Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-2bdfx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-11T23:21:13.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Measurement of Local Flow Velocity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2024

Stavros Tavoularis  and
Jovan Nedić
Stavros Tavoularis
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
Jovan Nedić
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Get access

Summary

Thoroughly revised and expanded, the new edition of this established textbook equips readers with a robust and practical understanding of experimental fluid mechanics. Enhanced features include improved support for students with emphasis on pedagogical instruction and self-learning, end-of-chapter summaries, 127 examples, 165 problems, refined illustrations, as well as new coverage of techniques in digital photography, frequency analysis of signals and the measurement of forces. It describes comprehensively classical and modern methods for flow visualisation and measuring flow rate, pressure, velocity, temperature, concentration, forces and wall shear stress, alongside supporting material on system response, measurement uncertainty, signal analysis, data analysis, optics, laboratory apparatus and laboratory practice. With enhanced instructor resources, including lecture slides, additional problems, laboratory support materials and online solutions, this is the ideal textbook for senior undergraduate and graduate students studying experimental fluid mechanics and is also suitable for an introductory measurements laboratory. Moreover, it is a valuable resource for practising engineers and scientists in this area.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Measurement in Fluid Mechanics , pp. 436 - 504
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adrian, R.. Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 23:261–304, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrian, R.J.. Laser velocimetry. In Goldstein, R.J., editor, Fluid Mechanics Measurements, pages 175–299. Taylor & Francis Publishers, Washington DC, 1996.Google Scholar
Adrian, R.J. and Westerweel, J.. Particle Image Velocimetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2011.Google Scholar
Agüera, N., Cafiero, G., Astarita, T., and Discetti, S.. Ensemble 3D PTV for high resolution turbulent statistics. Meas. Sci. Technol., 27:124011 (12pp), 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, R.W., Miller, R.J., Moss, R.W., and Thorpe, S.J.. Unsteady pressure measurement. Meas. Sci. Technol., 11:1055–1076, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. Laser doppler anemometry: An introduction to the basic principles. Technical Report 1203E, DISA Elektronik A/S, Skovlunde, Denmark, 1981.Google Scholar
Arroyo, M. P. and Greated, C.A.. Stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol., 2:1181–1186, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, S.C.C., Kunkel, G.J., Hultmark, M., Vallikivi, M., Hill, J.P., Meyer, K.A., Tsay, C., Arnold, C.B., and Smits, A.J.. Turbulence measurements using a nanoscale thermal anemometry probe. J. Fluid Mech., 663:160, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnhart, D.H., Adrian, R.J., and Papen, G.C.. Phase-conjugate holographic system for high resolution particle image velocimetry. Appl. Opt., 33:7159–7170, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belden, J., Truscott, T.T., Axiak, M.C., and Techet, A.H.. Three-dimensional synthetic aperture particle image velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol., 21:125403, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beresh, S.J.. Time-resolved particle image velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol., 32:102003, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruun, H.H.. Hot-Wire Anemometry. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryer, D.W. and Pankhurst, R.C.. Pressure-Probe Methods for Determining Wind Speed and Flow Direction. National Physical Laboratory, London, 1971.Google Scholar
Buchhave, P., George, W.K., and Lumley, J.L.. The measurement of turbulence with the laser doppler anemometer. Ann. Rev. Fluid mech., 11:443–503, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burattini, P. and Antonia, R. A.. The effect of different x-wire calibration schemes on some turbulence statistics. Exp. Fluids, 38 (1):80–89, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, T.L. and Wagner, J.W.. Application of a three-sensor hot-wire probe for incompressible flow. AIAA J., 21:726–732, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, T.A., Sakakibara, J., and Thoroddsen, S.T.. Scanning tomographic particle image velocimetry applied to a turbulent jet. Phys. Fluids, 25:025102, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, I.P. and Dianat, M.. Pulsed wire velocity anemometry near walls. Exp. Fluids, 8:343–352, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, K.T.. The influence of peak-locking errors on turbulence statistics computed from piv ensembles. Exp. Fluids, 36:484–497, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chue, S.H.. Pressure probes for fluid measurement. Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 16 (2):147–223, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collis, DC and Williams, M.J.. Two-dimensional convection from heated wires at low Reynolds numbers. J.Fluid Mech., 6:357–384, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comte-Bellot, G.. Hot-wire anemometry. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 8:209–231, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarske, J., Büttner, L., and Razik, T.. Boundary layer velocity measurements by a laser-doppler profile sensor with micrometre spatial resolution. Meas. Sci. Technol., 13:1979–1989, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGraaff, D.B. and Eaton, J. K.. A high-resolution laser Doppler anemometer: design, qualification and uncertainty. Exp. Fluids, 30:522–530, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSouza, F. and Tavoularis, S.. Hot-wire response in compressible subsonic flow. AIAA J., 58(8):3332–3338, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devenport, W.J., Evans, G.P., and Sutton, E.P.. A traversing pulsed-wire probe for velocity measurements near a wall. Exp. Fluids, 8:336–342, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Discetti, S. and Coletti, F.. Volumetric velocimetry for fluid flows. Meas. Sci. Technol., 29:042001, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doebbeling, K., Lenze, B., and Leuchel, W.. Basic considerations concerning the construction and usage of multiple hot-wire probes for highly turbulent three-dimensional flows. Meas. Sci. Technol., 1:924–933, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryden, H.L. and Kuethe, A.M.. The measurement of fluctuations of air speed by the hot-wire anemometer. Technical Report NACA 581, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington DC, 1929.Google Scholar
Durst, F., Melling, A., and Whitelaw, J.H.. Principles and Practice of Laser Doppler Anemometry. Academic Press, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Edwards, R.V.. Report of the special panel on statistical particle bias problems in laser anemometry. J. Fluids Eng., 109:89–93, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsinga, G.E., Scarano, F., Wieneke, B., and van Oudheusden, B.W.. Tomographic particle image velocimetry. Exp. Fluids, 41:933–947, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsnab, J. R., Monty, J. P., White, C.M., Koochesfahani, M., and Klewicki, J.C.. Efficacy of single-component MTV to measure turbulent wall-flow velocity derivative profiles at high resolution. Exp. Fluids, 58:128, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emrich, R.J., editor. Methods of Experimental Physics, Vol. 18A and B: Fluid Dynamics. Academic Press, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
Everett, K.N., Gerner, A.A., and Durston, D.A.. Seven-hole cone probes for high angle flow measurement: Theory and calibration. AIAA J., 21:992–998, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Y, Arwatz, G, Van Buren, TW, Hoffman, DE, and Hultmark, M. Nanoscale sensing devices for turbulence measurements. Experiments in Fluids, 56(7):1–13, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, H.J.S., Princevac, M., and Calhoun, R.J.. Atmospheric measurements (chapter 17). In Tropea, C., Yarin, A.L., and Foss, J.F., editors, Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics. Springer, Berlin, 2007.Google Scholar
Fox, R.W., McDonald, A.T., and Mitchell, J.W.. Fox and McDonald’s Introduction to Fluid Mechanics (10th Edition). Wiley, New York, 2019.Google Scholar
Fu, M.K., Fan, Y., and Hultmark, M.. Design and validation of a nanoscale cross-wire probe (X-NSTAP). Exp. Fluids, 60 (6):1–14, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T., Hain, R., and Kähler, C.J.. Non-iterative double-frame 2D/3D particle tracking velocimetry. Exp. Fluids, 58:119, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieseke, T.J. and Guezennec, Y.G.. An experimental approach to the calibration and use of triple hot-wire probes. Exp. Fluids, 14:305–315, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, R.J.. Fluid Mechanics Measurements (2nd Edition). Taylor & Francis, Washington DC, 1996.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S.. A note on the measurement of total head and static pressure in a turbulent stream. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 155:570–575, 1936.Google Scholar
Grant, I.. Particle image velocimetry: A review. Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. Part C, 211:55–76, 1997.Google Scholar
Grothe, R.L. and Dabiri, D.. An improved three-dimensional characterisation of defocusing digital particle image velocimetry (DDPIV) based on a new imaging volume definition. Meas. Sci. Technol., 19:065402, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guellouz, M.S. and Tavoularis, S.. A simple pendulum technique for the calibration of hot-wire anemometers over low-velocity ranges. Exp. Fluids, 18:199–203, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handford, P.M. and Bradshaw, P.. The pulsed-wire anemometer. Exp. Fluids, 7:125–132, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R.B. and Klewicki, J.C.. Data reduction methods for flow tagging velocity measurements. Exp. Fluids, 20:142–152, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinsch, K.D.. Three-dimensional particle velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol., 6:742–753, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinsch, K.D.. Holographic particle image velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol., 13:R61–72, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinze, J.O.. Turbulence (2nd Edition). McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
Huffman, G.D.. Calibration of tri-axial hot-wire probes using a numerical search algorithm. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum., 13:1177–1182, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, E.S. and Rediniotis, O.K.. Unsteady calibration of fast-response pressure probes, part 1: Theoretical studies. AIAA J., 43:816–826, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, E.S. and Rediniotis, O.K.. Unsteady calibration of fast-response pressure probes, part 2: Water-tunnel experiments. AIAA J., 43:827–834, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, E.S. and Rediniotis, O.K.. Unsteady calibration of fast-response pressure probes, part 3: Air-jet experiments. AIAA J., 43:835–845, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, E.S., Rediniotis, O.K., and Jones, G.. The compressible calibration of miniature multi-hole probes. J. Fluids Eng., 123:128–138, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, P.R. and Kent, P.M.. Two-dimensional velocity measurement by automatic analysis of trace particle motion. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum., 12:604–609, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B.G.. A bleed-type pressure transducer for in-stream fluctuating static pressure sensing. TSI Quarterly, 7 (2):5–11, April-June 1981.Google Scholar
Kähler, C.J. and Kompenhans, J.. Fundamentals of multiple plane stereo particle image velocimetry. Exp. Fluids, 29:S70–7, 2000.Google Scholar
Kähler, C.J., Scholz, U., and Otmanns, J.. Wall-shear-stress and near-wall turbulence measurements up to single pixel resolution by means of long-distance micro-PIV. Exp. Fluids, 41:327–341, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. and Sheng, J.. Applications of holography in fluid mechanics and particle dynamics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 42:531–555, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, R.D. and Adrian, R.J.. Theory of cross-correlation analysis of PIV images. Appl. Sci. Res., 49:191–215, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, L.V.. On the convection of heat from small cylinders in a stream of fluid: Determination of the convection constants of small platinum wires with application to hot-wire anemometry. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, A214:373–432, 1914.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., Ishihara, T., and Sasaki, N.. Automatic analysis of photographs of trace particles by microcomputer system. In Yang, W.J., editor, Flow Visualisation III, pages 231–235. Hemisphere Publishing Corp., Washington DC, 1985.Google Scholar
Koochesfahani, M.M.. Molecular tagging velocimetry (MTV): Progress and applications. In Proc. 30th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, 28 June—1 July 1999, Norfolk, VA, AIAA 99-3786, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostrzewsky, G.J. and Flack, R.D.. Simple system for fluid flow visualisation and measurement using a chronophotographic technique. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 57 (12):3066–3074, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovasznay, L.S.G.. Simple analysis of the constant temperature feedback hot-wire anemometer. Technical Report AERO/JHU CM-478, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 1948.Google Scholar
Kunkel, G., Arnold, C., and Smits, A.J.. Development of NSTAP: Nanoscale thermal anemometry probe. In 36th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, page 3718, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupferschmied, P., Koeppel, P., Gizzi, W., Roduner, C., and Gyarmathy, G.. Time-resolved flow measurements with fast-response aerodynamic probes in turbomachines. Meas. Sci. Technol., 11:1036–1054, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, J. M. and Dawson, J.R.. A scanning PIV method for fine-scale turbulence measurements. Exp. Fluids, 55:1857, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, W.R., Magee, K., Ronney, P., Gee, K.R., and Haughland, R.P.. Flow tagging velocimetry in incompressible flow using photo-activated nonintrusive tracking of molecular motion (PHANTOMM). Exp. Fluids, 18:249–257, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J.D., McKeon, B.J., Jiang, W., Morrison, J.F., and Smits, A.J.. The response of hot wires in high Reynolds-number turbulent pipe flow. Meas. Sci. Technol., 15:789–798, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligrani, P.M., Singer, B.A., and Baun, L.R.. Miniature five-hole pressure probe for measurement of three mean velocity components in low-speed flows. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum., 22:868–876, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limbourg, R. and Nedić, J.. An extension to the universal time scale for vortex ring formation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 915:A46, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limbourg, R. and Nedić, J.. Formation of an orifice-generated vortex ring. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 913:A29, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomas, C.G.. Fundamentals of Hot Wire Anemometry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986.Google Scholar
Lowe, K.T. and Simpson, R.L.. An advanced laser-Doppler velocimeter for fullvector particle position and velocity measurements. Meas. Sci. Tech., 20:045402, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lueptow, R.M., Breuer, K.S., and Haritonidis, J.H.. Computer-aided calibration of x-probes using a look-up table. Exp. Fluids, 6 (2):115–118, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, F.A.. Experiments on pitot tubes in shear flow. Technical Report Reports and Memoranda No. 3028, Aeronautical Research Council, London, 1957.Google Scholar
Mayinger, F. and Feldmann, O., editors. Optical Measurements (2nd Edition). Springer, Berlin, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, B.J., Li, J., Jiang, W., Morrison, J.F., and Smits, A.J.. Pitot probe corrections in fully developed turbulent pipe flow. Meas. Sci. Technol., 14(8):1449, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, B.J. et al. Velocity, vorticity and Mach number (chapter 5). In Tropea, C., Yarin, A.L., and Foss, J.F., editors, Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics. Springer, Berlin, 2007.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, D.K. and Tiedermann, W.G.. Biasing correction for individual realization of laser anemometer measurements in turbulent flow. Phys. Fluids, 16:2082–2088, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelson, L and Techet, A.H.. Quantitative wake analysis of a freely swimming fish using 3D synthetic aperture PIV. Exp. Fluids, 56:135, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, C.. Optical Metrology for Fluids, Combustion and Solids. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, D., Neal, D. R., and Wieneke, B.. Peak-locking reduction for particle image velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol., 27:104005, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullin, J. A. and Dahm, W. J. A.. Dual-plane stereo particle image velocimetry (DSPIV) for measuring velocity gradient fields at intermediate and small scales of turbulent flows. Exp. Fluids, 38:185–196, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedić, J., Ganapathisubramani, B., Vassilicos, J.C., Borée, J., Brizzi, L-E., and Spohn, A. Aeroacoustic performance of fractal spoilers. AIAA J., 50:2695–2710, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novara, M., Schanz, D., Reuther, N., Kähler, C. J., and Schröder, A.. Lagrangian 3D particle tracking in high-speed flows: Shake-The-Box for multi-pulse systems. Exp. Fluids, 57:128:1–20, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ossofsky, E.. Constant temperature operation of the hot-wire anemometer at high frequency. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 19:881–889, 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ower, E. and Pankhurst, R.C.. The Measurement of Air Flow. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1977.Google Scholar
Perry, A.E.. Hot-Wire Anemometry. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982.Google Scholar
Quarmby, A. and Das, H.K.. Displacement effects on pitot tubes with rectangular mouths. Aeron. Quart., 20:129–139, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffel, M., Willert, C.E., Scarano, F., Kähler, C.J., Wereley, S.T., and Kompenhans, J.. Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide (3rd Edition). Springer, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishman, V. and Rediniotis, O.K.. Development of a 12-hole onmidirectional flow-velocity measurement probe. AIAA J., 45:1430–1432, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rediniotis, O.K. and Vijayagopal, R.. Miniature multihole pressure probes and their neural-network-based calibration. AIAA J., 37:666–674, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinsztein-Dunlop, H., Littleton, B., Barker, P., Ljungberg, P., and Malmsten, Y.. Ionic strontium fluorescence as a method for flow tagging velocimetry. Exp. Fluids, 30:36–42, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadr, R. and Klewicki, J.C.. A spline-based technique for estimating flow velocities using two-camera multi-line MTV. Exp. Fluids, 35:257–261, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samet, M. and Einav, S.. Directional pressure probe. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 55:582–588, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samet, M. and Einav, S.. A hot-wire technique for simultaneous measurement of instantaneous velocities in 3D flows. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum., 20:683–690, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samimy, M. and Lele, S.. Motion of particles with inertia in a compressible free shear layer. Phys. Fluids A, 3:1915–1923, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarano, F.. Iterative image deformation methods in PIV. Meas. Sci. Technol., 13:R1–R19, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarano, F.. Tomographic PIV: principles and practice. Meas. Sci. Technol., 24:012001, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schanz, D., Gesemann, S., and Schröder, A.. Shake-The-Box: Lagrangian particle tracking at high particle image densities. Exp. Fluids, 57:70:1–27, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw-Ward, S., McParlin, S.C., Nathan, P., and Birch, D.M.. Optimal calibration of directional velocity probes. AIAA J., 56:2594–2603, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw-Ward, S., Titchmarsh, A., and Birch, D.M.. The calibration and use of n-hole velocity probes. AIAA J., 53:336–346, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinpaugh, K.A. and Simpson, R.L.. A rapidly scanning two-velocity component laser doppler velocimeter. Meas. Sci. Technol., 6:690–701, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, K., Pfister, T., Büttner, L., Czarske, J., Müller, H., Becker, S., Lienhart, H., and Durst, F.. Highly spatially resolved velocity measurements of a turbulent channel flow by a fiber-optic heterodyne laser-Doppler velocity-profile sensor. Exp. Fluids, 40:473–481, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddon, T.E.. On the response of pressure measuring instrumentation in unsteady flow. Technical Report 136, University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies, Toronto, 1969.Google Scholar
Sitaram, N., Lakshminarayana, B., and Ravindranath, A.. Conventional probes for the relative flow measurement in a turbomachinery rotor blade passage. J. Eng. for Power, 103:406–414, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B.L. and Neal, D.R.. Particle image velocimetry (chapter 48). In Johnson, R.W., editor, Handbook of Fluid Dynamics (2nd Edition). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2016.Google Scholar
Smits, A.J. and Lim, T.T., editors. Flow Visualisation Techniques and Examples. Imperial College Press, London, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somerscales, E.F.C.. Fluid velocity measurement by particle tracking. In Dowdell, R.B., editor, Flow – Its Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, pages 795–808. Instrument Society of America, Pittsburgh, PA, 1974.Google Scholar
Spencer, B.W. and Jones, B.G.. A bleed-type pressure transducer for in-stream measurement of static pressure fluctuations. Rev. Sci. Instru., 42 (4):450–454, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavoularis, S.. Techniques for turbulence measurement. In Cheremisinoff, N.P., editor, Encyclopedia of Fluid Mechanics, volume 1, pages 1207–1255. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, TX, 1986.Google Scholar
Treaster, A.L. and Houtz, H.E.. Fabricating and calibrating five-hole probes. In Bajura, R.A. and Billet, M.L., editors, Proc. Fluid Measurements and Instrumentation Forum, AIAA/ASME 4th Fluid Mechanics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference, pages 1–4, Atlanta, GA, 1986.Google Scholar
Treaster, A.L. and Yocum, A.M.. The calibration and application of five-hole probes. ISA Trans., 18 (3):23–34, 1979.Google Scholar
Vukoslavcevic, P. and Wallace, J.M.. A 12-sensor hot-wire probe to measure the velocity and vorticity vectors in turbulent flow. Meas. Sci. Technol., 7:1451–1461, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, J.M. and Foss, J. F.. The measurement of vorticity in turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 27:469–514, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watrasiewitz, B.M. and Rudd, M.J.. Laser Doppler Measurements. Butterworths, Sydney, 1976.Google Scholar
Wereley, S.T. and Meinhart, C.D.. Recent advances in micro-particle image velocimetry. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 42:557–576, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernet, M.P.. Stereo viewing 3-component, planar PIV utilizing fuzzy inference, 1006. AIAA-96-2268, June 17–20.Google Scholar
Westerweel, J.. Fundamentals of digital particle image velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol., 8:1379–1392, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerweel, J., Elsinga, G.E., and Adrian, R.J.. Particle image velocimetry for complex and turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 45:409–436, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willert, C.E.. High-speed particle image velocimetry for the efficient measurement of turbulence statistics. Exp. Fluids, 56, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winternitz, F.A.L.. Simple shielded total-pressure probes. Aircraft Eng., pages 313–317, October 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittmer, K.S., Devenport, W.J., and Zsoldos, J.S.. A four-sensor hot-wire probe system for three-component velocity measurement. Exp. Fluids, 24:416–423, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyngaard, J.C.. Cup, propeller, vane and sonic anemometers in turbulence research. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 13:399–423, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, H. and Cummins, H.Z.. Localized fluid flow measurements with a He-Ne spectrometer. Appl. Phys. Lett., 4:178, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagarola, M.V. and Smits, A.J.. Mean-flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech., 373:33–79, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilliac, G.G.. Calibration of seven-hole pressure probes for use in fluid flows with large angularity. Technical Report NASA Technical Memorandum 102200, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, CA, 1989.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×