Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-fnprw Total loading time: 0.508 Render date: 2022-08-10T06:42:09.544Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

1 - Neoliberalism

Policy Regimes, International Regimes, and Social Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

Peter A. Hall
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Michèle Lamont
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

In the final three decades of the twentieth century, the world's political economic framework underwent a far-reaching transformation from a state-centric to a neoliberal form (Sewell 2005). In the years following World War II, economies in all areas of the world had been governed by state-centered regulatory regimes. In the wealthy countries of North America, Western Europe, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand, economies were based on free markets and private property, but they were carefully steered and regulated by democratic Keynesian welfare states. In the communist countries, almost all economic activity took place in authoritarian state institutions. And in most of the major countries of Africa, Asia, and Latin America, governments imposed ambitious schemes of state-led development. Over the course of the 1970s, state-led regulatory regimes entered into crisis. By the 1990s, the communist regimes had fallen or had been thoroughly transformed from within by introducing markets and privatizing production. The advanced capitalist countries had dismantled or watered down their regulatory states by privatizing publicly owned enterprises, lifting capital controls, deregulating markets, and, more selectively, paring back welfare guarantees. And the vast majority of developing countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America had abandoned important elements of their nationalist development strategies and opened their borders to global flows of capital and goods – some on their own volition and others under the coercive urging of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. All of these countries had become part of a rapidly integrating world market regulated by global rules administered by economic governance institutions such as the World Trade Organization and disciplined by instantaneous global exchanges for currencies, securities, and bonds.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrighi, Giovanni. 2007. Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, Heller, Patrick, and Silva, Marcelo K.. 2011. Bootstrapping Democracy: Transforming Local Governance and Civil Society in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Block, Fred and Keller, Matthew, eds. 2010. The Invisible Hand of Government: Innovation Policy in the U.S. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Bockman, Johanna. 2011. Markets in the Name of Socialism: The Left-Wing Origins of Neoliberalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockman, Johanna K. and Eyal, Gil. 2002. “Eastern Europe as a Laboratory for Economic Knowledge: The Transnational Roots of Neoliberalism.” American Journal of Sociology 108: 310–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, David H. and Stephens, John D.. 2007. “Employment Performance in OECD Countries: A Test of Neoliberal and Institutionalist Hypotheses.”Comparative Political Studies 40 (12): 1486–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, Neil, Peck, Jamie and Theodore, Nik. 2010. “Variegated Neoliberalism: Geographies, Modalities, Pathways.” Global Networks 10: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, Robert. 1998. “The Economics of Global Turbulence” (Special Issue). New Left Review May–June: 1–265.
Caldwell, Bruce. 2007. “Introduction.” In F. A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, ed. Caldwell, Bruce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Cardoso, F. H. 2009. “New Paths: Globalization in Historical Perspective.” Studies in Comparative International Development 44: 296–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, A. B. 2007. “No espelho da China” Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro: unpublished manuscript.
Castro, A. B. 2008. “From Semi-Stagnation to Growth in a Sino-Centric Market.” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy [Revista de Economia Politica] 28 (1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Deborah, and Wang, Feng, eds. 2009. Creating Wealth and Poverty in Post-Socialist China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
de Ferranti, David, Perry, Guillermo E., Ferreira, Francisco H. G., and Walton, Michael. 2004. Inequality in Latin America: Breaking with History? Washington: the World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Janvry, A., and Sadoulet, E. 2005. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs for Child Human Capital Development: Lessons Derived from Experience in Mexico and Brazil. Washington, DC: World Bank Development Economics Research Group.Google Scholar
Dostal, Jörg Michael. 2010. “The Developmental Welfare State and Social Policy: Shifting From Basic to Universal Social Protection.” The Korean Journal of Policy Studies 25 (3): 147–72.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1997. “The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in an Era of Globalization.” World Politics 50 (October): 62–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter. 2004. “Development as Institutional Change: The Pitfalls of Monocropping and Potentials of Deliberation.” Studies in Comparative International Development 38 (4): 30–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter. 2009. “From Situations of Dependency to Globalized Social Democracy.” Studies in Comparative International Development 44: 318–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter. 2010. “Constructing the 21st century Developmental State: Potentialities and Pitfalls.” In Constructing a Democratic Developmental State in South Africa: Potentials and Challenges, edited by Edigheji, Omano. Capetown, South Africa: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
Fairbrother, Malcolm. 2003. “The Freedom of the State? Recent NDP Governments and a Reply to the Globalization Skeptics.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 40 (3): 311–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion, and Babb, Sarah. 2002. “The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed: Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 108 (3): 533–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Robert H, Levine, Adam Seth, and Dijk, Oege. 2010. “Expenditure Cascades.” Unpublished working paper, available electronically at Social Science Research Network.
Freeman, Richard 1994. “Doing It Right? The U.S. Labor Market Response to the 1980s/1990s.” Paper presented at the Egon-Sohmen-Foundation Symposium on Fighting Europe's Unemployment in the 1990s, Salzburg, Austria, August 27–28.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 2002 [1962]. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, Claudia and Margo, Robert. 1992. “The Great Compression: The Wage Structure in the United States at Mid-Century.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2006. The Great Risk Shift: The Assault on American Jobs, Families, Health Care, and Retirement and How You Can Fight Back. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob and Pierson, Paul. 2010a. “Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States.” Paper presented at conference sponsored by Politics & Society.
Hacker, Jacob and Pierson, Paul. 2010b. Winner Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 1987. “The Evolution of Economic Policy under Mitterrand.” In The Mitterrand Experiment: Continuity and Change in Modern France, edited by Ross, George, Hoffmann, Stanley, and Malzacher, Sylvia. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. Forthcoming. Politics in the New Hard Times: The Great Recession in Comparative Perspective, edited by Miles Kahler and David Lake.
Hall, Peter A. and Lamont, Michèle, eds. 2009. Successful Societies: How Institutions and Culture Affect Health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancké, B. 2001. “Revisiting the French Model: Coordination and Restructuring in French Industry.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1991. The Conditions of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 2007 [1944]. The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents, edited by Caldwell, Bruce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertzman, Clyde, and Arjumand, Sidiqqi. 2009. “Population Health and the Dynamics of Collective Development.” In Hall, and Lamont, (eds.) Successful Societies: How Institutions and Culture Affect Health, edited by Peter A. Hall and Michèle Lamont. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 23--53.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. 1994. The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914–1991. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Huo, Jingjing, Nelson, Moira, and Stephens, J. D.. 2008. “Decommodification and Activation in Social Democratic Policy: Resolving the Paradox.” Journal of European Social Policy 18 (1): 5–20.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Stephens, J. D.. 2008. “Partisan Politics, the Welfare State, and Three Worlds of Human Capital Formation.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (4/5): 600–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Ian. 2010. “The Party: Impenetrable, All Powerful.” New York Review of Books LVII (14): 69–72.Google Scholar
Johnson, Simon. 2009. “The Quiet Coup.” Atlantic Monthly. May. .
Kelly, Nathan. 2009. The Politics of Income Inequality in the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerstenetzky, Celia Lessa. 2009. “The Brazilian Social Developmental State: A Progressive Agenda in a (Still) Conservative Political Society.” Unpublished manuscript.
Kerstenetzky, Celia Lessa. 2010. “Social Development in Latin America?” Discussion Paper No. 26 – July. Niteroi, RJ, Brazil: Center for Studies on Inequality and Development, Universidade Federal Fluminense.
Levy, J. D. 2005. “Redeploying the State: Liberalization and Social Policy in France.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lucero, José Antonio. 2008. Struggles of Voice: The Politics of Indigenous Representation in the Andes. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustig, N. 2009. Poverty, Inequality and the New Left in Latin America. Democratic Governance and the “New Left.”Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Latin American Program.Google Scholar
McGuire, James W. 2010. Wealth, Health, and Democracy in East Asia and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter, eds. 2009. The Road From Mount Pelerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. 2010. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Palier, Bruno. 2005. “Ambiguous Agreement, Cumulative Change: French Social Policy in the 1990s.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palier, Bruno and Thelen, Kathleen (2010) “Institutionalizing Dualism: Complementarities in Germany and France.” Politics and Society 38 (1): 119–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Ito and Wong, Joseph, 2008. “Institutions and Institutional Purpose: Continuity and Change in East Asian Policy.” Politics and Society 36: 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 2003. “Income Inequality in France, 1901–1998.” Journal of Political Economy 111 (5): 1004–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas and Saez, Emmanel. 2003. “Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 2001 [1944]. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.” International Organization 36: 379–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, William H., Jr. 2009. “From State-Centrism to Neoliberalism: Macro-Historical Contexts of Population Health Since World War II.” In Successful Societies: Institutions, Cultural Repertories, and Health, edited by Hall, Peter A. and Lamont, Michèle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siddiqi, A. & Hertzman, C. 2001. “Economic Growth, Income Equality and Population Health among the Asian Tigers.” International Journal of Health Services 31: 323–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Solzhenitsyn, Aleksandr. 1974. The Gulag Archipelago: An Experiment in Literary Investigation, translated by Whitney, Thomas P.. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Somers, Margaret R. 2008. Genealogies of Citizenship: Markets, Statelessness, and the Right to Have Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2002. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Van Horn, Rob. 2009. “Reinventing Monopoly and the Role of Corporations: The Roots of Chicago Law and Economics.” In The Road From Mount Pelerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, edited by Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, John. 1990. “What Washington Means by Policy Reform.” In Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? edited by Williamson, John. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Williamson, John. 1999. “What Should the World Bank Think About the Washington Consensus?” Paper prepared as a background to the World Bank's World Development Report 2000.
Wong, Joseph. 2004. Healthy Democracies: Welfare Politics in Taiwan and South Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zuberi, Dan. 2006. Differences that Matter: Social Policy and the Working Poor in the United States and Canada. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press/ILR Press.Google Scholar
Zuberi, Dan. 2010. Outsourced: Neoliberalism and the Fate of Our Hospitals, Health Care Systems, and Societies. Book manuscript in progress.
43
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×