Critical race feminism

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139015431.014

9 - Critical race feminism

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2014

Adrien K. Wing

Edited by

Karim Murji and

John Solomos

Show author details

Adrien K. Wing: Affiliation:
University of Iowa College of Law
Karim Murji: Affiliation:
The Open University, Milton Keynes
John Solomos: Affiliation:
University of Warwick

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter introduces critical race feminism (CRF) as an analytical tool to assess the legal plight of women in various jurisdictions. Developed primarily by U.S. legal authors, CRF draws from several other jurisprudential trends. After a general discussion of the various interwoven themes, the chapter applies a CRF analysis to the recent situation confronting Arab and/or Muslim women during the age of the continued War on Terror as well as the post–Arab Spring – what I have termed the ‘Arab season’. These women have been stigmatized and have faced substantial discrimination both in Western countries, where they are a minority, and in their countries of origin. The chapter concludes that a nuanced CRF approach reveals both the positive and the negative realities of Muslim/Arab women’s lives, and there is room for optimism as well as pessimism for the future.

CRF is a term originally coined by Professor Richard Delgado (1995a), then of the University of Colorado Law School, in the first edition of his anthology Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge. CRF describes an emphasis on the legal status and rights of women of color around the world. I produced two editions of an anthology using this term – Critical Race Feminism: A Reader (Wing 1997, 2003). CRF poses two fundamental questions. First, what is the de jure and de facto legal status of women of color, whether they be minorities within the United States or Europe or part of majority cultures in the developing world? Second, what can a focused theoretical framework do to beneficially affect their condition? These queries are posed about this group because women of color are disproportionately stalled at the bottom of every society – economically, socially and politically – no matter what country they call their own. CRF seeks to identify and theorize about these issues and formulate relevant solutions as well. Furthermore, CRF may use a multidisciplinary approach that considers the law to be a necessary, but not sufficient, basis to formulate solutions to social justice dilemmas. Fields including history, sociology, psychology, criminology and education may be particularly relevant, and scholars in these disciplines are using CRF approaches (Pratt-Clarke 2010).

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Theories of Race and Ethnicity
Contemporary Debates and Perspectives
, pp. 162 - 179

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139015431.014 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

ALBAWABA. (2011). Arab Spring poet and blogger tipped for Nobel Prize nominations. 2 October. .

Arriola, E. (1994). Gendered inequality: lesbians, gays, and feminist legal theory. Berkeley Women’s Law Journal, 9(1), 103–43.Google Scholar

Barnard, A. (2011). Libya’s war-tested women hope to keep new power. New York Times, 13 September. .

Bell, D. (1987). And We Are Not Saved: The Elusive Quest for Racial Justice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar PubMed

Boyle, J., ed. (1992). Critical Legal Studies. New York: New York University Press.

Burke, J. (2011). Osama bin Laden’s wives told they are free to leave Pakistan. The Guardian, 8 December. .

Chang, R. (1993). Toward an Asian American legal scholarship: critical race theory, post-structuralism, and narrative space. California Law Review, 81(5), 1241–323.CrossRef Google Scholar

Coleman, I. (2011). ‘Blue bra girl’ rallies Egypt’s women vs oppression. 22 December. .

Cowell, A., Kasinof, L. and Nossiter, A. (2011). Nobel Peace Prize awarded to three activist women. New York Times, 7 October. .

Crenshaw, K. (1996). Introduction. In Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., and Thomas, K., eds, Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement. New York: New Press, pp. xiii–xxxii.Google Scholar

Davies, C. (2011). The woman who wants to be Egypt’s first female president. CNN, 16 September. .

Davis, A. (1989). An Autobiography. New York: International.Google Scholar

Delgado, R. (1990). When a story is just a story: does voice really matter?Virginia Law Review, 76(1), 95–111.CrossRef Google Scholar

Delgado, R., ed. (1995a). Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Delgado, R. (1995b). Rodrigo Chronicles. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Delgado, R. and Stefancic, J., eds. (1998a). The Latino/a Condition: A Critical Reader. New York: New York University Press.

Delgado, R. and Stefancic, J., eds. (1998b). Critical White Studies: Looking behind the Mirror. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Delgado, R. and Stefancic, J., eds. (1999). Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Delgado, R. and Stefancic, J. (2001). Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Delgado, R. and Stefancic, J. (2012). Critical Race Theory: An Introduction, 2nd edn. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Farber, D. and Sherry, S. (1997). Beyond All Reason: The Radical Assault of Truth in American Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, P. and Hunt, A., eds. (1987). Critical Legal Studies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Harris, A. (1990). Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory. Stanford Law Review, 42(3), 581–615.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hill Collins, P. (2008). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, A., ed. (1989). Critical Legal Studies. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

Kelman, M. (1990). A Guide to Critical Legal Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kramer, M. (1995). Critical Legal Theory and the Challenge of Feminism: A Philosophical Reconception. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Lorde, A. (1995). Sister Outsider. New York: Crossing Press.Google Scholar

Matsuda, M. (1989). When the first quail calls: multiple consciousness as jurisprudential method. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 11, 297–99.Google Scholar

Morrison, T. (2004). Beloved. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Mortenson, G. and Relin, D. (2006). Three Cups of Tea. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Olsen, F., ed. (1995). Feminist Legal Theory. New York: New York University Press.

PBS. (n.d.). Caught in the crossfire: Arab Americans. .

Pratt-Clarke, M. (2010). Critical Race, Feminism, and Education: A Social Justice Model. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Google Scholar

Saito, N. (2001). Symbolism under siege: Japanese American redress and the ‘racing’ of Arab Americans as ‘terrorists’. Asian Law Journal, 8(1), 1–29.Google Scholar

Shaheen, J. (2001). Reel Bad Arabs: How Hollywood Vilifies a People. New York: Olive Branch Press.Google Scholar

Shakur, A. (1987). An Autobiography. London: Zed.Google Scholar

Think Africa Press. (2011). Egypt’s quiet gender revolution. 24 August. .

Valdes, F. (1995). Queers, sissies, dykes, and tomboys: deconstructing the conflation of ‘sex’, ‘gender’, and ‘sexual orientation’ in Euro-American law and society. California Law Review, 83(1), 1–377.CrossRef Google Scholar

Walker, A. (1982). The Colour Purple. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Weisberg, D. (1993). Feminist Legal Theory: Foundations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, P. (1987). Alchemical notes: reconstructing ideals from deconstructed rights. Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review, 22(2), 401–33.Google Scholar

Wing, A. (1990–91). Brief reflections toward a multiplicative theory and praxis of being. Berkeley Women’s Law Journal, 6(1), 181–202.Google Scholar

Wing, A., ed. (1997). Critical Race Feminism: A Reader. New York: New York University Press.

Wing, A., ed. (2000). Global Critical Race Feminism: An International Reader. New York: New York University Press.

Wing, A., ed. (2003). Critical Race Feminism: A Reader, 2nd edn. New York: New York University Press.

Wing, A. (2012). The ‘Arab fall’: the future of women’s rights. University of California at Davis Journal of International Law and Policy, 18(2), 445–68.Google Scholar

Wing, A. and Smith, M. (2006). Critical race feminism lifting the veil? Muslim women, France and the headscarf ban. University of California at Davis Law Review, 39(3), 743–86.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.