Are modern-day plant-based foods taking us in the wrong direction?

The Paper of the Month for September is ‘The food system and climate change: are plant-based diets becoming unhealthy and less environmentally sustainable?’ and the blog is written by author Jennie. I. Macdiarmid and is published by Proceedings of the Nutrition Society and is free to access for 1 month.

We need to act now to limit increasing global temperatures by reducing greenhouse gas emissions to meet global targets set out in the Paris Agreement. Among other things, this means changing our diets and reducing our consumption of meat and dairy since livestock production has the highest environmental impact in the food system. Hence, the need to transition away from diets high in animal products to more plant-based diets. Nutritionally balanced plant-based diets, which can include small amounts of meat and dairy, can also have health benefits. However, that not all plant-based diets are necessarily healthy, despite the halo effect associated with health and environmental sustainability that surrounds the term plant-based foods.

Awareness about reducing meat consumption to help tackle climate change has increased with publication of reports from high level committees, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and greater media coverage over the past few years. The food industry has responded with an explosion in the market of the plant-based meat alternatives, from non-dairy milk to meat-free burgers and sausage rolls. Alongside these are numerous meat-free processed convenience food, including ready to eat meals. This helps address some of the concerns people expressed about it being difficult and time consuming to prepare meat-free meals. However, many are high in salt, fat and sugar making them less healthy.

Plant-based diets can be categories into traditional and modern-day diets. Traditional plant-based diets are associated with health benefits and lower greenhouse gas comprising plenty of wholegrains, pulses, fruit and vegetables. However, this new market of plant-based alternatives is creating very different diets, ones that could be called modern-day plant-based diets, which are not as healthy or environmentally sustainable. They comprise highly processed plant-based alternatives many with high in salt, fat and sugar contents. Further, some of the ingredients are derived from monocrops such as palm oil, corn and soya, which have reduce biodiversity and are linked to deforestation. These types of diets are more likely to be adopted by younger groups in populations and those adopting vegetarian diets more recently.

Changes need to be made to our diets for both human and planetary health. However, plant-based alternatives can help the transition to reduce meat consumption, but it cannot be assumed the name ‘plant-based’ always means healthy. There is momentum building to eat less meat, especially with the increasing number of these alternatives, but we need to make sure unhealthy plant-based foods do not derail the progress to achieve healthy and sustainable diets. The public and industry both have a role to play.

Each month a paper is selected by one of the Editors of the five Nutrition Society Publications (British Journal of Nutrition, Public Health Nutrition, Nutrition Research Reviews, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society and Journal of Nutritional Science). Take a look at the entire Nutrition Society Paper of the Month Collection.

Comments

  1. Robert Hart taught us how to make a forest food farm (garden) easy , and this is taking control of whats in your food, and surprisingly vegan meats have some environmental effects which as said, promotes deforestation, and they are not as healthy as one might have thought, m thinking about the “foods, too much processed and having high glycemic load dr Joel Fuhrman would argue not good for our health. And sadly vegan meats to be classed like bad for the environment via deforestation, while vegans say the feed for cows be given to human, and the water embedded in their production and cows (animal) methane in the billions as per the land they take, i believe vegan meats wouldn’t curve the atmosphere, but here now and the demand for it, raises the price for one taught its environmental friendly also and as such the demand for such companies to expand until no one cries deforestation due to animal (livestock) feed, even housed and their methane. M sure beyond meat and Frys Family, impossible foods the Just ink are all listening and by all means suck some co2 via their production. And have less cardiovascular risk that the actual animal based meats.

  2. “Plant-based diets” are being advocated by corporate forces (and their governmental servants) so they can continue selling their grain-based pseudo-foods and increase profits. They cannot justify it on health grounds so instead they are trying to use environmental concerns.

    Fact: Humans are social hunters that evolved over eons with fatty meat as the preferred food. It allowed us to develop large brains and small stomachs.

    After the neolithic agricultural revolution, when grains become the predominant source of calories, humans shrunk in size and developed chronic diseases due to vitamin deficiencies.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *