Book contents
Microdevelopment: A process-oriented perspective for studying development and learning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Summary
This book presents a new, process-oriented view of development and learning focusing on microdevelopment. Microdevelopment is the process of change in abilities, knowledge, and understanding during short time spans. The defining attributes of microdevelopment are embedded in its name. “Micro-” pertains to short time scales, periods ranging from months to just a few minutes. “Development” indicates the evolving nature of the process, the real-time (on-line) evolution of skills and abilities of development and learning. Studies of cognitive, motor, and emotional microdevelopment commonly focus on processes in which lower-level abilities are reorganized into higher-level ones (Werner, 1957). In this way abilities are examined as they are constructed and before they become automatic reactions (Vygotsky, 1978; Werner, 1957). The microdevelopmental perspective allows researchers to follow the evolution and modification of the functional models that people use (Inhelder et al., 1980). When observing microdevelopment, researchers examine processes within specific task contexts, while people solve problems, perform assignments, or make discoveries. They analyze the process of change, identify its attributes and patterns, and look for the processes that underlie quantitative and qualitative change (Miller & Coyle, 1999; Siegler, 1996). Researchers focus, then, on the “how” of development and learning, on giving explanations, which is the ultimate goal of science (Flavell, 1984).
State-oriented vs. process-oriented approaches
Although development and learning are evolving processes, their understanding has been based on comparing knowledge and abilities at different ages. In pre- and posttests or cross-sectional designs, researchers compare abilities at different time points.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- MicrodevelopmentTransition Processes in Development and Learning, pp. 1 - 28Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
References
, , & (1993). Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessment. American Psychologist, 48(12), 1210–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982). Learning and development: The problem of compatibility, access, and induction. Human Development, 25, 89–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1997). Age differences in, and consequences of, multiple- and variable-strategy use on a multitrial sort-recall task. Developmental Psychology, 33, 372–380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K. W., & Yan, Z. (this volume). Darwin's construction of the theory of evolution: Microdevelopment of explanations of variation and change in species
Flavell, J. H. (1984). Discussion. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Mechanisms of cognitive development (pp. 187–209). New York: Freeman
, & (1957). A microgenetic approach to perception and thought. Psychological Bulletin, 54(3), 197–217CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, R., Romo, L., & Francis, W. S. (this volume). Notebooks as windows on learning: The case of a science-into-ESL program
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W. (this volume). Looking at the hands through time: A microgenetic perspective on learning and instruction
Granott, N. (1993). Patterns of interaction in the co-construction of knowledge: Separate minds, joint effort, and weird creatures. In R. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 183–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
(1998a). A paradigm shift in the study of development. Human Development, 41(5–6), 360–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granott, N. (1998b). We learn, therefore we develop: Learning versus development – or developing learning? In C. Smith & T. Pourchot (Eds.), Adult learning and development: Perspectives from educational psychology (pp. 15–34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
(1998c). Unit of analysis in transit: From the individual's knowledge to the ensemble process. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 5(1), 42–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granott, N. (this volume). How microdevelopment creates macrodevelopment: Reiterated sequences, backward transitions, and the Zone of Current Development
Granott, N., Fischer, K. W., & Parziale, J. (this volume). Bridging to the unknown: A transition mechanism in learning and development
(1995). Learning processes in cognitive development: A reassessment with some unexpected implications. Human Development, 38, 295–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , & (1980). Procédures et significations dans la résolution d’un problème concret. Bulletin de Psychologie, 33(345), 645–648Google Scholar
(1979). Micro and macrodevelopmental changes in language acquisition and other representational systems. Cognitive Science, 3, 91–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981). Getting developmental differences or studying child development?Cognition, 10, 151–158CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, D. (Ed.). (1995a). Development and learning: Reconceptualizing the intersection [Special issue]. Human Development, 38(2).
(1995c). Microgenetic study of change: What has it told us?Psychological Science 6(3), 133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, D. (this volume). A multi-component system that constructs knowledge: Insights from microgenetic study
Lee, K., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (this volume). Macro- and microdevelopmental research: Assumptions, research strategies, constraints, and utilities
Lewis, M. D. (this volume). Interacting time scales in personality (and cognitive) development: Intentions, emotions, and emergent forms
Liben, L. S. (Ed.). (1987). Development and learning: Conflict or congruence? Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
(1993). Preschoolers’ developing knowledge of the pan balance: From new representation to transformed problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 11(1), 31–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. H., & Coyle, T. R. (1999). Developmental change: Lessons from microgenesis. In E. K. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S. A. Gelman, & P. H. Miller (Eds.), Conceptual development: Piaget's legacy (pp. 209–239). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum
Parziale, J. (this volume). Observing the dynamics of construction: Children building bridges and new ideas
Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning. In R. Ripple & V. Rockcastle (Eds.), Piaget rediscovered (pp. 7–19). Ithaca: Cornell University Press
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In P. H. Musssen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (pp. 103–128). New York: Wiley
Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. New York: Oxford University Press
Siegler, R. S. (this volume). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation
, & (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46, 606–620CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1993). Theories of learning and development for academics and educators [Special issue]. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E., & Corbetta, D. (this volume). Microdevelopment and dynamic systems: Applications to infant motor development
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
van Geert, P. (this volume). Developmental dynamics, intentional action, and fuzzy sets
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Werner, H. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development. New York: International Universities Press
(1956). Microgenesis and aphasia. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 347–353CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development: An issue in the study of human behavior (pp. 125–148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
(1995). Attaining reciprocality between learning and development through self-regulation. Human Development, 38, 367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 35
- Cited by