Ethnicity, class and the social sources of US exceptionalism

doi:10.1017/CBO9781316091166.010

10 - Ethnicity, class and the social sources of US exceptionalism

from Part III - American exceptionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2016

Liliana Riga

Edited by

Ralph Schroeder

Show author details

Liliana Riga: Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Ralph Schroeder: Affiliation:
University of Oxford

Book contents

Get access

Summary

An analysis of the character and consequences of US political development is centrally threaded across Michael Mann's magisterial account of the twentieth century. In fact one of the most compelling arguments of the last two volumes of The Sources of Social Power is that enduring exceptionalism cannot consistently explain US political development. Mann shows that through most of the nineteenth century, and especially in the era of intense industrialism between 1872 and 1902, US labour organization was not much behind that of Britain. But then the United States began to lag compared to other capitalist democracies of the Progressive Era in terms of labour welfare and other social protections, with comparatively weak socialist or trade union organizations, an absence of labour parties and exceptional levels of violent labour repression. It was, Mann aptly argues, a labour movement without a working class. By the New Deal years, however, social welfare provisions and a lib-lab welfare regime had generally caught up to make it again unexceptional, and union membership in the 1940s was roughly comparable to that of other industrialized states – before falling behind once again in the post-Second World War conservative drift (Mann 2012 Vol. 3: ch. 3, 8; 2013 Vol. 4: ch. 3).

This account is powerful and persuasive. Mann (2013 Vol. 3: 70–74; 1993: 642–644) shows that labour's Progressive or industrial era weakness involved a number of possible factors, concluding that while a certain class organization was indeed present in the 1890s and 1900s, broad class identities eventually ‘re-tracked’ into a combination of localism, sectionalism and factionalism. Region and sector generally outmaneuvered class and prevented lib-lab politics, while in the South race was determinative. So these distinctive racial and regime crystallizations, including an exceptional level of domestic militarism, meant that underlying sectoral, regional, ethnic/racial diversities and localized politics undermined class solidarity, making it hard to mobilize on a class basis (Mann 2013 Vol. 3: 70–74, 172; Vol. 4: ch.3).

Taken together, these findings imply a central tension around US exceptionalism. In its formative industrial decades, the United States was also characterized by a complex and paradoxical combination of repression and liberalism.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Global Powers
Michael Mann's Anatomy of the Twentieth Century and Beyond
, pp. 185 - 208

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316091166.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barrett, James. 1992. ‘Americanization from the Bottom Up: Immigration and the Remaking of the Working Class in the United States, 1880–1930’ Journal of American History, Dec.: 996–1020.

Carter, Susan et al. (eds.). 2006. Historical Statistics of the United States, Earliest Times to the Present Vol. I. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Carter, Susan, Ransom, Roger, and Sutch, Richard. 1991. ‘The Historical Labor Statistics Project at the University of California’ Historical Methods, 24 (2): 52–65.Google Scholar

Cohen, Patricia. 1999. A Calculating People: the Spread of Numeracy in Early America, edn. London: Routledge.

Crocker, Ruth. 1992. Social Work and Social Order: The Settlement Movement in Two Industrial Cities, 1889–1930. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Dillingham, W.P. et al. United States Immigration Commission (1907–1910). 1911, multivolume. Washington, DC: GPO.

Fishback, Price, Holmes, Rebecca, and Allen, Samuel. 2008. ‘Lifting the Curse of Dimensionality: Measures of the Labor Legislative Climate in the States During the Progressive Era’ National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 14167.

Flanagan, Maureen. 2006. America Reformed: Progressives and Progressivism, 1890s–1920s. New York: Oxford University Press.

Fox, Cybelle. 2012. Three Worlds of Relief: Race, Immigration, and the American Welfare State from the Progressive Era to the New Deal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Gerstle, Gary. 2001. American Crucible: Race and Nation in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Goldstein, Robert. 2010. ‘Labor History Symposium: Political Repression of the American Labor Movement during its Formative Years – A Comparative Perspective’ Labor History, 51 (2): 271–293.Google Scholar

Gould, Lewis. 2001. America in the Progressive Era, 1890–1914. New York: Pearson Education Limited.

Hannon, Joan. 1982. ‘Ethnic Discrimination in a 19th-Century Mining District: Michigan Copper Mines, 1888’ Explorations in Economic History, 19 (1): 28–50.Google Scholar

Higham, John. 2002 [1955]. Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism, 1860–1925. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Hill, Howard. 1919. ‘The Americanization Movement’ American Journal of Sociology, 24 (6): 609–642.Google Scholar

Hofstadter, Richard. 1955. The Age of Reform. New York: Vintage Press.

Kanstroom, Daniel. 2007. Deportation Nation: Outsiders in American History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Katznelson, Ira and Zolberg, Aristide. (eds.). 1986. Working-class Formation: Nineteenth-century Patterns in Western Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kimeldorf, Howard. 2013. ‘Worker Replacement Costs and Unionization: Origins of the U.S. Labor Movement’ American Sociological Review, 78 (6): 1033–1062.Google Scholar

King, Desmond. 2000. Making Americans: Immigration, Race, and the Origins of Diverse Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Link, Arthur. 1959. ‘What Happened to the Progressive Movement in the 1920s?’ American Historical Review, 64: 833–851.Google Scholar

Lipold, Paul and Isaac, Larry. 2009. ‘Striking Deaths: Lethal Contestation and the “Exceptional” Character of the American Labor Movement, 1870–1970’ Internationaal Instituut voor Geschiedenis, 54: 167–205.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1997. American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

Mann, Michael. 2013. The Sources of Social Power: Vol. 4 Globalizations, 1945–2011. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mann, Michael 2012. The Sources of Social Power: Vol.3 Global Empires and Revolution, 1890–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mann, Michael 1993. The Sources of Social Power: Vol.2 The Rise of Classes and Nation-States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McClymer, John. 1978. ‘The Federal Government and the Americanization Movement, 1915–1924’ Prologue: Journal of the National Archives, 10 (Spring): 23–41.Google Scholar

McGerr, Michael. 2003. A Fierce Discontent: The Rise and Fall of the Progressive Movement in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ngai, Mae. 2004. Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Ngai, Mae. 1999. ‘The Architecture of Race in American Immigration Law: A Reexamination of the Immigration Act of 1924’ Journal of American History, 86 (1): 67–92.Google Scholar

O'Connor, Alice. 2001. Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy, and the Poor in Twentieth Century U.S. History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Perlmann, Joel. 2001. ‘Race or People: Federal Race Classifications for Europeans in America, 1898–1913’ Jerome Levy Economics Institute Working Paper No. 320.

Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, Harvard University Press.

Raskin, J. B. 1993. ‘Legal Aliens, Local Citizens: the Historical, Constitutional and Theoretical Meanings of Alien Suffrage’ University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 141 (4): 1391–1470.Google Scholar

Restifo, Salvatore, Roscigno, Vincent, and Qian, Zhenchao. 2013. ‘Segmented Assimilation, Split Labor Markets, and Racial/Ethnic Inequality: the Case of Early Twentieth Century New York’ American Sociological Review, 78 (5): 897–924.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith. 1991. American Citizenship: the Quest for Inclusion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Smith, Rogers. 1988. ‘The ‘American Creed’ and American Identity: The Limits of Liberal Citizenship in the United States’ Western Political Quarterly, 41 (2): 225–251.Google Scholar

Sombart, Werner. 1976 [1906]. Why Is There No Socialism in the United States?. New York: Sharpe.

Zeidel, Robert. 2004. Immigrants, Progressives, and Exclusion Politics: The Dillingham Commission, 1900–1927. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.

Ziegler-McPherson, Christina. 2010. Americanization in the States: Immigrant Social Welfare Policy, Citizenship, and National Identity in the United States, 1908–1929. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.

Zolberg, Aristide. 2006. A Nation by Design: Immigration Policy in the Fashioning of America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.