Modelling Leaf and Canopy Transpiration and the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Continuum

Derek Eamus; Alfredo Huete; Qiang Yu

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107286221.013

12 - Modelling Leaf and Canopy Transpiration and the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Continuum

from Section Three - Modelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016

Derek Eamus ,

Alfredo Huete and

Qiang Yu

Show author details

Derek Eamus: Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Alfredo Huete: Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Qiang Yu: Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

The concept of the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum (SPAC) was first proposed by Phillip in 1966. In this conceptualisation, water flows from soil to the atmosphere via a plant's hydraulic pathways (Chapter 3). The flow is driven by the gradient of water potential from high to low, arising principally from differences in solute and turgor potentials along the SPAC (Chapter 3).

The biophysical and physiological processes occurring through the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum (SPAC) can be divided into three components: (1) radiation absorption and energy balance; (2) water transfer; and, (3) photosynthesis and physiological regulation of carbon and water fluxes. This chapter focuses on the second process, that is, water transfer, while Chapter 9 deals with the first and Chapter 10 deals with the third process.

There are two significant differences between canopy-scale and leaf-scale transpiration which need to be considered explicitly in models. These are: (a) radiation interception; and, (b) turbulent transfer. It is the shading and multiple layering within canopies that increases the complexity of radiation interception and turbulent transfer. A brief consideration of these is given prior to a more complete description of leaf and canopy transpiration.

Canopy Radiation Exchange

Radiation Interception

Solar radiation is the key input to leaf energy balances and this drives transpiration, in addition to it being the energy source for photosynthesis.

The net radiation balance of a leaf is partitioned into sensible heat by heat conductance and turbulent transfer and into latent heat by transpiration. Because net radiation is a radiation balance between changes in sensible and latent heat exchanges, net radiation represents a steady-state, at any given moment. Leaf temperature, as determined by a leaf's energy balance, influences the biochemical reaction rates of all photosynthetic processes. Leaf temperature determines the leaf's emission of long wave radiation and also determines the saturated water vapour pressure in the sub-stomatal cavity (Chapter 2). Consequently leaf temperature influences stomatal conductance and transpiration.

Turbulent Transfer of Energy and Mass Within and Above a Canopy

CO2 and water vapour pass into and out of stomatal pores, respectively (Chapter 2). The rate of CO2 flux and water vapour transfer are determined by stomatal conductance, boundary layer conductance and differences in CO2 concentration and vapour pressure between the sub-stomatal cavity and ambient air. In these processes there are complex interactions between photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2 concentration. These are discussed later in this chapter.

Type: Chapter
Information: Vegetation Dynamics
A Synthesis of Plant Ecophysiology, Remote Sensing and Modelling
, pp. 296 - 320

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107286221.013 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ali, M, Jensen, CR and Mogensen, VO, (1998). Early signals in field grown wheat in response to shallow soil drying. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25(8), 871–882.Google Scholar

Allen, RG, Pereria, LS, Raes, D and Smith, M, (1998). Crop evapotranspiration–guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the UN, Rome.

Anadranistakis, M, Kerkides, P, Liakatas, A, Alexandris, S and Poulovasilis, A, (1999). How significant is the usual assumption of neutral stability in evapotranspiration estimating models?Meteorological Applications 6(2), 155–158.Google Scholar

Aphalo, PJ and Jarvis, PG, (1993a). An analysis of Balls empirical-model of stomatal conductance. Annals of Botany 72(4), 321–327.Google Scholar

Aphalo, PJ and Jarvis, PG, (1993b). The boundary layer and the apparent responses of stomatal conductance to wind speed and to the mole fraction of CO2 and water vapor in the air. Plant Cell Environment, 1993, 16, 771–783.Google Scholar

Benmehrez, M, Taconet, O, Vidalmadjar, D and Valencogne, C, (1992). Estimation of stomatal-resistance and canopy evaporation during the Hapex-Mobilhy experiment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 58(3–4), 285–313.Google Scholar

Brenner, AJ and Incoll, LD, (1997). The effect of clumping and stomatal response on evaporation from sparsely vegetated shrublands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 84(3–4), 187–205.Google Scholar

Brutsaert, W, (1982). Some exact-solutions for non-linear desorptive diffusion. Zeitschrift Fur Angewandte Mathematik Und Physik 33(4), 540–546.Google Scholar

Brutsaert, W and Stricker, H, (1979). Advection-aridity approach to estimate actual regional evapotranspiration. Water Resources Research 15(2), 443–450.Google Scholar

Campbell, GS, (1977). An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics, Spring-Cerlag, Berlin. pp. 223–233.

Chen, DX and Coughenour, MB,(1994). Gemtm–a general-model for energy and mass-transfer of land surfaces and its application at the five sites. Agricultural and Forest eteorology 68 (3–4), 145–171.Google Scholar

Choudhury, BJ and Monteith, JL, (1988). A 4-layer model for the heat-budget of homogeneous land surfaces. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 114(480), 373–98.Google Scholar

Collatz, GJ, Ball, JT, Grivet, C and Berry, JA, (1991). Physiological and environmental-regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration–a model that includes a laminar boundary-layer. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 54(2–4), 107–136.Google Scholar

Cowan, IR, (1965). Transport of water in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. Journal of Applied Ecology 2, 221–239.Google Scholar

Cruiziat, P, Cochard, H and Ameglio, T, (2002). Hydraulic architecture of trees: main concepts and results. Annals of Forest Science 59(7), 723–752.Google Scholar

Davies, WJ and Zhang, JH, (1991). Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 2, 55–76.Google Scholar

Debruin, HAR and Holtslag, AAM, (1982). A simple parameterization of the surface fluxes of sensible and latent-heat during daytime compared with the Penman-Monteith concept. Journal of Applied Meteorology 21(11), 1610–1621.Google Scholar

Denmead, OT and Bradley, EF, (1987). On scalar transport in plant canopies. Irrigation Science 8 (2), 131–149.Google Scholar

Dolman, AJ, (1993). A multiple-source land-surface energy-balance model for use in general-circulation models. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 65 (1–2), 21–45.Google Scholar

Dolman, AJ and Wallace, JS, (1991). Lagrangian and K-Theory approaches in modeling evaporation from sparse canopies. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 117 (502), 1325–1340.Google Scholar

Domingo, F, Villagarcia, L, Brenner, AJ and Puigdefabregas, J, (1999). Evapotranspiration model for semi-arid shrub-lands tested against data from SE Spain. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 95(2), 67–84.Google Scholar

Doorenbos, J and Pruitt, WO, (1977). Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, No.24, Rome.

Farahani, HJ, (1994). Evaporation and transpiration processes, root zone water quality model Tech Rep.No.2. USDA-ARS GPSR, Fort Clooins, CO.

Farquhar, GD, Caemmerer, SV and Berry, JA, (1980). A biochemical-model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C-3 species. Planta 149(1), 78–90.Google Scholar

Feddes, RA and Zaradny, H, (1978). Model for simulating soil-water content considering evapotranspiration–comments. Journal of Hydrology 37(3–4), 393–397.Google Scholar

Flerchinger, GN, (2000). The Simultaneous Heat and Water (SHAW) Model: Technical Documentation, USDA-ARS, Northwest Watershed Research Center, Boise, Idaho.

Flerchinger, GN and Pierson, FB, (1991). Modeling plant canopy effects on variability of soil-temperature and water. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 56(3–4), 227–246.Google Scholar

Garratt, JR, (1978). Transfer characteristics for a heterogeneous surface of large aerodynamic roughness. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 104(440), 491–502.Google Scholar

Goudriaan, J, (1989). Simulation of micrometeorology of crops, some methods and their problems and a few results. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 47(2–4), 239–258.Google Scholar

Grant, RF, (2001). A review of the Canadian ecosystem model ECOSYS. In: , S. M (Editor), Modeling carbon and nitrogen dynamics for soil management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 175–264.

Hsieh, CI, Katul, GG, Schieldge, J, Sigmon, JT and Knoerr, KK, (1997). The Lagrangian stochastic model for fetch and latent heat flux estimation above uniform and nonuniform terrain. Water Resources Research 33(3), 427–438.Google Scholar

Huntingford, C, Allen, SJ and Harding, RJ, (1995). An intercomparison of single and dual-sourcevegetation-atmosphere transfer models applied to transpiration from Sahelian savanna. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 74(4), 397–418.Google Scholar

Jensen, CR, Jacobsen, SE, Andersen, MN, Nunez, N, Andersen, SD, Rasmussen, L and Mogensen, VO, (2000). Leaf gas exchange and water relation characteristics of field quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) during soil drying. European Journal of Agronomy 13(1), 11–25.Google Scholar

Katul, GG and Parlange, MB, (1992). A Penman-Brutsaert model for wet surface evaporation. Water Resources Research 28(1), 121–126.Google Scholar

Konzelmann, T, Calanca, P, Muller, G, Menzel, L and Lang, H, (1997). Energy balance and evapotranspiration in a high mountain area during summer. Journal of Applied Meteorology 36(7), 966–973.Google Scholar

Leuning, R, (1995). A critical-appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C-3 plants. Plant Cell and Environment 18(4), 339–355.Google Scholar

Leyton, L, (1975). Fluid Behaviour in Biological Systems. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 167–175.

Lhomme, JP, (2001). Stomatal control of transpiration: Examination of the Jarvis-type representation of canopy resistance in relation to humidity. Water Resources Research 37(3), 689–699.Google Scholar

Lin, JD and Sun, SF, (1983). Moisture and heat flow in soil and theirs effects on bare soil evaporation. Trans. Water Conservancy 7, 1–7 (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Liu, FL, Andersen, MN, Jacobsen, SE and Jensen, CR, (2005). Stomatal control and water use efficiency of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) during progressive soil drying. Environmental and Experimental Botany 54(1), 33–40.Google Scholar

Menenti, M, (1984). Physical Aspects and Determination of Evaporation in Deserts Applying Remote Sensing Techniques, Instituut von Cultuurtechnik en Waterhuishounding. Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 202.

Meyers, TP, Baldocchi, DD and Hicks, BB, (1988). Processes promoting exchange between the surface and the atmosphere. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society 196, 136-AGRO.

Monteith, JL, (1965). Light distribution and photosynthesis in field crops. Annals of Botany 29(113), 17–37.Google Scholar

Monteith, JL, (1973). Principles of Environmental Physics. Edward Arnold, London.

Nichols, DJ, (1992). Plants at the K/T Boundary. Nature 356(6367), 295–295.Google Scholar

Parlange, MB and Katul, GG, (1992). Estimation of the diurnal variation of potential evaporation from a wet bare soil surface. Journal of Hydrology 132(1–4), 71–89.Google Scholar

Penman, HL, (1948). Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series a-Mathematical and Physical Sciences 193(1032), 120–145.Google Scholar

Philip, JR, (1966). Plant water relations: some physical aspects. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 17, 45–268.Google Scholar

Powell, DB and Thorpe, B, (1977). Dynamic aspects of plant-water relations in environmental effects on crop physiology. Academic Press, London, pp. 159–279.

Priestley, CHB and Taylor, RJ, (1972). Assessment of surface heat-flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Monthly Weather Review 100(2), 81–92.Google Scholar

Sellers, PJ, Randall, DA, Collatz, GJ, Berry, JA, Field, CB, Dazlich, DA, Zhang, C, Collelo, GD and Bounoua, L, (1996). A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. 1. Model formulation. Journal of Climate 9(4), 676–705.Google Scholar

Shaw, RH and Pereira, AR, (1982). Aerodynamic roughness of a plant canopy–a numerical experiment. Agricultural Meteorology 26(1), 51–65.Google Scholar

Shuttleworth, WJ and Wallace, JS, (1985). Evaporation from sparse crops–an energy combination theory. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 111(469), 839–855.Google Scholar

Stannard, DI, (1993). Comparison of Penman-Monteith, Shuttleworth-Wallace and modified Priestley-Taylor evapotranspiration models for wildland vegetation in semi-arid rangeland. Water Resources Research 29(5), 1379–1392.Google Scholar

Thom, AS, Stewart, JB, Oliver, HR and Gash, JHC, (1975). Comparison of aerodynamic and energy budget estimates of fluxes over a Pine forest. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 101(427), 93–105.Google Scholar

Thurtell, GW, (1989). Comments on using K-theory within and above the plant canopy to model diffusion processes. Estimation of Areal Evaotranspiration 177, 81–85.Google Scholar

Tuzet, A, Perrier, A and Leuning, R, (2003). A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant Cell and Environment 26(7), 1097–1116.Google Scholar

griend, AA Van de and Boxel, JH Van, (1989). Water and surface-energy balance model with a multilayer canopy representation for remote-sensing purposes. Water Resources Research 25(5), 949–971.Google Scholar

Vanbavel, CHM and Hillel, DI, (1976). Calculating potential and actual evaporation from a bare soil surface by simulation of concurrent flow of water and heat. Agricultural Meteorology 17(6), 453–476.Google Scholar

Wang, J, (2006). Study on the experiment and simulation of crop growth and water heat and CO2 transfer in the Agro-ecosystem. Doctor Thesis, Insititute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 211 pp.

Wang, J, Yu, Q, Li, J, Li, LH, Li, XG, Yu, GR and Sun, XM, (2006). Simulation of diurnal variations of CO2, water and heat fluxes over winter wheat with a model coupled photosynthesis and transpiration. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 137(3–4), 194–219.Google Scholar

Wang, SS, Grant, RF, Verseghy, DL and Black, TA, (2002). Modelling carbon-coupled energy and water dynamics of a boreal aspen forest in a general circulation model land surface scheme. International Journal of Climatology 22(10), 1249–1265.

Wang, YP and Leuning, R, (1998). A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy I: Model description and comparison with a multi-layered model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 91(1–2), 89–111.

Wilson, JD, (1989). Turbulent transport within the plant canopy. In Estimation of Areal Evapotranspiration, Black TA, DL Spittlehouse, MD Novak and DT Price (Eds.), IAHS Publication 17, pp. 43–80.

Wilson, TB, Norman, JM, Bland, WL and Kucharik, CJ, (2003). Evaluation of the importance of Lagrangian canopy turbulence formulations in a soil-plant-atmosphere model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 115(1–2), 51–69.

Wu, A, Black, A, Verseghy, DL and Bailey, WG, (2001). Comparison of two-layer and single-layer canopy models with Lagrangian and K-theory approaches in modelling evaporation from forests. International Journal of Climatology 21(14), 1821–1839.

Yao, C, Moreshet, S and Aloni, B, (2001). Water relations and hydraulic control of stomatal behaviour in bell pepper plant in partial soil drying. Plant Cell and Environment 24(2), 227–235.

Yu, Q and Flerchinger, GN, 2008. Extending Simulltaneous Heat and Water (SHAW) model to simulate carbon dioxide and water fluxes over wheat canopy. In Resonse of crops to limited water: understanding and modeling water stress effects on plant growth processes, Ahuja, LR, Reddy, VR, Saseendran, SA and Yu, Q (Eds.), Advances in Agricultural Systems Modeling 1. SSSA-ASA-CSSA Publication, USA.

Yu, Q, Goudriaan, J and Wang, TD, 2001. Modelling diurnal courses of photosynthesis and transpiration of leaves on the basis of stomatal and non-stomatal responses, including photoinhibition. Photosynthetica 39(1), 43–51.

Yu, Q, Xu, SH, Wang, J and Lee, XH, 2007. Influence of leaf water potential on diurnal changes in CO2 and water vapour fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 124(2), 161–181.

Yu, Q and Flerchinger, GN, 2008. Combining Simultaneous Heat and Water (SHAW) with photosynthesis model to simulate water and CO2 fluxes over wheat canopy. In Response of crops to limited water: Understanding and modeling water stress effects on plant growth processes. Advances in Agricultural Systems Modeling Series 1. Ed: L.R. Ahuja, V.R. Reddy, S.A. Saseendran, and Q Yu (SSSA-ASA-CSSA publication), pp. 191–214.