Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-k7rjm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-04T07:15:10.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Measuring capabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

By
Flavio Comim
Edited by
Flavio Comim ,
Mozaffar Qizilbash  and
Sabina Alkire
Flavio Comim
Affiliation:
Director of the Capability and Sustainability Centre (CSC) and Fellow of St Edmund's College University of Cambridge; Fellow of Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre (UFRGS) Brazil
Flavio Comim
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Mozaffar Qizilbash
Affiliation:
University of York
Sabina Alkire
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The measurement of capabilities is the most pressing challenge ahead for the operationalisation of the capability approach (CA). Yet the idea of measurement would seem prima facie inimical to the CA. Measurement in social sciences is usually identified with a narrowness of understanding about the application of concepts and theories. Quite often it involves dismissal of important qualitative information, such as what is important, good, or morally obligatory, focusing sometimes exclusively on quantitative information. In fact, in the jargon of the CA, we could say that measurement might entail a limitation of informational spaces used in evaluative assessments. Thus, in principle, it would seem that it is an error to insist on the measurement of capabilities. Whereas the CA puts forward a proposal for expansion of informational spaces for normative evaluations, assessment by measurement appears to narrow down those spaces, ignoring types of information that cannot be translated into concrete metrics. Sen (1999: 81) notes that the foundational merits of the CA do not

however, entail that the most fruitful focus of practical attention would invariably be measures of capabilities. Some capabilities are harder to measure than others, and attempts at putting them on a ‘metric’ may sometimes hide more than they reveal. [original emphasis]

Indeed, there are many different ways in which theories can be applied and, contrary to the conventional wisdom found, for instance, in mainstream economics, the operationalisation of a theory does not need to be limited to quantitative measurement.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The Capability Approach
Concepts, Measures and Applications
 , pp. 157 - 200
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Addabo, T., Di Tommaso, M. L. and Facchinetti, G. (2004) ‘To what extent fuzzy set theory and structural equation modelling can measure functionings? An application to child well-being,’ Proceedings of the 4thCapability Conference, Pavia, 5–7 September.
Aristotle. ‘Nichomachean Ethics’. In: Ackrill, J. L. (1987) A New Aristotle Reader. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah ([1958] 2002) ‘Two Concepts of Liberty.’ In: Berlin, Isaiah (2002) Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 166–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggeri, M., Libanora, R., Mariani, S. and Menchini, L. (2006) ‘Children Conceptualizing their Capabilities: Results of a Survey Conducted during the First Children's World Congress on Child Labour.’ Journal of Human Development 7(1): 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundtland, H. (1987) Our Common Future – The Brundtland Report. Oxford University Press (for the World Commission on Environment and Development).
Carter, I. (1999) A Measure of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappero-Martinetti, Enrica (2000) ‘A Multidimensional Assessment of Well-Being Based on Sen's Functioning Approach.’ Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali 108: 207–39.Google Scholar
Comim, Flavio (2005) ‘Capabilities and Happiness: Introductory Remarks’. Review of Social Economies, June.Google Scholar
Comim, Flavio (2001) ‘Richard Stone and Measurement Criteria for National Accounts.’ In: Klein, Juday and Morgan, Mary (eds.) (2001) The Age of Economic Measurement. London: Duke University Press, pp. 213–234.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary and Ney, Steven (1998) Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (1982) ‘Sour Grapes –Utilitarianism and the Genesis of Wants’. In: Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard (1982) Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno and Stutzer, Alois (2002) Happiness and Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, James (1986) Well-Being. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Klasen, Stephen (2000) ‘Measuring Poverty and Deprivation in South Africa’. Review of Income and Wealth, 46, 1, March.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnakumar, Jaya (2004) ‘Going Beyond Functionings to Capabilities: An Econometric Model to Explain and Estimate Capabilities’. Proceedings of the IV International Capability Conference, Pavia, Italy.
Nussbaum, M and Sen, A (1988) ‘Internal Criticism and Indian Rationalist Traditions’. In: Krausz, M. (ed.) Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (1990) Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (1999) Sex and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (2003) ‘Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice.’ Feminist Economics, 9(2/3): 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Onora (2002) Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qizilbash, Mozaffar (2002) ‘Development, Common Foes and Shared Values’. Review of Political Economy, 14(4): 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, Ingrid (2000a) ‘An Unworkable Idea or a Promising Alternative? Sen's Capability Approach Re-examined.’ In: Center for Economic Studies Discussion on Paper 00.30. Unversity of Leuven, mimeo.
Roemer, John (1996) Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schischka, J. (2002) ‘The Capabilities Approach as a Metric for Economic Development: An Application in Nepal’. Conference Proceedings: ‘Promoting Women's Capabilities: examining Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach’ 9–10 September. Von Hugel Institute, St Edmund's College Cambridge. http://www.ctedmunds.cam.ac.uk/vhi/sen/program1.shtml.
Sen, Amartya (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1998) ‘Mortality as an Indicator of Economic Success and Failure’. Economic Journal, 108: 447, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. (1997) On Economic Inequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1994) ‘Economic Regress: Concepts and Features’. Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1993a) ‘Capability and Well-Being’. In: Nussbaum, Martha and Sen, Amartya (1993) The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1993b) ‘Positional Objectivity.’ Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22(2): 126–145.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1992) Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1987) ‘The Standard of Living’. In: Sen, A. K., Muellbauer, J., Kanbur, R., Hart, K. and Williams, B., The Standard of Living: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1985) Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1981) ‘Plural Utility’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 80, 1980–1.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1980) ‘Equality of What?’ In: Sen, Amartya (1982) Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Singleton, Royce A., Straits, Bruce C. and Margaret, Miller Straits (1993) Approaches to Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singleton, Royce and Straits, Bruce (1999) Approaches to Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, third edition.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, T. N. (1994) ‘Human Development: A New Paradigm or Reinvention of the Wheel?’ AEA Papers and Proceedings. Vol. 84, n. 2, pp. 238–243.Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert (1993) ‘Welfare, Resources, and Capabilities: A Review of Inequality Reexamined by Amartya Sen’. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 31, n. 4, pp. 1947–1962.Google Scholar
Teschl, Miriam and Comim, Flavio (2005) ‘Adaptive Preferences and Capabilities: Preliminary Considerations’. Review of Social Economies June.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1987) ‘The Standard of Living: Interests and Capabilities’. In: Sen, A. K., Muellbauer, J., Kanbur, R., Hart, K. and Williams, B., The Standard of Living: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ysander, Bengt-Christer (1993) ‘Robert Erikson: Descriptions of Inequality’. In: Nussbaum, Martha and Sen, Amartya (1993) The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Measuring capabilities
    • By Flavio Comim, Director of the Capability and Sustainability Centre (CSC) and Fellow of St Edmund's College University of Cambridge; Fellow of Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre (UFRGS) Brazil
  • Edited by Flavio Comim, University of Cambridge, Mozaffar Qizilbash, University of York, Sabina Alkire, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Capability Approach
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492587.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Measuring capabilities
    • By Flavio Comim, Director of the Capability and Sustainability Centre (CSC) and Fellow of St Edmund's College University of Cambridge; Fellow of Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre (UFRGS) Brazil
  • Edited by Flavio Comim, University of Cambridge, Mozaffar Qizilbash, University of York, Sabina Alkire, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Capability Approach
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492587.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Measuring capabilities
    • By Flavio Comim, Director of the Capability and Sustainability Centre (CSC) and Fellow of St Edmund's College University of Cambridge; Fellow of Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre (UFRGS) Brazil
  • Edited by Flavio Comim, University of Cambridge, Mozaffar Qizilbash, University of York, Sabina Alkire, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Capability Approach
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492587.007
Available formats
×