Book contents
- Designing in Ethics
- Designing in Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 The Design Turn in Applied Ethics
- 2 Designing Responsibility: The Problem of Many Hands in Complex Organizations
- 3 Dealing with Moral Dilemmas through Design
- 4 Designing the Morality of Things: The Ethics of Behaviour-Guiding Technology
- 5 The Health Impact Fund: Aligning Incentives
- 6 Poverty, Exclusion and the Design of Microfinance Institutions
- 7 Designing-in-Ethics: A Compulsory Retirement Savings System
- 8 Pacifism: Designing a Moral Defence Force
- 9 An Anti-Corruption System for Police Organizations
- 10 Good Governance for the Commons: Design for Legitimacy
- 11 The Ethical Obligation to Beauty in the Design of Buildings
- Index
- References
4 - Designing the Morality of Things: The Ethics of Behaviour-Guiding Technology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 October 2017
Book contents
- Designing in Ethics
- Designing in Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 The Design Turn in Applied Ethics
- 2 Designing Responsibility: The Problem of Many Hands in Complex Organizations
- 3 Dealing with Moral Dilemmas through Design
- 4 Designing the Morality of Things: The Ethics of Behaviour-Guiding Technology
- 5 The Health Impact Fund: Aligning Incentives
- 6 Poverty, Exclusion and the Design of Microfinance Institutions
- 7 Designing-in-Ethics: A Compulsory Retirement Savings System
- 8 Pacifism: Designing a Moral Defence Force
- 9 An Anti-Corruption System for Police Organizations
- 10 Good Governance for the Commons: Design for Legitimacy
- 11 The Ethical Obligation to Beauty in the Design of Buildings
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Designing in Ethics , pp. 78 - 94Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Achterhuis, H. (1995). De moralisering van de apparaten. Socialisme en Democratie, 52(1), 3–12.Google Scholar
Berdichevsky, D., and Neuenschwander, E. (1999). Toward an ethics of persuasive technology. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty. In Four Essays on Liberty, 118–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dorrestijn, S. (2012a). Technical mediation and subjectivation: Tracing and extending Foucault's philosophy of technology. Philosophy and Technology, 25(2), 221–241.Google Scholar
Dorrestijn, S. (2012b). The design of our own lives: Technical mediation and subjectivation after Foucault (PhD thesis). Enschede: University of Twente.Google Scholar
Dorrestijn, S., and Verbeek, P. P. (2013). Technology, wellbeing, and freedom: The legacy of utopian design. International Journal of Design, 7(3), 45–56.Google Scholar
Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (2000). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In Rabinow, P. (ed.), Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, 1:303–319. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Friedman, B., ed. (1997). Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, B., Kahn, P., and Borning, A. (2002). Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods. CSE Technical Report 02-12-01. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Ihde, D. (2006). The designer fallacy and technological imagination. In Defining Technological Literacy, 121–131. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Bijker, W. E. and Law, J. (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society, 151–180. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation: Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29–64.Google Scholar
Lockton, D., Harrison, D., and Stanton, N. A. (2010). The design with intent method: A design tool for influencing user behaviour. Applied Ergonomics, 41(3), 382–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M., and Spahn, A. (2011). Can technological artefacts be moral agents? Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 411–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabinow, P. (2011). The Accompaniment: Assembling the Contemporary. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Selinger, E., ed. (2012). Book symposium on Peter Paul Verbeek's Moralizing Technology. Philosophy and Technology, 25(4), 605–631.Google Scholar
Steg, L. (1999). Verspilde energie? Wat doen en laten Nederlanders voor het milieu. SCP Cahier 156. The Hague: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tromp, N. (2013). Social Design: How Products and Services Can Help Us Act in Ways That Benefit Society (PhD dissertation). Delft: TU Delft.Google Scholar
Tromp, N., Hekkert, P., and Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Design for socially responsible behavior: A classification of influence based on intended user experience. Design Issues, 27(3), 3–19.Google Scholar
Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, P. P. (2012). Politics at issue: On art and the democratization of Things. In Open 24: The Politics of Things – What Art and Design Do in Democracy, 18–29. Rotterdam: NAi.Google Scholar
Weegink, R. J. (1996). Basisonderzoek elektriciteitsverbruik kleinverbruikers BEK’95. Arnhem, Netherlands: EnergieNed.Google Scholar
- 12
- Cited by