References
Andersen, R. W. (1984). Second language: A cross-linguistic perspective, Rowley: Newbury House.
Andersen, R. W. (1993). Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In Hyltenstam, K. and Viberg, Å., eds., Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological and linguistic perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 309–339.
Andersen, R. W. (2002). The dimension of “Pastness.” In Salaberry, R. & Y. Shirai, Y. , eds., The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 79–105.
Andersen, R. W. & Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive operating principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 133–156.
Andersen, R. W. & Shirai, Y. (1996). The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin/creole connection. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K., eds., Handbook of second language acquisition, New York: Academic Press, pp. 527–570.
Antinucci, F. & Miller, R. (1976). How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language, 3(2), 167–189.
Ayoun, D. & Rothman, J. (2013). Generative approaches to the L2 acquisition of temporal-aspectual-mood systems. In Salaberry, R. & Comajoan, L., eds., Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect, Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 119–156.
Baayen, R. H. (2010). Demythologizing the word frequency effect: A discriminative learning perspective. The Mental Lexicon, 5(3), 436–461.
Baggio, G., van Lambalgen, M. & Hagoort, P. (2008). Computing and recomputing discourse models: An ERP study. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(1), 36–53.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). The telling of a tale: Discourse structure and tense use in learner’s narratives. In Bouton, L. F. & Kachru, Y., eds., Pragmatics and language learning. Urbana-Champaign: Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois, pp. 144–161.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1994). Anecdote or evidence? Evaluating support for hypotheses concerning the development of tense and aspect. In Tarone, E., Gass, S. M. & Cohen, A. D., eds., Research methodology in second language acquisition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, pp. 41–60.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1995). A narrative perspective on the development of the tense/aspect system in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 263–291.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2002). Analyzing aspect. In Salaberry, R. & Shirai, Y., eds., The L2 acquisition of tense–aspect morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 129–154.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Comajoan-Colomé, L. (2020). The aspect hypothesis and the acquisition of L2 past morphology in the last 20 years. A state-of-the-scholarship review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000194 Beckers, T., De Houwer, J. & Matute, H. (2007). Editorial: Human contingency learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(3), 289–290.
Bennett, M. & Partee, B. (2004). Towards the logic of tense and aspect in English. In Partee, B., ed., Compositionality in Formal Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470751305.ch4 Bertinetto, P. M. (1986). Tempo, Aspetto e Azione nel verbo italiano: il sistema dell’indicativo (Tense, aspect and actionality in the Italian verb: The indicative system). Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.
Bertinetto, P. M. (2001). On a frequent misunderstanding in the temporal-aspectual domain: The “perfective-telic” confusion. In Cecchetto, C., Chierchia, G. & Guasti, M. T., eds., Semantic interfaces: Reference, anaphora, and aspect, Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 177–210.
Bertinetto, P. M & Delfitto, D. (2000). Aspect vs actionality: Why they should be kept apart. In Dahl, Ö., ed., Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 189–225.
Binnick, R. (1991). Time and the verb. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1983) The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning, 33(1), 1–17.
Bloom, L., Lifter, K. & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language, 66(2), 386–412.
Borer, H. (2004). The grammar machine. In Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Everaert, M., eds., The unaccusativity puzzle, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 288–331.
Borik, O., González, P. & Verkuyl, H. (2003). Comparing tense systems: The primacy of the Pres/Past opposition. Nordlyd, 31(1), 13–29.
Botne, R. (2003). To die across languages: Toward a typology of achievement verbs. Linguistic Typology 7(2), 75–119.
Champollion, L. & Krifka, M. (2016). Mereology. In Dekker, P. & Aloni, M., eds., Cambridge handbook of formal semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 513–541.
Chao, W. & Bach, E. (2009). On semantic universals and typology. In Collins, C., Christiansen, M. & Edelman, S., eds., Language Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 152–173.
Comajoan, L. (2006). The aspect hypothesis: Development of morphology and appropriateness of use. Language Learning, 56(2), 201–268.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cover, R. T. & Tonhauser, J. (2015). Theories of meaning in the field: Temporal and aspectual reference. In Bochnak, R. & Matthewson, L., eds., Methodologies in Semantic Fieldwork. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 306–350.
Cruse, A. (1997). Lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
Depraetere, I. (1995). On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy 18(1), 1–19.
De Swart, H. (1998). Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 347–385.
Diaubalik, T. & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2019). The strength of L1 effects on tense and aspect: How German learners of L2 Spanish deal with acquisitional problems. Language acquisition, 26(3), 282–301. DOI: http://10.1080/10489223.2018.1554663. Díaz, L., Bel, A. & Bekiou, K. (2007). Interpretable and uninterpretable features in the acquisition of Spanish past tenses. In Liceras, J., Zobl, H. & Goodluck, H., eds., The role of formal features in second language acquisition. Mhawah: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 485–511.
Dietrich, R., Klein, W. & Noyau, C. (1995). The acquisition of temporality in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Di Sciullo, A. M. & Slabakova, R. (2005). Quantification and aspect. In Verkuyl, H., De Swart, H. & van Hout, A., eds., Perspectives on aspect. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 61–80.
Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547–619.
Dryer, M. & Haspelmath, M. (eds.). (2013). The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, http://wals.info Ebert, K. (1995). Ambiguous perfect-progressive forms across languages. In Bertinetto, P. M., Bianchi, V., Dahl, Ö. & Squartini, M., eds., Temporal reference, aspect and actionality, vol. 2. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier, pp. 185–204.
Ellis, N. C. (2016). Cognition, corpora, and computing: Triangulating research in usage-based language learning. Language Learning, 67(51), 40–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12215 Ellis, N. C. & Ferreira-Junior, F. G. (2009). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 370–385.
Filip, H. (2004). The telicity parameter revisited. In Young, R., ed., Semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) XIV. Ithaca: CLC Publications. Department of Linguistics, Cornell University, pp 92–109.
Filip, H. (2011). Aspectual class and Aktionsart. In Maienborn, C., von Heusinger, K. & Portner, P., eds., Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 1. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 1186–1217.
Filip, H. (2012). Lexical aspect. In Binnik, R., ed., The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 721–751.
Foley, W. A. & Van Valin, R. D. (1984). Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gabriele, A., Martohardjono, G. & McClure, W. (2003). Why swimming is just as difficult as dying for Japanese learners of English. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 29, 85–103.
Gabriele, A. & McClure, W. (2011). Why some imperfectives are interpreted imperfectly: A study of Chinese learners of Japanese. Language Acquisition, 18(1), 39–83.
Garey, H. B. (1957). Verbal aspects in French. Language, 33(2), 91–110.
Gass, S., Behney, J. & Plonsky, L. (2013). Second language acquisition. An introductory course. New York/London: Routledge.
Giacalone Ramat, A. (1995). Tense and aspect in learner Italian. In Bertinetto, P. M., Bianchi, V., Dahl, O. & Squartini, M., eds., Temporal reference, aspect and actionality, vol. 2. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier, pp. 289–307.
Giacalone Ramat, A. & Rastelli, S. (2013). The qualitative analysis of actionality in learner language. In Salaberry, R. and Comajoan, L., eds., Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 391–422.
Giorgi, A. & Pianesi, F. (1997). Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press
González, P. (2013). Research design. A two-way predicational system is better than a four-way approach. In Salaberry, R. & Shirai, Y., eds., The L2 acquisition of tense–aspect morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 159–186
González, P. & Quintana-Hernández, L. (2018). Inherent aspect and L1 transfer in the L2 acquisition of Spanish grammatical aspect. Modern Language Journal, 102(3), 611–625. DOI: 10.1111/modl.12502
Gries, S. T. (2018). Mechanistic formal approaches to language acquisition. Yes, but at the right level(s) of resolution. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 733–737.
Gries, S. & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on “alternations”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri Haspelmath, M. (2001). The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Haspelmath, M., König, E., Oesterreicher, W. & Raible, W., eds., Language typology and language universals. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, pp. 1492–1510.
Hopper, P. J. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Givón, T., ed., Syntax and semantics: Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 213–241.
Housen, A. (2002).The development of tense–aspect in English as a second language and the variable influence of inherent aspect. In Salaberry, R. & Shirai, Y., eds., The L2 acquisition of tense–aspect morphology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 155–197.
Huang, P. Y. (2008). The Aspect Hypothesis and L2 learners’ awareness of lexical aspect. Poster presented in The acquisition of tense, aspect and mood in L1 and L2 Conference. Birmingham: Aston University.
Izquierdo, J. & Collins, L. (2008). The facilitative role of L1 influence in tense–aspect marking: A comparison of hispanophone and anglophone learners of French. Modern Language Journal, 92(3), 350–368.
Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kamp, H. & Rohrer, C. (1983). Tense in text. In von Stechow, A., ed., Meaning, use and interpretation of language. Berlin/New York: Mouton – De Gruyter, pp. 250–269.
Kazanina, N. & Phillips, C. (2003). Temporal reference frames and the imperfective paradox. In Garding, G. & Tsujimura, M., eds., Proceedings of WCCFL 22. Somerville: Cascadilla Press, pp. 287–300.
Kazanina, N. & Phillips, C. (2007). A developmental perspective on the imperfective paradox. Cognition, 105(1), pp. 65–102.
Kenny, A. (1963). Action, emotion and will. London: Routledge.
Klein, W. (1994). Time in language. London: Routledge.
Krifka, M. (1992). A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 1. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 127–158.
Krifka, M. (1998). The origins of telicity. In Rothstein, S., ed., Events and grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 197–235.
Labeau, E. (2005). Beyond the aspect hypothesis. Tense–aspect development in advanced L2 French. Oxford/Bern: Peter Lang.
Lakshmanan, U. & Selinker, L. (2001). Analysing interlanguage: How do we know what learners know? Second Language Research, 17, 393–420.
Landman, F. (1992). The progressive. Natural Language Semantics, 1(1), 1–32.
Lardiere, D. (2003). The comparative fallacy revisited: A reply to Lakshmanan and Selinker (2001). Second Language Research, 19, 129–143.
Lee, E. H. & Kim, H. Y. (2007). On cross-linguistic variations in imperfective aspect: The case of L2 Korean. Language Learning, 57(4), 651–685. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00431.x
Lenci, A. & Zarcone, A. (2009). Un modello stocastico della classificazione azionale. (A stocastic model of actional classification) In Ferrari, G., Benatti, R. & Mosca, M., eds., Atti del XL congresso internazionale della Società di Linguistica Italiana. Roma: Bulzoni, pp. 125–148.
Levin, B. & Rappoport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Li, C. & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Li, P. (2000). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect in a self-organizing feature-map model. In Gleitman, L. & Aravind, J., eds., Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, pp. 304–309.
Li, P. (2002). Emergent semantic structure and language acquisition: A dynamic perspective. In Leong, C.-K., Ding-Guo, G. & Kao, H., eds., Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong University Press, pp. 79–98.
Li, P. & Bowerman, M. (1998). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect in Chinese. First Language, 18(54), 311–350. DOI: 10.1177/014272379801805404
Li, P. & Shirai, Y. (2000). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Malaia, E., Wilbur, R. B. & Weber-Fox, C. (2009). ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentences. Brain and Language, 108(3), 145–158.
Matthews, S. & Yip, V. (2013). Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
McClure, W. (2003). Change of state syntax. Unpublished paper. New York: The Queens College and Graduate Center, CUNY.
McManus, K. (2013). Prototypical influence in second language acquisition: What now for the Aspect Hypothesis. IRAL, 51(3), 299–322.
McManus, K. (2015). L1–L2 differences in the acquisition of form–meaning pairings: A comparison of English and German learners of French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 71(2), 155–181.
Michaelis, L. A. (2004). Type shifting in cosntruction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual cohercion. Cognitive Linguistics. DOI: http://10.1515/cogl.2004.001 Mlynarczyk, A. K. (2004). Aspectual Pairing in Polish. PhD dissertation. Utrecht: Utrecht University Repository.
Moens, M. & Steedman, M. (2005). Temporal ontology and temporal reference. In Mani, I., Pusteiovskj, J. & Gaizauskas, R., eds., The language of time: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 93–114.
Montrul, S. (2002). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(1), 39–68.
Montrul, S. (2009) Knowledge of tense-aspect and mood in Spanish heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 239–269.
Montrul, S. & Perpiñán, S. (2011). Assessing differences and similarities between instructed heritage language learners and L2 learners in their knowledge of Spanish tense-aspect and mood (TAM) morphology. Heritage Language Journal, 8(1), 90–133.
Montrul, S. & Slabakova, R. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite-imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(3), 351–398.
Morgan-Short, K. & Ullman, M.T. (2011). The neurocognition of second language. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S., eds., The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. London: Routledge, pp. 282–299.
Mueller, C. M. (2018). Initial acquisition of tense aspect morphology in an artificial language. Second Language Research. DOI: http://10.1177/0267658317750219 Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, J., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C. & Molinaro, N. (2006). Novice learners, longitudinal designs and event-related potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second language processing. In Indefrey, P. & Gullberg, M., eds., The cognitive neuroscience of second language acquisition. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 199–230.
Pace, A., Levine, D. F., Golinkoff, R. M., Carver, L. J. & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2020). Keeping the end in mind: Preliminary brain and behavioral evidence for broad attention to endpoints in pre-linguistic infants. Infant Behavior and Development. DOI:http://10.1016/j.infbeh.2020.101425 Parsons, T. (1989). The progressive in English: Events, states and processes. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 213–241.
Rastelli, S. (2008). A compositional account of L2 verb actionality and the aspect hypothesis. Lingue e Linguaggio, 7(2), 261–289.
Rastelli, S. (2009). Lexical aspect too is learned: Data from Italian learner corpora. In Saxena, A. & Viberg, A., eds., Multilingualism. Uppsala: Edita Astra Varos, pp. 272–282.
Rastelli, S. (2020). Contingency learning and the emergence of the perfective in L2 Italian: a study on lexeme–morpheme associations with ΔP. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2019–0071 Rastelli, S. & Vernice, M. (2013). Developing actional competence and the building blocks of telicity in L2 Italian. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 51(1), 55–75.
Reeder, P. A., Newport, E. L. & Aslin, R. N. (2010). Novel words in novel contexts: The role of distributional information in form-class category learning. In Ohlsson, S. & Catrambone, R., eds., Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2063–2068.
Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. Free Press, New York.
Roberts, L. & Liszka, S.A. (2013). Processing tense/aspect agreement violations online in the second language: A self-paced reading study with French and German L2 learners of English. Second Language Research, 29(4) 413–439.
Roberts, L. & Liszka, S.A. (2019). Grammatical aspect and L2 learners’ online processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences in English: A self-paced reading study with German, Dutch and French L2 learners. Second Language Research. DOI: http://10.1177/0267658319895551. Rohde, A. (2002). The aspect hypothesis in naturalistic L2 acquisition: What uninflected and non-target-like verb forms in early interlanguage tells us. In Salaberry, R. & Shirai, Y., eds., The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 199–220.
Romagno, D., Rota, G., Ricciardi, E. & Pietrini, P. (2012). Where the brain appreciates the final state of an event: The neural correlates of telicity, 123(1), 68–74. Brain and Language http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.06.003 Rosch, E, (1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104(3), 192–233.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Barnes and Noble.
Ryu, J.-Y., Horie, K. & Shirai, Y. (2015). Acquisition of the Korean imperfective aspect markers –ko iss– and –a iss– by Japanese learners: A multiple-factor account. Language Learning, 65(4), 791–823.
Salaberry, M. R. (2008). Marking past tense in second language acquisition: A theoretical model. London: Continuum Press.
Salaberry, M. R. (2011) Assessing the effect of lexical aspect and grounding on the acquisition of L2 Spanish past tense morphology among L1 English speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14 (2), 184–202.
Salaberry, M. R., Comajoan, L. & González, P. (2013). Integrating the analyses of tense and aspect across research and methodological frameworks. In Salaberry, R. & Comajoan, L., eds., Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect. Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 423–450.
Salaberry, M. R. & Martins, C. (2014). Cross-linguistic transfer of core aspectual conceptualizations in Portuguese and Spanish Theoretical and methodological factors. In Amaral, P. & Carvalho, A. M., eds., Portuguese-Spanish interfaces: Diachrony, synchrony, and contact. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 335–355.
Salaberry, R. & Shirai, Y. (2002) (eds.). The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Shirai, Y. (2002). The prototype hypothesis of tense-aspect acquisition in second language. In Salaberry, R. & Shirai, Y., eds., The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 455–478.
Shirai, Y. (2007). The aspect hypothesis, the comparative fallacy, and the validity of obligatory context analysis: A reply to Lardiere (2003). Second Language Research, 23, 51–64.
Shirai, Y. (2013). Defining and coding data: Lexical aspect in L2 studies. In Salaberry, R. & Comajoan, L., eds., Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect. Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 271–308.
Shirai, Y. (2016). The current state of the Aspect Hypothesis: Exceptions that prove the rule. Plenary presentation at Tense Aspect Mood in Second Languages (TAML2) VII. University of York, June 16, 2016.
Shirai, Y. & Andersen, R. W. (1995). The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language 71(4), 743–762.
Slabakova, R. (2000). L1 transfer revisited: The L2 acquisition of telicity marking in English by Spanish and Bulgarian native speakers. Linguistics, 38(368), DOI: http://10.1515/ling.2000.004 Slabakova, R. (2001). Telicity in the second language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Slabakova, R. (2006). Is there a critical period for semantics? Second Language Research, 22(3), 302–338.
Slabakova, R. & Montrul, S. (2000). Acquiring semantic-properties of preterite and imperfect tenses in L2 Spanish. In Howell, S. C., Fish, S. A. & Keith-Lucas, T., eds., Proceedings of the 24th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville: Cascadilla Press, pp. 534–545.
Slabakova, R. & Montrul, S. (2002). On viewpoint aspect interpretation and its L2 acquisition: A UG perspective. In Salaberry, R. and Shirai, Y., eds., The L2 acquisition of tense–aspect morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 363–395.
Slabakova, R. & Montrul, S. (2007). L2 acquisition at the grammar–discourse interface: Aspectual shifts in L2 Spanish. In Liceras, J., Zobl, H. & Goodluck, H., eds., Formal features in second language acquisition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 452–483.
Slobin, D. (1979). Psycholinguistics. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company.
Smith, C. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Springer.
Smollet, R. (2005). Quantized direct objects don’t delimit after all. In Verkuyl, H., de Swart, H. & van Hout, A., eds., Perspectives on Aspect. Springer: Dordrecht, pp. 41–60.
Sorace, A. (2004). Gradience at the lexico–syntax interface: Evidence from auxiliary selection and implications for unaccusativity. In Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Everaert, M., eds., The unaccusativity puzzle. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 243–268.
Tatevosov, S. (2002). The parameter of actionality. Linguistic Typology, 6(3), 317–401.
Taylor, J. R. (1989). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tong, X. & Shirai, Y. (2016). L2 acquisition of Mandarin zai and –le. Chinese as Second Language Acquisition Research (CASLAR), 5(1), 1–26.
Tracy-Ventura, N. & Cuesta Medina, J. A. (2018). Can native-speaker corpora help explain L2 acquisition of tense and aspect? A study of the “input”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 4(2), 277–300.
Travis, deMena L. (1994). Event Phrase and a theory of functional categories. In Koskinen, P., ed., Proceedings of the 1994 Canadian Linguistic Association meeting at the University of Calgary. Toronto: Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 559–570.
Travis, deMena L. (2010). Inner aspect: The articulation of VP. Dordrecht: Springer.
van Hout, A. (2004). Unaccusativity as telicity checking. In Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Everaert, Martin, eds., The unaccusativity puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 60–83.
van Hout, A. (2008a). Acquiring telicity crosslinguistically: On the acquisition of telicity entailments associated with transitivity. In Bowermann, M. & Brown, P., eds., Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure. New York/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 255–278.
Van Hout, A. (2008b). Acquiring perfectivity and telicity in Dutch, Italian and Polish. Lingua, 118(11), 1740–1765.
van Hout, A., de Swart, H. & Verkuyl, H. (2005). Introducing perspectives on aspect. In Verkuyl, H., de Swart, H. & van Hout, A., eds., Perspectives on aspect. Springer: Dordrecht, pp. 1–19.
VanPatten, B., Keating, G. & Leeser, M. (2012). Missing verbal inflections as a representational problem: Evidence from on-line methodology. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(2), 109–140.
van Valin, R. D. (1990). Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language, 66(2), 221–260.
van Valin, R. D (2005). Exploring the syntax–semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 56(2), 143–160. Reprinted in Z. Vendler (1967). Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University.
Verkuyl, H. J. (1993). A theory of aspectuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Verkuyl, H. J. (1999). Aspectual issues: Studies on time and quantity. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Verkuyl, H. J. (2005). Aspectual composition: surveying the ingredients. In Verkuyl, H. J., de Swart, H. & van Hout, A., eds, Perspectives on aspect. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 19–39.
Verkuyl, H. (2015). Aspectual composition and aspectual classes: What did Aristotle really say to Ryle, Kenny and Vendler? Unpublished article, UIL OTS, Utrecht University.
Viberg, Å. (2002). Basic verbs in lexical progression and regression. In Burmeister, P., Piske, T. & Rohde, Andreas, eds., An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode. Wissenschaftlicher: Verlag Trier, pp. 109–134.
Vikner, C. & Vikner, S. (1997). The aspectual complexity of the simple past in English. A comparison with French and Danish. In Bache, C. & Klinge, A., eds., Sounds, structures and senses: Essays presented to Niels Davidsen-Nielsen on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday. Odense: Odense University Press, pp. 267–284.
von Stutterheim, C. & Klein, W. (1989). Referential movement in descriptive and narrative discourse. In Dietrich, R. & Graumann, C. F., eds., Language processing in social context. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 39–76.
Wagner, L. (2001). Aspectual influences on early tense comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 28(3), 661–681.
Wagner, L. (2002). Understanding completion entailment in the absence of agency cues. Journal of Child Language, 29(1), 109–125.
Weist, R. (2002). The first language acquisition of tense and aspect: A review. In Salaberry, R. and Shirai, Y., eds., The L2 acquisition of tense–aspect morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 21–78.
Weist, R., Wysocka, H., Witkowska-Stadnik, K., Buczowska, E. & Konieczna, E. (1984). The defective tense hypothesis: On the emergence of tense and aspect in child Polish. Journal of Child Language, 11(2), 347–374.
Wulff, S., Ellis, N., Bardovi-Harlig, K., Leblanc, C. J. & Römer, U. (2009). The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 354–369. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00895.x
Zhao, X. & Li, P. (2009). Acquisition of aspect in self-organizing connectionist models. Linguistics 47(5), 1075–1112.
