Book contents
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing CountriesRisk Analysis and Governance
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing Countries
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Risk Analysis Methodology and Decision-Making
- Part II Diversification of Expertise
- Part III Risk-Analysis-Based Regulatory Systems
- 13 The Risk Analysis Framework and Biosafety Policy
- 14 The Precautionary Principle as a Barrier to GMO Risk Analysis: Elicitation of Experts’ Viewpoints
- 15 How Do Socio-Political Disputes Concerning GMOs Influence Decision-Making in Developing Countries?
- 16 Biosafety Communication: Beyond Risk Communication
- 17 The Role of Mass Media and Lobbies in the Formulation of GMO Regulations
- Part IV Case Studies from Developing Countries
- Index
- References
15 - How Do Socio-Political Disputes Concerning GMOs Influence Decision-Making in Developing Countries?
from Part III - Risk-Analysis-Based Regulatory Systems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2017
Book contents
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing CountriesRisk Analysis and Governance
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing Countries
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Risk Analysis Methodology and Decision-Making
- Part II Diversification of Expertise
- Part III Risk-Analysis-Based Regulatory Systems
- 13 The Risk Analysis Framework and Biosafety Policy
- 14 The Precautionary Principle as a Barrier to GMO Risk Analysis: Elicitation of Experts’ Viewpoints
- 15 How Do Socio-Political Disputes Concerning GMOs Influence Decision-Making in Developing Countries?
- 16 Biosafety Communication: Beyond Risk Communication
- 17 The Role of Mass Media and Lobbies in the Formulation of GMO Regulations
- Part IV Case Studies from Developing Countries
- Index
- References
Summary
The disputes that surround the possible risks of GM technology, have been the cause of considerable public concern in several countries. The advent of GM foods has resulted in different policy responses in various parts of the world and has led to trade disputes between members of the World Trade Organization. Strong consumer skepticism on genetic engineering, especially in Europe, can also affect the trading environment within which developing countries have to compete. The socio-political disputes in northern countries can significantly influence the policies on GMO issues in countries in the south. Accordingly, this study aimed to shed light on the role of national and international organizations in developing countries' choices with regard to GMOs and to propose potential solutions addressing the GMO dilemma in developing countries. The study concluded that governments and international bodies need to take the public's concerns into account when elaborating risk-related regulations and when dealing with trade disputes. It is recommended that international and appropriate non-governmental organizations that monitor agricultural policy development, evaluate the outcomes and effects of regulatory policies regarding the adoption of GM crops in developing countries.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing CountriesRisk Analysis and Governance, pp. 175 - 186Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Adenle, A. A. (2011a). Global capture of crop biotechnology in developing world over a decade. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 9(2), 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adenle, A. A. (2011b). Response to issues on GM agriculture in Africa: are transgenic crops safe? BMC Research Notes 4, 388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adenle, A. A. (2012). Are transgenic crops safe? GM agriculture in Africa. United Nations University, Japan. [Online]. Available from http://unu.edu/publications/articles/are-transgenic-crops-safe-gm-agriculture-in-africa.htmlGoogle Scholar
Adenle, A. A. et al. (2013). Status of development, regulation and adoption of GM agriculture in Africa: views and positions of stakeholder groups. Food Policy 43, 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, J. H. (2000). Cartagena Protocol: biosafe or bio-sorry? Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 761, 772.Google Scholar
Ali, A. and Abdulai, A. (2010). The adoption of genetically modified cotton and poverty reduction in Pakistan. Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(1), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammann, K. (2014). Genomic misconception: a fresh look at the biosafety of transgenic and conventional crops. A plea for a process agnostic regulation. New Biotechnology 31(1), 1–17. [Online]. Available from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23684919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azadi, H. and Ho, P. (2010). Genetically modified and organic crops in developing countries: a review of options for food security. Biotechnology Advances 28(1), 160–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azadi, H. et al. (2015). Genetically modified crops: towards agricultural growth, agricultural development or agricultural sustainability? Food Reviews International 31(3), 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazuin, S. et al. (2011). Application of GM crops in Sub-Saharan Africa: lessons learned from Green Revolution. Biotechnology Advances 29, 908–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, D. (2013). Brazil Says ‘Yes’ to Genetically Modified Foods. Mexico Says ‘No’. [Online]. Available from www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013--10--30/brazil-says-yes-to-genetically-modified-foods-dot-mexico-says-noGoogle Scholar
Brookes, G. and Barfoot, P. (2016). GM crops: global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996–2014. PG Economics Ltd, UK. [Online]. Available from www.pgeconomics.co.uk/pdf/2016globalimpactstudymay2016.pdfGoogle Scholar
Brown-Lima, C. et al. (2012). An overview of the Brazil–China soybean trade and its strategic implications for conservation. [Online]. Available from www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/regions/southamerica/brazil/explore/brazil-china-soybean-trade.pdfGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, J. E. (2011). Impact of GM crops on biodiversity. GM Crops 1, 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Union Center of North Carolina (2007). Policy Area: GMOs. [Online]. Available from http://europe.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Brief0705-GMOs.pdfGoogle Scholar
FAO (2005). Public participation in decision-making regarding GMOs in developing countries: how to effectively involve rural people. Summary Document to Conference 12 of the FAO Biotechnology Forum. 17 January to 13 February 2005, Rome, Italy. [Online]. Available from www.fao.org/biotech/logs/C12/summary.htmGoogle Scholar
Glover, D. (2003). GMOs and the Politics of International Trade. Democratising Biotechnology. Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries Briefing Series. Briefing 5. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Glowka, L. (2003). Law and modern biotechnology: selected issues of relevance to food and agriculture. FAO Legislative Study 78. [Online]. Available from www.fao.org/docrep/006/Y4839E/Y4839E00.HTMGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, X. (2009). The politics of genetically modified organisms: global rules, local needs. The University of Texas at Austin. SIT Spring class 2009. International Studies Organizations and Social Justice, 39 pp.Google Scholar
Gouse, M. (2012). GM maize as subsistence crop: the South African smallholder experience. AgBioForum 15(2), 163–174. [Online]. Available from www.agbioforum.org/v15n2/v15n2a05-gouse.htmGoogle Scholar
Gouse, M. et al. (2006). Output and labour effects of GM maize and minimum tillage in a communal area of KwaZulu Natal. Development Perspectives 2(2), 192–207.Google Scholar
Gruère, G. P. (2006). An analysis of trade related international regulations of genetically modified food and their effects on developing countries. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Environment and Production Technology Division (EPT) Discussion Paper 147. Washington, D.C., 78 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruère, G. and Sengupta, D. (2009). Biosafety decisions and perceived commercial risks. The role of GM-free private standards. Environment and Production Technology Division, The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Discussion Paper 00847. [Online]. Available from www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/ifpridp00847.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hanrahan, C. E. (2010). Agricultural Biotechnology: The U.S.–EU Dispute. Congressional Research Service Reports. Paper 69. [Online]. Available from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crsdocs/69Google Scholar
ISHRW (2014). International Weed Science. [Online]. Available from www.weedscience.orgGoogle Scholar
James, C. (2014). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014. ISAAA Brief No. 49. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA.Google Scholar
James, C. (2015). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2015. ISAAA Brief 50–2015: Executive Summary. Ithaca, NY: ISAA.Google Scholar
Jonquieres, G. et al. (2003). Sowing discord: after Iraq, the US and Europe head for a showdown over genetically modified crops. Financial Times 14 May 2003, p. 21.Google Scholar
Josling, T. (2015). A review of WTO rules and GMO trade. Biotechnology 9(3). [Online]. Available from www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/biores/news/a-review-of-wto-rules-and-gmo-tradeGoogle Scholar
Klümper, W. and Qaim, M. (2014). A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PLoS ONE 9(11), e111629, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marris, C. (2004). Issues concerning public awareness and attitudes towards genetically modified bananas and tropical fruits. Third Session of the Intergovernmental Group on Bananas and Tropical Fruits, Puerto de la Cruz, Spain, 22–26 March 2004. [Online]. Available from ftp://193.43.36.93/unfao/bodies/ccp/ba-tf/04/j0803e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Meijer, E. and Stewart, R. (2004). The GM cold war: how developing countries can go from being dominos to being players. RECIEL 13(3), 247–262.Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2003). Chapter 5 – Governance in the use of genetically modified crops in developing countries. A Follow-up Discussion Paper, pp. 63–82. [Online]. Available from www.conacyt.gob.mx/cibiogem/images/cibiogem/comunicacion/publicaciones/Nuffield_Council-GMOs-for-dev-countries.pdfGoogle Scholar
Paarlberg, R. (2000). Agrobiotechnology choices in developing countries. International Journal of Biotechnology 2(1–3), 167–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, L. A. and Josling, T. (2002). Regulating biotechnology: comparing EU and US approaches. European Policy Papers #8. [Online]. Available from http://aei.pitt.edu/28/1/TransatlanticBiotech.pdfGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M. J. and White, P. A. (2010). The EU–US Dispute over Regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms, Plants, Feeds, and Foods. International Dimensions of Ethics Education in Science and Engineering. [Online]. Available from http://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=edethicsinscienceGoogle Scholar
Potrykus, I. (2010). Lessons from the ‘Humanitarian Golden Rice’ project: regulation prevents development of public good genetically engineered crop products. New Biotechnology 27, 466–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qaim, M. and Kouser, S. (2013). Genetically modified crops and food security. PLoS ONE 8(6), e64879, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qaim, M., and Zilberman, D. (2003). Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Science 299, 900–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, P. B. et al. (2013). GM technology can solve the world food crisis. Science Secure Journal of Biotechnology 2(2), 36–40.Google Scholar
Salmon, D. G. (2015). Agricultural biotechnology annual. Global Agricultural Information Network. [Online]. Available from http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Paris_EU-28_7-23-2015.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tabashnik, B. E. et al. (2013). Insect resistance to Bt crops: lessons from the first billion acres. Nature Biotechnology 31(6), 510–521. [Online]. Available from www.ask-force.org/web/Bt1/Tabashnik-Insect-Resistance-First-Billion-Acres-2013.pdfCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabashnik, B. E. et al. (2015). Dual mode of action of Bt proteins: protoxin efficacy against resistant insects. Nature Scientific Reports 5, 15107. [Online]. Available from www.ask-force.org/web/Bt1/Tabashnik-Dual-mode-action-Bt-proteins-2015.pdfCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walia, A. (2015). Here's why 19 countries in Europe just completely banned genetically modified crops. [Online]. Available from www.collective-evolution.com/2015/10/07/heres-why-19-countries-in-europe-just-completely-banned-genetically-modified-crops/Google Scholar
Wolson, R. A. (2007). Assessing the prospects for the adoption of biofortified crops in South Africa. AgBioForum 10, 184–191. [Online]. Available from www.agbioforum.org/v10n3/v10n3a08-wolson.htmGoogle Scholar
Young, A. R. (2003). Political transfer and ‘trading up’? Transatlantic trade in genetically modified food and US politics. World Politics 55(4), 457–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.