Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T13:58:37.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: ensuring full and equal access to information

from Part I - UN normative and institutional approaches to the protection of freedom of expression and information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

Tarlach McGonagle
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Yvonne Donders
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature

Arnardóttir, O. M. and Quinn, G. (eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – European and Scandinavian Perspectives, International Studies in Human Rights, vol. 100 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, Brill, 2009).Google Scholar
Bielefeldt, H.New Inspiration for the Human Rights Debate: The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 52(3) (2007), 397400.Google Scholar
De Búrca, G.The EU in the Negotiations of the UN Disability Convention’, European Law Review 35(2) (2010), 174–96.Google Scholar
Burke Robertson, C.Providing Access to the Future: How the Americans with Disabilities Act can Remove Barriers in Cyberspace’, Denver University Law Review 792 (2001), 199227.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.Valuing Diversity: The Disability Agenda – We've Only Just Begun’, Disability and Society 17(4) 2002, 471–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clement, A. et al.Debating Universal Access in the Canadian Context: The Role of Public Interest Organizations’, in Moll, M. and Shade, L. R. (eds.), Ecommerce vs. E-commons: Communications in the Public Interest (Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, 2002).Google Scholar
Coco, K. J.Beyond the Price Tag: An Economic Analysis of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act’, Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy 20(1) 2010, 5897.Google Scholar
Deal, M.Disabled People's Attitudes towards Other Impairment Groups: A Hierarchy of Impairments’, Disability and Society 18(7) (2003), 897910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanda, A.Constructing a New Human Rights Lexicon: Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, Sur: International Journal of Human Rights 5(8) (2008), 4359.Google Scholar
Feintuck, M. and Varney, M., Media Regulation, Public Interest and the Law, 2nd edn (Edinburgh University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Fraser Butlin, S.The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Does the Equality Act 2010 Measure up to UK International Commitments?’, Industrial Law Journal 40(4) (2011), 428–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, F. ‘The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: The Response of the Clinic’, International Journal of Clinical Legal Education summer (2011), 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goggin, G. and Newell, C., ‘The Business of Digital Disability’, Information Society 23 (2007), 159–68.Google Scholar
Gregg, J. L.Policy-making in the Public Interests: A Contextual Analysis in the Passage of Closed-captioning Policy’, Disability and Society 21(5) (2006), 537–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, A. C.UN Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, European Journal of Health Law 14 (2007), 273–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, L. and Moxon, E., ‘In Whose Service? Technology, Care and Disabled People: the Case for a Disability Politics Perspective’, Disability and Society 13(2) (1998), 241–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, A. S.The Promise and Challenge of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, Journal of International Law and Commerce 34 (2007), 287321.Google Scholar
Kayess, R. and French, P., ‘Out of Darkness into Light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, Human Rights Law Review 8(1) (2008), 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, A.Disability and Employment in the Equality Act 2010: Opportunities Seized, Lost and Generated’, Industrial Law Journal 404 (2011), 359383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, A.The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: New Era or False Dawn?’, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 34(2) (2007), 563619.Google Scholar
MacKay, D.The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 34(2) (2007), 323–31.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J.Unfulfilled expectations: the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women’, European Human Rights Law Review 1 (2010), 2646.Google Scholar
Pooran, B. D. and Wilkie, C., ‘Failing to Achieve Equality: Disability Rights in Australia, Canada, and the United States’, Journal of Law and Social Policy 20 (2005), 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, G.The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Toward a New International Politics of Disability’, Texas Journal on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights 15(1) (2009), 3352.Google Scholar
Quinn, G. and Degener, T. (eds.), Human Rights and Disability: The Current Use and Future Potential of United Nations Human Rights Instruments in the Context of Disability (New York and Geneva: United Nations Publications, 2002).Google Scholar
Réaume, D. G.Discrimination and Dignity’, Louisiana Law Review 63 (2003), 157.Google Scholar
Scotch, R.Models of Disability and the Americans with Disabilities Act’, Berkley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 21 (2000), 213–22.Google Scholar
Simpson, J.Inclusive Information and Communication Technologies for People with Disabilities’, Disability Studies Quarterly, 291 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. M.Who Says You're Disabled? The Role of Medical Evidence in the ADA Definition of Disability’, Tulane Law Review 82(1) (2007), 176.Google Scholar
Stein, M. A.A Quick Overview of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, Mental and Physical Disability Law Report 31(5) (2007), 679–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Stein, M. A. and Lord, J. E., ‘Monitoring the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Innovations, Lost Opportunities, and Future Potential’, Human Rights Quarterly 32(3) (2010), 689728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, M. A. and Lord, J. E., ‘Participatory Justice, and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, Texas Journal on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights 13(2) (2008), 167–85.Google Scholar
Varney, E. Disability and Information Technology: A Comparative Study in Media Regulation (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varney, E.A Hierarchy of Disability Rights? A Comparative Examination of the Regulation of Digital Television in the United States of America and the United Kingdom’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 60(4) (2009), 421–42.Google Scholar
Varney, E.Disability Rights in the Communications Sector: An Examination of Digital Television Regulation in the United Kingdom’, Communications Law 13(6) (2008), 187–96.Google Scholar
Varney, E.The Protection of Age and Disability Rights in the Regulation of Digital Television in the European Union’, Utilities Law Review 2007/2008 17(1) (2008), 616.Google Scholar
Waddington, L.The European Union and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Story of Exclusive and Shared Competences’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 18(4) (2011), 431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, P.Human Rights and Social Justice: the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Quiet Revolution in International Law’, Public Space: The Journal of Law and Social Justice 4 (2009), 7491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

UN documents

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (UN CESCR), General Comment No. 5: Persons with Disabilities, 9 December 1994, UN Doc. E/1995/22.Google Scholar
CESCR, General Comment No. 3: Article 2(1): The Nature of States Parties’ Obligations, 14 December 1990, UN Doc. E/1991/23 (SUPP).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, General Comment No. 2: Article 9 (Accessibility), 22 May 2014, UN Doc. CRPD/C/GC/2.Google Scholar
GA, Resolution 37/52: World Programme of Action Concerning Disabled Persons, 3 December 1982, UN Doc. A/RES/37/52.Google Scholar
GA, Resolution 48/69: Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities, 20 December 1993, UN Doc. A/RES/48/69.Google Scholar
GA, Resolution 2856 (XXVI): Declaration on the Rights of Mentally Retarded Persons, 20 December 1971.Google Scholar
GA, Resolution 3447 (XXX): Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons, 9 December 1975.Google Scholar
HR Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/27, 16 May 2011.Google Scholar
HRC, General Comment 34: Article 19 (Freedoms of Opinion and Expression), UN Doc. CCPR/C/GC/34, 12 September 2011.Google Scholar

EU documents

Council Decision of 24 November 2009 Concerning the Conclusion, by the European Community, of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, OJ No. L23/35, 27 January 2010.Google Scholar
Directive 2002/22/EC of 7 March 2002 (Universal Service Directive), OJ No. L108/51, 24 April 2002.Google Scholar
Directive 2009/136/EC of 25 November 2009 (Citizens’ Rights Directive), OJ No. L337/11, 18 December 2009.Google Scholar
Directive 2010/13/EU of 10 March 2010 on the Coordination of Certain Provisions Laid Down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States Concerning the Provision of Audiovisual Media Services (AMS Directive), OJ No. L95/1, 14 April 2010.Google Scholar
European Commission Communications Committee (Cocom), Report from the Inclusive Communications Subgroup, Doc. no. COCOM04–08, 27 January 2004.Google Scholar
European Commission (EC), Proposal for a Council Directive on implementing the Principle of Equal Treatment between Persons irrespective of Religion or Belief, Disability, Age or Sexual Orientation, Doc. No. COM(2008)426, 2 July 2008.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×