Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-jkvpf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-19T03:22:25.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moralistic punishment is not for cooperation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2023

Peter DeScioli Open the ORCID record for Peter DeScioli [Opens in a new window]  and
Robert Kurzban Open the ORCID record for Robert Kurzban [Opens in a new window]
Peter DeScioli
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA peter.descioli@stonybrook.edu
Robert Kurzban
Affiliation:
Philadelphia, PA, USA rkurzban@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The theory proposed by Fitouchi et al. misses the core of puritanical morality: Cruel punishment for harmless actions. Punishment is mutually harmful, unlike cooperation which is mutually beneficial. Theories of moral judgment should not obscure this fundamental distinction.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e301
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2009). Mysteries of morality. Cognition, 112, 281–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2013). A solution to the mysteries of morality. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind. Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurzban, R., Dukes, A., & Weeden, J. (2010). Sex, drugs and moral goals: Reproductive strategies and views about recreational drugs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1699), 3501–3508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merrill, L. T. (1945). The puritan policeman. American Sociological Review, 10(6), 766–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center (2013). Global attitudes survey. Retrieved on 12/5/2022 from https://www.pewresearch.org/global/interactives/global-morality/.Google Scholar
Weeden, J., & Kurzban, R. (2014). The hidden agenda of the political mind. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar