Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-pd9xq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-09T22:41:52.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Enhancements of the bisimulation proof method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Damien Pous
Affiliation:
INRIA Rhône-Alpes
Davide Sangiorgi
Affiliation:
Università di Bologna
Davide Sangiorgi
Affiliation:
University of Bologna, Italy
Jan Rutten
Affiliation:
Stichting Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica (CWI), Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

One of the main reasons for the success of bisimilarity is the strength of the associated proof method. We discuss here the method on processes, more precisely, on Labelled Transition Systems (LTSs). However the reader should bear in mind that the bisimulation concept has applications in many areas beyond concurrency [San12]. According to the proof method, to establish that two processes are bisimilar it suffices to find a relation on processes that contains the given pair and that is a bisimulation. Being a bisimulation means that related processes can match each other's transitions so that the derivatives are again related.

In general, when two processes are bisimilar there may be many relations containing the pair, including the bisimilarity relation, defined as the union of all bisimulations. However, the amount of work needed to prove that a relation is a bisimulation depends on its size, since there are transition diagrams to check for each pair. It is therefore important to use relations as small as possible.

In this chapter we show that the bisimulation proof method can be enhanced, by employing relations called ‘bisimulations up to’. These relations need not be bisimulations; they are just contained in a bisimulation. The proof that a relation is a ‘bisimulation up to’ follows diagram-chasing arguments similar to those in bisimulation proofs. The reason why ‘bisimulations up to’ are interesting is that they can be substantially smaller than any enclosing bisimulation; hence they may entail much less work in proofs.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[AG98] M., Abadi and A.D., Gordon. A bisimulation method for cryptographic protocols. Novdic Journal of Computing, 5(4):267, 1998.Google Scholar
[AKH92] S., Arun-Kumar and M., Hennessy. An efficiency preorder for processes. Acta Informatica, 29(9):737–760, 1992.Google Scholar
[BS98a] M., Boreale and D., Sangiorgi. Bisimulation in name-passing calculi without matching. In Proceedings of the 13th LICS ConferenceIEEE Computer Society Press, 1998.
[BS98b] M., Boreale and D., Sangiorgi. A fully abstract semantics for causality in the π-calculus. Acta Informatica, 35(5):353–400, 1998.Google Scholar
[DP90] B., Davey and H., Priestley. Introduction to Lattices and Order. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[dS85] R., Simone. Higher-level synchronising devices in Meije-SCCS. Theoretical Computer Science, 37:245–267, 1985.Google Scholar
[FG98] C., Fournet and G., Gonthier. A hierarchy of equivalences for asynchronous calculi. In Proceedings of the 25th ICALP, volume 1443 of LNCS, pages 844–855. Springer Verlag, 1998.
[FvG96] W., Fokkink and R.J., Glabbeek. Ntyft/ntyxt rules reduce to ntree rules. Information and Computation, 126(1):1–10, 1996.Google Scholar
[GV92] J.F., Groote and F.W., Vaandrager. Structured operational semantics and bisimulation as a congruence. Information and Computation, 100(2):202–260, 1992.Google Scholar
[JR99] A., Jeffrey and J., Rathke. Towards a theory of bisimulation for local names. In Proceedings LICS, pages 56–66, 1999.
[KW06] V., Koutavas and M., Wand. Small bisimulations for reasoning about higherorder imperative programs. In Proceedings of the 33rd POPL, pages 141–152. ACM, 2006.
[Las98] S.B., Lassen. Relational reasoning about functions and nondeterminism. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, 1998.
[Mil89] R., Milner. Communication and Concurrency. Prentice Hall, 1989.
[MN05] M., Merro and F., Zappa Nardelli. Behavioural theory for mobile ambients. Journal of the ACM, 52(6):961–1023, 2005.Google Scholar
[New42] Maxwell H.A., Newman. On theories with a combinatorial definition of ‘equivalence’. Annals of Mathematics, 43(2):223–243, 1942.Google Scholar
[Pou07] D., Pous. Complete lattices and up-to techniques. In Proceedings APLAS '07, volume 4807 of LNCS, pages 351–366. Springer Verlag, 2007.
[Pou08a] D., Pous. Techniques modulo pour les bisimulations. PhD thesis, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, February 2008.
[Pou08b] D., Pous. Using bisimulation proof techniques for the analysis of distributed algorithms. Theoretical Computer Science, 402(2–3):199–220, 2008.Google Scholar
[Pou10] D., Pous. Up-to context for the xyft/tyft format, 2010. Handwritten notes, available on request.
[San93] D., Sangiorgi. Locality and non-interleaving semantics in calculi for mobile processes. Theoretical Computer Science, 155:39–83, 1996.Google Scholar
[San98] D., Sangiorgi. On the bisimulation proof method. Journal of Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 8:447–479, 1998.Google Scholar
[San12] D., Sangiorgi. An Introduction to Bisimulation and Coinduction. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
[SKS07] D., Sangiorgi, N., Kobayashi, and E., Sumii. Environmental bisimulations for higher-order languages. In Proceedings LICS '07, pages 293–302. IEEE Computer Society, 2007.
[SM92] D., Sangiorgi and R., Milner. The problem of ‘weak bisimulation up to’. In Proceedings 3rd CONCUR, volume 630 of LNCS, pages 32–46. Springer Verlag, 1992.
[SP07a] E., Sumii and B.C., Pierce. A bisimulation for dynamic sealing. Theoretical Computer Science, 375(1–3):169–192, 2007.Google Scholar
[SP07b] E., Sumii and B.C., Pierce. A bisimulation for type abstraction and recursion. Journal of the ACM, 54(5), 2007.Google Scholar
[SW01] D., Sangiorgi and D., Walker. The π-Calculus: A Theory of Mobile Processes. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[TeR03] TeReSe, . Term Rewriting Systems. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[vG93] R.J., vanGlabbeek. The linear time – branching time spectrum II: The semantics of sequential systems with silent moves. In Proceedings 4th CONCUR, volume 715 of LNCS, pages 66–81. Springer Verlag, 1993.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×