. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(5), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.03.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed