Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T04:29:19.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Nonlethal Weapons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

David A. Koplow
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Law Center
Get access

Summary

Scenario 8

The beautiful but desperately poor and long-tumultuous nation of Ethalia is in chaos again. The previous government, whose grasp on control was always tenuous at best, collapsed in disarray months ago, ceding practical authority to half a dozen thuggish warlords; their ill-defined clan-based rivalry now erupts in daily bloodshed. The ubiquitous competing gangs – they are hardly organized or coherent enough to be characterized as forces engaged in a civil war – wreak perpetual havoc in the capital city and much of the surrounding countryside. The armaments of choice, mostly small arms and light weapons, have proliferated widely, and squads of irregular, nonuniformed fighters intermittently patrol the main streets, setting up roadblocks to search for rivals, to recruit or impress new members, and to extort money from civilians. The national economy has ground virtually to a halt and the civilian infrastructure is crumbling, resulting in widespread hunger, now approaching starvation levels. Outbreaks of infectious diseases, especially malaria, are also surging, as massive flows of refugees collect in ad hoc, poorly administered, and increasingly squalid encampments.

Pursuant to an emergency resolution by the United Nations Security Council, the United States has undertaken a limited intervention mission, with an expeditionary force of 2200 Marines dispatched to Ethalia in pursuit of three articulated goals: (a) to protect the skeleton staff of U.S. and U.N. diplomats who remain at their posts and the few hundred private citizen foreigners (mostly Americans, but several European and other nationals, too) who have chosen not to evacuate; (b) to safeguard the American embassy, which now serves as the Marines' own base, and to the extent possible, protect other nations' embassies and foreign-owned private corporate and nongovernmental organization properties, too;

Type
Chapter
Information
Death by Moderation
The U.S. Military's Quest for Useable Weapons
, pp. 188 - 215
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aftergood, Steven, The Soft-Kill Fallacy, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, September/October 1994, p. 40
Alexander, John B., Future War: Non-Lethal Weapons in 21st Century Warfare, 1999
Alexander, John B., The Role of Nonlethal Weapons in Future Military Operations, in McIvor, Anthony D. (ed.), Rethinking the Principles of War, 2005, p. 401
International, Amnesty, United States of America: Excessive and Lethal Force? Amnesty International's Concerns About Deaths and Ill-Treatment Involving Police Use of Tasers, 2004
Arkin, William M., Smart Bombs, Dumb Targeting? 56 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists No. 3, May/June 2000, p. 46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, Associated, Pentagon Nixes Ray Gun Weapon in Iraq, August 29, 2007
Atkinson, Rick, Lean, Not-So-Mean Marines Set for Somalia, Washington Post, February 25, 1995, p. A22
Bozeman, William P. et al., Safety and Injury Profile of Conducted Electrical Weapons Used by Law Enforcement Officers Against Criminal Suspects, 20 Annals of Emergency Medicine No. 10, January 2009, p. 1Google Scholar
Collins, John M., Nonlethal Weapons and Operations: Potential Applications and Practical Limitations, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, 95–974 S, September 14, 1995
,Committee for an Assessment of Non-Lethal Weapons Science and Technology, Naval Studies Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council, National Academies, An Assessment of Non-Lethal Weapons Science and Technology, National Academies Press, 2003
Coppernoll, Margaret-Anne, The Nonlethal Weapons Debate, 52 Naval War College Review112, Spring 1998Google Scholar
Council on Foreign Relations, Independent Task Force Report, Non-Lethal Technologies: Military Options and Implications, Malcolm Wiener, Chair, 1995
,Council on Foreign Relations, Independent Task Force Report: Nonlethal Technologies: Progress and Prospects, Richard Garwin, Chair, 1999
,Council on Foreign Relations, Independent Task Force Report, Nonlethal Weapons and Capabilities, Graham Allison and Paul X. Kelley, Co-Chairs, Richard L. Garwin, Project Director, 2004
Coupland, Robin M., ‘Calmatives’ and ‘Incapacitants’: Questions for International Humanitarian Law Brought by New Means and Methods of Warfare with New Effects? 19th Workshop of the Pugwash Study Group on the Implementation of the Chemical and Biological Weapons Conventions, April 26–27, 2003
Coupland, Robin M., Incapacitating Chemical Weapons: A Year After the Moscow Theatre Siege, 362 Lancet p. 1346, October 25, 2003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dando, Malcolm, A New Form of Warfare: The Rise of Non-Lethal Weapons, 1996
Dando, Malcolm (ed.), Non-Lethal Weapons: Technological and Operational Prospects, Jane's on-line special report, November 2000
Davison, Neil, The Contemporary Development of ‘Non-Lethal’ Weapons, Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project, Centre for Conflict Resolution, Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford (U.K.), Occasional Paper No. 3, May 2007
Davison, Neil, ‘Off the Rocker’ and ‘On the Floor’: The Continued Development of Biochemical Incapacitating Weapons, Bradford Science and Technology Report No. 8, Bradford Disarmament Research Centre, Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford (U.K.), August 2007
Davison, Neil, ‘Non-Lethal’ Weapons, 2009
Davison, Neil and Lewer, Nick, Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project, Centre for Conflict Resolution, Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford (U.K.), Research Report No. 8, March 2006
Defense Science Board Task Force on Directed Energy Weapon Systems and Technology Applications, Report, December 2007
,Doubt Over Shoot-to-Kill Policy, The Independent (U.K.), August 21, 2005
Downs, Raymond L., Less Lethal Weapons: A Technologist's Perspective, 30 Policing No. 3, 2007, p. 358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, James C., A Primer on the Employment of Non-Lethal Weapons, 45 Naval Law Review, 1998, p. 1Google Scholar
Fenton, George P., Current and Prospective Military and Law Enforcement Use of Chemical Agents for Incapacitation, for Symposium on Biochemical Weapons: Scientific, Military, Legal and Policy Perspectives and Prospects, July 15, 2005
Fidler, David P., The International Legal Implications of ‘Non-Lethal’ Weapons, 21 Michigan Journal of International Law 51, Fall 1999Google Scholar
Fidler, David, Law Enforcement under the Chemical Weapons Convention: Interpretation of Article II.9(d) of the Chemical Weapons Convention in Regard to the Use of Toxic Chemicals for Law Enforcement Purposes, memorandum to Federation of American Scientists Working Group, April 24, 2003, presented to the Open Forum on Challenges to the Chemical Weapons Ban, The Hague, May 1, 2002
Fidler, David P., The Meaning of Moscow: ‘Non-lethal’ Weapons and International Law in the Early 21st Century, 87 International Review of the Red Cross No. 859, September 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulghum, David A., Silent Launch; New Directed-energy Weapon Balances Strength, Low Cost and Portability, 165 Aviation Week & Space Technology No. 4, July 24, 2006, p. 66Google Scholar
Furmanski, Martin, Military Interest in Low-lethality Biochemical Agents: The Historical Interaction of Advocates, Experts, Pragmatists and Politicians, background paper for Symposium on Biochemical Weapons: Scientific, Military, Legal and Policy Perspectives and Prospects, Geneva, Switzerland, June 11, 2005
Gompert, David C., et al., Underkill: Scalable Capabilities for Military Operations Amid Populations, 2009
Graham, Caroline, Blitzed, The Mail (U.K.), November 13, 2005
,International Institute for Strategic Studies, Strategic Survey 1995–1996, 1996, p. 40
Charles, Jean de Menezes: In the Wrong Place. At the Wrong Time, The Independent (U.K.), July 25, 2005
Kenny, John M., Heal, Sid, and Grossman, Mike, The Attribute-Based Evaluation (ABE) of Less-Than-Lethal, Extended-Range, Impact Munitions, Pennsylvania State University, February 15, 2001
Klotz, Lynn, Furmanski, Martin, and Wheelis, Mark, Beware the Siren's Song: Why ‘Non-Lethal’ Incapacitating Chemical Agents Are Lethal, March 2003
Koplow, David A., Non-Lethal Weapons: The Law and Policy of Revolutionary Technologies for the Military and Law Enforcement, 2006
Kroll, Mark W. and Tchou, Patrick, How a TASER Works, IEEE Spectrum, December 2007
Kruger-Sprengel, F., Innovative Legal Effects of Non-Lethal Weapons (NLW) for Political and Military Strategy and for Humanitarian Intervention, 38 Military Law and Law of War Review p. 383, 1999Google Scholar
Lamb, Timothy J., Emerging Nonlethal Weapons Technology and Strategic Policy Implications for 21st Century Warfare, thesis, US Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, PA, 1998
Lewer, Nick (ed.), The Future of Non-Lethal Weapons: Technologies, Operations, Ethics, and Law, 2002
Lewer, Nick and Schofield, Steven, Non-Lethal Weapons: A Fatal Attraction? Military Strategies and Technologies for 21st Century Conflict, 1997
Lorenz, Frederick M., ‘Less-Lethal’ Force in Operation UNITED SHIELD, Marine Corps Gazette, September 1995, p. 68
Lorenz, F.M., Nonlethal Force: The Slippery Slope to War? 27 Parameters No. 3, Autumn 1996, p. 52Google Scholar
Lovelace, Jr. Douglas C., and Metz, Steven, Nonlethality and American Land Power: Strategic Context and Operational Concepts, U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, June 15, 1998
Mandel, Robert, Security, Strategy, and the Quest for Bloodless War, 2004
McNab, Robert M. and Scott, Richard L., Non-lethal Weapons and the Long Tail of Warfare, 20 Small Wars and Insurgencies No. 1, March 2009, p. 141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meselson, M.S. and Robinson, J.P. Perry, ‘Non Lethal’ Weapons and Implementation of the Chemical and Biological Weapons Conventions, paper for the 20th Pugwash Workshop Study Group on the Implementation of the CBW Conventions, November 8–9, 2003
Mihm, Stephen, The Quest for the Nonkiller App., New York Times Magazine, July 25, 2004
,Monterey Institute of International Studies, Chemical and Biological Weapons Nonproliferation Program, The Moscow Theater Hostage Crisis: Incapacitants and Chemical Warfare, November 4, 2002
Morehouse, David A., Nonlethal Weapons: War without Death, 1996
Moreno, Sylvia, In Houston, Questions of Bias Over Tasers, Washington Post, December 18, 2006, p. A3
‘Non-Lethal’ Weapons, The CWC and the BWC (editorial), The CBW Conventions Bulletin, No. 61, September 2003, p. 1
,Omega Foundation, Crowd Control Technologies: An Assessment of Crowd Control Technology Options for the European Union (an Appraisal for the Technologies of Political Control) EP/1/1V/B/STOA/99/14/01, Section C, Technical Annex, May 2000
W. Parks, Hays, Non-Lethal Weapons: Musings from Experience, presentation to Council on Foreign Relations NLW Task Force, September 8, 2003
Pearson, Alan M., Marie Isabelle Chevrier, and Mark Wheelis, Incapacitating Biochemical Weapons: Promise or Peril? 2007
,The Pentagon's Ray Gun, CBS News Sixty Minutes, March 2, 2008
Rainey, James, A Safer Weapon, With Risks, Los Angeles Times, May 18, 2006
Rappert, Brian, Scenarios on the Future of Non-lethal Weapons, 22 Contemporary Security Policy No. 1, April 2001, p. 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappert, Brian, Non-Lethal Weapons as Legitimizing Forces? Technology, Politics and the Management of Conflict, 2003
Rosenberg, Barbara, Nonlethal Weapons May Violate Treaties, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, September/October 1994, p. 40
Rumsfeld, Donald, Testimony before House Armed Services Committee, on FY 2004 Defense Authorization, February 5, 2003
Sautenet, Vincent, Legal Issues Concerning Military Use of Non-Lethal Weapons, 7 Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law No. 2, June 2000Google Scholar
Schneider, Greg R., Nonlethal Weapons: Considerations for Decision Makers, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Program in Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security, ACDIS Occasional Paper, January 1997
Sherman, Jason, DoD: Spend More on Non-Lethal Weapons, InsideDefense.com, May 23, 2006
Stanton, Martin N., What Price Sticky Foam? 26 Parameters No. 3, Autumn 1996, p. 63Google Scholar
Sutherland, Ronald G., Chemical and Biochemical Non-Lethal Weapons, SIPRI Policy Paper No. 23, November 2008
,Alvin and Heidi Toffler, War and Anti-War: Survival at the Dawn of the 21st Century, 1993
,US Aims to Use Heat-Beam Weapon by 2010, New Scientist, January 25, 2007
,U.S. Department of Defense Directive No. 3000.3, Policy for Non-Lethal Weapons, July 9, 1996
,U.S. Department of Defense, Military Transformation: A Strategic Approach, Fall 2003, p. 34
,U.S. Department of Defense, Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Program, Active Denial System (ADS) Fact Sheet, March 2007
,U.S. Department of Defense, Air, Land, Sea Application Center, NLW: Multi-Service Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for the Tactical Employment of Nonlethal Weapons, FM 3–22.40, October 2007
,U.S. Department of Defense, DoD Non-Lethal Weapons Program Annual Report 2008: Expanding Warfighter Capabilities
,U.S. Government Accountability Office, DoD Needs to Improve Program Management, Policy and Testing to Enhance Ability to Field Operationally Useful Non-lethal Weapons, Report to Congressional Requesters 09-344, April 2009
U.S. Chiefs, Joint of Staff, Peace Operations, Joint Publication 3–07.3, October 17, 2007
Twickel, Nikolaus, Unmasking Dubrovka's Mysterious Gas, Moscow Times, October 23, 2007, p. 1
Wade, Nicholas and Schmitt, Eric, Bush Approves Use of Tear Gas in Battlefield, New York Times, April 2, 2003
Wheelis, Mark, ‘Nonlethal’ Chemical Weapons: A Faustian Bargain, 19 Issues in Science and Technology No. 3, Spring 2003, p. 74Google Scholar
Wheelis, Mark, Will the New Biology Lead to New Weapons? and The Danger of ‘Nonlethal’ Weapons, 34 Arms Control Today No. 6, July/August 2004, p. 6Google Scholar
Williams, David and Wright, Stephen, Tragic Trail of Police Blunders Over Shooting, Daily Mail (U.K.), August 17, 2005
Winton, Richard, The Long, Safer Arm of the Law, Los Angeles Times, September 18, 2007, p. A1
,Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction, concluded in Paris, January 13, 1993, entered into force April 29, 1997, S. treaty doc. No. 103–21, 31 I.L.M. 800 (United States is a party) [hereinafter CWC]
Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction, Apr. 10, 1972, 26 U.S.T. 583, 1015 U.N.T.S. 163, T.I.A.S. No. 8062 (entered into force Mar. 26, 1975) [hereinafter BWC].
Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects, Oct. 10, 1980, 1342 U.N.T.S. 137, 19 I.L.M. 1523 [Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, or CCW], Protocol IV
Davison, Neil and Lewer, Nick, Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project, Centre for Conflict Resolution, Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford (U.K.), Research Report No. 8, March 2006
Davison, Neil, The Contemporary Development of ‘Non-Lethal’ Weapons, Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project, Centre for Conflict Resolution, Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford (U.K.), Occasional Paper No. 3, May 2007
Fidler, David P., The Meaning of Moscow: ‘Non-lethal’ Weapons and International Law in the Early 21st Century, 87 International Review of the Red Cross No. 859, September 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lean, Rick Atkinson, Not-So-Mean Marines Set for Somalia, Washington Post, February 25, 1995, p. A22

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×