Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-vqtzn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-25T03:23:59.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - From target language use to test tasks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Dan Douglas
Affiliation:
Iowa State University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In Chapter 2, 1 discussed a theory of language ability, and in particular the theoretical construct of specific purpose language ability that we attempt to measure with LSP tests. In Chapter 3, the topic was the nature of context and the theory of how context can be described in terms of task characteristics which can then be translated into test tasks. In this chapter, I will develop guidelines and techniques for constructing LSP tests, focussing particularly on techniques for investigating and describing the target language use situations that form the basis for identifying specific purpose test tasks. The same techniques will also provide a basis for evaluating LSP tests, in terms of test method characteristics, and for interpreting test performance, based on the understanding that test performances are the result of an interaction between test taker attributes (e.g., language ability and specific purpose background knowledge) and the context, as established by the characteristics of the test methods. I will begin the discussion of techniques for LSP test development by considering techniques for investigating target language use situations: grounded ethnography, contextbased research, and subject specialist informant procedures. I will then outline a framework for analyzing specific purpose TLU situations, based on the discussion in Chapter 3, considering a concrete example along the way. I will end with a discussion and example of LSP test specifications, finally illustrating how to apply the analytical framework to the description of test task characteristics.

Techniques for investigating the target language use domain

We saw in Chapter 2 that input data vary greatly in their level of specificity and that this variation is not necessarily obvious to test developers.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×