Majority of packaged foods unhealthy
4 August 2015
Last update: 03/08/15 22:33
The majority of packaged food available in New Zealand supermarkets is ultra-processed and so also the unhealthiest.
The ultra-processed foods are less healthy than less processed foods,” says Dr Wilma Waterlander from the University of Auckland’s School of Population Health in a study published in Public Health Nutrition. “The lack of significant price difference between ultra- and less processed foods suggests ultra-processed foods might provide time-poor consumers with more value for money.”
“These findings highlight the need to improve the supermarket food supply by reducing numbers of ultra-processed foods and reformulating products to improve their nutritional profile,” she says.
Most of the products were varieties of the same product. For example 311 breakfast cereal products were available, of which 92 (29.6 percent) were produced by two food manufacturers, Ozone Organics and Kellogg’s.
“This poses an unnecessary large exposure of unhealthy food products to New Zealand consumers and this study shows potential to create a healthier supermarket food environment,” says Dr Waterlander.“Strategies could for example, include reducing the number of varieties of unhealthy ultra-processed food and to reformulate products to improve their nutrient profile.”
Ultra-processed foods had the worst nutrient profile, but they were the most available packaged products in a sample of New Zealand supermarkets. In four Auckland supermarkets, (in 2011 and 2013), the products were classified according to their level of industrial processing (eg. minimally, culinary and ultra-processed) and their Nutrient Profiling Score (NPSC).
The study was recently published in the Journal Public Health Nutrition. The University of Auckland population nutrition researchers examined the availability of packaged food products in New Zealand supermarkets by this level of industrial processing, as well as the Nutrient Profiling Score (NPSC), the price (energy, unit and serving costs) and the brand variety.
The majority (84 percent in 2011 and 83 percent in 2013) of packaged foods were classified as ultra-processed, says Dr Waterlander.
“Ultra-processed foods had a worse nutrient profile (NPSC=11.63) than culinary processed foods (NPSC=7.95), which in turn had a worse nutrient profile than minimally processed foods (NPSC=3.27) p<0.001,” she says.
“No clear associations were observed between the three price measures and level of processing,” says Dr Waterlander. “This study observed many variations of virtually the same product. The ten largest food manufacturers produced 35 percent of all packaged foods available.”
Related Posts
International Women’s Day 2020: Influential women in STEM
International Women’s Day 2020 falls on Sunday, 8th March this year. In the run up to this date, each week day we’ll be highlighting one woman whose accomplishments in science, technology, engineering and/or mathematics not only elevated their fields but also took us one step closer to a gender-equal world. We hope you’ll join us […]
What’s in a name? Ultra-processed foods vs snack food vs takeaway – how do we know what is unhealthy?
The health impacts of eating too many ultra-processed foods are well known. Not only are ultra-processed foods high in sugar, salt, and fats, they have other chemicals and properties that contribute to poor health outcomes. Despite this, most dietary guidelines from across the world do not discuss the harms of ultra-processed foods.
New Zealand’s Response to the Coronavirus Pandemic – Now updated
From time to time, until the crisis has passed, the HEPL blog series authors will be given the opportunity to provide short updates on their country/region’s continuing response to this worldwide catastrophe and their further reflections on those responses. Each update will be labelled accordingly with the original response at the bottom of each post. […]
Junk food brands influence parents through kids’ sport sponsorship
A new Public Health Nutrition study, has found that when unhealthy food and drink brands sponsor kids’ sport programs parents are more likely to recognise, choose and view these brands in a positive light.
;
