Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-mk7jb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-20T12:03:29.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Teams: Heterogeneity, Sorting, and Complementarity

from Part II - Frontiers of Modern Econometrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2025

Victor Chernozhukov
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Johannes Hörner
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Eliana La Ferrara
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Iván Werning
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

Every 5 years, the World Congress of the Econometric Society brings together scholars from around the world. Leading scholars present state-of-the-art overviews of their areas of research, offering newcomers access to key research in economics. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Twelfth World Congress consists of papers and commentaries presented at the Twelfth World Congress of the Econometric Society. This two-volume set includes surveys and interpretations of key developments in economics and econometrics, and discussions of future directions for a variety of topics, covering both theory and application. The first volume addresses such topics as contract theory, industrial organization, health and human capital, as well as racial justice, while the second volume includes theoretical and applied papers on climate change, time-series econometrics, and causal inference. These papers are invaluable for experienced economists seeking to broaden their knowledge or young economists new to the field.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Advances in Economics and Econometrics
Twelfth World Congress
, pp. 49 - 89
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abowd, J. M., and Kramarz, F. (1999). “Chapter 40: The analysis of labor markets using matched employer–employee data,” Handbook of Labor Economics, 3(Part B), 26292710.10.1016/S1573-4463(99)30026-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abowd, J. M., Kramarz, F., and Margolis, D. (1999). “High wage workers and high wage firms,” Econometrica, 67(2), 251333.10.1111/1468-0262.00020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmadpoor, M., and Jones, B. F. (2019). “Decoding team and individual impact in science and invention,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(28), 1388513890.10.1073/pnas.1812341116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Airoldi, E. M., Blei, D. M., Fienberg, S. E., and Xing, E. P. (2008). “Mixed membership stochastic blockmodels,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9(Sep), 19812014.Google ScholarPubMed
Akcigit, U., Baslandze, S., and Stantcheva, S. (2016). “Taxation and the international mobility of inventors,” American Economic Review, 106(10), 29302981.10.1257/aer.20150237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akcigit, U., Grigsby, J., and Nicholas, T. (2017). “The rise of American ingenuity: Innovation and inventors of the Golden Age.” NBER Working Paper No. 23047.Google Scholar
Allman, E. S., Matias, C., and Rhodes, J. A. (2009). “Identifiability of parameters in latent structure models with many observed variables,” Annals of Statistics, 37(6A), 30993132.10.1214/09-AOS689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allman, E. S., Matias, C., and Rhodes, J. A. (2011). “Parameter identifiability in a class of random graph mixture models,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 141(5), 17191736.10.1016/j.jspi.2010.11.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K. A., and Richards-Shubik, S. (2019). “Collaborative production in science: An empirical analysis of coauthorships in economics.” CMU and Lehigh University Working Paper.Google Scholar
Andrews, M. J., Gill, L., Schank, T., and Upward, R. (2008). “High wage workers and low wage firms: Negative assortative matching or limited mobility bias?,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 171(3), 673697.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00533.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcidiacono, P., Foster, G., Goodpaster, N., and Kinsler, J. (2012). “Estimating spillovers using panel data, with an application to the classroom,” Quantitative Economics, 3(3), 421470.10.3982/QE145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcidiacono, P., Kinsler, J., and Price, J. (2017). “Productivity spillovers in team production: Evidence from professional basketball,” Journal of Labor Economics, 35(1), 191225.10.1086/687529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, M., and Bonhomme, S. (2009). “Robust priors in nonlinear panel data models,” Econometrica, 77, 489536.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1973). “A theory of marriage: Part I,” Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813846.10.1086/260084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A., Chetty, R., Jaravel, X., Petkova, N., and Van Reenen, J. (2019). “Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(2), 647713.10.1093/qje/qjy028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M., and Schoar, A. (2003). “Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 11691208.10.1162/003355303322552775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, P., Choi, D., Chang, X., and Zhang, H. (2013). “Asymptotic normality of maximum likelihood and its variational approximation for stochastic blockmodels,” Annals of Statistics, 41(4), 19221943.10.1214/13-AOS1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Blei, D. M., Kucukelbir, A., and McAuliffe, J. D. (2017). “Variational inference: A review for statisticians,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112(518), 859877.10.1080/01621459.2017.1285773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonhomme, S. (2017). “Econometric analysis of bipartite networks.” In Graham, B. and de Paula, A. (eds.), The Econometric Analysis of Network Data. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 83121.Google Scholar
Bonhomme, S., Holzheu, K., Lamadon, T., Manresa, E., Mogstad, M., and Setzler, B. (2020). “How much should we trust estimates of firm effects and worker sorting?NBER Working Paper No. 27368.Google Scholar
Bonhomme, S., Jochmans, K., and Robin, J. M. (2016). “Nonparametric estimation of finite mixtures from repeated measurements,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 78(1), 211229.10.1111/rssb.12110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonhomme, S., Lamadon, T., and Manresa, E. (2019). “A distributional framework for matched employer–employee data,” Econometrica, 87(3), 699739.10.3982/ECTA15722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonhomme, S., Lamadon, T., and Manresa, E. (2021). “Discretizing unobserved heterogeneity.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Bonhomme, S., and Manresa, E. (2015). “Grouped patterns of heterogeneity in panel data,” Econometrica, 83(3), 11471184.10.3982/ECTA11319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., and Fortin, B. (2009). “Identification of peer effects through social networks,” Journal of Econometrics, 150(1), 4155.10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.12.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlier, G., and Ekeland, I. (2010). “Matching for teams,” Economic Theory, 42(2), 397418.10.1007/s00199-008-0415-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celisse, A., Daudin, J. J., and Pierre, L. (2012). “Consistency of maximum-likelihood and variational estimators in the stochastic block model,” Electronic Journal of Statistics, 6, 18471899.10.1214/12-EJS729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chade, H., and Eeckhout, J. (2018). “Matching information,” Theoretical Economics, 13(1), 377414.10.3982/TE1820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chade, H., Eeckhout, J., and Smith, L. (2017). “Sorting through search and matching models in economics,” Journal of Economic Literature, 55(2), 493544.10.1257/jel.20150777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, G. (1984). “Panel data.” In Griliches, Z. and Intriligator, M. D. (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 12471318.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, G. (1992). “Efficiency bounds for semiparametric regression,” Econometrica, 60, 567596.10.2307/2951584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappori, P.-A., and Salanié, B. (2016). “The econometrics of matching models,” Journal of Economic Literature, 54(3), 832861.10.1257/jel.20140917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappori, P.-A., Salanié, B., and Galichon, A. (2019). “On human capital and team stability,” Journal of Human Capital, 13(2), 236259.10.1086/702925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daudin, J. J., Picard, F., and Robin, S. (2008). “A mixture model for random graphs,” Statistics and Computing, 18(2), 173183.10.1007/s11222-007-9046-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, K. (2018). “Identifying the value of teamwork: Application to professional tennis.” Working Paper Series, No. 14.Google Scholar
Ductor, L., Fafchamps, M., Goyal, S., and van der Leij, M. J. (2014). “Social networks and research output,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(5), 936948.10.1162/REST_a_00430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eeckhout, J., and Kircher, P. (2011). “Identifying sorting – in theory,” The Review of Economic Studies, 78(3), 872906.10.1093/restud/rdq034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eeckhout, J., and Kircher, P. (2018). “Assortative matching with large firms,” Econometrica, 86(1), 85132.10.3982/ECTA14450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fafchamps, M., Van der Leij, M. J., and Goyal, S. (2010). “Matching and network effects,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(1), 203231.10.1162/jeea.2010.8.1.203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furman, J. L., and Gaule, P. (2013). “A review of economic perspectives on collaboration in science.” Workshop on Institutional & Organizational Supports for Team Science.Google Scholar
Gans, J., and Murray, F. (2014). “Markets for scientific attribution.” NBER Working Paper No. 20677.Google Scholar
Garicano, L., and Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2006). “Organization and inequality in a knowledge economy,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 13831435.Google Scholar
Gaure, S. (2014). “Correlation bias correction in two-way fixed-effects linear regression,” Stat, 3, 379390.10.1002/sta4.68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goyal, S., Van Der Leij, M. J., and Moraga-González, J. L. (2004). “Economics: An emerging small world.” Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, No. 04-001/1.Google Scholar
Goyal, S., Van Der Leij, M. J., and Moraga-González, J. L. (2006). “Economics: An emerging small world,” Journal of Political Economy, 114(2), 403412.10.1086/500990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, J., and Moon, H. (2010). “Panel data models with finite number of multiple equilibria,” Econometric Theory, 26(3), 863881.10.1017/S0266466609990132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., and Trajtenberg, M. (2001). “The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, insights and methodological tools.” NBER Working Paper No. 8498.Google Scholar
Hall, P., and Zhou, X. H. (2003). “Nonparametric estimation of component distributions in a multivariate mixture,” Annals of Statistics, 31(1), 201224.10.1214/aos/1046294462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herkenhoff, K., Lise, J., Menzio, G., and Phillips, G. M. (2018). “Production and learning in teams.” NBER Working Paper No. 25179.Google Scholar
Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., and Rosen, H. S. (1988). “Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data,” Econometrica, 56(6), 13711395.10.2307/1913103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, C. S., Konig, M. D., Liu, X., and Zimmermann, C. (2020). “Collaboration in bipartite networks.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hu, Y. (2008). “Identification and estimation of nonlinear models with misclassification error using instrumental variables: A general solution,” Journal of Econometrics, 144(1), 2761.10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hvattum, L. M. (2019). “A comprehensive review of plus–minus ratings for evaluating individual players in team sports,” International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 18(1), 123.10.2478/ijcss-2019-0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. O., and Wolinsky, A. (1996). “A strategic model of social and economic networks,” Journal of Economic Theory, 71(1), 4474.10.1006/jeth.1996.0108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaravel, X., Petkova, N., and Bell, A. (2018). “Team-specific capital and innovation,” American Economic Review, 108(4–5), 10341073.10.1257/aer.20151184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jochmans, K., and Weidner, M. (2019). “Fixed-effect regressions on network data,” Econometrica, 87(5), 15431560.10.3982/ECTA14605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelso Jr., A. S., and Crawford, V. P. (1982). “Job matching, coalition formation, and gross substitutes,” Econometrica, 50(6), 14831504.10.2307/1913392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, P., Saggio, R., and Solvsten, M. (2020). “Leave-out estimation of variance components,” Econometrica, 88(5), 18591898.10.3982/ECTA16410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodrzycki, Y. K., and Yu, P. (2006). “New approaches to ranking economics journals,” The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(1), 1520.Google Scholar
Lei, J., and Rinaldo, A. (2015). “Consistency of spectral clustering in stochastic block models,” The Annals of Statistics, 43(1), 215237.10.1214/14-AOS1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, J., Tranmer, M., Mowbray, J., and Hancean, M. G. (2019). “REM beyond dyads: Relational hyperevent models for multi-actor interaction networks.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.07403.Google Scholar
Li, G. C., Lai, R., D’Amour, A., Doolin, D. M., Sun, Y., Torvik, V. I., et al. (2014). “Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the US Patent Inventor Database (1975–2010),” Research Policy, 43(6), 941955.10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariadassou, M., Robin, S., and Vacher, C. (2010). “Uncovering latent structure in valued graphs: A variational approach,” The Annals of Applied Statistics, 4(2), 715742.10.1214/10-AOAS361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. (2019). “Firm–inventor links and the composition of innovation.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A., and Nowicki, K. (1997). “Estimation and prediction for stochastic block-models for graphs with latent block structure,” Journal of Classification, 14(1), 75100.10.1007/s003579900004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talman, D., and Yang, Z. (2011). “A model of partnership formation,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 47(2), 206212.10.1016/j.jmateco.2011.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, K., Lunagómez, S., Nemeth, C., and Airoldi, E. (2019). “Latent space representations of hypergraphs.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.00472.Google Scholar
Weidmann, B., and Deming, D. J. (2020). “Team players: How social skills improve group performance.” NBER Working Paper No. 27071.Google Scholar
Woodcock, S. D. (2008). “Wage differentials in the presence of unobserved worker, firm, and match heterogeneity,” Labour Economics, 15(4), 771793.10.1016/j.labeco.2007.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×