Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-8p85h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-25T11:45:19.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Puritanical morality and the scaffolded evolution of self-control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2023

Walter Veit Open the ORCID record for Walter Veit [Opens in a new window]  and
Heather Browning Open the ORCID record for Heather Browning [Opens in a new window]
Walter Veit
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK wrwveit@gmail.com; https://walterveit.com/
Heather Browning
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK DrHeatherBrowning@gmail.com; https://www.heatherbrowning.net/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is a puzzle in reconciling the widespread presence of puritanical norms condemning harmless pleasures with the theory that morality evolved to reap the benefits of cooperation. Here, we draw on the work of several philosophers to support the argument by Fitouchi et al. that these norms evolved to facilitate and scaffold self-control for the sake of cooperation.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e319
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

De Lazari-Radek, K., & Singer, P. (2010). Secrecy in consequentialism: A defence of esoteric morality. Ratio, 23(1), 34–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. (2007). The evolution of morality. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. (1978). The law of the jungle: Moral alternatives and principles of evolution. Philosophy (London, England), 53(206), 455–464.Google Scholar
Mooijman, M., Meindl, P., Oyserman, D., Monterosso, J., Dehghani, M., Doris, J. M., & Graham, J. (2018). Resisting temptation for the good of the group: Binding moral values and the moralization of self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(3), 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saroglou, V., & Craninx, M. (2021). Religious moral righteousness over care: A review and a meta-analysis. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 79–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, K. (2012). The evolved apprentice. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit, W. (2019). Modeling morality. In Magnani, L., Nepomuceno, A., Salguero, F., Barés, C., & Fontane, M. (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in science and technology (pp. 83–102). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit, W., & Spurrett, D. (2021). Evolving resolve. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44, E56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed