Ahmed, I., Sutton, A. and Riley, R., ‘Assessment of Publication Bias, Selection Bias, and Unavailable Data in Meta-analyses Using Individual Participant Data: A Database Survey’, British Medical Journal, 344 (2012), d7762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexy, R., ‘Verfassungsrecht und einfaches Recht – Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit und Fachgerichtsbarkeit’, Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer, 61 (2002), pp. 7–33.Google Scholar

Applegate, W. B., Furberg, C. D. and Byungton, R. P., ‘The Multicenter Isradipine Diuretic Athersclerosis Study (Midas)’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 277 (1996), pp. 297–8.Google Scholar

Augsberg, I., ‘Subjektive und objektive Dimensionen der Wissenschaftsfreiheit’ in Voigt, F. (ed.), Freiheit der Wissenschaft. Beiträge zu ihrer Bedeutung, Normativität und Funktion (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012), pp. 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, A., and Dörter, F., ‘The Association between a Journal’s Source of Revenue and the Drug Recommendations Made in the Articles it Publishes’, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 183 (2011), pp. 544–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bombardier, C., Laine, L. and Reicin, A., ‘Comparison of Upper Gastrointestinal Toxicity of Rofecoxib and Naproxen in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. VIGOR Study Group’, The New England Journal of Medicine, 343 (2000), pp. 1520–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bumke, C., ‘Universitäten im Wettbewerb’, Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer, 69 (2009), pp. 407–61.Google Scholar

Chan, A.-W., Hróbjartsson, A. and Haahr, M. T., ‘Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials: Comparison of Protocols to Published Articles’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 291 (2004), pp. 2457–65.Google Scholar

Christensen, R., and Fischer-Lescano, A., Das Ganze des Rechts. Vom hierarchischen zum reflexiven Verständnis deutscher und europäischer Grundrechte (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2007).Google Scholar

Cicero, M. T., De Natura Deorum (London: Methuen, 1896).Google Scholar

Clapham, A., Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conrad, D., Freiheitsrechte und Arbeitsverfassung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Angelis, C., and Drazen, J. M., ‘Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors’, The New England Journal of Medicine, 351 (2004), pp. 1250–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dickersin, K., Min, Y.-I. and Meinert, C. L., ‘Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results. Follow-up of Applications Submitted to two Institutional Review Boards’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 267 (1992), pp. 374–8.Google ScholarPubMed

Dirnagl, U., and Lauritzen, M., ‘Fighting Publication Bias: Introducing the Negative Results Sections’, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 30 (2010), pp. 1263–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dreier, H., Dimensionen der Grundrechte. Von der Wertordnungsjudikatur zu den objektiv-rechtlichen Grundrechtsgehalten (Hannover: Hennies and Zinkhusen, 1993).Google Scholar

Dürig, G., ‘Grundrechte und Zivilrechtsprechung’ in Maunz, T. (ed.), Vom Bonner Grundgesetz zur gesamtdeutschen Verfassung: Festschrift Hans Nawiasky (München: Isar, 1956), pp. 157–210.Google Scholar

Easterbrook, P. J., Berlin, J. A., Gopalan, R. and Matthews, D., ‘Publication Bias in Clinical Research’, The Lancet, 337 (1991), pp. 867–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eyding, D., Lelgemann, M. and Grouven, U., ‘Reboxetine for a Cute Treatment of Major Depression: Sytematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published and Unpublished Placebo and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Controlled Trials’, British Medical Journal, 341 (2010), c4737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fanelli, D., ‘Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data’, PLoS ONE, 5 (2010), pp. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fischer-Lescano, A., ‘Kritik der praktischen Konkordanz’, Kritische Justiz, 2 (2008), pp. 166–77.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 25 (2004), pp. 999–1045.Google Scholar

Franzen, M., Breaking News: Wissenschaftliche Zeitschriften im Kampf um Aufmerksamkeit (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fugh-Berman, A. J., ‘The Haunting of Medical Journals: How Ghostwriting Sold “HRT”’, PLoS Medicine, 7 (2010), e1000335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Galtung, J., ‘Institutionalized Conflict Resolution: A Theoretical Paradigm’, Journal of Peace Research, 2 (1965), pp. 348–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gamillscheg, F., ‘Die Grundrechte im Arbeitsrecht’, Archiv für die civilistische Praxis, 164 (1964), pp. 385–445.Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S., ‘The “Horizontal Effect” of Constitutional Rights’, Michigan Law Review, 102 (2003), pp. 387–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerstenberg, O., ‘Private Law, Constitutionalism and the Limits of Judicial Role’ in Scott, C. (ed.), Torture as Tort: Comparative Perspectives on the Development of Transnational Human Rights Litigation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), pp. 687–703.Google Scholar

Graber, C., Zwischen Geist und Geld: Interferenzen von Kunst und Wirtschaft aus rechtlicher Sicht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1994).Google Scholar

Han, B.-C., ‘Im digitalen Panoptikum: Wir fühlen uns frei. Aber wir sind es nicht’, Der Spiegel, (2014)2, p. 106.Google Scholar

Hesse, K., Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 4th edn. (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 1999).Google Scholar

Horton, R., ‘Medical Editors Trial Amnesty’, The Lancet, 350 (1997), pp. 756ff.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jäger, H., Makrokriminalität: Studien zur Kriminologie kollektiver Gewalt (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1989).Google Scholar

Jefferson, T., Jones, M., Doshi, P., Del Mar, C.B., Heneghan, C.J., Hama, R. and Thompson, M.J., ‘Neuraminidase Inhibitors for Preventing and Treating Influenza in Healthy Adults and Children’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2012), Art. No.: CD008965.Google Scholar

Kanalan, I., ‘Horizontal Effect of Human Rights in the Era of Transnational Constellations: On the Accountability of Private Actors for Human Rights Violations’, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2539110 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karavas, V., Digitale Grundrechte: Zur Drittwirkung der Grundrechte im Internet (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2006).Google Scholar

Krajewska, A., ‘In Search of the Holy Grail of Transparent and Coherent Global Health Law’, 2013, available at: http://campus.hec.fr/global-transparency/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Krajewska-Transparency-and-global-health.pdf.Google Scholar

Krimsky, S., Science in the Public Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? (New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003).Google Scholar

Ladeur, K. H., Kritik der Abwägung in der Grundrechtsdogmatik (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004).Google Scholar

Ladeur, K. H. Das Medienrecht und die Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit. In Sachen Dieter Bohlen, Maxim Biller, Caroline von Monaco u.a. (Köln: Halem, 2007).Google Scholar

Lexchin, J., Bero, L., Djulbegovic, B. and Clark, O., ‘Pharmaceutical Industry Sponsorship and Research Outcome and Quality: Systematic Review’, British Medical Journal, 326 (2003), pp. 1167–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Luhmann, N., Grundrechte als Institution: Ein Beitrag zur politischen Soziologie (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1965).Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1990).Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. ‘The World Society as a Social System’ in Luhmann, N. (ed.), Essays on Self-Reference (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990), pp. 175–90.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. ‘Das Paradox der Menschenrechte und drei Formen seiner Entfaltung’ in Luhmann, N. (ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung 6: Die Soziologie und der Mensch (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1995), pp. 229–36.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. Social Systems, 2 vol. (Stanford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. Theory of Society (Stanford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Mathews, J., and Stone Sweet, A., ‘All Things in Proportion? American Rights Review and the Problem of Balancing’, Emory Law Journal, 4 (2011), pp. 102–79.Google Scholar

Medwedjew, S. A., Der Fall Lyssenko. Eine Wissenschaft kapituliert (Hamburg: Hoffmann & Campe, 1971).Google Scholar

Muir Watt, H., ‘Conflict of Laws Unbounded: The Case of Legal-Pluralist Revival’, Transnational Legal Theory, 7 (2016 forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nowotny, H., ‘The Changing Nature of Public Science’ in Nowotny, H. (ed.), The Public Nature of Science under Assault. Politics, Markets, Science and the Law (Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 2005), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar

Nolan, J., ‘With Power Comes Responsibility: Human Rights and Corporate Responsibilities’, University of New South Wales Law Journal, 28 (2005), p. 581ff.Google Scholar

Nowrot, K., ‘Den “Kinderschuhen” entwachsen: Die (Wieder-) Entdeckung der rechtssoziologischen Perspektive in der Dogmatik der Völkerrechtssubjektivität’, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 28 (2007), pp. 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petryna, A., When Experiments Travel: Clinical Trials and the Global Search for Human Subjects (Princeton University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfeffer, C., and Olsen, B. R., ‘Editorial: Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine’, Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, 1 (2002), p. 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Public Library of Science, Medicine Editors, ‘Ghostwriting Revisited: New Perspectives but Few Solutions in Sight’, PLoS Medicine, 8 (2011), e1001084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quack, C., and Wackerbeck, A., ‘Die Verpflichtung zur Registrierung und Veröffentlichung klinischer Studien: Darstellung der europäischen Rechtslage im Vergleich zur US-Regelung nach dem FDA Amendment Act’, GesundheitsRecht, 1 (2010), pp. 6–12.Google Scholar

Ridder, H., Die Freiheit der Kunst nach dem Grundgesetz (Berlin: Vahlen, 1963).Google Scholar

Ridder, H. Die soziale Ordnung des Grundgesetzes (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rüfner, W., ‘Grundrechtsadressaten’ in Isensee, J. and Kirchhof, P. (eds.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 2011), pp. 83-125.Google Scholar

Ruggie, J., ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Human Rightsand Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’, UN Doc. A/HRC/8/5 (7 April 2008).Google Scholar

Schaaber, J., Kochen, M., Müller-Oerlinghausen, B. and Niebling, W., ‘Warum unabhängige Arzneimittelzeitschriften und Fortbildungsveranstaltungen wichtig sind’ in Lieb, K., Klemperer, D., Ludwig, W.-D. and Kochen, M. (eds.), Interessenskonflikte in der Medizin – Hintergründe und Lösungsmöglichkeiten (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011), pp. 238–50.Google Scholar

Schierbeck, J., ‘Operational Measures for Identifying and Implementing Human Rights Issues in Corporate Operations’ in Eide, A., Bergesen, O. and Goyer, P. (eds.), Human Rights and the Oil Industry (Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2000), pp. 161–77.Google Scholar

Schmidt-Aßmann, E., ‘Wissenschaftsplanung im Wandel’ in Erbguth, W., Oebbecke, J. and Rengeling, H.-W. (eds.), Planung. Festschrift für Werner Hoppe zum 70. Geburtstag (München: C.H. Beck, 2000), pp. 649–65.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C., ‘Freiheitsrechte und institutionelle Garantien der Reichsverfassung (1931)’ in Schmitt, C. (ed.), Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1924–1954 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1985), pp. 140–78.Google Scholar

Schott, G., Pachl, H. and Limbach, U., ‘Finanzierung von Arzneimittelstudien durch pharmazeutische Unternehmen und die Folgen; Teil 1: qualitative systematische Literaturübersicht zum Einfluss auf Studienergebnisse, -protokoll und -qualität’, Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 107 (2010), pp. 279–85.Google Scholar

Schott, G., Pachl, H. and Limbach, U. ‘Finanzierung von Arzneimittelstudien durch pharmazeutische Unternehmen und die Folgen; Teil 2: qualitative systematische Literaturübersicht zum Einfluss auf Autorenschaft, Zugang zu Studiendaten sowie -registrierung und Publikation’, Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 107 (2010), pp. 295–301.Google Scholar

Schwabe, J., Die sogenannte Drittwirkung der Grundrechte. Zur Einwirkung der Grundrechte auf den Privatrechtsverkehr (München: Goldmann, 1971).Google Scholar

Selznick, P., Law, Society and Industrial Justice (New York: Russell Sage, 1969).Google Scholar

Smith, M. L., ‘Publication Bias and Meta-analysis’, Evaluation in Education, 4 (1980), pp. 22–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinhauer, F., ‘Das Grundrecht der Kunstfreiheit: Kommentar zu einem Grundlagentext von Helmut Ridder’ in Vesting, T., Korioth, S. and Augsberg, I. (eds.), Grundrechte als Phänomene kollektiver Ordnung. Zur Wiedergewinnung des Gesellschaftlichen in der Grundrechtstheorie und Grundrechtsdogmatik (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), pp. 247–82.Google Scholar

Stern, J., and Simes, R. J., ‘Publication Bias: Evidence of Delayed Publication in a Cohort Study of Clinical Research Projects’, British Medical Journal, 315 (1997), pp. 640–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stichweh, R., Wissenschaft, Universität, Professionen (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1994).Google Scholar

Stichweh, R. ‘Einheit und Differenz im Wissenschaftssystem der Moderne’ in Halfmann, J. and Rohbeck, J. (eds.), Zwei Kulturen der Wissenschaft - Revisited (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2007), pp. 213–28.Google Scholar

Stolleis, M., Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland IV (München: C.H. Beck, 2012).Google Scholar

Sutton, A., Duval, S. J. and Tweedie, R. L., ‘Empirical Assessment of Effect of Publication Bias on Meta-Analysis’, British Medical Journal, 320 (2000), pp. 1574–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, G., ‘The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by “Private” Transnational Actors’, Modern Law Review, 69 (2006), pp. 327–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, G. Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tonks, A., ‘A Clinical Trials Register for Europe’, British Medical Journal, 325 (2002), pp. 1314–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tramèr, M. R., Reynolds, D. J., Moore, A. and McQuay, H., ‘Impact of Covert Duplicate Publication on Meta-Analysis: a Case Study’, British Medical Journal, 315 (1997), pp. 635–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Verschraegen, G., ‘Differentiation and Inclusion: A Neglected Sociological Approach to Fundamental Rights’ in Madsen, M. R. and Verschraegen, G. (eds.), Making Human Rights Intelligible: Towards a Sociology of Human Rights (Oxford: Hart, 2013), pp. 61–80.Google Scholar

Vesting, T., Rechtstheorie: Ein Studienbuch (München: Beck, 2007).Google Scholar

Vesting, T. ‘Die Tagesschau-App und die Notwendigkeit der Schaffung eines “Intermedienkollisionsrechts”’ in Spiecker, I. (ed.), Karlsruher Dialog zum Informationsrecht (Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing, 2013), vol. IV, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

Vesting, T. Die Medien des Rechts: Computernetzwerke (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viellechner, L., Transnationalisierung des Rechts (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2013).Google Scholar

Viens, A. M., and Savulescu, J., ‘Introduction to the Olivieri Symposium’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 30 (2004), pp. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, M., Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, 3rd edn. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1968).Google Scholar

Wheatley, S., ‘Deliberating about Cosmopolitan Ideas: Does a Democratic Conception of Human Rights Make Sense?’ in Frouville, O. d. (ed.), Le Cosmopolitisme Juridique (Paris: Pedone, 2015), available at: SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2485068.Google Scholar

Wiethölter, R., ‘Justifications of a Law of Society’ in Perez, O. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Paradoxes and Inconsistencies in the Law (Oxford: Hart, 2005), pp. 65–77.Google Scholar

World Health Organization, ‘International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP)’, 2012, available at: www.who.int/ictrp/en.Google Scholar

Zöllner, W., ‘Regelungsspielräume im Schuldvertragsrecht: Bemerkungen zur Grundrechtsanwendung im Privatrecht und zu den sogenannten Ungleichgewichtslagen’, Archiv für die civilistische Praxis, 196 (1996), pp. 1–36.Google Scholar

Ackerman, B., ‘The Rise of World Constitutionalism’, Virginia Law Review, 83 (1997), pp. 771–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atlan, H., Entre le cristal et la fumée: essai sur l’organisation du vivant (Paris: Seuil, 1979).Google Scholar

Berman, H. J., Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Biaggini, G., Die Idee der Verfassung – Neuausrichtung im Zeitalter der Globalisierung?’, Zeitschrift für Schweizerisches Recht, 119 (2000), pp. 445–76.Google Scholar

Botero, E. S., Entre el Juez Salomón y el Dios Sira. Decisiones interculturales e interés superior del niño (Bogotá: University of Amsterdam and Unicef, 2006).Google Scholar

Burdeau, G., Traité de Science Politique, 2nd edn (Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1968), vol. I.Google Scholar

Canotilho, J. J. G., Direito constitucional. 5th edn (Coimbra: Almedina, 1991).Google Scholar

Canotilho, J. J. G., ‘Brancosos’ e interconstitucionalidade: Itinerários dos discursos sobre a historicidade constitucional (Coimbra: Almedina, 2006).Google Scholar

Calliess, G.-P., ‘Reflexive Transnational Law: The Privatisation of Civil Law and the Civilisation of Private Law’, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 23 (2002), pp. 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calliess, G.-P., and Maurer, A., ‘Transnationales Recht – Eine Einleitung’ in Calliess, G.-P. (ed.), Transnationales Recht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), pp. 1–36.Google Scholar

Calliess, G.-P., and Zumbansen, P., Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar

Carroll, L., ‘Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There [1872]’. The Complete Works of Lewis Carroll (London: The Nonesuch Press and New York: Random House, 1939), pp. 133–272.Google Scholar

Darwin, C., The Origins of Species. Introduction by Matthews, L. H. (London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd, 1971) [6th edn, 1872].Google Scholar

Engels, F., ‘Die Lage Englands. II. Die englische Konstitution’ in Marx, K. and Engels, F. (eds), Werke. 15th edn (Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1988), Vol. I, pp. 569–92 [first published in Vorwärts!, No 75, 18 September 1844].Google Scholar

Fassbender, B., ‘The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 (1998), pp. 529–619.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, P. K., Three Dialogues on Knowledge (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991).Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., Globalverfassung: Die Geltungsbegründung der Menschenrechte (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2005).Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2006).Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., ‘Fragmentierung des Weltrechts: Vernetzung globaler Regimes statt etatischer Rechtseinheit’ in Albert, M. and Stichweh, Rudolf (eds.), Weltstaat und Weltstaatlichkeit: Beobachtungen globaler politischer Strukturbildung (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2007), pp. 37–61.Google Scholar

Friedman, L. M., ‘Frontiers: National and Transnational Order’ in Ladeur, K.-H. (ed.), Public Governance in the Age of Globalization (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 25–50.Google Scholar

Gross, O., ‘“Control Systems” and the Migration of Anomalies’ in Choudhry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 403–30.Google Scholar

Günther, K., Der Sinn für Angemessenheit: Anwendungsdiskurse in Moral und Recht (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988) [English trans.: The Sense of Appropriateness: Application Discourses in Morality and Law (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993)].Google Scholar

Haldane, J. B. S., ‘Disease and Evolution’ in Dronamraju, K. R. (ed.), Selected Genetic Papers of J. B. S. Haldane (New York and London: Garland, 1990), pp. 325–34 [first published in La Ricerca Scientifica, Supplemento, 19 (1949), pp. 2–11].Google Scholar

Hamilton, W. D., ‘Sex versus Non-Sex versus Parasite’, Oikos, 35 (1980), pp. 282–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, W. D., Axelrod, R. and Tanese, R., ‘Sexual Reproduction as an Adaptation to Resist Parasites (A Review)’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 87 (1990), pp. 3566–73.Google ScholarPubMed

Hamilton, W. D., Henderson, P. A. and Moran, N. A., ‘Fluctuation of Environment and Coevolved Antagonist Polymorphism as Factors in the Maintenance of Sex’ in Alexander, R. D. and Tinkle, D. W. (eds.), Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and New Theory (New York: Chiron Press, 1981), pp. 363–81.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Heller, H., Staatslehre (Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff, 1934).Google Scholar

Hofstadter, D., Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid (Hassocks: The Harvester Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Jessup, P. C., Transnational Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Allgemeine Staatslehre (Bad Homburg v. d. Höhe, Berlin and Zurich: Gehlen, 1925).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., General Theory of Law and State, English trans. by Wedberg, A. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1946).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Reine Rechtslehre, 2nd edn (Vienna: Franz Deuticke, 1960).Google Scholar

Koselleck, R., ‘Begriffsgeschichtliche Probleme der Verfassungsgeschichtsschreibung’ in Koselleck, R. (ed.), Begriffsgeschichten: Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2006), pp. 365–401.Google Scholar

Lassalle, F., ‘Über Verfassungswesen’ [1962] in Friederici, H. J. (ed.), Reden und Schriften (Cologne: Röderberg, 1987), pp. 120–47.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., Rechtssoziologie 3rd edn (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1987) [English trans.: A Sociological Theory of Law, 2nd edn (Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge, 2014)].Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1984) [English trans.: Social Systems (Stanford University Press, 1995)].Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., ‘Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft’, Rechtshistorisches Journal, 9 (1990), pp. 176–220.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., ‘Ich sehe was, was Du nicht siehst’ in Luhmann, N. (ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung 5: Konstruktivistische Perspektiven (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1990), pp. 228–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, N., Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993) [English trans.: Law as a Social System (Oxford University Press, 2004)].Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., Die Politik der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000).Google Scholar

Maduro, M. P., A Constituição Plural: Constitucionalismo e União Européia (Cascais: Principia, 2006).Google Scholar

Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J., Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J., Der Baum der Erkenntnis: Die biologischen Wurzeln des menschlichen Erkennens, German trans. by Ludewig, Kurt, 3rd edn (Bern, Munich and Vienna: Scherz, 1987).Google Scholar

Meirmans, S., ‘The Evolution of the Problem of Sex’ in Schön, I., Martens, K. and van Dijk, P. (eds.), Lost Sex: The Evolutionary Biology of Parthenogenesis (Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer, 2009), pp. 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merry, S. E., ‘Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle’, American Anthropologist, 108 (2006), pp. 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michaelis, R., ‘Was ist nichtstaatliches Recht? – Eine Einführung’ in Calliess, G.-P. (ed.), Transnationales Recht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), pp. 39–56.Google Scholar

Neiman, M., and Koskella, B., (2009), ‘Sex and Red Queen’ in Schön, I., Martens, K. and van Dijk, P. (eds.), Lost Sex: The Evolutionary Biology of Parthenogenesis (Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer, 2009), pp. 133–59.Google Scholar

Neves, M., ‘Justicia y Diferencia en una Sociedad Global Compleja’, Doxa – Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, 24 (2001), pp. 349–77.Google Scholar

Neves, M., ‘A força simbólica dos direitos humanos’, Revista Eletrônica de Direito do Estado, 4 (2005), pp. 1–35 [English trans.: ‘The Symbolic Force of Human Rights’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 33 (2007), pp. 411–44].Google Scholar

Neves, M., Entre Têmis e Leviatã: uma relação difícil – o Estado democrático de direito a partir e além de Luhmann e Habermas (São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006).Google Scholar

Neves, M., Transconstitucionalismo (São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2009) [English trans.: Transconstitutionalism (Oxford: Hart, 2013)].Google Scholar

Pernice, I., ‘Multilevel Constitutionalism and Treaty of Amsterdam: European Constitution-Making Revisited?’, Common Market Law Review, 36 (1999), pp. 703–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pernice, I., ‘Multilevel Constitutionalism in the European Union’, European Law Review, 27 (2002), pp. 511–29.Google Scholar

Pires, F. L., Introdução ao direito constitucional europeu (seu sentido, problemas e limites) (Coimbra: Almedina, 1997).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, 1990 [orig. 1972]).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., The Law of Peoples, with ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’ (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Ridley, M., The Red Queen: Sex and Evolution of Human Nature (New York: Harper Collins, 2003).Google Scholar

Roach, K., ‘The Post-9/11 Migration of Britain’s Terrorism Act 2000’ in Choudhry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 373–402.Google Scholar

Scheppele, K. L., ‘The Migration of Anti-constitutional Ideas: the Post-9/11 Globalization of Public Law and the International State of Emergency’ in Choudhry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge University Press), pp. 347–73.Google Scholar

Segato, R. L., ‘Antropologia e direitos humanos: alteridade e ética no movimento de expansão dos direitos universais’, Mana: Estudos de antropologia social, 12 (2006), pp. 207–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segato, R. L., ‘Que cada pueblo teja los hilos de su historia. El pluralismo jurídico en diálogo didáctico con legisladores’ in Chenaut, N., Gómez, M., Ortiz, H. and Sierra, M. T. (eds.), Justicia y diversidad en América Latina. Pueblos indígenas ante la globalización (Mexico: CIESAS and Quito: FLACSO, 2011), pp. 357–81.Google Scholar

Smend, R., ‘Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht’ in Smend, R., (ed.) Staatsrechtliche Abhandlungen und andere Aufsätze, 2nd edn (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1968 [orig. 1928]), pp. 119–276.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., (1982). ‘Reflexives Recht: Entwicklungsmodelle des Rechts in vergleichender Perspektive’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 68 (1982), pp. 13–59.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., Recht als autopoietisches System (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989) [English trans.: Law as an Autopoietic System (Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1993)].Google Scholar

Teubner, G., ‘Globale Zivilverfassungen: Alternativen zur staatszentrierten Verfassungstheorie’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 63 (2003), pp. 1–28 [English trans.: ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centred Constitutional Theory?’, in C. Joerges, I.-J. Sand and G. Teubner (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart, 2004), pp. 3–28].Google Scholar

Teubner, G., ‘Die Anonyme Matrix: Zu Menschenrechtsverletzungen durch “private” transnationale Akteure’, Der Staat, 45 (2006), pp. 161–87 [English trans.: ‘The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by “Private” Transnational Actors’, Modern Law Review, 69 (2006), pp. 327–46].Google Scholar

Teubner, G., Verfassungsfragmente: gesellschaftlicher Konstitutionalismus in der Globalisierung (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2012) [English trans.: Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalisation (Oxford University Press, 2012)].Google Scholar

Teubner, G., and Fischer-Lescano, A., ‘Cannibalizing Epistemes: Will Modern Law Protect Traditional Cultural Expressions?’ in Graber, C. B. and Burri-Nenova, M. (eds.), Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Digital Environment (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008), pp. 17–45.Google Scholar

Thornhill, C., A Sociology of Constitutions. Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomuschat, C., ‘Die internationale Gemeinschaft’, Archiv des Völkerrechts, 33 (1995), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Tushnet, M., ‘The Inevitable Globalization of Constitutional Law’, paper presented at the seminar ‘The Changing Role of Highest Courts in an Internationalizing World’, sponsored by the Hague Institute for the Internationalisation of Law, 23–24 October 2008 (available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1317766).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Valen, L., ‘Molecular Evolution as Predicted by Natural Selection’, Journal of Molecular Evolution, 3 (1974), pp. 89–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Viellechner, L. ‘Was heißt Transnationalität im Recht?’ in Calliess, G.-P. (ed.), Transnationales Recht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), pp. 57–76.Google Scholar

Von Foerster, H., ‘On Constructing Reality’ in von Foerster, H. (ed.), Observing Systems (Seaside: Intersystems Publications, 1981), pp. 288–309.Google Scholar

Weber, M., Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie, Winckelmann, J. (ed.), 5th edn (Tübingen: Mohr, 1985) [1st edn 1922].Google Scholar

Weiler, J., The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?’ and Other Essays on European Integration (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Welsch, W., Vernunft: Die zeitgenössische Vernunftkritik und das Konzept der transversalen Vernunft, 2nd edn (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996).Google Scholar

Welsch, W., Unsere postmoderne Moderne, 6th edn (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2002).Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R., ‘The Protection of Indigenous Peoples in International Law’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 59 (1999), pp. 369–82.Google Scholar

Zumbansen, P., ‘Transnational Law’ in Smits, J. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law (London: Edward Elgar, 2006), pp. 738–54.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. W., “Societal Constitutionalism, Social Movements, and Constitutionalism from Below,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 881–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, P., “The ‘Not-a-Cat’ Syndrome: Can the International Human Rights Regime Accommodate Non-State Actors?” in Alston, P. (ed.) Non-State Actors and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 3–36.Google Scholar

Anghie, A., Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Bailey, S., and Mattei, U., “Social Movements as Constituent Power: The Italian Struggle for the Commons,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 965–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backer, L. C., “The 3rd UN Forum on Business and Human Rights: Streaming Live With Thoughts on the Forum as Estates General,” Law at the End of the Day, December 2, 2014, available at http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-3rd-un-forum-on-business-and-human.html.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “The 2nd UN Forum on Business and Human Rights: Live Streaming and Thoughts on Trends in Managing Business Behaviors,” Law at the End of the Day, December 3, 2013, available at http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-2nd-un-forum-on-busness-and-human.html.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “A Conversation About Polycentricity in Governance Systems Beyond the State,” Law at the End of the Day November 11, 2013, available at http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.de/2013/11/a-conversation-about-polycentricity-in.html.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “Sovereign Investing and Markets-Based Transnational Rule of Law Building: The Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund in Global Markets,” American University International Law Review 29 (2013), pp. 1–121.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “Transnational Constitutions’ Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple Inc.,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20 (2013), p. 805–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backer, L. C., “The Structural Characteristics of Global Law for the 21st Century: Fracture, Fluidity, Permeability, and Polycentricity,” Tilburg Law Review 17 (2012), pp. 177–99.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “Governance without Government: An Overview and Application of Interactions Between Law-State and Governance-Corporate System,” in Handl, G., Zekoll, J. and Zumbansen, P. (eds.) Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Leiden, Netherlands & Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012), pp. 87–123.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “Private Actors and Public Governance Beyond the State: The Multinational Corporation, the Financial Stability Board, and the Global Governance Order,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 18 (2011), pp. 751–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backer, L. C., “Rights and Accountability in Development v. DAS Air and Global Witness v. Afrimex: Small Steps towards an Autonomous Transnational Legal System for the Regulation of Multinational Corporations,” Melbourne Journal of International Law 10 (2009), pp. 258–307.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “From Moral Obligation to International Law: Disclosure Systems, Markets and the Regulation of Multinational Corporations,” Georgetown Journal of International Law, 39 (2008), pp. 591–653.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “The Autonomous Global Corporation: On the Role of Organizational Law Beyond Asset Partitioning and Legal Personality,” Tulsa Law Review 41 (2006), pp. 541–71.Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., “Retaining Judicial Authority: A Preliminary Inquiry on the Dominion of Judges,” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 12 (2003), p. 117.Google Scholar

Bernstein, L., “Merchant Law in a Merchant Court: Rethinking the Code's Search for Immanent Business Norms,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144 (1996), p. 1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calliess, G.-P., and Zumbansen, P., Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Claire Cutler, A., Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy (Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, J., “Constitutionalization of Nongovernmental Certification Programs,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20 (2013), pp. 1035–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, R., Predatory Globalization: A Critique (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Final Statement by the UK National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Complaint from Survival International Against Vedanta Resources Plc, Urn 09/1373. Available at www.oecd.org/investment/mne/43884129.pdf.Google Scholar

Final Statement By The UK National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Complaint from the International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers’ Associations against Unilever Plc on Pakistan’s Khanewal Factory, 2009, (UK). Available at www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/44478619.pdf.Google Scholar

Final Statement by The UK National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Complaint from the International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers’ Associations against Unilever Plc on Pakistan’s Rahim Yar Khan Factory, 2009, Urn 09/1221, At 1 (UK). Available at www.oecd.org/investment/mne/44478663.pdf.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., “Global Constitutional Struggles: Human Rights between Colère Publique and Colère Politique” in Kaleck, W., Ratner, M., Singelnstein, T. and Weiss, P. (eds.) International Prosecution of Human Rights Crimes (Heidelberg: Springer, 2007), pp. 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law,” Michigan Journal of International Law 25 (2003–2004), pp. 999–1046.Google Scholar

Foster, L. A., “Critical Cultural Translation: A Socio-Legal Framework for Regulatory Orders,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 21 (2014), pp. 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J., “A Political Constitution for the Pluralist World Society?” in Habermas, J. (ed.) Between Naturalism and Religion (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008), pp. 312–52.Google Scholar

Hamann, A., and Fabri, H. R., “Transnational networks and constitutionalism,’ International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6 (2008), pp. 481–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Initial Assessment by the UK National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Survival International and Vedanta Resources Plc, March 27, 2009. Available at www.business-humanrights.org/Links/Repository/969215/jump.Google Scholar

Johns, F. E., “The Invisibility of the Transnational Corporation: An Analysis of International Law and Legal Theory,” Melbourne University Law Review, 19 (1994), pp. 893–923.Google Scholar

Joint IOE-ICC-BIAC Comments on the Draft Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, Geneva, January 26, 2011. Available at www.iccwbo.org/Data/Policies/2011/ICC-IOE-BIAC-joint-recommendations-to-the-UN-Working-Group-on-Business-Human-Rights/.Google Scholar

Kjaer, P., “Transnational Normative Orders: The Constitutionalism of Intra- and Trans-Normative Law,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 777–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koh, H. H., “Transnational Legal Process,” Nebraska Law Review, 75 (1996), pp. 181.Google Scholar

Kumm, M., “The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis,” European Journal of International Law, 15 (2004), pp. 907–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mollers, C., “Transnational Governance without Public Law?” in Joerges, C., Sand, I.-J. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart, 2004), pp. 329–38.Google Scholar

OECD, Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (2011), OECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs. Available at www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/48004323.pdf.Google Scholar

OECD, Annual Report on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 2013 Responsible Business Conduct in Action, Executive Summary. Available at http://mneguidelines.oecd.org/MNE-Annual-Report-2013-Summary.pdfGoogle Scholar

O’Neill, J., “The Disciplinary Society: From Weber to Foucault,” The British Journal of Sociology, 37 (1986), pp. 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, A., “Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures,” Leiden Journal of International Law, 19 (2006), pp. 579–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Queinnec, Y., “The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: An Evolving Legal Status” (Association Sherpa Report, June 2007).Google Scholar

Renner, M., “Occupy the System! Societal Constitutionalism and Transnational Corporate Accounting,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 941–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riles, A., “The Anti-Network: Private Global Governance, Legal Knowledge, and the Legitimacy of the State,” The American Journal of Comparative Law, 56 (2008), pp. 605–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rödl, F., “Fundamental Rights, Private Law, and Societal Constitution: On the Logic of the So-Called Horizontal Effect,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 1015–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruggie, J. G., Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (New York: W. W. Norton 2013).Google Scholar

Ruggie, J. G., Letter, “Bizarre Response by Human Rights Groups to UN Framework Plan,” Financial Times, January 19, 2011. Available at www.ft.com/cms/s/0/629fbcd0-2361-11e0-8389-00144feab49a.html#axzz2ngb0wGXd.Google Scholar

Ruggie, J. G., Opening remarks by UN Special Representative John Ruggie, October 5, 2009. Available at www.business-humanrights.org/Documents/Ruggie-speech-to-Geneva-consultation-Oct-2009.pdf.Google Scholar

Sachs, N., “Beyond the Liability Wall: Strengthening Tort Remedies in International Environmental Law,” University of California Law Review, 55 (2008), pp. 837–904.Google Scholar

Sand, I.-J., “Polycontextuality as an Alternative to Constitutionalism” in Joerges, C., Sand, I.-J. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), pp. 41–66.Google Scholar

Shamir, R., “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case of Hegemony and Counter-Hegemony” in de Sousa Santos, B. and Rodríguez-Garavito, C. A. (eds.) Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality (Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 92–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, G., McCorquodale, R., and De Schutter, O., “The Third Pillar: Access to Judicial Remedies for Human Rights Violations by Transnational Business” (ICAR, CORE ECCJ, December 2013).Google Scholar

Special Representative of the Secretary-General, “Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework,” UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31 (March 21, 2011). Available at www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011.pdf.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (Oxford University Press 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, G., “Self-Constitutionalizing TNCs?: On the Linkage of ‘Private’ and ‘Public’ Corporate Codes of Conduct,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 18 (2011), pp. 617–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, G., “The Corporate Codes of Multinationals: Company Constitutions Beyond Corporate Governance and Co-Determination” in Nikel, R. (ed.), Conflict of Laws and Laws of Conflict in Europe and Beyond: Patterns of Supranational and Transnational Juridification (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar

Teubner, G., “Societal Constitutionalism: An Alternative to State Centered Constitutional Theory” in Joerges, C., Sand, I.-J. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), pp. 2–28.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., “Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Differences,” in Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds.), Varieties Of Capitalism (Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 417–41.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., “The King’s Many Bodies: The Self-Deconstruction of Law's Hierarchy,” Law & Society Review, 31 (1997), pp. 763–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, G., “Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society,” in Teubner, G. (ed.), Global Law without a State (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996), pp. 3–28.Google Scholar

Thornhill, C., “A Sociology of Constituent Power: The Political Code of Transnational Societal Constitutions,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 551–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

United Nations Human Rights Council Res. 17/4, 17th Sess., July 6, 2011, UN Doc. A/HRC/RES/17/4 (July 6, 2011). Available at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G11/144/71/PDF/G1114471.pdf?OpenElement.Google Scholar

UN Human Rights Council, Forum on Business and Human Rights, Second session, 3 and 4 December 2013, Background note by the Secretariat A/HRC/FBHR/2013/2 (24 September 2013).Google Scholar

Ward, H., “Securing Transnational Corporate Accountability through National Courts: Implications and Policy Options,” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 24 (2001), pp. 451–74.Google Scholar

Watt, H. M., “Private International Law Beyond the Schism,” Transnational Legal Theory, 3 (2011), pp. 347–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weissbrodt, D., “Keynote Address: International Standard-Setting on the Human Rights Responsibilities of Businesses,” Berkeley Journal of International Law, 26 (2008), pp. 373–91.Google Scholar

Wiener, A., and Liste, P., “Lost without Translation?: Cross-Referencing and a New Global Community of Courts,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 21 (2014), pp. 263–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, H., “Amnesty Criticises UN Framework for Multinationals,” Financial Times, January 17, 2011.Google Scholar

Zürn, M., “Sovereignty and Law in a Denationalised World” in Appelbaum, R. P., Felstiner, W. L. F. and Gessner, V. (eds.) Rules and Networks: The Legal Culture of Global Business Transactions (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar

Adams, C. A., ‘The Ethical, Social and Environmental Reporting Performance Portrayal Gap’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17 (2004), 731–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahmed, T., and de Jesús Butler, I., ‘The European Union and Human Rights: An International Law Perspective’, European Journal of International Law, 17 (2006), 771–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allianz Group, Economic Research & Corporate Development, ‘Working Paper: Is Speculation to Blame for Rising Food Prices? – A Compilation of Facts and Findings’, (18 June 2012), www.foodwatch.org/uploads/media/Allianz_Workingpaper06-2012_ger_01.pdf.Google Scholar

Amnesty International, ‘Non-Financial Reporting: Amnesty International Position Paper’, (April 2013), www.amnesty.org/en/documents/POL30/001/2013/en/.Google Scholar

Augenstein, D., ‘Study of the Legal Framework on Human Rights and the Environment Applicable to European Enterprises Operating Outside the European Union’ (University of Edinburgh, 2010).Google Scholar

Backer, L. C., ‘Multinational Corporations, Transnational Law: The United Nations’ Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations as a Harbinger of Corporate Social Responsibility in International Law, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 37 (2006), 287–389.Google Scholar

Bass, H. H., ‘Finanzspekulation und Nahrungsmittelpreise: Anmerkungen zum Stand der Forschung’, Materialien des Wissenschaftsschwerpunktes ‚‚Globalisierung der Weltwirtschaft‘‘, 42 (2013).Google Scholar

Bockmann, R., Internationale Koordinierung nationaler Enforcement-Aktivitäten: Eine kritische Analyse unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Deutschen Prüfstelle für Rechnungslegung (Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boiral, O., ‘Sustainability Reports as Simulacra? A Counter-Account of A and A+ GRI Reports’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26 (2013), 1036–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brett, R., ‘The Role of NGOs – An Overview’ in Alfredsson, G. et al. (eds.),International Human Rights Monitoring Mechanisms – Essays in Honor of Jakob Th. Möller (Leiden: Matinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009), pp. 673–80.Google Scholar

Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., and Levy, D. L., ‘Building Institutions Based on Information Disclosure: Lessons from GRI’s Sustainability Reporting’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 17 (2009), 571–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, R., and Milne, M. J., ‘The Triple Bottom Line: How New Zealand Companies Measure Up’, Corporate Environmental Strategy: International Journal for Sustainable Business, 11 (2004), 37–50.Google Scholar

Clapham, A., ‘UN Human Rights Reporting Procedures: An NGO Perspective’ in Alston, P. and Crawford, J. (eds.), The Future of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring (Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 175–98.Google Scholar

Dao, T. H. P., ‘Monitoring Compliance with IFRS: Some Insights from the French Regulatory System’, Accounting in Europe, 2 (2005), 107–35.Google Scholar

Davy, U., ‘Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren’ in Gusy, C. (ed.), Grundrechtsmonitoring – Chancen und Grenzen außergerichtlichen Menschenrechtsschutzes (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2011), pp. 238–64.Google Scholar

Deegan, C. and Rankin, M., ‘Do Australian Companies Report Environmental News Objectively? An Analysis of Environmental Disclosures by Firms Prosecuted Successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9 (1996), 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Schutter, O., ‘Food Commodities Speculation and Food Price Crises: Regulation to Reduce the Risks of Price Volatility’, Briefing Note 02, (September 2010), www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/food/docs/Briefing_Note_02_September_2010_EN.pdf.Google Scholar

De Schutter, O., Eide, A., et al., ‘Commentary to the Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 34 (2012), 1084–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deva, S., Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations – Humanizing Business (London and New York: Routledge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

European Coalition for Corporate Justice (ECCJ), ‘EU Legislation on Non-financial Reporting by Companies – Position Paper of the European Coalition for Corporate Justice’, www.corporatejustice.org/IMG/pdf/position_paper_final-2.pdf.Google Scholar

European Coalition for Corporate Justice (ECCJ), ‘Principles & Pathways: Legal Opportunities to Improve Europe’s Corporative Accountability Framework’, (November 2010), www.corporatejustice.org/IMG/pdf/eccj_principles_pathways_webuseblack.pdf.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Impact Assessment – Accompanying the document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large companies and groups’, SWD(2013) 127 final of 16 April 2013.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., Human Rights in Times of Austerity – The EU Institutions and the Conclusion of Memoranda of Understanding (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2013).Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., ‘Der Kampf um die Internetverfassung’, Juristenzeitung, 69 (2014), 965–74.Google Scholar

Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), ‘Number of Hungry People Rises to 963 Million’, (9 December 2008), www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/8836/.Google Scholar

Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), ‘The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2009 – Economic Crises – Impacts and Lessons Learned’, (2009), www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0876e/i0876e00.htm.Google Scholar

Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), ‘The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2013 – The Multiple Dimensions of Food Security’, (2013), www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3434e/i3434e00.htm.Google Scholar

Foodwatch, ‘foodwatch-Argumentationspapier zur Studie “Finanzspekulation und Nahrungsmittelpreise” von Prof. Hans-Heinrich Bass’, (21 November 2013), www.foodwatch.org/uploads/media/2013-11-21_Argumentationspapier_Bass-Studie_01.pdf.Google Scholar

Freeman, M., ‘Conclusion: Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Economic and Social Rights’ in Minkler, L. (ed.), The State of Economic and Social Human Rights – A Global Overview (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 365–88.Google Scholar

Gallahofer, S., Haslam, J., Monk, E., and Roberts, C., ‘The Emancipatory Potential of Online Reporting: The Case of Counter Accounting’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19 (2006), 681–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Germanwatch and Miseror, ‘Nationaler Aktionsplan zur Umsetzung der UN-Leitprinzipien für Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte – Anforderungen an den Umsetzungsprozess in Deutschland’, (July 2012), www.germanwatch.org/de/download/6648.pdf.Google Scholar

Global Reporting Initiative, ‘G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines’, (2013), www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf.Google Scholar

Gray, R., ‘Does Sustainability Reporting Improve Corporate Behaviour?: Wrong Question? Right Time?’, Accounting and Business Research, 36 (2006), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hess, D., ‘Social Reporting: A Reflexive Law Approach to Corporate Social Responsiveness’, Journal of Corporation Law, 21 (1999), 41–84.Google Scholar

Ivanic, M., and Martin, W., ‘Implications of Higher Global Food Prices for Poverty in Low Income Countries’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4594, (April 2008), www.elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/1813-9450-4594.Google Scholar

Keller, H., ‘Reporting Systems’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, (June 2009).Google Scholar

Klein, E., The Monitoring System of Human Rights Treaty Obligations – Colloquium Potsdam, 22/23. November 1996 (Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz, 1998).Google Scholar

Kinley, D., and Chambers, R., ‘The UN Human Rights Norms for Corporations: The Private Implications of Public International Law’, Human Rights Law Review, 6 (2006), 447–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krennerich, M., Soziale Menschenrechte – Zwischen Recht und Politik (Schwalbach: WochenschauVerlag, 2013).Google Scholar

Kretzmer, D., ‘Human Rights, State Reports’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, (October 2008).Google Scholar

Laufer, W. S., ‘Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing’, Journal of Business Ethics, 43 (2003), 253–61.Google Scholar

Liese, A., ‘Epistula (non) Erubescit. Das Staatenberichtsverfahren als Instrument internationaler Rechtsdurchsetzung’, Die Friedens‐Warte, 59 (2006), 51–69.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1998).Google Scholar

Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., and LaGore, W., ‘A Research Note on Standalone Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Signaling or Greenwashing?’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24 (2013), 350–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maus, I., ‘Perspektiven “reflexiven Rechts” im Kontext gegenwärtiger Deregulierungstendenzen’, Kritische Justiz, 19 (1986), 390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mittal, A., ‘The 2008 Food Price Crisis: Rethinking Food Security Policies’, UNCTAD: G-24 Discussion Paper Series, 56 (2009), www.unctad.org/en/Docs/gdsmdpg2420093_en.pdf.Google Scholar

O’Dwyer, B., ‘Stakeholder Democracy: Challenges and Contributions from Social Accounting’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 14 (2005), 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oxfam Deutschland, ‘Oxfam Hintergrundpapier, Hungerroulette – Wie viel deutsche Finanzinstitute durch Nahrungsmittelspekulationen einnehmen’, (May 2013), www.oxfam.de/files/20130507_hungerroulette.pdf.Google Scholar

Oxfam Deutschland, ‘Mit Essen spielt man nicht! Die deutsche Finanzbranche und das Geschäft mit dem Hunger’, (2013), www.oxfam.de/sites/www.oxfam.de/files/o_nms_2013_mb_web.pdf.Google Scholar

Pies, I., and Glauben, T., ‘Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahme zum Argumentationspapier von Foodwatch’, Diskussionspapier Nr. 2013-26 des Lehrstuhls für Wirtschaftsethik an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, (2013), http://ethik.wiwi.uni-halle.de/forschung/news199874/.Google Scholar

Pies, I., and Will, M. G., ‘Finanzspekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen – Analyse und Bewertung aus wirtschaftsethischer Sicht’, Diskussionspapier Nr. 2013-24 des Lehrstuhls für Wirtschaftsethik an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, (2013), http://wcms.itz.uni-halle.de/download.php?down=32275&elem=2728397.Google Scholar

The Regional Office for Europe of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘The EU and International Human Rights Law’, (2008), www.europe.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/EU_and_International_Law.pdf.Google Scholar

Reporting and Assurance Frameworks Initiative (RAFI), ‘Draft UN Guiding Principles Reporting Framework’, (November 2014), www.business-humanrights.org/sites/default/files/documents/DRAFT_UNGPReportingFramework_11Nov2014.pdf.Google Scholar

Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., and Seidl, D., ‘Managing Legitimacy in Complex and Heterogeneous Environments: Sustainable Development in a Globalized World’, Journal of Management Studies, 50 (2013), 259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skouloudisa, A., Evangelinosa, K., and Kourmousis, F., ‘Assessing Non-financial Reports According to the Global Reporting Initiative Guidelines: Evidence from Greece’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18 (2010), 426–38.Google Scholar

Tilt, C. A., ‘The Influence of External Pressure Groups on Corporate Social Disclosure – Some Empirical Evidence’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7 (1994), 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, G., ‘Die anonyme Matrix: Zu Menschenrechtsverletzungen durch “private” transnationale Akteure’, Der Staat, 44 (2006), 161–87.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., ‘Reflexives Recht – Entwicklungsmodelle des Rechts in vergleichender Perspektive’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 68 (1982), 13–59.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., ‘Selbst‐Konstitutionalisierung transnationaler Unternehmen? Zur Verknüpfung “privater” und “staatlicher” Corporate Codes of Conduct”’ in Grundmann, S. v. et al. (eds.), Unternehmen, Markt und Verantwortung: Festschrift für Klaus Hopt (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010), pp. 1449–70.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., Verfassungsfragmente (Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2012).Google Scholar

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and Arbeiterkammer Wien, ‘Price Formation in Financialized commodity markets: The Role of Information. Study prepared by the Secretariat of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development’, (June 2011), www.unctad.org/en/docs/gds20111_en.pdf.Google Scholar

Wensen, K. v., Broer, W., Klein, J., and Knopf, J., ‘The State of Play in Sustainability Reporting in the EU’, (2011), www.ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=6727&langId=en.Google Scholar

Weißbrodt, D., and Kruger, M., ‘Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights’, American Journal of International Law, 97 (2003), 901–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wymeersch, E., ‘The reforms of the European Financial Supervisory System: An Overview’, European Company and Financial Law Review, 7 (2010), 240–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar