Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Preface
- Organization of This Handbook
- How to Work with This Handbook
- Part I Background and Theory
- Part II Application Areas of Interaction Analysis
- Part III Methodology and Procedures of Interaction Analysis
- Part IV Data Analysis and Data Presentation
- Part V Coding Schemes for Interaction Research
- General Group Process Systems
- Argument, Conflict, and Negotiations
- Coordination and Coherence
- Cognition and Metacognition
- 33 CASoRL
- 34 Coding Scheme for Group Creativity
- 35 Analyzing Critical Thinking in Group Constellations
- 36 Identifying Teacher and Student Contributions during Assessment Conversations
- 37 Hidden Profile Discussion Coding
- 38 TRAWIS
- Personality and Team Behavior
- Roles and Relationships
- Appendix
- Index
- References
33 - CASoRL
Coding Scheme for the Analysis of Social Regulation of Learning
from Cognition and Metacognition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Preface
- Organization of This Handbook
- How to Work with This Handbook
- Part I Background and Theory
- Part II Application Areas of Interaction Analysis
- Part III Methodology and Procedures of Interaction Analysis
- Part IV Data Analysis and Data Presentation
- Part V Coding Schemes for Interaction Research
- General Group Process Systems
- Argument, Conflict, and Negotiations
- Coordination and Coherence
- Cognition and Metacognition
- 33 CASoRL
- 34 Coding Scheme for Group Creativity
- 35 Analyzing Critical Thinking in Group Constellations
- 36 Identifying Teacher and Student Contributions during Assessment Conversations
- 37 Hidden Profile Discussion Coding
- 38 TRAWIS
- Personality and Team Behavior
- Roles and Relationships
- Appendix
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , pp. 528 - 536Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Bannert, M. (2009). Promoting self-regulated learning through prompts: A discussion. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 22(2), 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brydges, R., Manzone, J., Shanks, D., Hatala, R., Hamstra, S. J., Zendejas, B., & Cook, D. A. (2015). Self-regulated learning in simulation-based training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education, 49(4), 368–378. doi:10.1111/medu.12649CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.), Collaborative Learning (pp. 1–19). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Grau, V., & Whitebread, D. (2012). Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: The interplay of individual and group cognition. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 401–412. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurme, T.-R., Merenluoto, K., & Järvelä, S. (2009). Socially shared metacognition of pre-service primary teachers in a computer-supported mathematics course and their feelings of task difficulty: A case study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(5), 503–524. doi:10.1080/13803610903444659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogat, T. K., & Adams-Wiggins, K. R. (2014). Other-regulation in collaborative groups: implications for regulation quality. Instructional Science, 42(6), 879–904. doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9322-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoor, C., & Bannert, M. (2012). Exploring regulatory processes during a computer-supported collaborative learning task using process mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1321–1331. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoor, C., & Deiglmayr, A. (in prep.). Aufteilung von Informationen auf verschiedene Dokumente beim individuellen und kooperativen computerunterstützten Lernen [Distribution of information on different documents during computer-supported individual and cooperative learning]. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Schoor, C., Narciss, S., & Körndle, H. (2015). Regulation during cooperative and collaborative learning: A theory-based review of terms and concepts. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 97–119. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1038540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.794676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by