Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-gcwzt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-21T23:31:59.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Link-tracing and respondent-driven sampling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

By
Steve Thompson
Edited by
Roger Tourangeau ,
Brad Edwards ,
Timothy P. Johnson ,
Kirk M. Wolter  and
Nancy Bates
Steve Thompson
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
Roger Tourangeau
Affiliation:
Westat Research Organisation, Maryland
Brad Edwards
Affiliation:
Westat Research Organisation, Maryland
Timothy P. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Kirk M. Wolter
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Nancy Bates
Affiliation:
US Census Bureau
Get access

Summary

Introduction

For studies of hidden and hard-to-reach human populations, often the most effective way of obtaining a sample is to use link-tracing methods. Conventional designs, such as a random stratified household sample, tend to produce a very small yield of very rare subpopulations and an even smaller yield of subpopulations with stigmatized or socially marginalized behaviors, such as illegal drug use or commercial sex-related activities. The usual frames used in surveys, such as landline and cell-phone numbers and household addresses, lead to underrepresentation of subgroups, such as persons who are homeless, traveling, or in institutionalized settings. Undocumented workers may be hard to survey because of geographic mobility and uncertain legal status. Social network connections can in some cases provide access not easily obtained by other means.

For some studies, it is important to understand the network structure of a population as well as the individual characteristics of the people in it. This is especially true in the case of epidemics of contagious diseases. The epidemic of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has compelled societies throughout the world to try to understand sexual and drug-using behaviors and reach at-risk, hidden populations in an effort to understand and alleviate the spread of the disease. More broadly, individual behaviors and social connections are related, and understanding of social network structure is necessary for the understanding of each. Link-tracing sampling designs provide a natural means for studying and understanding socially structured human populations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Hard-to-Survey Populations , pp. 503 - 516
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aldous, D., & Fill, J.. (2002). Reversible Markov Chains and Random Walks on Graphs [online draft book]. Retrieved from .
Basu, D. (1969). Role of the sufficiency and likelihood principles in sample survey theory. Sankhya A: Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 31(4), 441–54.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, Z. W., & Sirken, M. G. (1965). Design of sample surveys to estimate the prevalence of rare diseases: three unbiased estimates. Vital and Health Statistics, Ser. 2, No. 11. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Boyd, S., Diaconis, P., & Xiao, L. (2004). Fastest mixing Markov chain on a graph. SIAM Review, 46(4), 667–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, M., & Thompson, S. K. (2003). Estimation with link-tracing sampling designs: a Bayesian approach. Survey Methodology, 29(2), 197–206.Google Scholar
Felix-Medina, M. H., & Monjardin, P. E. (2006). Combining link-tracing sampling and cluster sampling to estimate the size of hidden populations: a Bayesian-assisted approach. Survey Methodology, 32(2), 187–96.Google Scholar
Felix-Medina, M. H., & Thompson, S. K. (2004). Combining link-tracing sampling and cluster sampling to estimate the size of hidden populations. Journal of Official Statistics, 20(1), 19–38.Google Scholar
Frank, O. (1971). Statistical Inference in Graphs. Stockholm: ForsvaretForskningsanstalt.Google Scholar
Frank, O. (1977a). Survey sampling in graphs. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 1(3), 235–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, O. (1977b). Estimation of graph totals. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 4(2), 81–89.Google Scholar
Frank, O. (1978a). Estimating the number of connected components in a graph by using a sampled subgraph. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 5(4), 177–88.Google Scholar
Frank, O. (1978b). Sampling and estimation in large social networks. Social Networks, 1(1), 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, O. (1979). Estimation of population totals by use of snowball samples. In Holland, P. W. and Leinhardt, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research (pp. 319–47). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, O., & Snijders, T. (1994). Estimating the size of hidden populations using snowball sampling. Journal of Official Statistics, 10(1), 53–67.Google Scholar
Gile, K. J. (2011). Improved inference for respondent-driven sampling data with application to HIV prevalence estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(493), 135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gile, K. J., & Handcock, M. S. (2010). Respondent-driven sampling: an assessment of current methodology. Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 285–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gile, K. J., & Handcock, M. S. (2011). Network Model-Assisted Inference from Respondent-Driven Sampling Data. arXiv:1108.0298 [Cornell University Library].Google Scholar
Goel, S., & Salganik, M. J. (2010). Assessing respondent-driven sampling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(15), 6743–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A. X., Fienberg, S. E., & Airoldi, E. M. (2009). A Survey of Statistical Network Models. arXiv:0912.5410 [Cornell University Library].Google Scholar
Goodreau, S. M., Cassels, S., Kasprzyk, D., Montano, D. E., Greek, A., & Morris, M. (2012). Concurrent partnerships, acute infection and HIV epidemic dynamic among young adults in Zimbabwe. AIDS and Behavior, 16, 312–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Handcock, M. S., & Gile, K. J. (2010). Modeling social networks from sampled data. Annals of Applied Statistics, 4(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Handcock, M. S., Gile, K. J., & Mar, C. M. (2012). Estimating Hidden Population Size Using Respondent-Driven Sampling. arXiv:1209.6241 [Cornell University Library].Google Scholar
Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckathorn, D. D. (2002). Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems, 49(1), 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klovdahl, A. S. (1989). Urban social networks: some methodological problems and possibilities. In Kochen, M. (ed.), The Small World (pp. 176–210). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing, 176–210.Google Scholar
Kolaczyk, E. D. (2009). Statistical Analysis of Network Data: Methods and Models. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwanisai, M. (2005). Estimation in link-tracing designs with subsampling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
Kwanisai, M. (2006). Estimation in network populations. In Joint Statistical Meetings Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section (pp. 3285–91). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
Lovasz, L. (1993). Random walks on graphs: a survey. In Miklos, D., Sos, D., & Szoni, T. (eds.), Combinatorics, Paul Erdos is Eighty (vol. II, pp. 1–46). Keszthely: Janos Bolyai Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
Magnani, R., Sabin, K., Saidel, T., & Heckathorn, D. (2005). Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance. AIDS, 19 (Suppl. 2), S67–S72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63(3), 581–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salganik, M. J., & Heckathorn, D. D. (2004). Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34(1), 193–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirken, M. G. (1972a). Stratified sample surveys with multiplicity. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67(337), 224–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirken, M. G. (1972b). Variance components of multiplicity estimators. Biometrics, 28(3), 869–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B. (1992). Estimation on the basis of snowball samples: how to weight. Bulletin Méthodologie Sociologique, 36(1), 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreen, M. (1992). Rare populations, hidden populations, and link-tracing designs: what and why?Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 36(1), 34–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. K. (2006a). Targeted random walk designs. Survey Methodology, 32(1), 11–24.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. K. (2006b). Adaptive web sampling. Biometrics, 62(4), 1224–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, S. K. (2011). Adaptive network and spatial sampling. Survey Methodology, 37(2), 183–96.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. K. (2012). Sampling (3rd edn.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, S. K., & Frank, O. (2000). Model-based estimation with link-tracing sampling designs. Survey Methodology, 26(1), 87–98.Google Scholar
Vincent, K., & Thompson, S. (2012). Estimating Population Size with Link-Tracing Sampling. arXiv:1210.2667 [stat.ME] [Cornell University Library].Google Scholar
Volz, E., & Heckathorn, D. D. (2008). Probability based estimation theory for respondent driven sampling. Journal of Official Statistics, 24(1), 79–97.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×