Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-cp4x8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-25T09:56:14.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - Experience and Intelligence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2023

Richard J. Haier
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Roberto Colom
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Earl Hunt
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

Every experience we have leaves an imprint in our brains. Physical and social experiences can change the brain. We refer to experience because environment (1) is a catch-all term and (2) suggests that humans are passive entities. We know that this is not the case, as carefully discussed almost a century ago by Louis Leon Thurstone (1923) during the behaviorism academic tidal wave that simplified all human behavior as comprising nothing more than responses to stimuli without any role for motivation, intention, or any other nonobservable construct (Watson, 1919). With today’s historical perspective, behaviorism was much less generalized and influential than usually discussed in textbooks about the history of psychology (Braat et al., 2020). Thurstone’s active view is illustrated in the bottom of Figure 7.1. Critiquing the passive approach of behaviorism, he wrote in “The Stimulus–Response Fallacy in Psychology,”

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, D. R. 1998. Educational television is not an oxymoron. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 557, 2438.Google Scholar
Barnett, W. S. 1998. Long-term cognitive and academic effects of early childhood education of children in poverty. Preventive Medicine, 27, 204207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, W. S., & Hustedt, J. T. 2005. Head Start’s lasting benefits. Infants and Young Children, 18, 1624.Google Scholar
Batty, G. D., Deary, I. J., & Macintyre, S. 2006. Childhood IQ and life course socioeconomic position in relation to alcohol induced hangovers in adulthood: The Aberdeen children of the 1950s study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 872874.Google Scholar
Bayless, S., & Stevenson, J. 2007. Executive functions in school-age children born very prematurely. Early Human Development, 83, 247254.Google Scholar
Bayley, N. 1968. Behavioral correlates of mental growth: Birth to 36 years. American Psychologist, 23, 117.Google Scholar
Bayley, N. 2005. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Bellinger, D. C., Chen, A., & Lanphear, B. P. 2017. Establishing and achieving national goals for preventing lead toxicity and exposure in children. JAMA Pediatrics, 171, 616618.Google Scholar
Blackwell, D. L., & Lichter, D. T. 2000. Mate selection among married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 275302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braat, M., Engelen, J., Van Gemert, T., & Verhaegh, S. 2020. The rise and fall of behaviorism: The narrative and the numbers. History of Psychology, 23, 252280.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. H. 1993. Children’s home environments, health, behavior, and intervention efforts – a review using the Home Inventory as a marker measure. Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs, 119, 439490.Google Scholar
Brody, N. 1992. Intelligence. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U., Mcclelland, P., Wethington, E., et al. 1996. The state of Americans: This generation and the next. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Burgoyne, A. P., Mashburn, C. A., Tsukahara, J. S., & Engle, R. W. 2022. Attention control and process overlap theory: Searching for cognitive processes underpinning the positive manifold. Intelligence, 91, 111.Google Scholar
Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E., Miller-Johnson, S., Burchinal, M., & Ramey, C. T. 2001. The development of cognitive and academic abilities: Growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 231242.Google Scholar
Capron, C., & Duyme, M. 1989. Assessment of effects of socio-economic status on IQ in a full cross-fostering study. Nature, 340, 552554.Google Scholar
Capron, C., & Duyme, M. 1996. Effect of socioeconomic status of biological and adoptive parents on WISC-R subtest scores of their French adopted children. Intelligence, 22, 259275.Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J. 1990. On intelligence … more or less: A bio-ecological treatment on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. 1997. Schooling, intelligence, and income. American Psychologist, 52, 10511058.Google Scholar
Chiodo, L. M., Covington, C., Sokol, R. J., et al. 2007. Blood lead levels and specific attention effects in young children. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 29, 538546.Google Scholar
Church, A. T., & Katigbak, M. S. 1991. Home-environment, nutritional-status, and maternal intelligence as determinants of intellectual-development in rural Philippine preschool-children. Intelligence, 15, 4978.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1966. Equality of educational opportunity. Summary report. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.Google Scholar
Colom, R. 2016. Advances in intelligence research: What should be expected in the XXI century (questions and answers). Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, 1–8.Google Scholar
Colom, R., & Flores-Mendoza, C. E. 2007. Intelligence predicts scholastic achievement irrespective of SES factors: Evidence from Brazil. Intelligence, 35, 243251.Google Scholar
Counter, S. A., Buchanan, L. H., & Ortega, F. 2005. Neurocognitive impairment in lead-exposed children of Andean lead-glazing workers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 47, 306312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daley, T. C., Whaley, S. E., Sigman, M. D., Espinosa, M. P., & Neumann, C. 2003. IQ on the rise: The Flynn effect in rural Kenyan children. Psychological Science, 14, 215219.Google Scholar
Damian, R. I., & Roberts, B. W. 2015a. The associations of birth order with personality and intelligence in a representative sample of US high school students. Journal of Research in Personality, 58, 96105.Google Scholar
Damian, R. I., & Roberts, B. W. 2015b. Settling the debate on birth order and personality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 1411914120.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J., Der, G., & Shenkin, S. D. 2005. Does mother’s IQ explain the association between birth weight and cognitive ability in childhood? Intelligence, 33, 445454.Google Scholar
Detterman, D. K. 2016. Education and intelligence: Pity the poor teacher because student characteristics are more significant than teachers or schools. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, 1–11.Google Scholar
Detterman, D. K., & Thompson, L. A. 1997. What is so special about special education? American Psychologist, 52, 10821090.Google Scholar
Dombrowski, S. C., Noonan, K., & Martin, R. P. 2007. Low birth weight and cognitive outcomes: Evidence for a gradient relationship in an urban, poor, African American birth cohort. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 2643.Google Scholar
Esbjorn, B. H., Hansen, B. M., & Mortensen, E. L. 2006. Intellectual development in a Danish cohort of prematurely born preschool children: Specific or general difficulties? Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 27, 477484.Google Scholar
Fagan, J. F., Holland, C. R., & Wheeler, K. 2007. The prediction, from infancy, of adult IQ and achievement. Intelligence, 35, 225231.Google Scholar
Firkowska, A., Ostrowska, A., Sokolowska, M., et al. 1978. Cognitive development and social policy. Science, 200, 13571362.Google Scholar
Fuchs, F., Monet, B., Ducruet, T., Chaillet, N., & Audibert, F. 2018. Effect of maternal age on the risk of preterm birth: A large cohort study. PLoS ONE, 13, e0191002.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. M., Tanner, C. M., Oakes, D., et al. 2006. Head injury and Parkinson’s disease risk in twins. Annals of Neurology, 60, 6572.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kuhl, P. K. 1999. The scientist in the crib: Mind, brains, and how children learn. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Gorey, K. M. 2001. Early childhood education: A meta-analytic affirmation of the short- and long-term benefits of educational opportunity. School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 930.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. 2007. Innovation, fatal accidents, and the evolution of general intelligence. In Roberts, M. J. (ed.), Integrating the mind: Domain general vs domain specific processes in higher cognition. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Guerrero, L. M. K. 2009. The impact of lead contamination in children of Callao, Peru. Lima, Peru: Fundacion Cayetano Heredia.Google Scholar
Haier, R. J. 2017. The neuroscience of intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegelund, E. R., Gronkjaer, M., Osler, M., et al. 2020. The influence of educational attainment on intelligence. Intelligence, 78, 17.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. 1994. The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hubbs-Tait, L., Nation, J. R., Krebs, N. F., & Bellinger, D. C. 2005. Neurotoxicants, micronutrients, and social environments: Individual and combined effects on children’s development. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6, 57121.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. 1969. How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1123.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. 1981. Straight talk about mental tests. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. 1997. The puzzle of non-genetic variance. In Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. (eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. 1998. The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kan, K. J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Levine, S. Z. 2019. Extending psychometric network analysis: Empirical evidence against g in favor of mutualism? Intelligence, 73, 5262.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., Turkheimer, E., Ohlsson, H., Sundquist, J., & Sundquist, K. 2015. Family environment and the malleability of cognitive ability: A Swedish national home-reared and adopted-away cosibling control study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 46124617.Google Scholar
Kotchick, B. A., & Forehand, R. 2002. Putting parenting in perspective: A discussion of the contextual factors that shape parenting practices. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11, 255269.Google Scholar
Lanphear, B. P. 2017. Low-level toxicity of chemicals: No acceptable levels? PLoS Biology, 15, e2003066.Google Scholar
Lanphear, B. P., Hornung, R., Khoury, J., et al. 2005. Low-level environmental lead exposure and children’s intellectual function: An international pooled analysis. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113, 894899.Google Scholar
Lemos, G. C., Almeida, L. S., & Colom, R. 2011. Intelligence of adolescents is related to their parents’ educational level but not to family income. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 10621067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, R. 1998. Dysgenics. American Psychologist, 53, 1232.Google Scholar
Lynn, R., & Harvey, J. 2008. The decline of the world’s IQ. Intelligence, 36, 112120.Google Scholar
Lynn, R., & Van Court, M. 2004. New evidence of dysgenic fertility for intelligence in the United States. Intelligence, 32, 193201.Google Scholar
Marks, G. N., & O’Connell, M. 2021. Inadequacies in the SES-achievement model: Evidence from PISA and other studies. Review of Education, 9.Google Scholar
Matte, T. D., Bresnahan, M., Begg, M. D., & Susser, E. 2001. Influence of variation in birth weight within normal range and within sibships on IQ at age 7 years: Cohort study. British Medical Journal, 323, 310314.Google Scholar
Molfese, V. J., Dilalla, L. F., & Bunce, D. 1997. Prediction of the intelligence test scores of 3- to 8-year-old children by home environment, socioeconomic status, and biomedical risks. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly Journal of Developmental Psychology, 43, 219234.Google Scholar
Moreau, D., Macnamara, B. N., & Hambrick, D. Z. 2019. Overstating the role of environmental factors in success: A cautionary note. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 2833.Google Scholar
Mortensen, L. H., Sorensen, T. I. A., & Gronbaek, M. 2005. Intelligence in relation to later beverage preference and alcohol intake. Addiction, 100, 14451452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moselhy, H. F., Georgiou, G., & Kahn, A. 2001. Frontal lobe changes in alcoholism: A review of the literature. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 36, 357368.Google Scholar
Murray, C. 2003. Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 BC to 1950, New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Murray, C. 2012. Coming apart: The state of white America, 1960–2010. New York Review of Books, 59, 2123.Google Scholar
Murray, C. 2020. Human diversity: The biology of gender, race, and class. New York: Twelve.Google Scholar
Needleman, H. L., Gunnoe, C., Leviton, A., et al. 1979. Deficits in psychologic and classroom performance of children with elevated dentine lead levels. New England Journal of Medicine, 300, 689695.Google Scholar
Newcombe, R., Milne, B. J., Caspi, A., Poulton, R., & Moffitt, T. E. 2007. Birthweight predicts IQ: Fact or artefact? Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10, 581586.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. 2009. Intelligence and how to get it: Why schools and cultures count. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
O’Toole, B. I. 1990. Intelligence and behaviour and motor vehicle accident mortality. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 22, 211221.Google Scholar
Parker, E. S., Parker, D. A., & Harford, T. C. 1991. Specifying the relationship between alcohol use and cognitive loss: The effects of frequency of consumption and psychological distress. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 52, 366373.Google Scholar
Peeters, W., van den Brande, R., Polinder, S., et al. 2015. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe. Acta Neurochirurgica, 157, 16831696.Google Scholar
Plomin, R. 1994. Genetics and experience: The interplay between nature and nurture. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., Defries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderhiser, J. M. 2016. Top 10 replicated findings from behavioral genetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 323.Google Scholar
Pollitt, E., Gorman, K., Engle, P. L., Martorell, R., & Rivera, J. 1993. Early supplementary feeding and cognition – effects over 2 decades. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, R5R98.Google Scholar
Protzko, J. 2015. The environment in raising early intelligence: A meta-analysis of the fadeout effect. Intelligence, 53, 202210.Google Scholar
Protzko, J. 2016. Does the raising IQ–raising g distinction explain the fadeout effect? Intelligence, 56, 6571.Google Scholar
Protzko, J., & Colom, R. 2021. A new beginning of intelligence research: Designing the playground. Intelligence, 87, 101559.Google Scholar
Raine, A., Reynolds, C., Venables, P. H., & Mednick, S. A. 2002. Stimulation seeking and intelligence: A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 663674.Google Scholar
Raven, J. 1989. The Raven Progressive Matrices: A review of national norming studies and ethnic and socioeconomic variation within the United States. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 116.Google Scholar
Rindermann, H. 2018. Cognitive capitalism: Human capital and the wellbeing of nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, S. J., Bates, T. C., & Deary, I. J. 2015. Is education associated with improvements in general cognitive ability, or in specific skills? Developmental Psychology, 51, 573582.Google Scholar
Ritchie, S. J., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. 2018. How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 29, 13581369.Google Scholar
Rodgers, J. L., Cleveland, H. H., van den Ourd, E., & Rowe, D. C. 2000. Resolving the debate over birth order, family size, and intelligence. American Psychologist, 55, 599612.Google Scholar
Rohrer, J. M. 2018. Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 2742.Google Scholar
Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Arneson, J. J., Cooper, S. R., & Waters, S. D. 2009. Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admissions tests and post-secondary academic performance? Psychological Bulletin, 135, 122.Google Scholar
Sauce, B., & Matzel, L. D. 2018. The paradox of intelligence: Heritability and malleability coexist in hidden gene–environment interplay. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 2647.Google Scholar
Scarr, S., & Weinberg, R. A. 1976. IQ test performance of black children adopted by white families. American Psychologist, 31, 726739.Google Scholar
Schiff, M., & Lewontin, R. C. 1986. Education and class: The irrelevance of IQ genetic studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schottenbauer, M. A., Momenan, R., Kerick, M., & Hommer, D. W. 2007. Relationships among aging, IQ, and intracranial volume in alcoholics and control subjects. Neuropsychology, 21, 337345.Google Scholar
Sigman, M., & Whaley, S. E. 1998. The role of nutrition in the development of intelligence. In Neisser, U. (ed.), The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related measures. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Skodak, M., & Skeels, H. M. 1949. A final follow-up study of 100 adopted children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 75, 85125.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, D. I., & Kirkham, R. W. 1982. Relationship between intelligence and driving record. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 14, 439442.Google Scholar
Stecher, B. M., Holtzman, D. J., Garet, M. S., et al. 2018. Improving teaching effectiveness – final report: The intensive partnerships for effective teaching through 2015–2016. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2242.html.Google Scholar
Stein, Z., Susser, M., Saenger, G., & Marolla, F. 1972. Nutrition and mental performance. Science, 178, 708713.Google Scholar
Sunderland, A., Harris, J. E., & Baddeley, A. D. 1983. Do laboratory tests predict everyday memory? A neuropsychological study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 341357.Google Scholar
Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. 1986. The influence of paternal social class on intelligence and educational level in male adoptees and non-adoptees. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 312.Google Scholar
Teglas, E., Vul, E., Girotto, V., et al. 2011. Pure reasoning in 12-month-old infants as probabilistic inference. Science, 332, 10541059.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. 1923. The stimulus–response fallacy in psychology. Psychological Review, 30, 354369.Google Scholar
Turkheimer, E. 1991. Individual and group-differences in adoption studies of IQ. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 392405.Google Scholar
van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Juffer, F., & Poelhuis, C. W. K. 2005. Adoption and cognitive development: A meta-analytic comparison of adopted and nonadopted children’s IQ and school performance. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 301316.Google Scholar
Wachs, T. D., & McCabe, G. 2001. Relation of maternal intelligence and schooling to offspring nutritional intake. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 444449.Google Scholar
Wasserman, G. A., Liu, X., Popovac, D., et al. 2000. The Yugoslavia Prospective Lead Study: Contributions of prenatal and postnatal lead exposure to early intelligence. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 22, 811818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, J. B. 1919. Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
Weinberg, R. A., Scarr, S., & Waldman, I. D. 1992. The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study: A follow-up of IQ test-performance at adolescence. Intelligence, 16, 117135.Google Scholar
Zigler, E., & Styfco, S. J. 1997. A “Head Start” in what pursuit? IQ versus social competence as the objective of early intervention. In Devlin, B., Fienberg, S. E., Resnick, D. P., & Roeder, K. (eds.), Intelligence, genes, and success: Scientists respond to The Bell Curve. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Zwick, R., & Green, J. G. 2007. New perspectives on the correlation of SAT scores, high school grades, and socioeconomic factors. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44, 2345.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×