Bar, W, Kratzer, A, Machler, M, Schmid, W. Postmortem stability of DNA. Forensic Sci Int. 1988;39(1):59–70.Google Scholar

Muciaccia, B, Vico, C, Aromatario, M, Fazi, F, Cecchi, R. Molecular analysis of different classes of RNA molecules from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded autoptic tissues: a pilot study. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129(1):11–21.Google Scholar

Almarzooqi, S, Leber, A, Kahwash, S. Artifacts and organism mimickers in pathology: case examples and review of literature. Adv Anat Pathol. 2010;17(4):277–81.Google Scholar

Bindhu, P, Krishnapillai, R, Thomas, P, Jayanthi, P. Facts in artifacts. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2013;17(3):397–401.Google Scholar

Taqi, SA, Sami, SA, Sami, LB, Zaki, SA. A review of artifacts in histopathology. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2018;22(2):279.Google Scholar

McInnes, E. Artefacts in histopathology. Comp Clin Pathol. 2005;13:100–8.Google Scholar

Polgar, K, Abel, G, Laczko, J, Sipka, S, Papp, Z. Immunocytochemical characterization of amniotic fluid macrophages in cases of fetal neural tube defects. Am J Clin Pathol. 1987;87(1):37–42.Google Scholar

Cammermeyer, J. The effect of water on the human spinal cord in post-mortem experiments. Monatsschr Psychiatr Neurol. 1953;126(4–5):229–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kies, MW, Schwimmer, S. Observations on proteinase in brain. J Biol Chem. 1942;145(2):685–91.Google Scholar

Pope, A, Nixon, RA. Proteases of human brain. Neurochem Res. 1984;9(3):291–323.Google Scholar

Gibson, CA, Umbreit, F, Bradley, HC. Studies of autolysis VII. Autolysis of brain. J Biol Chem. 1921;47:333–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romanic, AM, Madri, JA. Extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes in the nervous system. Brain Pathol. 1994;4:145–56.Google Scholar

Bednarek, N, Clement, Y, Lelievre, V, Olivier, P, Loron, G, Garnotel, R, et al. Ontogeny of MMPs and TIMPs in the murine neocortex. Pediatr Res. 2009;65(3):296–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bernstein, HG, Kirschke, H, Kloss, P, Wiederanders, B, Rinne, A, Frohlich, J. Cathepsin B during early human brain development. Acta Histochem Suppl. 1990;39:473–5.Google Scholar

Mahajan, RG, Mandal, S, Mukherjee, KL. Cathepsin D and 2’,3’-cyclic nucleotide 3’-phosphohydrolase in developing human foetal brain. Int J Dev Neurosci. 1988;6(2):117–23.Google Scholar

Marks, N, Stern, F, Lajtha, A. Changes in proteolytic enzymes and proteins during maturation of the brain. Brain Res. 1975;86(2):307–22.Google Scholar

Benner, SA. Enzyme kinetics and molecular evolution. Chem Rev. 1989;89:789–806.Google Scholar

Sheleg, SV, Lobello, JR, Hixon, H, Coons, SW, Lowry, D, Nedzved, MK. Stability and autolysis of cortical neurons in post-mortem adult rat brains. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2008;1(3):291–9.Google Scholar

Pakkenberg, H, Vraa-Jensen, J. Cytoplasmic basophilia in the nerve cells of the cerebral cortex. V. Autolysis of RNA and inhibition of glycolysis. Acta Neuropathol. 1964;3:211–6.Google Scholar

Smythies, JR, Inman, OR. The effect of post-mortem autolysis on synaptic terminals in cerebral cortex of dog. J Anat. 1960;94:241–3.Google Scholar

Ansari, KA, Rand, A, Hendrickson, H, Bentley, MD. Qualitative and quantitative studies on human myelin basic protein in situ with respect to time interval between death and autopsy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1976;35(2):180–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ansari, KA, Hendrickson, H, Sinha, AA, Rand, A. Myelin basic protein in frozen and unfrozen bovine brain: a study of autolytic changes in situ. J Neurochem. 1975;25(3):193–5.Google Scholar

Fishman, MA, Trotter, JL, Agrawal, HC. Selective loss of myelin proteins during autolysis. Neurochem Res. 1977;2(3):247–57.Google Scholar

Matthieu, JM, Koellreutter, B, Joyet, ML. Changes in CNS myelin proteins and glycoproteins after in situ autolysis. Brain Res Bull. 1977;2(1):15–21.Google Scholar

Hukkanen, V, Roytta, M. Autolytic changes of human white matter: an electron microscopic and electrophoretic study. Exp Mol Pathol. 1987;46(1):31–9.Google Scholar

Sheedy, D, Harding, A, Say, M, Stevens, J, Kril, JJ. Histological assessment of cerebellar granule cell layer in postmortem brain; a useful marker of tissue integrity? Cell Tissue Bank. 2012;13(4):521–7.Google Scholar

Ogata, J, Yutani, C, Imakita, M, Ueda, H, Waki, R, Ogawa, M, et al. Autolysis of the granular layer of the cerebellar cortex in brain death. Acta Neuropathol. 1986;70(1):75–8.Google Scholar

Varlet, V, Smith, F, Giuliani, N, Egger, C, Rinaldi, A, Dominguez, A, et al. When gas analysis assists with postmortem imaging to diagnose causes of death. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;251:1–10.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, JM. Examining the decomposed brain. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2014;35(4):265–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Matoba, K, Hyodoh, H, Murakami, M, Matoba, T, Saito, A, Feng, F, et al. Freezing preparation for macroscopic forensic investigation in putrefied brain. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2017;26:6–10.Google Scholar

Morris, JA, Harrison, LM, Partridge, SM. Practical and theoretical aspects of postmortem bacteriology. Curr Diagn Pathol. 2007;13(1):65–74.Google Scholar

Metz, B, Kersten, GF, Hoogerhout, P, Brugghe, HF, Timmermans, HA, de Jong, A, et al. Identification of formaldehyde-induced modifications in proteins: reactions with model peptides. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(8):6235–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wadsworth, A, Pangborn, MC. The reaction of formaldehyde with amino acids. J Biol Chem. 1936;116(1):423–36.Google Scholar

Koga, D, Imoto, T, Yasuyuki, N, Shinichi, F, Yagishita, K. Analysis of the reaction between formaldehyde and amide. Agric Biol Chem. 1978;42(6):1147–56.Google Scholar

Start, RD, Layton, CM, Cross, SS, Smith, JH. Reassessment of the rate of fixative diffusion. J Clin Pathol. 1992;45(12):1120–1.Google Scholar

Helander, KG. Formaldehyde binding in brain and kidney: a kinetic study of fixation. J Histotechnol. 1999;22:317–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, CH, Johnson, FB, Whiting, J, Roller, PP. Formaldehyde fixation. J Histochem Cytochem. 1985;33(8):845–53.Google Scholar

Dawe, RJ, Bennett, DA, Schneider, JA, Vasireddi, SK, Arfanakis, K. Postmortem MRI of human brain hemispheres: T2 relaxation times during formaldehyde fixation. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61(4):810–8.Google Scholar

Wehrl, HF, Bezrukov, I, Wiehr, S, Lehnhoff, M, Fuchs, K, Mannheim, JG, et al. Assessment of murine brain tissue shrinkage caused by different histological fixatives using magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging. Histol Histopathol. 2015;30(5):601–13.Google Scholar

Garman, RH. Artifacts in routinely immersion fixed nervous tissue. Toxicol Pathol. 1990; 18 (1 Pt 2): 149–53.Google Scholar

Stradleigh, TW, Greenberg, KP, Partida, GJ, Pham, A, Ishida, AT. Moniliform deformation of retinal ganglion cells by formaldehyde-based fixatives. J Comp Neurol. 2015;523(4):545–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jones, D. Reactions of aldehydes with unsaturated fatty acids during histological fixation. Histochem J. 1972;4(5):421–65.Google Scholar

Werner, M, Chott, A, Fabiano, A, Battifora, H. Effect of formalin tissue fixation and processing on immunohistochemistry. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24(7):1016–9.Google Scholar

Do, H, Dobrovic, A. Sequence artifacts in DNA from formalin-fixed tissues: causes and strategies for minimization. Clin Chem. 2015;61(1):64–71.Google Scholar

Takayasu, T. Toxicological analyses of medications and chemicals in formalin-fixed tissues and formalin solutions: a review. J Anal Toxicol. 2013;37(9):615–21.Google Scholar

Helander, KG, Widehn, S, Helander, HF. Kinetic studies of glutaraldehyde binding in liver. Biotech Histochem. 2002;77(4):207–12.Google Scholar

Wells, GA, Wells, M. Neuropil vacuolation in brain: a reproducible histological processing artefact. J Comp Pathol. 1989;101(4):355–62.Google Scholar

Brenner, E. Human body preservation – old and new techniques. J Anat. 2014;224(3):316–44.Google Scholar

Mall, FP. On the transitory or artificial fissures of the human cerebrum. Am J Anat. 1903;2:333–9.Google Scholar

Streeter, GL. The cortex of the brain in the human embryo during the fourth month with special reference to the so-called “papillae of Retzius.”. Am J Anat. 1907;7:337–44.Google Scholar

Rickert, CH, Gros, O, Nolte, KW, Vennemann, M, Bajanowski, T, Brinkmann, B. Leptomeningeal neurons are a common finding in infants and are increased in sudden infant death syndrome. Acta Neuropathol. 2009;117(3):275–82.Google Scholar

Strachan, GI. The pathology of foetal maceration: a study of 24 cases. Br Med J. 1922;2(3211):80–2.Google Scholar

Pizzolato, P. Formalin pigment (acid hematin) and related pigments. Am J Med Technol. 1976;42(11):436–40.Google Scholar

Rahaman, P, Del Bigio, MR. Histology of brain trauma and hypoxia-ischemia. Acad Forensic Pathol. 2018;8(3):539–54.Google Scholar

Geddes, JF, Tasker, RC, Hackshaw, AK, Nickols, CD, Adams, GG, Whitwell, HL, et al. Dural haemorrhage in non-traumatic infant deaths: does it explain the bleeding in ‘shaken baby syndrome’? Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2003;29(1):14–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scharrer, E. On dark and light cells in the brain and in the liver. Anat Rec. 1938;72(1):53–65.Google Scholar

Cammermeyer, J. Histochemical phospholipid reaction in ischemic neurons as an indication of exposure to postmortem trauma. Exp Neurol. 1975;49:252–71.Google Scholar

Zsombok, A, Toth, Z, Gallyas, F. Basophilia, acidophilia and argyrophilia of “dark” (compacted) neurons during their formation, recovery or death in an otherwise undamaged environment. J Neurosci Methods. 2005;142(1):145–52.Google Scholar

Brown, AW. Structural abnormalities in neurones. J Clin Pathol Suppl. 1977;11:155–69.Google Scholar

Cammermeyer, J. The post-mortem origin and mechanism of neuronal hyperchromatosis and nuclear pyknosis. Exp Neurol. 1960;2:379–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cammermeyer, J. An evaluation of the significance of the “dark” neuron. Ergeb Anat Entwicklungsgesch. 1962;36:1–61.Google Scholar

Gallyas, F, Zoltay, G, Dames, W. Formation of “dark” (argyrophilic) neurons of various origin proceeds with a common mechanism of biophysical nature (a novel hypothesis). Acta Neuropathol. 1992;83:504–9.Google Scholar

Gallyas, F, Gasz, B, Szigeti, A, Mazlo, M. Pathological circumstances impair the ability of “dark” neurons to undergo spontaneous recovery. Brain Res. 2006;1110(1):211–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gallyas, F, Farkas, O, Mazlo, M. Gel-to-gel phase transition may occur in mammalian cells: Mechanism of formation of “dark” (compacted) neurons. Biol Cell. 2004;96(4):313–24.Google Scholar

Kherani, ZS, Auer, RN. Pharmacologic analysis of the mechanism of dark neuron production in cerebral cortex. Acta Neuropathol. 2008;116(4):447–52.Google Scholar

Ebels, EJ. Dark neurons. A significant artifact: the influence of the maturational state of neurons on the occurrence of the phenomenon. Acta Neuropathol. 1975;33(3):271–3.Google Scholar

Anonymous. Facts about Stillbirth: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services / Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2017 (updated October 2, 2017). Available from: www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/stillbirth/facts.html.Google Scholar

Joseph, KS, Kinniburgh, B, Hutcheon, JA, Mehrabadi, A, Dahlgren, L, Basso, M, et al. Rationalizing definitions and procedures for optimizing clinical care and public health in fetal death and stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(4):784–8.Google Scholar

Froen, JF, Gordijn, SJ, Abdel-Aleem, H, Bergsjo, P, Betran, A, Duke, CW, et al. Making stillbirths count, making numbers talk – issues in data collection for stillbirths. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:58.Google Scholar

Tavares Da Silva, F, Gonik, B, McMillan, M, Keech, C, Dellicour, S, Bhange, S, et al. Stillbirth: case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunization safety data. Vaccine. 2016;34(49):6057–68.Google Scholar

Cousens, S, Blencowe, H, Stanton, C, Chou, D, Ahmed, S, Steinhardt, L, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2009 with trends since 1995: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1319–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blencowe, H, Cousens, S, Jassir, FB, Say, L, Chou, D, Mathers, C, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(2):e98–e108.Google Scholar

Joseph, KS, Basso, M, Davies, C, Lee, L, Ellwood, D, Fell, DB, et al. Rationale and recommendations for improving definitions, registration requirements and procedures related to fetal death and stillbirth. BJOG. 2017;124(8):1153–7.Google Scholar

Paternoster, M, Perrino, M, Travaglino, A, Raffone, A, Saccone, G, Zullo, F, et al. Parameters for estimating the time of death at perinatal autopsy of stillborn fetuses: a systematic review. Int J Legal Med. 2019;133(2):483–9.Google Scholar

Rudolph, AM, Heyman, MA. Fetal and neonatal circulation and respiration. Annu Rev Physiol. 1974;36:187–207.Google Scholar

Papp, JG. Autonomic responses and neurohumoral control in the human early antenatal heart. Basic Res Cardiol. 1988;83(1):2–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davis, ME, Potter, EL. Intrauterine respiration of the human fetus. J Am Med Assoc. 1946;131(15):1194–201.Google Scholar

Yoshizato, T, Koyanagi, T, Takashima, T, Satoh, S, Akazawa, K, Nakano, H. The relationship between age-related heart rate changes and developing brain function: a model of anencephalic human fetuses in utero. Early Hum Dev. 1994;36(2):101–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, U, Frank, B, Fiedler, A, Kaehler, C, Hoyer, D, Liehr, M, et al. Human fetal heart rate variability-characteristics of autonomic regulation in the third trimester of gestation. J Perinat Med. 2008;36(5):433–41.Google Scholar

Kinney, HC, Broadbelt, KG, Haynes, RL, Rognum, IJ, Paterson, DS. The serotonergic anatomy of the developing human medulla oblongata: implications for pediatric disorders of homeostasis. J Chem Neuroanat. 2011;41(4):182–99.Google Scholar

Matturri, L, Minoli, I, Lavezzi, AM, Cappellini, A, Ramos, S, Rossi, L. Hypoplasia of medullary arcuate nucleus in unexpected late fetal death (stillborn infants): a pathologic study. Pediatrics. 2002;109(3):E43.Google Scholar

Lavezzi, AM, Ferrero, S, Matturri, L, Roncati, L, Pusiol, T. Developmental neuropathology of brainstem respiratory centers in unexplained stillbirth: What’s the meaning? Int J Dev Neurosci. 2016;53:99–106.Google Scholar

Folkerth, RD, Zanoni, S, Andiman, SE, Billiards, SS. Neuronal cell death in the arcuate nucleus of the medulla oblongata in stillbirth. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2008;26(1):133–40.Google Scholar

Pongsatha, S, Tongsong, T. Outcomes of pregnancy termination by misoprostol at 14–32 weeks of gestation: a 10-year-experience. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011;94(8):897–901.Google Scholar

Lanna, MM, Rustico, MA, Dell’Avanzo, M, Schena, V, Faiola, S, Consonni, D, et al. Bipolar cord coagulation for selective feticide in complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: 118 consecutive cases at a single center. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(4):407–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharvit, M, Klein, Z, Silber, M, Pomeranz, M, Agizim, R, Schonman, R, et al. Intra-amniotic digoxin for feticide between 21 and 30 weeks of gestation: a prospective study. BJOG. 2019;126(7):885–9.Google Scholar

Rayssiguier, R, Musizzano, Y, Perez, MJ, Mousty, E, Menard, A, Boulot, P, et al. Comparison between potassium chloride and lidocaine as lethal agents for feticide in termination of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(4):546–7.Google Scholar

Pinar, H, Koch, MA, Hawkins, H, Heim-Hall, J, Shehata, B, Thorsten, VR, et al. The Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network neuropathologic examination protocol. Am J Perinatol. 2011;28(10):793–802.Google Scholar

Roncati, L, Piscioli, F, Pusiol, T, Lavezzi, AM. Neuropathological protocol for the study of unexplained stillbirth. Folia Neuropathol. 2017;55(2):79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shruthi, M, Gupta, N, Jana, M, Mridha, AR, Kumar, A, Agarwal, R, et al. Conventional vs virtual autopsy with postmortem MRI in phenotypic characterization of stillbirths and fetal malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(2):236–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Papadopoulou, I, Langan, D, Sebire, NJ, Jacques, TS, Arthurs, OJ. Diffusion-weighted post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging of the human fetal brain in situ. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(6):1167–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cox, P, Marton, T. Pathological assessment of intrauterine growth restriction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23(6):751–64.Google Scholar

Sims, ME, Turkel, SB, Halterman, G, Paul, RH. Brain injury and intrauterine death. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(6):721–3.Google Scholar

Becher, JC, Bell, JE, Keeling, JW, Liston, WA, McIntosh, N, Wyatt, B. The Scottish Perinatal Neuropathology Study–clinicopathological correlation in stillbirths. BJOG. 2006;113(3):310–17.Google Scholar

Jacques, SM, Kupsky, WJ, Giorgadze, T, Qureshi, F. Fetal central nervous system injury in third trimester stillbirth: a clinicopathologic study of 63 cases. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2012;15(5):375–84.Google Scholar

Burke, CJ, Tannenberg, AE. Intrapartum stillbirths in hospital unrelated to uteroplacental vascular insufficiency. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2007;10(1):35–40.Google Scholar

Sylvester, PE. Brain disease in stillborn infants and neonates. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1960;67:219–27.Google Scholar

Grafe, MR, Kinney, HC. Neuropathology associated with stillbirth. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26(1):83–8.Google Scholar

Gaffney, G, Squier, MV, Johnson, A, Flavell, V, Sellers, S. Clinical associations of prenatal ischaemic white matter injury. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994;70(2):F101–6.Google Scholar

Burke, CJ, Tannenberg, AE. Prenatal brain damage and placental infarction – an autopsy study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1995;37(6):555–62.Google Scholar

Korteweg, FJ, Erwich, JJ, Timmer, A, van der Meer, J, Ravise, JM, Veeger, NJ, et al. Evaluation of 1025 fetal deaths: proposed diagnostic workup. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(1):53e1–e12.Google Scholar

The Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Causes of death among stillbirths. JAMA. 2011;306(22):2459–68.Google Scholar

Bell, JE, Gosden, CM. Central nervous system abnormalities – contrasting patterns in early and late pregnancy. Clin Genet. 1978;13(5):387–96.Google Scholar

Creasy, MR, Alberman, ED. Congenital malformations of the central nervous system in spontaneous abortions. J Med Genet. 1976;13(1):9–16.Google Scholar

Richards, ID. Fetal and infant mortality associated with congenital malformations. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1973;27(2):85–90.Google Scholar

Jaquier, M, Klein, A, Boltshauser, E. Spontaneous pregnancy outcome after prenatal diagnosis of anencephaly. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2006;113(8):951–3.Google Scholar

O’Leary, C, Jacoby, P, D’Antoine, H, Bartu, A, Bower, C. Heavy prenatal alcohol exposure and increased risk of stillbirth. BJOG. 2012;119(8):945–52.Google Scholar

McClure, EM, Saleem, S, Pasha, O, Goldenberg, RL. Stillbirth in developing countries: a review of causes, risk factors and prevention strategies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22(3):183–90.Google Scholar

McClure, EM, Goldenberg, RL. Infection and stillbirth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;14(4):182–9.Google Scholar

Pinar, H, Koch, MA, Hawkins, H, Heim-Hall, J, Abramowsky, CR, Thorsten, VR, et al. The stillbirth collaborative research network postmortem examination protocol. Am J Perinatol. 2012;29(3):187–202.Google Scholar

Corabian, P, Scott, NA, Lane, C, Guyon, G. Guidelines for investigating stillbirths: an update of a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007;29(7):560–7.Google Scholar

Faye-Petersen, OM, Heller, DS. Pathology of the stillborn infant for the general pathologist: part 2. Adv Anat Pathol. 2015;22(2):71–93.Google Scholar

Pinar, H, Carpenter, M. Placenta and umbilical cord abnormalities seen with stillbirth. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53(3):656–72.Google Scholar

Leviton, A, Allred, EN, Kuban, KC, Hecht, JL, Onderdonk, AB, O’Shea, TM, et al. Microbiologic and histologic characteristics of the extremely preterm infant’s placenta predict white matter damage and later cerebral palsy. the ELGAN study. Pediatr Res. 2010;67(1):95–101.Google Scholar

Chang, KT, Keating, S, Costa, S, Machin, G, Kingdom, J, Shannon, P. Third-trimester stillbirths: correlative neuropathology and placental pathology. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2011;14(5):345–52.Google Scholar

Ernst, LM, Bit-Ivan, EN, Miller, ES, Minturn, L, Bigio, EH, Weese-Mayer, DE. Stillbirth: correlations between brain injury and placental pathology. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2016;19(3):237–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohen, MC, Peres, LC, Al-Adnani, M, Zapata-Vazquez, R. Increased number of fetal nucleated red blood cells in the placentas of term or near-term stillborn and neonates correlates with the presence of diffuse intradural hemorrhage in the perinatal period. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2014;17(1):1–9.Google Scholar

Flenady, V, Koopmans, L, Middleton, P, Froen, JF, Smith, GC, Gibbons, K, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1331–40.Google Scholar

Pacora, P, Romero, R, Jaiman, S, Erez, O, Bhatti, G, Panaitescu, B, et al. Mechanisms of death in structurally normal stillbirths. J Perinat Med. 2019;47(2):222–40.Google Scholar

Man, J, Hutchinson, JC, Ashworth, M, Judge-Kronis, L, Levine, S, Sebire, NJ. Stillbirth and intrauterine fetal death: role of routine histological organ sampling to determine cause of death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(5):596–601.Google Scholar