Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-pxgks Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-04T17:43:44.818Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

1 - Using the capability approach: prospective and evaluative analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Sabina Alkire
Director Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) University of Oxford
Flavio Comim
University of Cambridge
Mozaffar Qizilbash
University of York
Sabina Alkire
University of Oxford
Get access


‘Anxiety is the mark of spiritual insecurity. It is the fruit of unanswered questions. But questions cannot go unanswered unless they first be asked. And there is a far worse anxiety, a far worse insecurity, which comes from being afraid to ask the right questions – because they might turn out to have no answer. One of the moral diseases we communicate to one another in society comes from huddling together in the pale light of an insufficient answer to a question we are afraid to ask.’

The focal question

The focal question of the conference that gave rise to this volume was how Amartya Sen's capability approach, which appears to have captured the interest of many, could be put to use in confronting poverties and injustices systematically and at a significant level. The often-discussed issue beneath that question is whether the research sparked by the capability approach gives rise to more effective practical methodologies to address pressing social problems. Of course ensuing applications are not the only grounds on which to examine a proposition – its theoretical implications, its measurability, or its conceptual coherence might also be fruitfully examined, for example. The extent to which specific applications and techniques embody the approach – their accuracy and limitations – might also be of interest. But in the context of poverty and justice it would appear directly relevant to evaluate concrete applications and consequences, whatever else we also examine. Such a sharp focus might generate anxiety.

The Capability Approach
Concepts, Measures and Applications
, pp. 26 - 50
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Alkire, S. 2002. Valuing Freedoms. Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. New York, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkire, S. 2005. ‘Why the Capability Approach?Journal of Human Development 6 (1): 115–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkire, S. 2006. ‘Instrumental Freedoms and Human Capabilities,’ mimeo
Alkire, S. 2007. ‘Choosing Dimensions: the Capability Approach and Multidimensional Poverty’, in The Many Dimensions of Poverty, Silber, J. (ed.), New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. 1999. ‘The Contributions of Amartya Sen to Welfare Economics’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 101 (2): 173–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, K. and Calva, L. F. López 2002. Functionings and Capabilities. México: Centro de Estudios Económicos El Colegio de MéxicoGoogle Scholar
Bohman, J. 1996. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. A. 2005. ‘Sen's Capability Approach and the Many Spaces of Human Well-Being’, Journal of Development Studies 41 (8): 1339–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colander, D. 1992. ‘The Lost Art of Economics’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 6 (3): 191–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, D. 2006. ‘Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy – An Introduction’, Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 26 (1/2): 21–7Google Scholar
Crocker, D. 1992. ‘Functioning and Capabilities: the Foundation of Sen's and Nussbaum's Development Ethic’, Political Theory 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, D. 1995. ‘Functioning and Capability: The Foundation of Sen's and Nussbaum's Development Ethic, Part II’, in Nussbaum, M. and Glover, J.. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Herdt, T. and Deneulin, S., Eds. 2007. Special Issue: Individual Freedoms as Relational Experiences, Journal of Human Development 8: 2, July
Deneulin, S. 2002. ‘Perfectionism, Paternalism and Liberalism in Sen and Nussbaum's Capability Approach’, Review of Political Economy 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deneulin, S. 2006. The Capability Approach and the Praxis of Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deneulin, S., Nebel, M. and Sagovsky, N.. 2006. Transforming Unjust Structures: The Capability Approach. Dordrecht: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drèze, J. and Sen, A. K. 1989. Hunger and Public Action. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Drèze, J. and Sen, A. K. 2002. India, Development and Participation. New Delhi, New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, P. 2002. ‘Collective Capabilities, Culture, and Amartya Sen's Development as Freedom’, Studies in Comparative International Development 37 (2): 54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuda-Parr, S. 2003. ‘The Human Development Approach: Operationalizing Sen's Ideas on Capabilities’, Feminist Economics 9 (2–3): 301–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasper, D. 2002. ‘Is Sen's Capability Approach an Adequate Basis for Considering Human Development?’, Review of Political Economy 14 (4): 435–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasper, D. 1997. ‘Sen's Capability Approach and Nussbaum's Capability Ethics’, Journal of International Development 9 (2): 281–3023.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasper, D. and Staveren, I. 2003. ‘Development as Freedom – And as What Else?’, Feminist Economics 9(2/3): 137–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooptu, N. 2002. ‘Sex Workers in Calcutta and the Dynamics of Collective Action: Political Activism, Community Identity and Group Behaviour’, in Group Behaviour and Development: Is the Market Destroying Cooperation?, Heyer, J., Stewart, F. and Thorp, R. (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gore, C. 1997. ‘Irreducible Social Goods and the Informational Basis of Amartya Sen's Capability Approach’, Journal of International Development 9 (2): 235–503.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibrahim, S. 2006. ‘From Individual to Collective Capabilities: The Capability Approach as a Conceptual Framework for Self-help’, Journal of Human Development 7 (3): 397–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklys, W. 2005. Amartya Sen's Capability Approach: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications. Berlin: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Malenbaum, W. 1988. ‘Amartya Sen on Future Development Policy and Program: Review Article’, Economic Development & Cultural Change 36 (2): 401–09CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, T. 1955. No Man is an Island. New York: Harcourt BraceGoogle Scholar
Myrdal, G. 1953. Political Elements in the Development of Economic Theory. London: International Library of SociologyGoogle Scholar
Myrdal, G. 1958. Value in Social Theory. London: Allen and UnwinGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2003. ‘Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice’, Feminist Economics 9 (2–3): 33–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omkarnath, G. 1997. ‘Capabilities and the Process of Development’. Centre for Development Studies Working Paper, No. 275. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
Pressman, S. and Summerfield, G. 2002. ‘Sen and Capabilities’, Review of Political Economy 14 (4): 429–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qizilbash, M. 1996. ‘Capabilities, Well-Being and Human Development: A Survey’, The Journal of Development Studies 33(2): 143–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1992. One Self as Another. Kathleen Blamey, trans. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Robbins, L. C. R. 1932. An Essay on the Nature & Significance of Economic Science. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2005. ‘The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey’, Journal of Human Development 6 (1): 93–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2005. ‘Selecting Capabilities for Quality of Life Measurement’, Social Indicators Research 74 (1): 191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2000. An Unworkable Idea or a Promising Alternative? Sen's Capability Approach Re-examined, Center for Economic Studies Discussion Paper 0030. University of Leuven, mimeo
Sen, A. 2004. ‘Capabilities, Lists, and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation’, Feminist Economics 10 (3): 77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 2004. ‘Economic Methodology: Heterogeneity and Relevance’, Social Research 71 (3): 583–614Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1992. Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 1997. ‘Maximization and the Act of Choice’, Econometrica 65 (4): 745–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 2002. ‘Response to Commentaries’, Studies in Comparative International Development 37 (2): 78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 2002. ‘What Difference Can Ethics Make?’, International Meeting on ‘Ethics and Development’ of Inter-American Development Bank on Collaboration with the Norwegian GovernmentGoogle Scholar
Stewart, F. 1996. ‘Basic Needs, Capabilities, and Human Development,’ in In Pursuit of the Quality of Life, Offer, A. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Stewart, F. 2005. ‘Groups and Capabilities’, Journal of Human Development 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, F. and Deneulin, S. 2002. ‘Amartya Sen's Contribution to Development Thinking’, Studies in Comparative International Development 37 (2): 61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeten, P. 2000. ‘Freedom and Welfare: A Review Essay on Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom’, Population & Development Review 26 (1): 153–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, V. 1995. ‘Amartya Sen on Inequality, Capabilities and Needs: Review Article’, Science & Society 59 (4): 556–69Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats