Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Summary
Amartya Sen's capability approach has generated remarkable interest in recent years. This volume brings together a selection of papers initially presented at an international conference on the capability approach (CA) held at St Edmund's College, Cambridge in 2001. This conference marked an important turning point in research on the capability approach. It brought together many young scholars who were interested in the approach as well as others who had been working on it for some time. The conference was initially motivated by issues relating to the usefulness of the approach in the particular contexts of poverty and injustice. However, conference papers covered a wide range of topics relating to concepts, measurement and other applications. In this volume, the papers are categorised in terms of these broad and overlapping areas. In 2002 a follow-up conference explored Martha Nussbaum's version of the approach, and annual conferences have been held in subsequent years. Numerous initiatives have since emerged, including the Human Development and Capability Association (www.hd-ca.org). In part as a result of these initiatives, but also quite independently of them, a large literature on the capability approach has emerged.
Amartya Sen's 1980 Tanner lecture, ‘Equality of What?’, set out a broad agenda for debate and further research. While the approach has been extensively discussed, Sabina Alkire suggests in Chapter 1 that work in this area is still at a relatively early stage.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Capability ApproachConcepts, Measures and Applications, pp. 1 - 25Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
(2002) Valuing Freedoms. Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction (New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Subjective quantitative studies of human agency, Social Indicators Research (74), pp. 217–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkire, S. (2006) Needs and capabilities, in The Philosophy of Need, (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997) A practical reasoning theory of development ethics: furthering the capabilities approach: Policy arena, Journal of International Development (9), pp. 263–79.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005) Equity, capabilities and health, Social Science & Medicine (60), pp. 219–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1997) Concepts of Human Development and Poverty: A Multidimensional Perspective (New York: United Nations Development Program).Google Scholar
and (2000) Human development and economic sustainability, World Development (28), pp. 2029–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000) The income component of the human development index, Journal of Human Development (1), p. 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1994) Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement (New York: Human Development Report Office United Nations Development Program).Google Scholar
and (1995) Gender Inequality in Human Development: Theories and Measurement (New York: Human Development Report Office United Nations Development Program).Google Scholar
(1995) Book review of ‘Inequality Reexamined’, by Amartya Sen, Economics and Philosophy (11), pp. 182–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Beyond homo economicus: new developments in theories of social norms, Philosophy and Public Affairs (29), pp. 170–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989) Equality and equal opportunity for welfare, Philosophical Studies (56), pp. 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Multidimensional deprivation: contrasting social welfare and counting approaches, Journal of Economic Inequality (1), p. 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Book review of ‘Resources, Values and Development’, by Amartya Sen, Economics and Philosophy (2), pp. 282–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Opportunity sets and individual well-being, Social Choice and Welfare (14), pp. 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Opportunity sets and uncertain consequences, Journal of Mathematical Economics (33) pp. 475–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004) Deprivation and social exclusion, CIREQ, 23. Cahiers de recherche, 2002–2004.Google Scholar
and (1999) A family in multidimensional poverty measures, in Advances in Econometrics, Income Distribution and Scientific Methodology: Essay in Honor of C. Dagum (New York: Physica-Verlas).Google Scholar
, and (2003) The measurement of multidimensional poverty, Journal of Economic Inequality (1), pp. 25–49.Google Scholar
and (1998) Measuring Well-being in the Functioning Space (Banco d'Italia Reseach Department).Google Scholar
Burchardt, T. (2003) Disability, capability and social exclusion, in Understanding Social Security: Issues for social policy and practice, (ed.) The Policy Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Capabilities and disability: the capabilities framework and the social model of disability, Disability and Society (19), pp. 736–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Are one man's rags another man's riches? Identifying adaptive expectations using panel data, Social Indicators Research (74), pp. 57–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) On the possibility of a weighting system for functionings, Indian Economic Review (XXXI), pp. 241–50.Google Scholar
(1996) Standard of living evaluation based on Sen's approach: some methodological questions, Politeia (12), pp. 47–53.Google Scholar
(2000) A multidimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen's functioning approach, Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali (108), pp. 207–39.Google Scholar
(2003) Concepts and perceptions of human well-being: some evidence from South Africa, Oxford Development Studies (31), pp. 173–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Sen's capability approach and the many spaces of human well-being, Journal of Development Studies (41), pp. 1339–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1993) Equality of what? On welfare, goods and capabilities, in The Quality of Life, and (eds.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Capability and happiness: possible synergies, Review of Social Economy (63), pp. 161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Objective and subjective quality of life: an interactive model, Social Indicators Research (52), pp. 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Normative life satisfaction: measurement issues and a homeostatic model, Social Indicators Research (64), pp. 225–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and (2000) Vulnerability, seasonality and poverty in Ethiopia, Journal of Development Studies (36), 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997) Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators, Social Indicators Research (40), pp. 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyal, L. and I. Gough (1992) Need satisfaction as a measure of human welfare, in Mixed Economies in Europe: An Evolutionary Perspective on their Emergence, Transition and Regulation, and (eds.) (Brookfield, VT: E. Elgar).Google Scholar
Drèze, J. and A. Sen (1991) Public action for social security: foundations and strategy, in Social Security in Developing Countries, et al. (eds.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997) Indian Development: Selected Regional Perspectives (Delhi, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1989) Hunger and Public Action (Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
and (2002) India, Development and Participation (New Delhi, New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996) Ranking opportunity sets and arrow impossibility theorems: correspondence results, Journal of Economic Theory (71), pp. 90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen's development as freedom, Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2), 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Development, Capabilities, and Freedom, Studies in Comparative International Development, (37)(2), 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. (2002) Equality of Resources Revisited, Ethics, (113), pp. 82–105.
(1994) Normative measurement: is theory relevant?, American Economic Review (84), pp. 365–70.Google Scholar
(1996) Needs and basic needs: a clarification of meanings, levels and different streams of work, Institute of Social Studies Working Paper No. 210 (The Hague, Institute of Social Studies).Google Scholar
and (2003) Development as Freedom – and as What Else?, Feminist Economics, (9:2/3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) On the axiomatic approach to freedom as opportunity: a general characterization result, Mathematical Social Sciences (42), pp. 169–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Irreducible social goods and the informational basis of Amartya Sen's capability approach. Journal of International Development, 9(2), pp. 235–50.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) Can a ranking of opportunity sets attach an intrinsic importance to freedom of choice, American Economic Review (84), pp. 454–8.Google Scholar
(1998) Ranking opportunity sets on the basis of their freedom of choice and their ability to satisfy preferences: a difficulty, Social Choice and Welfare (15), pp. 371–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Well-being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
and (2001) The inability to be self-reliant as an indicator of poverty: trends for the U.S., 1975–97, Review of Income and Wealth (47), pp. 335–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003) Special issue: conceptualising chronic poverty, World Development (31), pp. 403–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Measuring poverty and deprivation in South Africa, Review of Income and Wealth (46), pp. 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Freedom of choice – a comparison of different rankings of opportunity sets, Social Choice and Welfare (10), pp. 189–207.Google Scholar
(2005) Amartya Sen's Capability Approach: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications (Berlin: Springer).Google Scholar
and (2001) Capability failure and group disparities: some evidence from India for the 1980s, Journal of Development Studies (37), pp. 104–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002) On measuring deprivation adjusted for group disparities, Social Choice & Welfare (19), pp. 265–80.Google Scholar
and (1993) Measuring development? The United Nations Development Program's Human Development Index, Journal of International Development, 5(2), pp. 193–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005) Inequality and multidimensional well-being, Review of Income and Wealth (51), pp. 193–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Nature, functioning and capability: Aristotle on political distribution, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume, pp. 145–84.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1990) Aristotelian social democracy. Liberalism and the Good, , and (eds.) (New York: Routledge), pp. 203–52.Google Scholar
(1992) Human functioning and social justice. In defense of Aristotelian essentialism, Political Theory (20), pp. 202–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1993) Non-relative virtues: an aristotelian approach, in The Quality of Life, and (eds.) (Oxford:Clarendon Press), pp. 242–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1995) Aristotle on human nature and the foundations of ethics, in World, Mind, and Ethics: Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams, and (eds.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). pp. 86–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Human capabilities, female human being. Women, Culture, and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities, and (eds.) (Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press). pp. 61–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1998) The good as discipline, the good as freedom, in Ethics of Consumption: The Good Life, Justice and Global Stewardship, and (eds.) (Lanham, MD, Oxford: Rowmand and Littlefield Publishers), pp. 312–41.Google Scholar
(2000) Aristotle, politics and human capabilities: a response to Antony, Arneson, Charlesworth and Mulgan, Ethics (111), pp. 102–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Adaptive preferences and women's options, Economics and Philosophy (17), pp. 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice, Feminist Economics (9), pp. 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Public Philosophy and International Feminism, Ethics (108) (4), pp. 762–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Women's bodies: violence, security, capabilities, Journal of Human Development (6), pp. 167–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
and (eds.) (1995) Women, Culture, and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities (Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003) The choice of principal variables for computing some measures of human well-being, Social Indicators Research (64), pp. 139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) On opportunity inequality measurement, Journal of Economic Theory (77), pp. 300–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998) The measurement of opportunity inequality: a cardinality-based approach, Social Choice and Welfare (15), pp. 263–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Endorsement and freedom in Amartya Sen's capability approach, Economics and Philosophy (21), pp. 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1990) On ranking opportunity sets in terms of freedom of choice, Recherches Economiques de Louvain (56), pp. 383–90.Google Scholar
, and (2000) On diversity and freedom of choice, Mathematical Social Sciences (40), pp. 123–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000) On ranking opportunity sets in economic environments, Journal of Economic Theory (93), pp. 48–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Capability and freedom: a defence of Sen, Economics and Philosophy (17), pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Can the capability approach be justified?, Philosophical Topics (30), pp. 167–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Freedom of choice and rational decisions, Social Choice and Welfare (12), pp. 137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) An axiomatic approach to ‘preference for freedom of choice’, Journal of Economic Theory (68), pp. 174–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Capabilities, well-being and human development: a survey, The Journal of Development Studies (33), pp. 143–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qizilbash, M. (1998) Poverty: concept and measurement, Research Report No. 12, Sustainable Development Policy Institute, and paper presented at the annual conference of Development Studies Association, University of East Anglia, September 1997.
(2002) Development, common foes and shared values, Review of Political Economy (14), pp. 463–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) On the arbitrariness and robustness of multi-dimensional poverty rankings, Journal of Human Development (5), pp. 355–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Sen on freedom and gender justice, Feminist Economics (11), pp. 151–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Cambridge: Mass., Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
(2003) Sen's capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities, Feminist Economics (9), pp. 61–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Assessing global poverty and inequality: income, resources, and capabilities, Metaphilosophy (36), pp. 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Bibliography on the capability approach, 2004–2005, Journal of Human Development (6), pp. 421–26.Google Scholar
(2005) The capability approach: a theoretical survey, Journal of Human Development (6), pp. 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2003) Does the gender division of labor result in unjust inequalities?, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, July 9.
(2004) Changing times: work and leisure in postindustrial society (book review), Feminist Economics 10, pp. 155–9.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. E. (2002) Equality of Opportunity: A Progress Report, Social Choice and Welfare (19), pp. 455–71.
and (1990) Sen's concept of the living standard applied to the Belgian unemployed, Recherches Economiques de Louvain (56), pp. 429–50.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1980) Equality of What?, Tanner Lectures on Human Values, (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1984) Family and food: sex bias in poverty, in Resources Values & Development, (ed.) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). pp. 346–68.Google Scholar
(1985) Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984, The Journal of Philosophy, 82, 169–221.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1990) Development as capability expansion, in Human Development and the International Development Strategy for the 1990s, and (eds.) (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) A decade of human development, Journal of Human Development (1), p. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Health: perception versus observation, British Medical Journal (324), pp. 860–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2005) Human rights and capabilities, Journal of Human Development, 6, 151–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989) Basic needs strategies, human rights and the right to development, Human Rights Quarterly, (11), pp. 347–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002) Amartya Sen's contribution to development thinking, Studies in Comparative International Development, (37), 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Welfare, resources and capabilities: a review of inequality re-examined by Amartya Sen, Journal of Economic Literature (XXXVI), pp. 1947–62.Google Scholar
(2003) Opportunity as a space for individuality: its value and the impossibility of measuring it, Ethics (113), pp. 783–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Economic well-being and non-economic well-being: a review of the meaning and measurement of poverty, WIDER Research Paper #2004/30.Google Scholar
(2005) Beyond the dilemma of difference: the capability approach to disability and special educational needs, Journal of Philosophy of Education (39), pp. 443–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) A capability perspective on impairment, disability, and special needs: towards social justice in education, Theory and Research in Education (3), pp. 197–223.Google Scholar
and (2005) A ‘Fair Innings’ between the sexes: are men being treated inequitably?, Social Science & Medicine (60), pp. 277–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Multidimensional inequality and multidimensional generalised entropy measures: an axiomatic appproach, Social Choice & Welfare (16), pp. 145–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Multidimensional poverty indices, Social Choice & Welfare (19), pp. 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Crossing disciplinary boundaries: the potential of Sen's capability approach for sociologists of education, British Journal of Sociology of Education (24), pp. 665–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Framing social justice in education: what does the ‘capabilities’ approach offer?, British Journal of Educational Studies (51), pp. 168–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Towards a capability-based theory of social justice for education policy-making, Journal of Education Policy (21), pp. 163–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2000) World Development Report, 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty (New York: Oxford University Press).
(2002) Functioning, capability, and the standard of living – an axiomatic approach, Economic Theory (20), 387–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005) Comparing incomes when needs differ: equivalization for the extra costs of disability in the UK, Review of Income and Wealth (51), pp. 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 11
- Cited by