Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T23:19:02.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Manipulators on Space Platforms

Dynamics and Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2019

Ranjan Vepa
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Vepa, R. (2009) Biomimetic Robotics: Mechanisms and Control, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, T. R. and Levinson, D. A. (1985) Dynamics: Theory and Applications, McGraw-Hill Series in Mechanical Engineering, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Vepa, R. (2016) Nonlinear Control of Robots and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: An Integrated Approach, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamel, A. (1904) Lagrange-Eulerschen Gleichungen der Mechanik. Zeitschrift fur Mathematiks und Physiks (ZAMP), 50: 157.Google Scholar
Boltzmann, R. (1902) Sitzungsberichte, Wien.Google Scholar
Desloge, E. A. (1986) A comparison of Kane’s equations of motion and the Gibbs-Appell equations of motion. American Journal of Physics, 54(5): 470472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberson, R. E. and Scwertassek, R. (1988) Dynamics of Multibody Systems. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borri, M., Bottasso, C., and Mantegazza, P. (1990) Equivalence of Kane’s and Maggi’s equations. Meccanica, 25(4): 272274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L.S. and Pao, Y.H. (2003) Jourdain’s variational equation and Appell’s equation of motion for non-holonomic dynamical systems. American Journal of Physics, 71(1): 7282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, M. A. (1992) Kane’s equations, Lagrange’s equations, and virtual work. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 15(1): 277280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoneking, E. T. (2013) Implementation of Kane’s method for a spacecraft composed of multiple rigid bodies, in AIAA 2013–4649, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference, Boston, MA, 2013, Guidance, Navigation, and Control and Co-located Conferences, 1428–1440 https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013–4649.Google Scholar
Cao, Y., Modi, V. J., de Silva, C. W., and Misra, A. K. (2001) Dynamics and control of a novel space-based manipulator: Analyses and experiments, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics & Automation in Space: i-SAIRAS 2001, Paper No. AM068, Canadian Space Agency, June 18–22, St-Hubert, Quebec, Canada, 2001.Google Scholar
Dubowsky, S., Vance, E. E., and Torres, M. A. (1989) The control of space manipulators subject to spacecraft attitude control saturation limits, in Proceedings of the NASA Conference on Space Tekrobotics, Jet Propulsion Lab., Pasadena, CA, Vol. IV, 109–418.Google Scholar
Nenchev, D., Umetani, Y., and Yoshida, K. (1992) Analysis of a redundant free-flying spacecraft/manipulator system. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 8(1): 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, R. D., Chen, J. L., and Lawrence, C. (1994) Base reaction control for space-based robots operating in microgravity environment. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 17(2): 263270.Google Scholar
Torres, M. A. and Dubowsky, S. (1992) Minimizing spacecraft attitude disturbances in space manipulator systems. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 15(4): 10101017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, H. L. and Cannon, R. H. (1987) Experiments on the control of a satellite manipulator, in Proceedings of American Control Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1987.Google Scholar
Longman, R. W., Lindberg, R. E., and Zedd, M. F. (1987) Satellite-mounted robot manipulators: New kinematics and reaction moment compensation. The International Journal of Robotics Research, Raleigh, NC, 6(3): 87103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vafa, Z. and Dubowsky, S. (1987) On the dynamics of manipulators in space using the virtual manipulator approach, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, NC, 579–585.Google Scholar
Vafa, Z. and Dubowsky, S. (1990) The kinematics and dynamics of space manipulators: The virtual manipulator approach. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 9(4): 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vafa, Z. and Dubowsky, S. (1990) On the dynamics of space manipulator using the virtual manipulator with application to path planning. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 38(4): 441472.Google Scholar
Lindberg, R. E., Longman, R. W., and Zedd, M. F. (1990) Kinematic and dynamic properties of an elbow manipulator mounted on a satellite. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 38(4): 397421.Google Scholar
Longman, R. W. (1990) The kinetics and workspace of a satellite-mounted robot. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 38(4): 423440.Google Scholar
Vafa, Z. and Dubowsky, S. (1987) A virtual manipulator model for space robotic systems, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Space Telerobotics, March 31–April 3, Pasadena, CA, 335344.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, E. (1990) On the Dynamics and Control of Space Manipulators, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Yoshida, K. and Umetani, Y. (1999) Resolved motion rate control of space manipulators with generalized Jacobian matrix. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 5(3): 303314.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, E. (1991) Path planning for space manipulators exhibiting nonholonomic behavior, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems: Raleigh, NC, 669–675.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, E. (1993) Nonholonomic behavior in free-floating space manipulators and its utilization. In Nonhonomic Motion Planning, Li, Z. and Canny, J. F., eds., Boston: Kluwer Academic, pp. 423445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, E. and Dubowsky, S. (1993) Dynamic singularities in the control of free-floating space manipulators. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 115(1): 4452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, E. and Dubowsky, S. (1991) On the nature of control algorithms for free-floating space manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 7(6): 750758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, E. and Dubowsky, S. (1991) Coordinated manipulator/spacecraft motion control for space robotic systems, in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, CA, 1696–1701.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, E., Moosavian, S., and Ali, A. (1994) A comparison of motion control algorithms for space free-flyers, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Adaptive Structures, 1554–1561, Sendai, Japan.Google Scholar
Moosavian, S., Ali, A., and Papadopoulos, E. (1997) Coordinated motion control of multiple manipulator space free-flyers, in Proceedings of the Seventh AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Huntsville, AL.Google Scholar
Masutani, Y., Miyazaki, F., and Arimoto, S. (1989) Modeling and sensory feedback for space manipulators, in Proceedings of the NASA Conference on Space Telerobotics, January 14–February 1, 1989, Pasadena, CA, 287–296.Google Scholar
Markley, F. L. (1978) Matrix and vector algebra. In Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control, Wertz, J. R., ed., Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 754755.Google Scholar
He, W., Chen, Y., and Yin, Z. (2006) Adaptive neural network control of an uncertain robot with full-state constraints. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 46(3): 620629.Google Scholar
Tee, K. P., Ge, S., and Tay, E. H. (2009) Barrier Lyapunov functions for the control of output-constrained nonlinear systems. Automatica, 45(4): 918927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julier, S. J. (2002) The scaled unscented transformation, in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 6, 45554559.Google Scholar
Vepa, R. (2010) Spacecraft large attitude estimation using a navigation sensor. The Journal of Navigation, 63(1): 89104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vepa, R. and Zhahir, A. (2011) High-precision kinematic satellite and doppler aided inertial navigation system. The Journal of Navigation, 64(1): 91108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vepa, R. (2017) Joint position localization of spacecraft and debris for autonomous navigation applications using angle measurements only. Journal of Navigation, 70(4): 748760. doi: 10.1017/S0373463316000904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Manipulators on Space Platforms
  • Ranjan Vepa, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Dynamics and Control of Autonomous Space Vehicles and Robotics
  • Online publication: 29 April 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525404.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Manipulators on Space Platforms
  • Ranjan Vepa, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Dynamics and Control of Autonomous Space Vehicles and Robotics
  • Online publication: 29 April 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525404.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Manipulators on Space Platforms
  • Ranjan Vepa, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Dynamics and Control of Autonomous Space Vehicles and Robotics
  • Online publication: 29 April 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525404.005
Available formats
×