Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-j6k2s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-29T03:21:12.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 26 - Dichorionic and Higher Order Multiple Gestations

from Section 7 - Pathology of Multiple Gestations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2018

Raymond W. Redline
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
Theonia K. Boyd
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston
Drucilla J. Roberts
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Kulkarni, AD, Jamieson, DJ, Jones, HW Jr., Kissin, DM, Gallo, MF, Macaluso, M, Adashi, EY. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2218–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoekstra, C, Zhao, ZZ, Lambalk, CB, Willemsen, G, Martin, NG, Boomsma, DI, Montgomery, GW. Dizygotic twinning. Human reprod update. 2008;14:3747.10.1093/humupd/dmm036CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, JG. Twinning. Lancet. 2003;362:735–43.10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14237-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smits, J, Monden, C. Twinning across the developing world. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25239.10.1371/journal.pone.0025239CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, GW, Zhao, ZZ, Marsh, AJ, Mayne, R, Treloar, SA, James, M, Martin, NG, Boomsma, DI, Duffy, DL. A deletion mutation in GDF9 in sisters with spontaneous DZ twins. Twin Res. 2004;7:548–55.10.1375/1369052042663823CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, JS, Zhao, ZZ, Hoekstra, C, Hayward, NK, Webb, PM, Whiteman, DC, Martin, NG, Boomsma, DI, Duffy, DL, Montgomery, GW. Novel variants in growth differentiation factor 9 in mothers of dizygotic twins. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4713–6.10.1210/jc.2006-0970CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mbarek, H, Steinberg, S, Nyholt, DR, Gordon, SD, Miller, MB, McRae, AF, Hottenga, JJ, Day, FR, Willemsen, G, de Geus, EJ, Davies, GE, Martin, HC, Penninx, BW, Jansen, R, McAloney, K, Vink, JM, Kaprio, J, Plomin, R, Spector, TD, Magnusson, PK, Reversade, B, Harris, RA, Aagaard, K, Kristjansson, RP, Olafsson, I, Eyjolfsson, GI, Sigurdardottir, O, Iacono, WG, Lambalk, CB, Montgomery, GW, McGue, M, Ong, KK, Perry, JR, Martin, NG, Stefansson, H, Stefansson, K, Boomsma, DI. Identification of common genetic variants influencing spontaneous dizygotic twinning and female fertility. American journal of human genetics. 2016;98:898908.10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phelan, MC, Geer, JS, Blackburn, WR. Vascular anastomoses leading to amelia and cutis aplasia in a dizygotic twin pregnancy. Clin Genet. 1998;53:126–30.10.1111/j.1399-0004.1998.tb02659.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, BA, Boomsma, DI, de Man, AJ. Blood group chimerism in human multiple births is not rare. Am J Med Genet. 1996;61:264–8.10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960122)61:3<264::AID-AJMG11>3.0.CO;2-R3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinar, H, Sung, CJ, Oyer, CE, Singer, DB. Reference values for singleton and twin placental weights. Pediatr Pathol Lab Med. 1996;16:901–7.10.1080/15513819609168713CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Paepe, ME, Shapiro, S, Young, LE, Luks, FI. Placental weight, birth weight and fetal:placental weight ratio in dichorionic and monochorionic twin gestations in function of gestational age, cord insertion type and placental partition. Placenta. 2015;36:213–20.10.1016/j.placenta.2014.11.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zech, NH, Wisser, J, Natalucci, G, Riegel, M, Baumer, A, Schinzel, A. Monochorionic-diamniotic twins discordant in gender from a naturally conceived pregnancy through postzygotic sex chromosome loss in a 47,XXY zygote. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:759–63.10.1002/pd.2031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, G. Non-identical monozygotic twins, intermediate twin types, zygosity testing, and the non-random nature of monozygotic twinning: a review. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2009;151 C:110–27.Google Scholar
Qin, JB, Wang, H, Sheng, X, Xie, Q, Gao, S. Assisted reproductive technology and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1180–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Breathnach, FM, McAuliffe, FM, Geary, M, Daly, S, Higgins, JR, Dornan, J, Morrison, JJ, Burke, G, Higgins, S, Dicker, P, Manning, F, Mahony, R, Malone, FD. Definition of intertwin birth weight discordance. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:94103.10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821fd208CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaponis, A, Thanatsis, N, Papadopoulos, V, Decavalas, G. Intertwin estimated fetal weight or crown rump length discordance and adverse perinatal outcome. J Perinat Med. 2016;44:863–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewi, L, Devlieger, R, De Catte, L, Deprest, J. Growth discordance. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28:295303.10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.12.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Antonio, F, Khalil, A, Dias, T, Thilaganathan, B. Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twins: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:643–8.Google Scholar
Bristow, RE, Shumway, JB, Khouzami, AN, Witter, FR. Complete hydatidiform mole and surviving coexistent twin. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996;51:705–9.10.1097/00006254-199612000-00002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaisbuch, E, Ben-Arie, A, Dgani, R, Perlman, S, Sokolovsky, N, Hagay, Z. Twin pregnancy consisting of a complete hydatidiform mole and co-existent fetus: report of two cases and review of literature. Gynecologic oncology. 2005;98:1923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebire, NJ, Foskett, M, Paradinas, FJ, Fisher, RA, Francis, RJ, Short, D, Newlands, ES, Seckl, MJ. Outcome of twin pregnancies with complete hydatidiform mole and healthy co-twin. Lancet. 2002;359:2165–6.10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09085-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massardier, J, Golfier, F, Journet, D, Frappart, L, Zalaquett, M, Schott, AM, Lenoir, VT, Dupuis, O, Hajri, T, Raudrant, D. Twin pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and coexistent fetus: obstetrical and oncological outcomes in a series of 14 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;143:84–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemann, I, Bolund, L, Sunde, L. Twin pregnancies with diploid hydatidiform mole and co-existing normal fetus may originate from one oocyte. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2031–5.10.1093/humrep/den226CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makrydimas, G, Sebire, NJ, Thornton, SE, Zagorianakou, N, Lolis, D, Fisher, RA. Complete hydatidiform mole and normal live birth: a novel case of confined placental mosaicism: case report. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2459–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, AS, Tsai, TC, Soong, YK. Clinical management of a quadruplet pregnancy combining a triplet pregnancy with a classical hydatidiform mole: case report and review of literature. Prenat Diagn. 1999;19:1073–6.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199911)19:11<1073::AID-PD702>3.0.CO;2-43.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumenfeld, Z, Dirnfeld, M, Abramovici, H, Amit, A, Bronshtein, M, Brandes, JM. Spontaneous fetal reduction in multiple gestations assessed by transvaginal ultrasound. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99:333–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landy, HJ, Keith, LG. The vanishing twin: a review. Human reprod update. 1998;4:177–83.10.1093/humupd/4.2.177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oloyede, OA, Iketubosin, F, Bamgbopa, K. Spontaneous fetal reduction and early pregnancy complications in multiple pregnancies following in vitro fertilization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119:5760.10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.05.021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shek, NW, Hillman, SC, Kilby, MD. Single-twin demise: pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28:249–63.10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.11.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, L, Gao, X, Wu, Y, Zhang, Z. Analysis of pregnancy outcomes for survivors of the vanishing twin syndrome after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;203:35–9.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, T, Boucher, K, Aul, R, Rashid, S, Meschino, WS. First and second trimester maternal serum markers in pregnancies with a vanishing twin. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:90–6.10.1002/pd.4492CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vlkova, B, Hodosy, J. Vanishing twin as a potential source of bias in non-invasive fetal sex determination: a case report. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:1128–31.10.1111/jog.12314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masala, M, Saba, L, Zoppi, MA, Puddu, R, Picciau, A, Capponi, V, Iuculano, A, Monni, G, Rosatelli, MC. Pitfalls in noninvasive fetal RhD and sex determination due to a vanishing twin. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:506–8.10.1002/pd.4489CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daw, E. Fetus papyraceus–11 cases. Postgrad Med J. 1983;59:598600.10.1136/pgmj.59.695.598CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNamara, HC, Kane, SC, Craig, JM, Short, RV, Umstad, MP. A review of the mechanisms and evidence for typical and atypical twinning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:172–91.10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.930CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callen, DF, Fernandez, H, Hull, YJ, Svigos, JM, Chambers, HM, Sutherland, GR. A normal 46,XX infant with a 46,XX/69,XXY placenta: a major contribution to the placenta is from a resorbed twin. Prenat Diagn. 1991;11:437–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, D, Platt, MJ, Pharoah, PO. Comparative development of surviving co-twins of vanishing twin conceptions, twins and singletons. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2007;10:210–5.10.1375/twin.10.1.210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinborg, A, Lidegaard, O, la Cour Freiesleben, N, Andersen, AN. Consequences of vanishing twins in IVF/ICSI pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2821–9.10.1093/humrep/dei142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malinowski, W, Koktysz, R, Stawerski, P. The case of monochorionic twin gestation complicated by intrauterine demise of one fetus in the first trimester. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2005;8:262–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marton, V, Zadori, J, Kozinszky, Z, Kereszturi, A. Prevalences and pregnancy outcome of vanishing twin pregnancies achieved by in vitro fertilization versus natural conception. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:13991406.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1098CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ong, SS, Zamora, J, Khan, KS, Kilby, MD. Prognosis for the co-twin following single-twin death: a systematic review. BJOG. 2006;113:992–8.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01027.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillman, SC, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. Co-twin prognosis after single fetal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:928–40.10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822f129dCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shinwell, ES, Haklai, T, Eventov-Friedman, S. Outcomes of multiplets. Neonatology. 2009;95:614.10.1159/000151750CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, JA, Kung, HC, Mathews, TJ, Hoyert, DL, Strobino, DM, Guyer, B, Sutton, SR. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2006. Pediatrics. 2008;121:788801.10.1542/peds.2007-3753CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schachter, M, Raziel, A, Friedler, S, Strassburger, D, Bern, O, Ron-El, R. Monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive techniques: a phenomenon independent of micromanipulation. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1264–9.10.1093/humrep/16.6.1264CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papageorghiou, AT, Avgidou, K, Bakoulas, V, Sebire, NJ, Nicolaides, KH. Risks of miscarriage and early preterm birth in trichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: new data and systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1912–7.10.1093/humrep/del048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinar, H, Stephens, M, Singer, DB, Boyd, TK, Pflueger, SM, Gang, DL, Roberts, DJ, Sung, CJ. Triplet placentas: reference values for weights. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2002;5:495–8.10.1007/s10024-002-0014-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luke, B, Keith, LG. The contribution of singletons, twins and triplets to low birth weight, infant mortality and handicap in the United States. J Reprod Med. 1992;37:661–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Alexander, GR, Kogan, M, Martin, J, Papiernik, E. What are the fetal growth patterns of singletons, twins, and triplets in the United States? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1998;41:114–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blickstein, I. Growth aberration in multiple pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2005;32:3954, viii.10.1016/j.ogc.2004.10.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pharoah, PO, Cooke, T. Cerebral palsy and multiple births. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996;75:F174–7.10.1136/fn.75.3.F174CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petterson, B, Nelson, KB, Watson, L, Stanley, F. Twins, triplets, and cerebral palsy in births in Western Australia in the 1980s. BMJ. 1993;307:1239–43.10.1136/bmj.307.6914.1239CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geipel, A, Berg, C, Katalinic, A, Plath, H, Hansmann, M, Germer, U, Gembruch, U. Prenatal diagnosis and obstetric outcomes in triplet pregnancies in relation to chorionicity. BJOG. 2005;112:554–8.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00627.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abel, JS, Flock, A, Berg, C, Gembruch, U, Geipel, A. Expectant management versus multifetal pregnancy reduction in higher order multiple pregnancies containing a monochorionic pair and a review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(6):1167–73.10.1007/s00404-016-4145-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewi, L, Deprest, J, Hecher, K. The vascular anastomoses in monochorionic twin pregnancies and their clinical consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:1930.10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, SW, Demissie, K, Yang, Q, Walker, MC. Maternal morbidity and obstetric complications in triplet pregnancies and quadruplet and higher-order multiple pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:254–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×