Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-rn2sj Total loading time: 0.414 Render date: 2022-08-13T07:30:01.698Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

12 - Finding the Ties That Bind: Tools in Support of a Knowledge-Building Community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2009

Christopher Hoadley
SRI International and Stanford University 333 Ravenswood Avenue BN271 Menlo Park, CA 94025
Roy D. Pea
Stanford University Institute for Learning Sciences and Technologies School of Education Cubberly Hall Stanford, CA 94305
K. Ann Renninger
Swarthmore College, Pennsylvania
Wesley Shumar
Drexel University, Philadelphia
Get access


Finding a professional connection with a colleague seems like a simple task but can devour hours of time. An anecdote illustrates why this is hard. A researcher whom we will call David got a call with a question about research on interactive toys. David had some experience in that area and immediately recalled several people who did similar work, but who didn't quite fit the bill of this request. He vaguely remembered someone he had heard about who did do that sort of work – the researcher was a Canadian woman who had recently won an award for women in computer science. He thought but wasn't sure that the woman was from western Canada. With these recollections in mind, he set about trying to find her.

First, he tried searching based on the topic. He began with a Web search on the topic area but found far too many results. He tried narrowing his search but had no luck. He tried a number of refinements, including searching on words related to the award, and so on. After spending nearly half an hour, he decided to try a different strategy.

This time, David tried to find the researcher through his social network. He began by asking a co-worker down the hall. A short conversation didn't yield any leads. Continuing down the hall, he asked another colleague. Again, the colleague didn't know the person he was seeking, but this person did suggest another related researcher who might know the mystery woman's identity.

Building Virtual Communities
Learning and Change in Cyberspace
, pp. 321 - 354
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Allen, C. (1993). Reciprocal evolution as a strategy for integrating basicresearch, design, and studies of work practice. In D. Shuler and A. Namioka (Eds.), Participatory design (pp. 239–53). Hillsdale, NJ: lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Becker, H. S., & Geer, B. (1969a). “Participant observation and interviewing”: A rejoinder. In G. J. McCall & J. L. Simmons (Eds.), Issues in participant observation (pp. 338–41). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Becker, H. S., & Geer, B. (1969b). Participant observation and interviewing: A comparison. In G. J. McCall & J. L. Simmons (Eds.), Issues in participant observation (pp. 322–31). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Bedny'i, G. Z., & Meister, D. (1997). The Russian theory of activity: Current applications to design and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Bødker, S. (1991). Through the interface: A human activity approach to user interface design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communitiesof-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, R. G. (1984). Multiple strategies in field research. In R. G. Burgess (Ed.), In the field (pp. 143–65). Winchester, MA: Allen & UnwinCrossRef
Cashman, P. M., & Stroll, D. (1989). Developing the management systems of the 1990s: The role of collaborative work. In M. H. Olson (Ed.), Technological support for work group collaboration (pp. 129–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research: A collection of readings (pp. 109–26). Boston: Little, Brown, and Co
Cohen, A. (1995). Mediated collaborative learning – How CSILE supports a shift from knowledge in the head to knowledge in the world. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
EDUCOM Review Staff. (1996). Bernie Gifford on changing the educational technical landscape, EDUCOM Review, 31(4), 14–19
Ehn, P. (1989). Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum
Fischer, G. (1999). Lifelong learning – More than training. In R. Mizoguchi & P. A. M. Kommers (Eds.), International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, special issue on Intelligent Systems/Tools in Training and Life-Long Learning, pp. 265–94; Vol. II, No 3/4, Olney, Bucks, UK: Inderscience Publishers
Francik, E., Rudman, S. E., Cooper, D., & Levine, S. (1991). Putting innovation to work – Adoption strategies for multimedia communication systems. Communications of the ACM, 34(12), 52–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garratt, B. (1987). The learning organization: And the need for directors who think. Aldershot, Hampshire, England: Ashgate
Gay, G., & Bennington, T. L. (Eds.). (1999). Information technologies in evaluation: Social, moral, epistemological, and practical implications, New Directions for Evaluation #84. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Glance, N. S., & Huberman, B. A. (1994). The dynamics of social dilemmas. Scientific American, 270(3), 76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, J., McCalla, G., Kumar, V., Collins, J., & Meagher, P. (1997). Facilitating collaborative learning in distributed organizations. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 97 Conference, Toronto
Hewitt, J., & Scardamalia, M. (1999). Knowledge forum: A next-generation discourse environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada
Hoadley, C. M. (1999). Scaffolding scientific discussion using socially relevant representations in networked multimedia. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA
Hoadley, C. M., & Enyedy, N. (1999). Between information and collaboration: Middle spaces in computer media for learning. In C. M. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), CSCL '99: Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 1999. (pp. 242–250). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Teaching science through on-line, peer discussions: SpeakEasy in the Knowledge Integration Environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 839–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsi, S. H. (1997). Facilitating knowledge integration in science through electronic discussion: The Multimedia Forum Kiosk. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Hsi, S. H., & Hoadley, C. M. (1997). Productive discussion in science: Gender equity through electronic discourse. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(1), 23–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Kahn, T. M. (1999). Social “know-who” for building virtual communities: It's both what you know and who you know that count [World Wide Web page]. EOE (Educational Object Economy) Feature of the Week. Available: [1 November 1999]
Kautz, H., Selman, B., & Shah, M. (1997). The hidden web. AI Magazine, 18(2), 27–36Google Scholar
Kling, R. (1991). Cooperation, coordination, and control in computer-supported work. Communications of the ACM, 34(12), 83–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozma, R. (1996). Increasing the impact of advanced technology on the education market (Technical Report). Menlo Park, CA: Center for Technology in Learning, SRI International
Kuutti, K., & Bannon, L. J. (1993). Searching for unity among diversity: Exploring the “interface” concept. In Proceedings of the International Computer Human Interaction Conference (Inter CHI) '93 (pp. 263–268).New York: ACM PressCrossRef
Kyng, M. (1991). Designing for cooperation: Cooperating in design. Communications of the ACM, 34(12), 64–73Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press
Linn, M. C., & Burbules, N. C. (1993). Construction of knowledge and group learning. In K. G. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 91–119). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Press
Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. New York: Cambridge University Press
Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). Power On! New tools for teaching and learning (GPO Stock No. 052-003-01125-5, ERIC number ED295677). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. Paper presented at the Computer-Supported Cooperative Work Conference, Toronto, Canada
Ornstein, M., & Cohn, A. E. (1938). The role of scientific societies in the seventeenth century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
Orr, J. E. (1990). Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: Community memory in a service culture. In D. Middleton & D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective remembering (pp. 169–89). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Pea, R. (1992). Augmenting the discourse of learning with computer-based learning environments. In E. De Corte, M. Linn, H. Mandl & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 313–43CrossRef
Pea, R. D. (1993). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 285–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pea, R., & Gomez, L. (1992). Distributed multimedia learning environments: Why and how?Interactive Learning Environments, 2, 73–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pea, R. D., Tinker, R., Linn, M. C., Means, B., Bransford, J., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Brophy, S., & Songer, N. (1999). Toward a learning technologies knowledge network. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(2), 19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perin, C. (1991). Electronic social fields in bureaucracies. Communications of the ACM, 34(12), 75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (1997). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K–12 education in the United States. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President of the United States
Reil, M., & Levin, J. (1990). Building electronic communities: Success and failure in computer networking. Instructional Science, 19, 145–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). An architecture for collaborative knowledge-building. In E. De Corte, M. C. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving. Berlin: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–83CrossRef
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R. S., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(1), 55–68Google Scholar
Trow, M. (1969). Comment on “Participant observation and interviewing: A comparison.” In G. J. McCall & J. L. Simmons (Eds.), Issues in participant observation (pp. 331–8). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Webb, N. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 406–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press
Woodruff, E. E. (1999). Concerning the cohesive nature of CSCL communities. In C. M. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning '99 Conference (pp. 677–80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesCrossRef
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats