Baron, R.A., and Byrne, D. (1994). Social psychology: understanding human interaction. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Bauer, N. (2005). Für und wider Wildnis – Soziale Dimensionen einer aktuellen gesellschaftlichen Debatte. Zürich, Bristol-Stiftung; Bern, Stuttgart, Wien, Haupt. 185 S.Google Scholar

Bauer, N. (2016). Social values of wilderness in Europe. In Bastmeijer, K. (Ed.), Wilderness protection in Europe. The role of international, European and national law (pp. 94–113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, N., Wallner, A., and Hunziker, M. (2009). The change of European landscapes: human–nature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2910–2920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bauer, N., Vasile, M., and Mondini, M. (2018). Attitudes towards nature, wilderness and protected areas: a way to sustainable stewardship in the South-Western Carpathians. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61, 857–877.Google Scholar

BMUB/BfN Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit und Bundesamt für Naturschutz. (2014). 2013 Nature awareness study: Population survey on nature and biological diversity. www.bfn.de/fileadmin/BfN/gesellschaft/Dokumente/nature-awareness-study-2013.pdf (accessed 27 October 2017).Google Scholar

Braito, M., Böck, K., Flint, C., Muhar, A., Muhar, S., and Penker, M. (2017). Human–nature relationships and the complexity of environmental behaviour. Environmental Values, 26, 365–389.Google Scholar

Buijs, A.E. (2009). Public natures. In Social representations of nature and land practices. Wageningen: Wageningen University.Google Scholar

Buijs, A.E., Pedroli, B., and Luginbühl, Y. (2006). From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: changing social perceptions of the European landscape. Landscape Ecology, 21, 375–389.Google Scholar

Buijs, A.E., Elands, B.H.M., and Langers, F. (2009). No wilderness for immigrants: cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91, 113–123.Google Scholar

Byrka, K., Kaiser, F.G., and Olko, J. (2017). Understanding the acceptance of nature-preservation-related restrictions as the result of the compensatory effects of environmental attitude and behavioral costs. Environment and Behavior, 49, 487–508.Google Scholar

Cordell, H.K., Tarrant, M.A., McDonald, B L., and Bergstrom, J.C. (1998). How the public views wilderness: more results from the USA survey on recreation and the environment. International Journal of Wilderness, 4, 28–31.Google Scholar

Cordell, H.K., Tarrant, M.A., and Green, G.T. (2003). Is the public viewpoint of wilderness shifting? International Journal of Wilderness, 9, 27–32.Google Scholar

Corlett, R.T. (2016). Restoration, reintroduction, and rewilding in a changing world. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31, 453–462.Google Scholar

de Groot, W.T., and van den Born, R.J.G. (2003). Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: an exploration in the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63, 127–138.Google Scholar

de Groot, M., Drenthen, M., and de Groot, W.T. (2011). Public visions on the human/nature relationship and their implications for environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics, 33, 25–44.Google Scholar

Devine-Wright, P., and Howes, Y. (2010). Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: a wind energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 271–280.Google Scholar

Durrant, J.O., and Shumway, J.M. (2004). Attitudes toward wilderness study areas: a survey of six southeastern Utah counties. Environmental Management, 33, 271–283.Google Scholar

Eagly, A.H., and Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, & Janovich.Google Scholar

Fazio, R.H., Chen, J., McDonel, E.C., and Sherman, S.J. (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude–behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 339–357.Google Scholar

Flint, C.G., Kunze, I., Muhar, A., Yoshida, Y., and Penker, M. (2013). Exploring empirical typologies of human–nature relationships and linkages to the ecosystem services concept. Landscape and Urban Planning, 120, 208–217.Google Scholar

Fox, D., and Xu, F. (2017). Evolutionary and socio-cultural influences on feelings and attitudes towards nature: a cross-cultural study. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 22, 187–199.Google Scholar

Fulton, D.C., Manfredo, M.J., and Lipscomb, J. (1996). Wildlife value orientations: a conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1, 24–47.Google Scholar

Gundersen, V., Stange, E.E., Kaltenborn, B.P., and Vistad, O.I. (2017). Public visual preferences for dead wood in natural boreal forests: the effects of added information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, M. (2014). Extracting culture or injecting nature? Rewilding in transatlantic perspective. In Drenthen, M. and Keulartz, J. (Eds.), Old World and New World perspectives in environmental philosophy (pp. 17–35). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Hermann, N., and Menzel, S. (2013). Predicting the intention to support the return of wolves: a quantitative study with teenagers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 153–161.Google Scholar

Höchtl, F., Lehringer, S., and Konold, W. (2005). Kulturlandschaft oder Wildnis in den Alpen? Fallstudien im Val Grande-Nationalpark und im Stronatal (Piemont/Italien). Zürich: Haupt Verlag.Google Scholar

Höchtl, F., Lehringer, S., and Konold, W. (2007). Wilderness: what it means when it becomes a reality – a case study from the southwestern Alps. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunka, A.D., De Groot, W.T., and Biela, A. (2009). Visions of nature in Eastern Europe: a Polish example. Environmental Values, 18, 429–452.Google Scholar

Hunziker, M., Felber, P., Gehring, K., Buchecker, M., Bauer, N., and Kienast, F. (2008). Evaluation of landscape change by different social groups. Results of two empirical studies in Switzerland. Mountain Research and Development, 28, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, D. (2015). Rethinking rewilding. Geoforum, 65, 482–488.Google Scholar

Kals, E., Becker, R., and Rieder, D. (1999). Förderung natur- und umweltschützenden Handelns bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. In Linneweber, V. and Kals, E. (Eds.), Umweltgerechtes Handeln: Barrieren und Brücken (pp. 190–209). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Kaltenborn, B.P., and Bjerke, T. (2002). The relationship of general life values to attitudes toward large carnivores. Human Ecology Review, 9, 55–61.Google Scholar

Kellert, S.R. (1980). Contemporary values of wildlife in American Society. Institutional Series Report Nr. 1. In Shaw, W.W. and Zube, E.H. (Eds.), Wildlife values (pp. 241–267). Tucson, AZ: Center for Assessment of Noncommodity Natural Resource Values, University of Arizona.Google Scholar

Kellert, S.R. (1993). The biological basis for human values of nature. In Kellert, S.R. and Wilson, O. (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 42–69). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Kelly, A.G, Slagle, K.M., Wilson, R.S., Moeller, S.J., and Bruskotter, J.T. (2016). Changes in attitudes toward animals in the United States from 1978 to 2014. Biological Conservation, 201, 237–242.Google Scholar

Kloek, M.E., Buijs, A.E., Boersema, J.J., and Schouten, M.G.C. (2017). Cultural echoes in Dutch immigrants’ and non-immigrants’ understandings and values of nature. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61, 818–840.Google Scholar

Lockwood, M. (1999). Humans valuing nature: synthesising insights from philosophy, psychology and economics. Environmental Values, 8, 381–401.Google Scholar

Lupp, G., and Konold, W. (2008). Landscape perceptions and preferences of both residents and tourists: a case study in the Müritz National Park (Germany). In Siegrist, D., Clivaz, C., Hunziker, M., and Iten, S. (Eds.), Visitor management in nature-based tourism – strategies and success factors for parks and recreational areas (pp. 47–58). Series of the Institute of Landscape and Open Space. HSR University of Applied Sciences Rapperswil 2.Google Scholar

Lupp, G., Höchtl, F., and Wende, W. (2011). Wilderness – a designation for Central European landscapes? Land Use Policy, 28, 594–603.Google Scholar

Lutz, A.R., Simpson-Housley, P., and De Man, A.F. (1999). Wilderness: rural and urban attitudes and perceptions. Environment and Behaviour, 31, 259–266.Google Scholar

Manfredo, M.J., Teel, T.L., and Henry, K.L. (2009). Linking society and environment: a multilevel model of shifting wildlife value orientations in the Western United States. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 407–427.Google Scholar

Martens, D., Gutscher, H., and Bauer, N. (2011). Walking in ‘wild’ and ‘tended’ urban forests: the impact on psychological well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mkonyi, F.J., Estes, A.B., Msuha, M.J., Lichtenfeld, LL., and Durant, S.M. (2017). Local attitudes and perceptions toward large carnivores in a human-dominated landscape of northern Tanzania. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 22, 314–330.Google Scholar

Mondini, M., and Hunziker, M. (2018). Psychological factors influencing human attitudes towards brown bear: a case study in the Swiss Alps. Umweltpsychologie, in press.Google Scholar

Muhar, A., and Böck, K. (2017). Mastery over nature as a paradox: societally implemented but individually rejected. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61, 994–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muhar, A., Raymond, C.M., van den Born, R.J.G., et al. (2017). A model integrating social-cultural concepts of nature into frameworks of interaction between social and natural systems. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61, 756–777.Google Scholar

Müller, M., and Job, H. (2009). Managing natural disturbance in protected areas: tourists’ attitudes towards the bark beetle in a German national park. Biological Conservation, 142, 375–383.Google Scholar

Petty, R.E., and Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion – central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Roskaft, E., Handel, B., Bjerke, T., and Kaltenborn, B.P. (2007). Human attitudes towards large carnivores in Norway. Wildlife Biology, 13, 172–185.Google Scholar

Rudzitis, G., and Johansen, H.E. (1991). How important is wilderness? Results from a United States survey. Environmental Management, 15, 227–233.Google Scholar

Sacher, P., Kaufmann, S., and Mayer, M. (2017). Wahrnehmung der natürlichen Waldentwicklung im Nationalpark Harz durch Besucher. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, 49(9), 291–299.Google Scholar

Schenk, A., Hunziker, M., and Kienast, F. (2007). Factors influencing the acceptance of nature conservation measures – a qualitative study in Switzerland. Journal of Environmental Management, 83, 66–79.Google Scholar

Schnitzler, A. (2014). Towards a new European wilderness: embracing unmanaged forest growth and the decolonisation of nature. Landscape and Urban Planning, 126, 74–80.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M.P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–65). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S.H., and Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230–255.Google Scholar

Stelling, F., Allan, C., and Thwaites, R. (2017). Nature strikes back or nature heals? Can perceptions of regrowth in a post-agricultural landscape in South-eastern Australia be used in management interventions for biodiversity outcomes? Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 202–210.Google Scholar

Stelzig, I. (2000). Zur Akzeptanz von Totholz in deutschen Wald-Nationalparken. In Trommer, G. and Stelzig, I. (Eds.), Naturbildung und Naturakzeptanz. Beiträge zur biologischen Forschung (pp. 117–123). Frankfurt: Shaker-Verlag.Google Scholar

Stenmark, M. (2002). Environmental ethics and policy-making. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Stern, P.C., and Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65–84.Google Scholar

Stremlow, M., and Sidler, C. (2002). Schreibzüge durch die Wildnis. Bern: Haupt-Verlag.Google Scholar

Teel, T., Dayer, A., Manfredo, M.J., and Bright, A. (2005). Regional results from the research project entitled ‘Wildlife Values in the West’ (Project Rep. No. 58). Project Report for the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, Human Dimensions in Natural Resources Unit.Google Scholar

Thompson, S.C.G., and Barton, M.A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Treves, A., Naughton-Treves, L., and Shelley, V. (2013). Longitudinal analysis of attitudes toward wolves. Conservation Biology, 27, 315–323.Google Scholar

van den Born, R.J.G. (2006). Implicit philosophy – images of relationships between humans and nature in the Dutch population. In van den Born, R.J.G., Lenders, R.H.J., and de Groot, W.R. (Eds.), Visions of nature. A scientific exploration of people’s implicit philosophies regarding nature in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (pp. 63–83). Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar

van den Born, R.J.G., Lenders, R.H.J., de Groot, W.T., and Huijsman, E. (2001). The new biophilia: an exploration of visions of nature in Western countries. Environmental Conservation, 28, 65–75.Google Scholar

Ward Thompson, C., Aspinall, P., and Montarzino, A. (2008). The childhood factor: adult visits to green places and the significance of childhood experience. Environment and Behavior, 40, 111–143.Google Scholar

Wilson, E.O. (1993). Biophilia and the conservation ethic. In Kellert, S. and Wilson, E.O. (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 31–41). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Wolsink, M., and Devilee, J. (2009). The motives for accepting or rejecting waste infrastructure facilities. Shifting the focus from the planners’ perspective to fairness and community commitment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52, 217–236.Google Scholar

Yoshida, Y., Flint, C.G., and Dolan, M. (2017). Farming between love and money: US Midwestern farmers’ human–nature relationships and impacts on watershed conservation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61, 1033–1050.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, B., Wabakken, P., and Dötterer, M. (2001). Human–carnivore interactions in Norway: how does the re-appearance of large carnivores affect people’s attitudes and levels of fear? Forest Snow and Landscape Research, 76, 137–153.Google Scholar