Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T15:31:01.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Microengineered tools for studying cell migration in electric fields

from Part I - Micro-nano techniques in cell mechanobiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Yu Sun
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Deok-Ho Kim
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Craig A. Simmons
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

The migratory ability of various cell types contributes to cell functions, physiological processes, and disease pathologies. Among the diverse environmental guiding mechanisms for cell migration, the electric field is a long-known important guiding cue. The electric field–directed cell migration, termed “electrotaxis,” can mediate processes that are important for human health such as wound healing, immune responses, and cancer metastasis. The growing interest in better understanding electrotaxis has motivated technological developments to enable more advanced electrotaxis studies. In particular, various microengineered devices have been developed and applied to studying electrotaxis over recent years. In general these new experimental tools can better control electric field application in cell migration experiments, whereas each developed tool offers its own features. Successful applications of the new devices have been demonstrated for studying electrotaxis of various cell types such as cancer cells, lymphocytes, animal models, and tissue cells related to wound healing, as well as for investigating electric field–mediated orientation responses in stem cells and yeast cells. In this chapter, we will provide the background information in directed cell migration, electrotaxis, and cell migration assays. We follow with a survey of fabrication and assembly methods of various microengineered electrotaxis devices and experimental setup and analysis methods, as well as their applications for cell studies. Finally, we conclude the chapter with our perspective on the issues challenging this research area and on the proposed directions for future development.

Type
Chapter
Information
Integrative Mechanobiology
Micro- and Nano- Techniques in Cell Mechanobiology
, pp. 110 - 127
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abhyankar, V. V., Toepke, M. W., Cortesio, C. L. Lokuta, M. A., Huttenlocher, A. and Beebe, D. J. (2008). “A platform for assessing chemotactic migration within a spatiotemporally defined 3D microenvironment.” Lab on a Chip 8: 15071515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amadi, O., Steinhauser, M., Nishi, Y., Chung, S., Kamm, R., Mcmahon, A. and Lee, R. (2010). “A low resistance microfluidic system for the creation of stable concentration gradients in a defined 3D microenvironment.” Biomedical Microdevices 12: 10271041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baggiolini, M. (1998). “Chemokines and leukocyte traffic.” Nature 392: 565568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyden, S. (2008). “The chemotactic effect of mixtures of antibody and antigen on polymorphonuclear leucocytes.” J Exp Med 115: 453466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. and Butcher, E. (2000). “Chemokines in tissue-specific and microenvironment-specific lymphocyte homing.” Curr Opin Immunol 12: 336–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortese, B., Palamà, I. E., D’amone, S. and Gigli, G. (2014). “Influence of electrotaxis on cell behaviour.” Integrative Biology 6: 817830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delong, E. F., Frankel, R. B. and Bazylinski, D. A. (1993). “Multiple evolutionary origins of magnetotaxis in bacteria.” Science 259: 803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Djamgoz, Mba, Mycielska, M., Madeja, Z., Fraser, S. and Korohoda, W. (2001). “Directional movement of rat prostate cancer cells in direct-current electric field: involvement of voltagegated Na+ channel activity.” J Cell Sci 114: 26972705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamboa, O. L. Pu, J., Townend, J., Forrester, J. V., Zhao, M., McCaig, C. and Lois, N. (2010). “Electrical estimulation of retinal pigment epithelial cells.” Exp Eye Res 91: 195204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, A., Song, B., Reid, B., Gu, Y., Forrester, J. V., Jahoda, C. A. B. and Zhao, M. (2010). “Effects of physiological electric fields on migration of human dermal fibroblasts.” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 130: 23202327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haessler, U., Kalinin, Y., Swartz, M. A. and Wu, M. (2009). “An agarose-based microfluidic platform with a gradient buffer for 3D chemotaxis studies.” Biomed Microdevices 11: 827835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, B., Kim, D., Hyun Ko, U. and Shin, J. H. (2012). “A sorting strategy for C. elegans based on size-dependent motility and electrotaxis in a micro-structured channel.” Lab on a Chip 12: 41284134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, S., Thakar, R., Liepmann, D. and Li, S. (2005). “Effects of shear stress on endothelial cell haptotaxis on micropatterned surfaces.” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 337: 401409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, C., Cheng, J., Yen, M. and Young, T. (2009). “Electrotaxis of lung cancer cells in a multiple-electric-field chip.” Biosens Bioelectron 24: 35103516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y.-J., Samorajski, J., Kreimer, R. and Searson, P. C. (2013). “The influence of electric field and confinement on cell motility.” PLoS One 8: e59447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J., et al. (2012a). “Microfluidic device for studying cell migration in single or co-existing chemical gradients and electric fields.” Biomicrofluidics 6: 024121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, L., et al. (2012b). “E-cadherin plays an essential role in collective directional migration of large epithelial sheets.” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 69: 27792789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J., and Lin, F. (2011). “Microfluidic devices for studying chemotaxis and electrotaxis.” Trends in Cell Biology 21: 489497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J., Nandagopal, S., Wu, D., Romanuik, S. F., Paul, K., Thomson, D. J. and Lin, F. (2011). “Activated T lymphocytes migrate toward the cathode of DC electric fields in microfluidic devices.” Lab on a Chip 11: 12981304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, F., Baldessari, F., Gyenge, C. C., Sato, T., Chambers, R. D., Santiago, J. G. and Butcher, E. C. (2008). “Lymphocyte electrotaxis in vitro and in vivo.” The Journal of Immunology 181: 24652471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lohof, A., Quillan, M., Dan, Y. and Poo, M. (1992). “Asymmetric modulation of cytosolic cAMP activity induces growth cone turning.” J. Neurosci 12: 12531261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luster, A., Alon, R. and von Andrian, U. (2005). “Immune cell migration in inflammation: present and future therapeutic targets.” Nat Immunol 6: 1182–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manière, X., Lebois, F., Matic, I., Ladoux, B., Di Meglio, J.-M. and Hersen, P. (2011). “Running worms: C. elegans self-sorting by electrotaxis.” PLoS One 6: e16637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaig, C. D., Allan, D. W., Erskine, L. Rajnicek, A. M. and Stewart, R. (1994). “Growing nerves in an electric field.” Neuroprotocols 4: 134141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaig, C. D., Rajnicek, A., Song, B. and Zhao, M. (2005). “Controlling cell behavior electrically: current views and future potential.” Physiol Rev 85: 943978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mccormick, K. E., Gaertner, B. E., Sottile, M., Phillips, P. C. and Lockery, S. R. (2011). “Microfluidic devices for analysis of spatial orientation behaviors in semi-restrained Caenorhabditis elegans.” PLoS One 6: e25710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minc, N. and Chang, F. (2010). “Electrical control of cell polarization in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.” Current Biology 20: 710716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mosadegh, B., Saadi, W., Wang, S. J. and Jeon, N. L. (2008). “Epidermal growth factor promotes breast cancer cell chemotaxis in CXCL12 gradients.” Biotechnol Bioeng 100: 12051213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, A., Homey, B., Soto, H., Ge, N., Catron, D., Buchanan, M. E., Mcclanahan, T., et al. (2011). “Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis.” Nature 410: 5056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mycielska, M. and Djamgoz, M. (2004). “Cellular mechanisms of direct-current electric field effects: galvanotaxis and metastatic disease.” J Cell Sci 117: 16311639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, R. D., Quie, P. G. and Simmons, R. L. (1975). “Chemotaxis under agarose: a new and simple method for measuring chemotaxis and spontaneous migration of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes and monocytes.” J Immunol 115: 16501656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pu, J., McCaig, C. D., Cao, L. Zhao, Z., Segall, J. E. and Zhao, M. (2007). “EGF receptor signalling is essential for electric-field-directed migration of breast cancer cells.” J Cell Sci 120: 33953403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rezai, P., Salam, S., Selvaganapathy, P. R. and Gupta, B. P. (2011). “Effect of pulse direct current signals on electrotactic movement of nematodes Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae.” Biomicrofluidics 5: 44116441169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rezai, P., Salam, S., Selvaganapathy, P. R. and Gupta, B. P. (2012). “Electrical sorting of Caenorhabditis elegans.” Lab on a Chip 12: 18311840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rezai, P., Siddiqui, A., Selvaganapathy, P. R. and Gupta, B. (2010a). “Electrotaxis of Caenorhabditis elegans in a microfluidic environment.” Lab Chip 10: 220226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rezai, P., Siddiqui, A., Selvaganapathy, P. R. and Gupta, B. P. (2010b). “Behavior of Caenorhabditis elegans in alternating electric field and its application to their localization and control.” Applied Physics Letters 96: 153702153703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saadi, W., Rhee, S. W., Lin, F., Vahidi, B., Chung, B. G. and Jeon, N. L. (2007). “Generation of stable concentration gradients in 2D and 3D environments using a microfluidic ladder chamber.” Biomed Microdevices 9: 627635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, M. J., Ueda, M., Takagi, H., Watanabe, T. M. and Yanagida, T. (2007). “Input-output relationship in galvanotactic response of Dictyostelium cells.” Biosystems 88: 261272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, B., Gu, Y., Pu, J., Reid, B., Zhao, Z. and Zhao, M. (2007). “Application of direct current electric fields to cells and tissues in vitro and modulation of wound electric field in vivo.” Nat Protoc 2: 14791489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, S., Han, H., Ko, U. H., Kim, J. and Shin, J. H. (2013). “Collaborative effects of electric field and fluid shear stress on fibroblast migration.” Lab on a Chip 13(8): 16021611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sudo, R., Chung, S., Zervantonakis, I. K., Vickerman, V., Toshimitsu, Y., Griffith, L. G. and Kamm, R. D. (2009). “Transport-mediated angiogenesis in 3D epithelial coculture.” The FASEB Journal 23: 21552164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Y.–S., et al. (2012a). “In vitro electrical-stimulated wound-healing chip for studying electric field-assisted wound-healing process.” Biomicrofluidics 6: 034117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Y. S., et al. (2012b). “Electrotaxis of lung cancer cells in ordered three-dimensional scaffolds.” Biomicrofluidics 6: 1410214114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tai, G., Reid, B., Cao, L. and Zhao, M. (2009). “Electrotaxis and wound healing: experimental methods to study electric fields as a directional signal for cell migration.” Methods Mol Biol 571: 7797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, H.-F., Huang, C.-W., Chang, H.-F., Chen, J. J., Lee, C.-H. and Cheng, J.-Y. (2013). “Evaluation of EGFR and RTK signaling in the electrotaxis of lung adenocarcinoma cells under direct-current electric field stimulation.” PLoS One 8: e73418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wadhawan, N., Kalkat, H., Natarajan, K., Ma, X., Gajjeraman, S., Nandagopal, S., Hao, N., et al. (2012). “Growth and positioning of adipose-derived stem cells in microfluidic devices.” Lab on a Chip 12: 48294834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, C.-C., Kao, Y.-C., Chi, P.-Y., Huang, C.-W., Lin, J.-Y., Chou, C.-F., Cheng, J.-Y., et al. (2011). “Asymmetric cancer-cell filopodium growth induced by electric-fields in a microfluidic culture chip.” Lab on a Chip 11: 695699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S.-J., Saadi, W., Lin, F., Minh-Canh Nguyen, C. and Li Jeon, N. (2004). “Differential effects of EGF gradient profiles on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell chemotaxis.” Experimental Cell Research, 300, 180189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitesides, G. M. (2006). “The origins and the future of microfluidics.” Nature 442: 368373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, D., et al. (2013a). “DC electric fields direct breast cancer cell migration, induce EGFR polarization, and increase the intracellular level of calcium ions.” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics 67: 11151125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, D. and Lin, F. (2011). “A receptor-electromigration-based model for cellular electrotactic sensing and migration.” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 411: 695701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, J., et al. (2013b). “Recent developments in microfluidics-based chemotaxis studies.” Lab on a Chip 13: 24842499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, J. and Lin, F. (2014). “Recent developments in electrotaxis assays.” Advances in Wound Care 3: 149155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zervantonakis, I., Chung, S., Sudo, R., Zhang, M., Charest, J. and Kamm, R. (2010). “Concentration gradients in microfluidic 3D matrix cell culture systems.” International Journal of Micro-Nano Scale Transport 1: 2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, M. (2009). “Electrical fields in wound healing-An overriding signal that directs cell migration.” Semin Cell Dev Biol 20: 674682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, M., Agius-Fernandez, A., Forrester, J. and McCaig, C. (1996). “Directed migration of corneal epithelial sheets in physiological electric fields.” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37: 25482558.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhao, M., Dick, A., Forrester, J. and McCaig, C. (1999). “Electric field-directed cell motility involves up-regulated expression and asymmetric redistribution of the epidermal growth factor receptors and is enhanced by fibronectin and laminin.” Mol Biol Cell 10: 12591276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, M., Song, B., Pu, J., Wada, T., Reid, B., Tai, G., Wang, F., et al. (2006). “Electrical signals control wound healing through phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase-gamma and PTEN.” Nature 442: 457460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, S., Gao, R., Devreotes, P. N., Mogilner, A. and Zhao, M. (2013). “3D arrays for high throughput assay of cell migration and electrotaxis.” Cell biology international 37: 9951002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zigmond, S. 1977. “Ability of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to orient in gradients of chemotactic factors.” J Cell Biol 75: 606616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×