Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:06:34.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Summing up

from Section 7 - Policy alternatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

Wayne Hall
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Rosalie Liccardo Pacula
Affiliation:
RAND Corporation, California
Get access

Summary

In many developed countries the debate about cannabis policy has been simplified in the popular media to a choice of two options: (1) we should legalise cannabis, or at the very least decriminalise its use, because its use is harmless (or at least much less harmful than alcohol); or (2) we should continue to prohibit cannabis use because it is harmful to users. We have argued that this simplification has distorted the policy debate and evaluations of the health risks of cannabis use.

Our aim has been to broaden the cannabis policy debate to take account of the problems caused by our efforts to control cannabis use. The fact that we have devoted much more space to the adverse health effects of cannabis than we have to the effectiveness and costs of cannabis prohibition reflects the power of the policy simplification to direct research investment. We support recent proposals for more research on the effectiveness of drug policy (Manski et al., 2001) which may address the current imbalance in research investment.

The health and psychological effects of cannabis use

Acute psychological and health effects

The main reason why people use cannabis is to feel good, relax, and be sociable. These effects come at the cost of impaired attention, short-term memory, and psychomotor performance. The most frequent unpleasant effects of cannabis use are anxiety and panic reactions. These most often occur in users who are unfamiliar with the drug's effects. Psychotic symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations may be experienced following very high doses. There are no cases of fatal cannabis poisoning in the human medical literature and the fatal dose in humans is likely to exceed what recreational users can ingest.

Psychomotor effects and driving

Cannabis intoxication impairs a wide range of cognitive and behavioural functions that are involved in driving an automobile or operating machinery. It has been difficult until recently to decide whether these impairments increase the risk of being involved in motor vehicle accidents. Studies of the effect of cannabis on driving performance on the road have found only modest impairments because cannabis-intoxicated drivers drive more slowly, and take fewer risks, than alcoholintoxicated drinkers. More recent evidence from large, well-controlled longitudinal and case-control studies suggests that driving after using cannabis on its own approximately doubles the risk of accidental injury in a motor vehicle accident.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cannabis Use and Dependence
Public Health and Public Policy
, pp. 213 - 226
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Summing up
  • Wayne Hall, University of Queensland, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, RAND Corporation, California
  • Book: Cannabis Use and Dependence
  • Online publication: 05 July 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511470219.026
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Summing up
  • Wayne Hall, University of Queensland, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, RAND Corporation, California
  • Book: Cannabis Use and Dependence
  • Online publication: 05 July 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511470219.026
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Summing up
  • Wayne Hall, University of Queensland, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, RAND Corporation, California
  • Book: Cannabis Use and Dependence
  • Online publication: 05 July 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511470219.026
Available formats
×