Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-5959bf8d4d-km8cc Total loading time: 0.652 Render date: 2022-12-08T21:17:22.390Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

12 - An experimentalist's introduction to orbital angular momentum for quantum optics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

J. Romero
University of Glasgow
D. Giovannini
University of Glasgow
S. Franke-Arnold
University of Glasgow
M. J. Padgett
University of Glasgow
David L. Andrews
University of East Anglia
Mohamed Babiker
University of York
Get access



Although the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of light is often quantified in terms of ℓℏ per photon, one should recognise that this result can be derived directly from Maxwell's equations and is most certainly not an exclusively quantum property. Following the recognition of optical OAM in 1992 [1], the immediate thrust of experimental work was to observe OAM transfer to microscopic objects. These exciting experiments by Rubinsztein- Dunlop [2, 3] and others established that the predicted angular momentum was truly mechanical, but did not provide insight on OAM at the level of single photons. Laguerre- Gaussian modes were identified as being a natural basis set for describing beams with OAM, where their phase terms describe the helical phasefronts corresponding to an OAM of ℓℏ per photon.

The polarisation of light has played an important historical role in the experimental investigation of quantum entanglement, quantum gate operations and quantum cryptography. A potential advantage of OAM is that it resides in a higher-dimensional state space which, as follows from the theory, is infinite-dimensional. One of the experimental challenges is to access a large number of these dimensions. In quantum communication, the most obvious advantage of high n-dimensional systems is the increased bandwidth [4], but qunits also lead to stronger security [5, 6]. An increase in the number of entangled quantum modes has also been shown to improve measures of nonlocality [7], to allow quantum computation with better fault tolerance [8] and to simplify quantum logic structures [9].

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


[1] L., Allen, M. W., Beijersbergen, R. J. C., Spreeuw and J. P., Woerdman. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre–Gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev.A, 45:8185–9, 1992.Google Scholar
[2] H., He, M., Friese, N. R., Heckenberg, and H., Rubinzstein-Dunlop. Direct observation of transfer of transfer of angular momentum to absorptive particles from a laser beam with a phase singularity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 75:826–9, 1995.Google Scholar
[3] M., Friese, J., Enger, H., Rubinzstein-Dunlop and N. R., Heckenberg. Optical angular momentum transfer to trapped absorbing particles. Phys. Rev.A, 54:1593–6, 1996.Google Scholar
[4] J. T., Barreiro, T. C., Wei, and P. G., Kwiat. Beating the channel capacity limit for linear photonic superdense coding. Nat. Phys., 4(4):282–6, 2008.Google Scholar
[5] H., Bechmann-Pasquinucci and W., Tittel. Quantum cryptography using larger alphabets. Phys. Rev.A, 61(6):62308, 2000.Google Scholar
[6] S. P., Walborn, D. S., Lemelle, M. P., Almeida and P. H. S., Ribeiro. Quantum key distribution with higher-order alphabets using spatially encoded qudits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96(9):90501, 2006.Google Scholar
[7] D., Kaszlikowski, P., Gnaciński, M., Żukowski, W., Miklaszewski and A., Zeilinger. Violations of local realism by two entangled n-dimensional systems are stronger than for two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85(21):4418–21, 2000.Google Scholar
[8] D., Gottesman. Fault-tolerant quantum computation with higher-dimensional systems. In Quantum Computing and Quantum Communications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pages 302–13, 1999.
[9] B. P., Lanyon, M., Barbieri, M. P., Almeida et al. Simplifying quantum logic using higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Nat. Phys., 5(2):134–40, 2008.Google Scholar
[10] K., Dholakia, N., Simpson, M. J., Padgett and L., Allen. Second-harmonic generation and the orbital angular momentum of light. Phys. Rev.A, 54(5):3742–5, 1996.Google Scholar
[11] L. C. Dávila, Romero, D. L., Andrews and M., Babiker. A quantum electrodynamics framework for the nonlinear optics of twisted beams. J. Opt.B, 4:S66–72, 2002.Google Scholar
[12] D., Burnham and D., Weinberg. Observation of simultaneity in parametric production of optical photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett., 25:84, 1970.Google Scholar
[13] C. K., Hong and L., Mandel. Theory of parametric frequency down conversion of light. Phys. Rev.A, 31(4):2409–18, 1985.Google Scholar
[14] S. J., Freedman and J. F., Clauser. Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett., 28:938–41, 1972.Google Scholar
[15] A., Aspect, Dalibard, and G., Roger. Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Phys. Rev. Lett., 49:1804–7, 1982.Google Scholar
[16] A., Aspect, P., Grangier and G., Roger. Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell's theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett., 47:460–3, 1981.Google Scholar
[17] J., Bell. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
[18] V., Bazhenov, M. V., Vasnetsov and M. S., Soskin. Laser beams with screw dislocations in their wavefronts. JETP Lett., 52:429–31, 1990.Google Scholar
[19] N. R., Heckenberg, R., McDuff, C. P., Smith, H., Rubinsztein-Dunlop and M. J., Wegener. Laser beams with phase singularities. Opt. Quant. Electron., 24(9):951–62, 1992.Google Scholar
[20] A., Mair, A., Vaziri, G., Weihs and A., Zeilinger. Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons. Nature, 412:313–6, 2001.Google Scholar
[21] S., Franke-Arnold, S., Barnett, M., Padgett and L., Allen. Two-photon entanglement of orbital angular momentum states. Phys. Rev.A, 65:033823, 2002.Google Scholar
[22] C. H., Monken, P. H. S., Ribeiro and S., Pádua. Transfer of angular spectrum and image formation in spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev.A, 57(4):3123–6, 1998.Google Scholar
[23] S. P., Walborn, A. N., De Oliveira, R. S., Thebaldi, and C. H., Monken. Entanglement and conservation of orbital angular momentum in spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev.A, 69(2):23811, 2004.Google Scholar
[24] H., Everett III. ‘Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys., 29(3):454–62, 1957.Google Scholar
[25] N. K., Langford, R. B., Dalton, M. D., Harvey et al. Measuring entangled qutrits and their use for quantum bit commitment. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93(5):53601, 2004.Google Scholar
[26] B., Jack, J., Leach, H., Ritsch, S. M., Barnett, M. J., Padgett and S., Franke-Arnold. Precise quantum tomography of photon pairs with entangled orbital angular momentum. New J. Phys., 11:103024, 2009.Google Scholar
[27] M. W., Beijersbergen, L., Allen, H., Van der Veen and J. P., Woerdman. Astigmatic laser mode converters and transfer of orbital angular momentum. Opt. Commun., 96(1–3):123–32, 1993.Google Scholar
[28] M. J., Padgett and J., Courtial. Poincaré-sphere equivalent for light beams containing orbital angular momentum. Opt. Lett., 24(7):430–2, 1999.Google Scholar
[29] L., Allen, J., Courtial and M. J., Padgett. Matrix formulation for the propagation of light beams with orbital and spin angular momenta. Phys. Rev.E, 60:7497–503, 1999.Google Scholar
[30] D., Kawase, Y., Miyamoto, M., Takeda, K., Sasaki and S., Takeuchi. Observing quantum correlation of photons in Laguerre–Gauss modes using the Gouy phase. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101(5):50501, 2008.Google Scholar
[31] J., Romero, J., Leach, B., Jack et al. Entangled optical vortex links. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106(10):100407, 2011.Google Scholar
[32] A., Vaziri, G., Weihs and A., Zeilinger. Experimental two-photon, three-dimensional entanglement for quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89(24):240401, 2002.Google Scholar
[33] A., Dada, J., Leach, G., Buller, M. J., Padgett and E., Andersson. Experimental high-dimensional two-photon entanglement and violations of generalized Bell inequalities. Nature Phys., 7:677–80, 2011.Google Scholar
[34] J., Leach, B., Jack, J., Romero et al. Quantum correlations in optical angle-orbital angular momentum variables. Science, 329:662–5, 2010.Google Scholar
[35] J. B., Pors, A., Aiello, S. S. R., Oemrawsingh, M. P., van Exter, E. R., Eliel, and J. P., Woerdman. Angular phase-plate analyzers for measuring the dimensionality of multimode fields. Phys. Rev.A, 77(3):033845, 2008.Google Scholar
[36] J. B., Pors, S. S. R., Oemrawsingh, A., Aiello et al. Shannon dimensionality of quantum channels and its application to photon entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101(12):120502, 2008.Google Scholar
[37] D., Collins, N., Gisin, N., Linden, S., Massar and S., Popescu. Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88(4):40404, 2002.Google Scholar
[38] G., Molina-Terriza, J. P., Torres and L., Torner. Management of the angular momentum of light: preparation of photons in multidimensional vector states of angular momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88(1):13601, 2001.Google Scholar
[39] J. P., Torres, Y., Deyanova, L., Torner and G., Molina-Terriza. Preparation of engineered two-photon entangled states for multidimensional quantum information. Phys. Rev.A, 67:052313, 2003.Google Scholar
[40] S., Franke-Arnold, S. M., Barnett, E., Yao, J., Leach, J., Courtial and M. J., Padgett. Uncertainty principle for angular position and angular momentum. New J. Phys., 6:103, 2004.Google Scholar
[41] D. L., Andrews. The effect of scattering on single photon transmission of optical angular momentum. J. Opt., 13:064003, 2011.Google Scholar
[42] J. P., Torres, A., Alexandrescu and L., Torner. Quantum spiral bandwidth of entangled two-photon states. Phys. Rev.A, 68(5):050301, 2003.Google Scholar
[43] F. M., Miatto, A. M., Yao and S. M., Barnett. Full characterization of the quantum spiral bandwidth of entangled biphotons. Phys. Rev.A, 83(3):033816, 2011.Google Scholar
[44] A. M., Yao. Spectral decomposition of entangled photons with an arbitrary pump. New J. Phys, 13(5):053048, 2011.Google Scholar
[45] H. Di Lorenzo, Pires, H. C. B., Florijn and M. P., van Exter. Measurement of the spiral spectrum of entangled two-photon states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104(2):20505, 2010.Google Scholar
[46] C. E., Shannon and W., Weaver. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. New York: University of Illinois Press, 1949.
[47] A. K., Jha, B., Jack, E., Yao et al. Fourier relationship between the angle and angular momentum of entangled photons. Phys. Rev.A, 78:043810, 2008.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats