Book contents
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Food Webs: Complexity and Stability
- Part II Food Webs: From Traits to Ecosystem Functioning
- Part III Food Webs and Environmental Sustainability
- 17 Integrating Species Interaction Networks and Biogeography
- 18 Food-Web Dynamics When Divergent Life-History Strategies Respond to Environmental Variation Differently: A Fisheries Ecology Perspective
- 19 Rare but Important: Perturbations to Uncommon Species Can Have a Large Impact on the Structure of Ecological Communities
- 20 Food-Web Simulations: Stochastic Variability and Systems-Based Conservation
- 21 An Individual-Based Simulation Model to Link Population, Community, and Metacommunity Dynamics
- 22 Structural Instability of Food Webs and Food-Web Models and Their Implications for Management
- 23 Linking Ecology and Epidemiology: The Case of Infected Resource
- Index
- References
21 - An Individual-Based Simulation Model to Link Population, Community, and Metacommunity Dynamics
from Part III - Food Webs and Environmental Sustainability
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2017
Book contents
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Food Webs: Complexity and Stability
- Part II Food Webs: From Traits to Ecosystem Functioning
- Part III Food Webs and Environmental Sustainability
- 17 Integrating Species Interaction Networks and Biogeography
- 18 Food-Web Dynamics When Divergent Life-History Strategies Respond to Environmental Variation Differently: A Fisheries Ecology Perspective
- 19 Rare but Important: Perturbations to Uncommon Species Can Have a Large Impact on the Structure of Ecological Communities
- 20 Food-Web Simulations: Stochastic Variability and Systems-Based Conservation
- 21 An Individual-Based Simulation Model to Link Population, Community, and Metacommunity Dynamics
- 22 Structural Instability of Food Webs and Food-Web Models and Their Implications for Management
- 23 Linking Ecology and Epidemiology: The Case of Infected Resource
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Adaptive Food WebsStability and Transitions of Real and Model Ecosystems, pp. 352 - 371Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Alfaro, A. C., Thomas, F., Sergent, L., and Duxbury, M. (2006). Identification of trophic interactions within an estuarine food web (northern New Zealand) using fatty acid biomarkers and stable isotopes. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 70(1), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, R. A., Byrne, R. W., and Whiten, A. (1996). Ecology, feeding competition and social structure in baboons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 38(5), 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bascompte, J., Melián, C. J., and Sala, E. (2005). Interaction strength combinations and the overfishing of a marine food web. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(15), 5443–5447.Google Scholar
Bhadra, A., Jordán, F., Sumana, A., Deshpande, S. A., and Gadagkar, R. (2009). A comparative social network analysis of wasp colonies and classrooms: linking network structure to functioning. Ecological Complexity, 6(1), 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, A. J. and McKane, A. J. (2012). Stochastic formulation of ecological models and their applications. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27(6), 337–345.Google Scholar
Bolnick, D. I., Svanbäck, R., Fordyce, J. A., et al. (2003). The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. American Naturalist, 161(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolnick, D. I., Amarasekare, P., Araújo, M. S., et al. (2011). Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26(4), 183–192.Google Scholar
Botkin, D. B., Janak, J. F., and Wallis, J. R. (1972). Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth. Journal of Ecology, 60(3), 849–872.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S. and Pavlovic, N. B. (1992). Evolution in heterogeneous environments: effects of migration on habitat specialization. Evolutionary Ecology, 6(5), 360–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, D. P., James, R., Ward, A. J. W., et al. (2005). Assortative interactions and social networks in fish. Oecologia, 143(2), 211–219.Google Scholar
Crooks, K. R. and Soulé, M. E. (1999). Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature, 400(6744), 563–566.Google Scholar
DeAngelis, D. L., Cox, D. K., and Coutant, C. C. (1980). Cannibalism and size dispersal in young-of-the-year largemouth bass: experiment and model. Ecological Modelling, 8, 133–148.Google Scholar
DeAngelis, D. L., Loftus, W. F., Trexler, J. C., and Ulanowicz, R. E. (1997). Modeling fish dynamics and effects of stress in a hydrologically pulsed ecosystem. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery, 6(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Dematté, L., Priami, C., and Romanel, A. (2008). The BlenX language: a tutorial. In Formal Methods for Computational Systems Biology, ed. Bernardo, M., Degano, P., and Zavattaro, G., Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 313–365.Google Scholar
de Silva, S., Ranjeewa, A. D., and Kryazhimskiy, S. (2011). The dynamics of social networks among female Asian elephants. BMC Ecology, 11(1), 17.Google Scholar
Eklöf, A., Jacob, U., Kopp, J., et al. (2013). The dimensionality of ecological networks. Ecology Letters, 16(5), 577–583.Google Scholar
Faust, K. and Skvoretz, J. (2002). Comparing networks across space and time, size and species. Sociological Methodology, 32(1), 267–299.Google Scholar
Gaines, M. S., Vivas, A. M., and Baker, C. L. (1979). An experimental analysis of dispersal in fluctuating vole populations: demographic parameters. Ecology, 60(4), 814–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, D. T. (1977). Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 81(25), 2340–2361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, V., Berger, U., Bastiansen, F., et al. (2006). A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological Modelling, 198(1–2), 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, V., Berger, U., DeAngelis, D. L., et al. (2010). The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecological Modelling, 221(23), 2760–2768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanski, I. and Zhang, D. Y. (1993). Migration, metapopulation dynamics and fugitive co-existence. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 163(4), 491–504.Google Scholar
Iken, K., Brey, T., Wand, U., Voigt, J., and Junghans, P. (2001). Food web structure of the benthic community at the Porcupine Abyssal Plain (NE Atlantic): a stable isotope analysis. Progress in Oceanography, 50(1), 383–405.Google Scholar
Jordán, F. and Molnár, I. (1999). Reliable flows and preferred patterns in food webs. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 1(5), 591–609.Google Scholar
Jordán, F., Scotti, M., and Priami, C. (2011). Process algebra-based computational tools in ecological modelling. Ecological Complexity, 8(4), 357–363.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R. (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 4, 1942–1948.Google Scholar
Kneitel, J. M. and Chase, J. M. (2004). Trade‐offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence. Ecology Letters, 7(1), 69–80.Google Scholar
Kokkoris, G. D., Troumbis, A. Y., and Lawton, J. H. (1999). Patterns of species interaction strength in assembled theoretical competition communities. Ecology Letters, 2(2), 70–74.Google Scholar
Kunz, H. and Hemelrijk, C. K. (2003). Artificial fish schools: collective effects of school size, body size, and body form. Artificial Life, 9(3), 237–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leibold, M. A., Holyoak, M., Mouquet, N., et al. (2004). The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters, 7(7), 601–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levins, R. (1968). Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lusseau, D., Wilson, B. E. N., Hammond, P. S., et al. (2006). Quantifying the influence of sociality on population structure in bottlenose dolphins. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75(1), 14–24.Google Scholar
Marinho-Filho, J. S. (1991). The coexistence of two frugivorous bat species and the phenology of their food plants in Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 7(1), 59–67.Google Scholar
Michels, E., Cottenie, K., Neys, L., and De Meester, L. (2001). Zooplankton on the move: first results on the quantification of dispersal of zooplankton in a set of interconnected ponds. Hydrobiologia, 442(1), 117–126.Google Scholar
Mittermayr, A., Hansen, T., and Sommer, U. (2014a). Simultaneous analysis of δ13C, δ15N and δ34S ratios uncovers food web relationships and the trophic importance of epiphytes in an eelgrass, Zostera marina community. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 497, 93–103.Google Scholar
Mittermayr, A., Fox, S. E., and Sommer, U. (2014b). Temporal variation in stable isotope composition (δ13C, δ15N and δ34S) of a temperate Zostera marina food web. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 505, 95–105.Google Scholar
Murray, A. G. and Parslow, J. S. (1999). The analysis of alternative formulations in a simple model of a coastal ecosystem. Ecological Modelling, 119(2), 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, T. J., Ferdy, J. B., and Quince, C. (2004). Extinction times and moment closure in the stochastic logistic process. Theoretical Population Biology, 65(2), 115–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacala, S. W., Gordon, D. M., and Godfray, H. C. J. (1996). Effects of social group size on information transfer and task allocation. Evolutionary Ecology, 10(2), 127–165.Google Scholar
Roy, S. and Chattopadhyay, J. (2007). Towards a resolution of “the paradox of the plankton”: a brief overview of the proposed mechanisms. Ecological Complexity, 4(1), 26–33.Google Scholar
Scotti, M., Ciocchetta, F., and Jordán, F. (2013). Social and landscape effects on food webs: a multi-level network simulation model. Journal of Complex Networks, 1(2), 160–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotti, M., Hartvig, M., Winemiller, K. O., et al. (2017). Trait-based and process-oriented modeling in ecological network dynamics. In Adaptive Food Webs: Stability and Transitions of Real and Model Ecosystems, ed. Moore, J. C., de Ruiter, P. C., McCann, K. S., and Wolters, V., Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 228–256.Google Scholar
Stander, P. E. (1994). Cooperative hunting in lions: the role of the individual. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 29(6), 445–454.Google Scholar
Sullivan, K. A. (1984). The advantages of social foraging in downy woodpeckers. Animal Behaviour, 32(1), 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirelli, T. and Pessani, D. (2011). Importance of feature selection in decision-tree and artificial-neural-network ecological applications. Alburnus alburnus alborella: a practical example. Ecological Informatics, 6(5), 309–315.Google Scholar
van Nouhuys, S. and Hanski, I. (2005). Metacommunities of butterflies, their host plants, and their parasitoids. In Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities, ed. Holyoak, M., Leibold, M. A., and Holt, R. D., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 99–121.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by