The anthropic principle revisited

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107050990.007

5 - The anthropic principle revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2014

Bernard Carr

Edited by

Bernard Carr

Show author details

Bernard Carr: Affiliation:
University of London
Bernard Carr: Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

My brief historical overview in Chapter 1 alluded to the crucial influence of the Newtonian mechanistic picture on the development of our view of the Universe. According to this, the cosmos operates likes a giant machine, oblivious to whether life or any form of consciousness is present, i.e. the laws of physics and the characteristics of the Universe are independent of whether anybody actually observes them. In the last fifty years, however, the Anthropic Principle has developed [1], and this might be regarded as a reaction to the mechanistic view. This claims that, in some respects, the Universe has to be the way that it is because otherwise it could not produce life and we would not be here speculating about it. Although the term ‘anthropic’ derives from the Greek word for ‘man’, it should be stressed that most of the arguments pertain to life in general.

As a simple example of an anthropic argument, consider the following question: why is the Universe as big as it is? The mechanistic answer is that, at any particular time, the size of the observable Universe is the distance travelled by light since the Big Bang, which is about 1010 light-years. There is no compelling reason the Universe has the size it does; it just happens to be 1010 y old.

Type: Chapter
Information: Universe or Multiverse? , pp. 77 - 90

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107050990.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] J. D., Barrow and F. J., Tipler. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

[2] R. H., Dicke. Nature, 192 (1961), 440.

[3] A. J. M., Garret and P., Coles. Comments Astrophys. 17 (1993), 23.

[4] B. J., Carr and M. J., Rees. Nature, 278 (1979), 605.

[5] B., Carter. In Confrontation of Cosmological Models with Observations, ed. M. S., Longair (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974), pp. 291–298.Google Scholar

[6] D. N., Page (2002) [hep-th/0203051].

[7] F., Hoyle. Astrophys. J. 118 (1953), 513.

[8] H., Oberhummer, A., Csoto and H., Schlattl. Science, 289 (2000), 88.

[9] C. J., Hogan. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72 (2000), 1149.

[10] A. H., Guth. Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981), 347.

[11] D. N., Spergel, L., Verde, H. V., Peiriset al.Astrophys. J. Supp. 148 (2003), 175.

[12] A. D., Linde. Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology (Chur, Switzerland: Harwood, 1990).Google Scholar

[13] S. W., Hawking. This volume (2007).

[14] B. J., Carr. J. Brit. Interplan. Soc. 44 (1991), 63.

[15] A., Aguirre. Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001), 83508.

[16] S., Weinberg. Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 (1989), 1.

[17] G., Efstathiou. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 274 (1995), L73.

[18] A., Vilenkin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995), 846.

[19] M., Tegmark and M. J., Rees. Astrophys. J. 499 (1998), 526.

[20] M., Tegmark. Ann. Phys. 270 (1998), 1.

[21] M., Tegmark. In Science and Ultimate Reality, eds. J. D., Barrow, P. C. W., Davies and C. L., Harper (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

[22] P. J., Steinhardt and N., Turok. Science, 296 (2002), 1436.

[23] R., Kallosh and A., Linde. Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003), 023510.

[24] M. S., Turner and B. J., Carr. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2 (1987), 1.

[25] F., Wilczek. This volume (2007).

[26] J., Polkinghorne. The Faith of a Physicist (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

[27] J., Wheeler. In Foundational Problems in the Special Sciences, eds. R., Butts and J., Hintikka (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1977), p. 3.Google Scholar

[28] M., Tegmark. Ann. Phys. 270 (1998), 1.

[29] M. J., Rees. Our Cosmic Habitat (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

[30] M. J., Rees. Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1999).Google Scholar

[31] L., Smolin. Class. Quant. Grav. 9 (1992), 173.

[32] L., Smolin. The Life of the Cosmos (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

[33] J. K., Webb, M. T., Murphy, V. V., Flambaumet al.Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001), 091301.

[34] H. B., Sandvik, J. D., Barrow and J., Magueijo. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002), 031302.

[35] L., Smolin. This volume (2007).

[36] M. J., Rees. This volume (2007).

[37] B., Carter. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 310 (1983), 347.

[38] P. C. W., Davies. This volume (2007).

[39] F., Dyson. Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 (1979), 447.

[40] H., Reeves. The Hour of Our Delight (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1991).Google Scholar